0 Page 4 --The Michigan Daily- Wednesday, March 3, 1993 c E , tx. Ygtt t ttt1 .DEATH...a eSu f possegi'LE TF FsEAR...frMY &oi kCh.o w WHAT- 7 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by spdents at the University of Michigan Josi Dulow Editor in Chief YAEL M. CITRO ERIN LIZA EINIORN Opinion Editors " " / I Unsigned editorials represent the majority opinion of the Daily editorial board. All other cartoons, signed articles and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. HOUSING RATES Regents pass hike with no discussion 077' ~~L v , I- C>, D~o You 741f S ME1ANS YEP.... / Al' Ao N1 f7 Ocf1 ou I I' .' 25-- EJI h C XJ Le> (, f0 / - 4CEM-r a -._. - { ; 1" :1! ?"" 1 ff a YPAS. " - PROVE ~cw on_ :;:-s: 71 OMBN 7H E z-vius> AiT ITS FEBRUARY meeting, the University Board of Regents authorized a 4.6 per- cent housing rate hike for the 1993-94 academic year - without even one word of discussion. Students will be forced to pay al- most $200 more to live in residence halls next year,andtheUniversity'ss governing board did not consider this fact impor-r tant enough to warrant debate. This move proves once again that the re- gents are woefully out of touch with student con- cerns. Instead oflookingout for the interests of stu- dents who may have Deitch trouble paying extra costs, the regents waxed nostalgic about their college days.. The discussion centered around proposed changes to the housing move-in date and Michigan's chances for beating Notre Dame next year. Regent Laurence Deitch (D- Bloomfield Hills) spoke extensively about both "preserving the magic" ofmove-in day and his desire for a victorious football team. In order to avoid conflict with the Wolver- ines' opening gridiron contest, housing offi- cials are considering opening the dorms two days early. But University executive officers waited to formally discuss the move until after the rate increase was finalized. By linking the two decisions, the University manages to pass the buck-students must pay for its inability to coordinate academic and athletic schedules. Since students will be pay- ing more to live in residence halls anyway, University officials said, the University ismuch more willing to house students for a few extra days. Still, students may not receive any direct benefits fronmtheirincreased fees.:Even though the 4.6 percent increase is well above the rate of inflation, the University has not detailed its planned expenditures. The Housing Division's 1993-94 budget includes no new or expanded programs and it remains questionable where the increased funds will go. Director of Housing Robert Hughes took care to emphasize that the rate increase was cal- culated by a committee with representation by students and staff mem- bers. But this careful in- vestigation becomes un- necessary when the rates are presented to a disin- terested party-namely, the regents. Simply put, board members do not under- stand the value of $200 to the average Univer- sity student. Many people on campus struggle to afford tuition and books, and this money represents more than extra beer funds. In addi- tion, the regents do not care where the money - nearly $2 million - is going. Student housing on campus is among the least of the regents' concerns, and to them$2 million means nothing. This attitude is typical. Board members are willing to invest time, energy and money in University affairs. But they concentrate on areas which have little importance to most students. For example, Regent Paul Brown (D- Petoskey) single-handedly raised $3.9 million for renovations to the clubhouse serving the University's golf course. However, he sat silent while Hughes pre- sented the proposed rate increase. Clearly, Brown cares about some aspects of the Univer- sity, and he obviously realizes that funding is a vital resource to the campus. But his enthusi- asm seems misdirected. Approximately 10,000 students live in University housing. Far fewer play golf. = Editors note: Unfortunately, sexual assault has become an issue of statistics. We often see so many numbers, we forget human beings are involved. It is for this reason that the Daily dedicates this space every Wednesday to sexual assault survivors. Some pieces will be signed. Others will not. All of them present real situations from survivors who respond in their own way to assault. Every day in many ways the abuse is with me I was eleven the first time my uncle sexually abused me. Now, ten years later I'm in therapy and trying to deal with the lasting effects of what he did to me. I started going to a counselor two years ago because I am bulimic. What ily and I avoid going home as much as I can. There are big gaps in my memory of the abuse and one of the hard parts of therapy is that after a session sometimes memories will come flooding back to me as flashbacks. It's scary and a very I know I need to remember to heal but sometimes I wish I could just forget it all and pretend it never happened. friends and a lot of people think I'm aloof. I still feel guilty and dirty and embar- rassed. I often have thoughts about sui- cide as a way to end the pain. I feel very alone. My counselor says to focus on one day a+ a time and that is what I'm trying to do. SEXUAL ASSAULTS REPORTED TO SAPAC IN 1993:23 Involving penetration: 14 No penetration: 3 Acquaintance: 17 Stranger: 0 On Campus: 0 Reported to police: 5 No additional information available for some reports e0 she has helped me understand is that my eating disorder is a coping mechanism for dealing with my sexual abuse. It's been painful to start the healing process. I haven't yet told my family what my uncle did to me because I'm not ready to face the possibility that they may not believe me or support me. My mother and my uncle are very close and she will have to choose between us. I'm not sure who she will choose. In the meantimel feel estranged from my fam- out of control feeling. I've done a very goodjobofrepressingthepainfulmemo- ries. I know I need to remember to heal but sometimes I wish I could just forget it all and pretend it never happened. Every day in many ways the abuse is with me. I don'ttrust people very easily, especially men. It has had a definite effect on my ability to be close and intimate with a man. Even with women I am very slow to open up and reveal much about myself. I don't have many Clinton will sell us out just like the rest HOMOPHOBIC REGENT Ignorant comment lends dignity to bigotry N THE MIDST of discussion at the February Board of Regents' meeting about the hous- ing move-in date dilemma caused by an early football game in September, Regent Deane Baker (R-Ann Arbor) sacked fellow board members with an inappropriate comment that came out of nowhere. He mentioned a letter he recently received from seven members of Uni- versity Housing staff that had been sent to the Regents and several administra- tors. The letter, signed by six fa- cilities managers and a mainte-. nance coordinator, expressed u concernforthe University's sup- portofgay andlesbianliterature and programming. Specific complaintsincludedthe fact that East Quadrangle's library "is promulgated with gay/lesbian reading material which supports unnatural human relationships" and the construction and main- tenance of the Lesbian-Gay Male Program Offices, which Baker "add credence and support to gay/lesbian lifestyles." The letter concluded withthe opinionthatUniversity resources should be used to promote "comfortable living and academiclearning forouryoung people and not be used to influence their sexual orientation." The letter itself is based on faulty logic and expresses bigotry and intolerance toward ho- mosexuals. But Baker's attempt to introduce the letter at the Regents' meeting lends this bigotry a dignity and credence it does not de- serve. The authors oftheletterclassify homosexual inherent or ingrained, not something subject to "influence" - by the University or anyone else. Think about it: if sexual orientation were a matter of personal choice, would anyone really choose to be homosexual, given the level of prejudice and discrimination in our society against gays and lesbians? The authors of the letter are correct on one point: it is the responsibility of the University "to promote a service environ- ment conducive to comfortable living and academic learning." However, it is easier to do this by expressing tolerance of and support for all minorities, re- gardless of race, religion, sexual orientation or other characteris- tics. By writing this letter, the seven members of Housing staff have clearly shown themselves to be intolerant, heterosexistbig- ots. However, if the letter's au- thors deserve criticism for their views, Bakerdeserves evenmore criticism for bringing them to the spotlight. The letter is a minor complaint from seven individual University employees, not a major policy proposal or student movement. If the complaint had been from white supremacists about programming for African Americans, it would have been rightly dismissed as the shrill whining ofaracistminority. Because itfocuses on homosexuals, however, Baker- who has commented on the University's "bias in favor of the lesbian/gay lifestyle" - has seen fit to bring it to the table. and encourages "full To the Daily: The National Women's Rights Organizing Coalition (NWROC), has a very different view of Clinton than any of the groups quoted in the recent article on Clinton and abortion rights. President Clinton is just another Democrat, which means he has been and will be selling us out as the Republicans and Democrats have done historically. The Democrats have a strategy of exploiting the hatred of oppressed people for the Republicans. Black people, women, gays and lesbians, poor and working- class people have been so sold out by Republicans that the Democrats have to do almost nothing to ensure these groups' support. With a majority of Democrats in the House, they could easily have kept Clarence Thomas off the Supreme Court. Their unwillingness to make unconditional support for abortion rights a basic requirement for the election of Supreme Court Justice shows that they don't at all intend to use their majority in the House or any of their political power to wage a struggle for women to control their own bodies. Clinton has done the least he can do to be able to say he is pro-choice. He hasn't done anything about parental consent or restoring Medicaid funding, the restrictions that keep most poor and young women from having access to abortions. In addition, Clinton supported the bombing of Iraq, and in the little time since being elected to office he's backed off on his promise to open the border to more Haitian refugees, and totally blown off any action around the issue of gays in the military. He's clearly no friend of any group of opressed people. NWROC has the position that we cannot keep begging these two parties of the rich for the rights that are so fundamental to our lives. There is so much wealth and power invested in keeping us oppressed, that the only source of power that offers any kind of ability to fight back is the power of organized labor. We call for the formation of a workers' party based on the trade unions and organizations of the oppressed created in struggle like NWROC, AIDS groups, anti-racist and Black community organizations, and other minority groups. The struggle for abortion rights is one we've all fought too long and hard to leave in the hands of a sellout politician like President Clinton. We must break with the Democrats and build a workers' party. NWROC meets at 6:00 on Tuesdays in MLB 119. Pamela Harcourt Vice-Chair Ann Arbor NWROC America: love it or leave it, despite flaws To the Daily: Speaking as a Black American who has served in the U.S. Armed Forces, I know that many African Americans are proud to carry the American flag. Just because Mr. Kwame Kunta Kinte of the Detroit School Board is not proud to be an American, does not mean that the flag should not be honored or presented at government functions where that flag is the lawful and most appropriate symbol. People came here and continue to come here because of the rights and freedoms they can experience here. Certainly America is not all that it should or could be, but we are all here, and it's all we've got so we should make the best of it. Love it or leave it. Do not argue about whether the flag should fly, be burned or be honored. Instead, make this country all the flag is supposed to represent, as stated in the last line of the Pledge of Allegiance: "Liberty and justice for all." Candy Jackson LSA senior Teaching abstinence teaches higher moral values To the Daily: I regret that I have to read from an editor of the Daily that "conservative Christians . crawled from beneath their collective rock to criticize the proposal (to revise the AIDS curriculum in Ann Arbor" teaching a higher moral value of responsibility to protect our society as much as possible from the destruction of lives through illness and broken homes. One of the teachings of narents. teachers and our indulgence of sex outside of marriage with all of its ugly consequences of illness and severely dysfunctional people. We need to return to the values of purity and chastity and help those that have a nrohlem with abstinence with schools on track again and teach children how to prepare for future jobs that will benefit their family and our nation and get off teaching "sex." Ann Knox Ann Arbor resident 0 i I I