Page 4--The Michigan Daily -Weekend etc. --January 28, 1993 Prez Duderstadt: where are 'U'? As students and professors who be- came devout inauguration buffs last week return to routine academic life, some University administrators should consider some lessons of the recent election. Clinton's newly soaring popularity is no mere accident. It is the result of a carefully orchestrated populist cam- paign, and it has elevated the Arkansan to celebrity status unparalleled in recent years. One would assume that our local politicians - the Jim Duderstadts and Phil Powers and Deanne Bakers - would be taking cues from this political genius. But this is Ann Arbor, where regents and University presidents are effectively accountable to no one, and politics is a topic tobe studied, not an art to be practiced. But if President Duderstadt (to choose Clinton's counterpart) were to break out of his electrical engineering shell and try playing the populist, he might be surprised at the results. At no point was this made clearer to me than when I regretfully woke up to see my friend's grinning face on the frontpage of the DetroitFree Pressashe received a bear hug from President Clinton. He was the college kid from Ann Arbor who camped out on the White House lawn. The national press - who make a living at reporting this kind of sugary stuff -jumped all over the story. Contrast that with a recent piece of information about Duderstadt. When asked about his administration's new restrictive Diag policy -aimed at turn- ing the diag from a place of unrestricted political debate to a virtual golf course - the president admitted he had no idea that the policy was even being consid- ered until after the changes had been made. While one president (with a consid- erably busier schedule) was taking time to send a message of inclusion to stu- dents, the other was shunning their input and asleep at the wheel. This is no anomaly for Duderstadt, but a pattern that spans his entire tenure here. Duderstadt came to the University in a flurry of protests over the regents' illegal hiring of him. Since then, he has wanted nothing to do with students, whom he views as a regretful inconve- nience of running a university. Duderstadtlives virtually inabubble, accepting only monthly press interviews, and communicating almost exclusively through his staff. He spends much of his living time in hisoff-campus house, and is frequently away from campus on work-related trips anyway.. The regents, who are elected state- wide, are notorious for coming to cam- pus only for their monthly meetings, and most students probably couldn't recognize them even if they did make an impromptu appearance. The sameholds true for Duderstadt, a person most stu- dents only see on the way in (at convo- cation) and on the way out (at gradua- tion) from the University. One reason: Duderstadt has refused to play the politician. He has refused to admit that being president of a Univer- sity requires politics and persuasion, and has refused to dirty himself with these tactics. He has ruled by edict, when he could have ruled by dialogue and discussion. Duderstadt would do well to over- come his political hang-up and engage in a little old-fashioned populism. If he were to make himself a more visible leader and emphasize meeting and con- sulting students a priority, his job might become easier. The sacrifice is minimal. It is poli- ticking, not power-sharing, but it pro- vides the people (or the students) with a sense of control and direction. Critics might want nothing to do with such pandering. But meeting with the people affected by your decisions is not just a political stunt, it serves an essential purpose: it offers the governed access to government, andprovidesthem with a sense of security and control. People like to choose window seats on airplanes - not because it gives them control of the speed or altitude of the plane, but because it allows them to keep tabs on where they are, and where they are going. Likewise, people like to know what their leaders are up to, and prefer to have access to those leaders. When they don't, the results for the leaders can be costly. Local pundits have speculated that one-time populist Detroit Mayor Coleman Young's recent retreat into reclusiveness might cost him his job. President Duderstadt must surely remember the last two spring gradua- tions, when stadiums full of graduates booed him in front of thousands of po- tential University patrons, or the student protests that accompany virtually every major student-related decision the re- gents make unilaterally. All of this hassle might have been avoided ifDuderstadthadeven sprinkled his presidency with a few Jacksonian- or Clintonian - tricks. When the Dude can be seen hugging a freshman on the front page of the Daily, attending a class, playing the saxophone on the Diag or (God forbid) asking students for their opinion and then heedingit - just as an experiment - he might find that students learn to like him. Or at least know who he is. by Sarah Weidman Drinking milk used to be a metaphor for purity in a woman. At least it was in Southeast Kansas in 1928. Elia Kazan's 1961 masterpiece "Splendor in the Grass" uses this symbolism to differen- loyal and wait patiently until he and Deanie are married, or to takehis father's advice: finda"differentkind ofgirl"for a night and let off a little steam. Deanie's purity is exaggerated whei she's around Bud's sister, Jenny, the trashy town flapper whose mother had to come get her from Chicago after she had "one of those awful operations. Jenny teases Deanie about her chastity and makes Deanie look even more vir tuous in Bud's eyes. Tension between Deanie and Budd and each with his/her parents hits hard toward the end of their senior year whet "Spring Fever" sets in. Hormones are raging, passion is at its peak, and no one has any patience for abstinence. The movie then begins its emotional jour- ney into morality. We've become immune to sex int films, so this reflection into the days when it was still taboo is enticing.: "Splendor in the Grass" is an evocative movie sure to draw tears and contem- plation of our society and its attitude toward sexuality. PLENDOR IN THE GRASS is available at Liberty Street Video. Warren Beatty has aged since his debut in "Splendor in the Grass." A video Full of 'Splendor' tiate between the "good" and the "bad" girls. It stars Natalie Wood as Deanie Loomis, a lovestruck high school se- nior, torn between a need to express her sexual desires and the societal pressure ofwhatis appropriate behavior.Deanie's mother serves loads of milk and says, "Women don't enjoy those (sex) the way men do. She just lets him come near her in order to have children." Deanie's equally frustrated boy- friend is the town stud, Bud Stamper, played by Warren Beatty in his screen debut. Bud's dilemma is whether to be Hal Hartley's in a league of his own The first time I saw a Hal Hartley movie, Ihated it. It was pretentious. The acting was awful. Every character was weird, andspokenothinglikepeopledo inreallife.Only after seeing afewofhis movies did I realize that's just what makes Hal Hartley so interesting. The 32-year-old independent film- maker has released two features to date, defined for himself a very personal, recognizable style of filmmaking. "I wanted to make a genre out of myself," he told GQ. In the context of conven- tional Hollywood cinema, the style can seem so unusual that it can be off- putting. Only when one understands what Hartley's trying for, and knows what to expect, do his films begin to make sense. From his sterile native environment of the middle-class suburbs, Hartley extracts simple truths of human interac- tion through a stylized approach. He doesn't attempt to "realistically" por- tray life as it looks; instead, he dives straight to the core of how life really works. His characters seem bizarre; in actuality, they're perfectly average, only magnified and distorted for effect. For example, Hartley astutely dra- matizes our self-centered inability to listen to other people with a conversa- tion like this one, between two women in "Trust": "I killed my father this morning." "My daughter would have been just about your age." "The Unbelievable Truth" and "Trust." A short film, "Surviving Desire," was broadcast on PBS' "American Play- house" last year, and his third feature, "Simple Men," starts tomorrow at the Michigan Theater. With unknown casts and budgets under $1 million, the writer/ director has managed to establish him- self as one of a new set of American auteurs along with names like Gus Van Sant and Quentin Tarantino. After only three films, Hartley has MLK DAY HAS COME AND GONE... WHAT WILL YOU DO NOW? Challenge yourself to Take Action! Participants needed for 6 week dialogues between Blacks/Jews, Men/ Women, Blacks/Whites or Lesbians/Gay Men/ Bisexuals/Heterosexuals. Dialogues meet once a week, beginning the 1st week of February. Applications due January 28. Call IGRC at 936- 1875. "I didn't mean to, honest. It was an accident." "I spent some time in a psychiatric hospital." "I didn't know he had a bad heart." Even in scenes of seemingly normal conversation, Hartley makes us con- stantly aware of the artificiality of mov- ies. Fully aware that conversations on film are nothing like real conversations, with all its interruptions, pauses and half-finished thoughts, Hartley conse- quently fashions his dialogue into rapid fire, line-by-line exchanges nothing at all like reality. The unusual dialogue calls for an unusual style of acting, a problem Hartley has dealt with by using the same troupe of actors for all his films. Martin Donovan ("Surviving Desire," "Trust") and Adrienne Shelley ("The Unbeliev- able Truth," "Trust") are able to capture the deadpan, half-sincere tone better than anyone else. (Unfortunately, how- ever, neither of them appear in "Simple Men.") Hartley cuts through the veneer of polite conversation to reveal the truth. "I'm not interested in creating the illu- sion of how we seem," he told the New York Times. "I want to create an image of how we are." Hartley's films are, however, quite talky, displaying the influence ofFrench NewWaverslikeEricRohmerandJean- Luc Godard. Even more intimidating is the level of conversation, whose ob- scure references and 50-cent words will alienate many a suburban moviegoer from these suburban comedies. This line from "Surviving Desire" is typical: "Ah, you see, that's another thing youalways do. Wheneveryou're losing an argument you always depict yourself as hopelessly incompetent, as if humbly admitting your shortcomings somehow places you above the argument at hand, therefore negating the other person's point of view entirely." It's this kind of talk, along with his too-carefully structured plots that can make Hartley seem pretentious and ce- rebral. "Surviving Desire," forexample, is filled with allusions (and direct quo- tations in dialogue) to the Bible, which are all too obvious. Then again, any filmmaker who re- fuses to conform to conventions might be called pretentious. At least he's try- ing something different. Hartley's pre- tentiousness is also excusable because of his fresh and light approach. His films are, afterall, comedies. As Hartley matures, his symbolism is sure to be- come a little less forced and his films ultimately more satisfying. Christopher Lambert (wrapped in towel) stars in "Knight Moves" the best thriller this year since "Body of Evidence.' 'Kniht Moves' ain't noble- 01 London $459* Franmkfurt $539* Paris $539* Rome $569* Fresare romcdtrip from Detroit. Taxis not included mdrestrictions apply. Veey flexible. Some tickets 30d for a yearom date of issue. Call for other oddwide destinations. 1220 S. University Avenue STE 208 M nAbor,MI 48104 313m.998=0200 by John R. Rybock "Knight Moves" might be the best thriller of the year. Then again, when you consider that, so far, the only other thriller is the Madonna vehicle, "Body of Evidence," this is a safe assumption. The story has possibilities. A small town in the Pacific Northwest is host to achess tournament. In the middle of the Knight Moves Directed by Carl Schenkel; written by Brad Mirman; with Christopher Lambert, Diane Lane, Tom Skerrit, and Daniel Baldwin. competition, there is aritualistic murder of a young woman. The star of the competition, Peter Sanderson (played by "Highlander" starChristopherLam- bert) becomes the recipient of clues from the killer. The police need Sanderson's help to solve the case, even though he is quickly their prime sus- pect. The plot has promise, but unfortu- nately, it is not used to its fullest poten- tial. "KnightMoves" is not thefirst film to use chess as a metaphor for life, but it puts the game in a new and interesting situation - as a tool for a psychotic killer. The quote "He's using the map as a chess board" has been used in the trailers for the film, but right there, in that two second shot, you get almost all of the chess clues used in the murder. The filmmakers could have, and should have, utilized the concept of chess more in "KnightMoves," certainly more than just in the title. All the actors give reasonably good performances - reasonably in light of the material that they have to work with. For example, how many ways can any- one say "I must be facing north! My powers come from the north!" with a straight face? And Tom Skerritt should be credited with giving a Tom Skerritt- esque performance, right up there with "Top Gun". What forces drive Christopher Lambert's character? Whatdraws Diane Lane ("Streets of Fire") to him? What does Daniel Baldwin's character have against Lambert? What motivates his actions in the end? All of these ques- tions, and many more, are left unan- swered in a movie which obviously wants to work on a psychological level. Thedirection by Carl Schenkel ("The Mighty Quinn") would get a "B-" from any film school. It never distracts the audience from the tale occurring on the screen, but that is only because it plays it fairly safe. As far as interesting shots go, they are few and far between. The best direction comes at the be- ginning, when Schenkel has some guts. It is in the opening sequences, set in 1972 and filmed in black and white. The sequences use lighting and camera angles to create mood. The rest of the film, the color portion, must rely on the musical score for mood, but at times it becomes very overbearing. The entire story and resolution of the crime hinges on misleading the audience's perception. The filmmakers work well to keep the audience guess- ing, though a skeptic may just blow the entire ending halfway through. In the end, despite all these short- comings, it was difficult not to enjoy the movie. There is something fresh about it. It does not frustrate the audience by making illogical turns, as was a prob- lem in "Basic Instinct." Rather, it is possible for the audience to keep a step ahead of the story, but only if the audi- ence is on its toes. 0 a WOMEN IN FILM SERIES 1993 presents YVONNE RAINER A significant dancer and choreographer who inter- grated film into her work, Rainer went on to make a series of films that have been honored inter- nationally. Rainer is the subject of the Indiana University Press publication, The Films nf Yvnnne Rainer. She will screen and discuss KNIGHT MOVES is playing at Showcase. 7- 215 S. State St. Ann Arbor 995-DEAD (upstairs) a - - rtasm. em- . , WR ITE FOR FINE ARTS The Daily needs writers to review art exhibits, classical music and dance. Stop by 420 Maynard, or call 763-0379 for info. i i