Page 4-The Michigan Daily- Friday, October 16,1992 G1bE Swtgatn itailg 420 Maynard Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 764-0552 Editor in Chief MATI'IIEW D. RENNIE Opinion Editors YAEL CITRO GEOFFREY EARLE AMITAVA MAZUMDAR Edited and Managed by Students at the University of Michigan Unsigned editorials represent a mjority of the Daily's Editorial Board. All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. Regents flee A to debate code Despite the fact that the University has neglected to address many key criticisms of its code, administrators hastily cranked out a final draft Wednesday in order to put the code on the agenda of the regents' annual Flint meeting. In an unusual reordering of a meeting schedule that is usually set in stone, the regents decided to hold their entire meeting in Flint, and cancelled the scheduled morning session to be held in Ann Arbor. Only students who travelled to Flint had the opportunity to address the regents, and only stu- dents with close ties to the administration had their hands on the final draft of the code before the meeting. When the code came up for discussion, though not for a vote, the regents divided along party lines. The Republicans favored delaying any discus- sion of the code until they could return to Ann Arbor. The Democrats, however, insisted on ram- ming through the discussion so that the adminis- tration could implement the code immediately. This faction tried to bypass student concerns, and should be condemned for its reckless behavior. That the code was to come up at the Flint meeting is reprehensible to begin with. After all, it is Ann Arbor students whom the code will affect. For the past two months, the administration has been sending out copies of the code and conduct- ing surveys and forums, ostensibly to educate the community about the code. But what is the point of educating the community if the regents planned to discuss the code behind its back? What is the point ofholding public comments in a community where the public is neither concerned, informed, or af- fected by the code? Moreover, the code still contains many defi- ciencies which must be addressed. David Schwartz, president of the campus chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, has proposed a public de- fender system that would extend the same right of counsel to the accused already offered to the ac- cuser under the current code. Currently, an accuser can bring a case through a third party, such as an administrator, but the accused must represent them- selves. Furthermore, MSARep. Robert Van Houweling has recognized that the code does not include a system for amendments, which leaves the docu- ment open to administrative manipulation. A few highly motivated students have fought hard to moderate the code. If the administration can simply amend out these reforms a few years later, their efforts will have gone for naught. Van Houweling has proposed an amendment procedure that would involve MSA, and would give students some influence over the process. Yet the final draft of the code contains neither of these thoughtful provisions. Moreover, the admin- istration has yet to answer the abundance of criti- cism that its code is overbroad, and prohibits crimes that are illegal under state law anyway. And the draft still has notable flaws. Last week, the Daily criticized thelast code draft for punishing some crimes - such as sexual assault and harass- ment - world wide, while punishing others, like murder, only if committed in Ann Arbor. Rather than giving up the role of holding stu- dents accountable for their actions regardless of where they occur, the University simply added murder to the list. This wasn't exactly what we had in mind. Clearly the code has serious problems. Add to that the fact that literally every comment voiced at all three public hearings was negative, and that the administration has refused to put the code up to a student vote. Considering this, there is no good reason for any regent to push for enactment of the code at this time, no matter where they hide their meeting. I WHY IS 7T-11 So CONFUS(NG? I'VE RES-F ASSUREDFELLAS: SEEN TrIE "COSSy" THE EPRESI[)ENT A/V) / ARE rt-IING-!okAY... "DOWN WITH" Th E "HOMEY"-COZ> PRo&L-EMS OF TNr INNER, FAIiLI A R...C1TIES' YO() )Ij - -4 Ile ISSUE.S FORUM Read it,_know it, join the debate_______ The great divide: Pro-choice vs. Pro-life For over three decades the issue of abortion has been in the political, religious and social spotlights. No one is immune from taking a stand because the issue permeates every segment of society. Does a woman have the right to choose to abort her fetus? Or, is aborting a fetus synonymous with murder. However, the issue goes much deeper than this. What about federalfunding to help women obtain abortions? Should the government be involved in this area of women's lives? What is the relevance to religious arguments to the debate? Are there clear answers to any of these questions? 0 Legal gambling has its costs Rights of the fetus by Bridget Hamilton- Why does the pro-life population oppose abortion? We oppose it be- cause of the basic fact that abortion kills a human being. A separate life since the moment of conception, the fetus ("little one" or "baby" in Latin) has its own complete genetic make- up. The heart has been beating since the 18th or 21st day of development. The EEG tracings of the fetus' brain have been recorded at less than six weeks gestation. From the time that abortions begin - almost never ear- lier than five weeks of fetal develop- ment -- the fetus' head, eyes, heart, arms and legs are clearly recogniz- able. If you question this, take a look at fetal development in any biology textbook. Better yet, get hold of a photograph of an aborted baby. Not only does abortion kill a baby, it exploits women. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, a research group for Planned Parenthood, found in a 1991 study that 91 percent of post- abortal women have had one or more symptoms of Post Abortion Syndrome (PAS), ranging from anxiety and guilt to suicidal tendencies. need to be protected Abortion does not help women, and no woman needs an abortion, regardless of what the multi-million dollar abortion industry tells them. The abortion industry tells a pack of lies to women. It tells women that The abortion industry tells a pack of lies to women. It tells women that they must choose between a family and a career, between moth- erhood and personhood. Women should not have to and do not need to make these choices. they expect and demand for them- selves. They resent the value of a woman being based on whether a man wants her, but then determine the value of an unborn child upon his or her "wantedness." A vid gamblers no longer have to travel all the way to Las Vegas, Atlantic City or to the Mississippi river boats to satisfy their urges. By December 1993, legalized gambling will be avail- able across the border in Windsor, Ontario. Resi- dents in Windsor and metropolitan Detroit should be aware, however, that gambling communities, especially poorer ones, disproportionately pay the price. In 1988, Detroit tried to legalize gambling by adopting the "Atlantic City model" and allowing dozens of casinos and hotels to set-up shop. This plan failed because many people believed that the casino economy would deviate from the city's historic economic structure. In addition, many residents feared that casinos would drive away business that disdained the sleazy environment that often goes hand in hand with gambling. Now Ontario is faced with a similar scenario as it tests a model casino. It is likely that the casino will exact ahigh social cost for the people who live in the surrounding areas. As is usually the case, the increased avail- ability of crap tables and one-armed bandits will have the greatest effect on those most susceptible to such addictions: the unemployed, the poor and the frustrated. Gambling makes little economic sense for de- pressed areas. The gambling industry creates noth- ing; the net effect of gambling is simply to redis- tribute money, primarily from the generally poor customers to the lowlifes and gangsters who own the establishments and local government which gets its cut through taxes. Thus gambling repre- sents a new tax of the most regressive kind. Currently, Ontario will allow the new casinos to operate for a one-year trial period, after which the province will judge the success of the project. Residents of Ontario and Detroit should be just as willing to re-examine gambling legalization. It may not be worth the money. H)T I M:E - ' ,_ : . . s- ," . ,. ht , - BL1N{ " '- GAM r, y- r .; , Y . ._..- i a, 0 O U 2 0 The Iraqgate story unfolds Hamilton is the Students for Life Co-chair. Freedom of choice by Amy Kushner On the television a news clip shows scenes from a recent attempt to blockade a women's health clinic. Men and women from the anti-choice movement stand and kneel around the building, trying to stop women from seeking assistance inside. Then the camera swings around and I see the men and women there who are trying to keep the clinic open. I read their signs - Abortion on demand and without apology. The clip left me feeling as I al- ways do when I see such episodes. I. am glad that there are many women and men who are actively seeking to protect the freedom of choice, but I am also scared that there are still people so vehemently opposed to al- lowing women this choice. To me, a woman's freedom to choose is an obvious and inalienable right. Yet at this moment, when we should be celebrating 20 years of choice in America, we are still bat- tling to keep abortion a safe and legal option. For a long time, abortion was ille- gal. This did not stop women from wanting to obtain abortions. Many people breathed a sigh of relief at the Supreme Court's 1972 Roe vs. Wade decision, but the freedom to choose that this decision brought about has since been methodologically dimin- ished. The decision to cut off federal funding for abortion and the institu- Kushner is an LSA senior. they must choose between a family and a career, between motherhood and personhood. Women should not have to and do not need to make these choices. The pro-abortionists, or so called "pro-choicers," say that women are strong and capable and then claim that when pregnant, a woman has no other choice but to kill her child. This is not "pro-choice" and it is certainly not "pro-woman." Women are ca- pable of dealing with crisis situations responsibly; the "pro-choice"faction denies that. Furthermore, women in favor of abortion are hypocritical in that they deny the prebom the same rights that belongs to each and tion of the 24-hour waiting period has restricted access to abortion for many women facing economic diffi- culties. Those females under the age of 18 find their choice limited by the increased appearance of the paren- tal-consent law. And often, women are made to feel that they must justify their desire to seek and abortion, as if by not producing children they are The pro-choice move- ment does not seek to make choices for women, rather the movement respects and assists women in any choice they make. somehow failing in their "womanly" duties. In the United States right now women with poor economic status, who are disproportionately women of color, have the most difficulty gaining access to abortion. We live in a country where we are expected to know how to protect our- selves against unwanted pregnancies, yet attempts to bring education about sex and birth control to schools are met with anger and resistance. We live in a country where some groups seek to take the freedom of choice away from women, but do nothing to guarantee that the children bornout ofacrisis pregnancy will get the long-term economic and emo- In addition, the pro-abortion men- tality is as prejudice as that of the salve owners and the Nazis. Black slaves and Jews were considered "property" and "subhuman" respec- tively. The discrimination of these groups based upon such physical traits as skin color or race is no different than the physical prejudice against the preborn based upon their size. It may be good to remember the words of our Constitution during the upcoming election. We may look at the issue differently when we recall that all people are created (not "born") equal and granted certain inalienable rights, the first and most basic of these being the right to life. every woman tional support they need. "Every child a wanted child."This is the credo of the pro-choice move- ment. The strongest accusations of the anti-choice movement is that the people who.are pro-choice advocate abortion as the only option to an un- planned pregnancy. This accusation is blatantly false. Pro-choice means being pro-alter- native --all alternatives. It is the pro- choice movement which educates women on birth control. It is the pro- choice movement which counsels women on all their options, including single parenthood, adoption or termi- nation of the pregnancy. The pro-choice movement does not seek to make choices for women, rather the movement respects and as- sists women in any choice they make. Abortion is not the answer for every person facing an unwanted pregnancy, but the freedom to have that choice is a personal and imperative right. Last June the U.S. Supreme Court was one vote away from overturning the Roe vs. Wade decision. In the upcoming election we need to vote in ways which show we are against the rollback of the right to choose, a move backwards which President Bush wholeheartedly supports. On November 3 we need to voice our support for safeguarding all women's right to choose. In doing this we will move towards getting the is- sue of abortion out of the political arena and placing it - without apol- ogy -back into the hands of women, where it belongs. 0 D uring his .inaugural address four years ago, President George Bush made a Carter-esque pledge, promising to keep his new administration free from even the appearance of impropriety or scandal. Today, however, the Bush administration may be rivaling its predecessor in corruption and abuse of power. In the endorsement editorials on Monday, the Daily itemized the Bush administration's laundry list of unethical, of not illegal, behavior. The list included the illegal transfer of grain credits to Iraq, which Saddam Hussein used to strengthen his military might. Now the administration has compounded that initial error to include the FBI and CIA's attempt to withhold evidence from a federal court. Moreover, Attorney General William Barr has wrongfully refused a congressional call for a special prosecu- tor to investigate the charges of FBI and CIA interference in the Iraqgate case. Still, at this point the details of the subterfuge are peripheral to the primary issue: the actual cover-up attempt. CIA officials submitted incom- plete documents to the Atlanta court investigating the BNL case. In response to the unraveling scan- dal, Barr (whom columnist William Safire calls "Cover-up General") ordered an FBI investigation of the CIA. The concept that such an investigation could get to the bottom of the scandal is ridiculous, since both organizations are clearly involved. Furthermore, Barr also called for the investiga- tion of FBI chief William Sessions for tax evasion and free-loading (apparently, Sessions made long- distance phone calls and plane trips at the tax payers' expense). Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee Sen. David Boren (D-Okla.) suspects this comparatively irrelevant investigation is a smoke screen to protect those involved in Iraqgate. Fearing a scandal that could worsen his chance for re-election, the president has effectively dis- qU"a m -'t