The Michigan Daily - Sports Monday - September 28,1992 - Page 3 Q&A.. ormer /flear o cs',ue s r er$o c cz'r Hoard The Cleveland running back talks about his adjustment to the pros John Niyo Leroy Hoard was a highly re- cruited high school running back from New Orleans in 1986. He was touted as a big back with breakaway speed - an uncommon and deadly combination. He was redshirted his freshman season at Michigan and played sparingly in 1987. Then his immea- surable talent began to show through in his third season with the Wolverines. At the same time, his tumultuous relationship with then coach Bo Schembechler took form. He was either rushing for 100-yard games or he was suspended for aca- demic and work-habit deficiencies. His collegiate career seemed to reach a pinnacle when the junior, with sophomore eligibility, ran his way to the Rose Bowl Most Valuable Player Award in the 1989 classic. His play prompted ex-Los Angeles Ram coach John Robinson to say that if Hoard were in the 1989 draft, the Rams would have made him their No. 1 selection. It was believed that With this 128-yard, two touchdown performance, his problems were be- hind hint But following each impressive Saturday in 1989, Hoard took a seat in Bo's doghouse for the remainder of the week. He was benched for nissed classes, poor practices, and pulled wisdom teeth. His up-and- down Michigan career came to a close after the 1990 Rose Bowl de- fa.at at the hands of Southern California. Fittingly, that game is better remembered for being some- body else's last game with the Wolverines: Bo's. Hoard entered the draft amidst more controversy. He had a year of ejigibility remaining, and most scouts and analysts felt he should have used it, but Leroy decided it was time to hove on. He was se- lected in the second round of the 1990 draft by the Cleveland Browns. He was again heralded as a big back with big speed and enormous poten- tial. Initially, Hoard's professional career paralleled his collegiate ac- colades: glimpses of promise sur- rounded by broken rules and uncer- tainty. He was jailed for three days because of excessive speeding tick- ets, and suffered countless fines for late reporting times to practice and training camp. Since his rookie season, Hoard has settled into a steady back-up role with the running back-laden Browns. He hasn't endured a fine in two years, and seems to have gained a new perspective on the exploits from the past. Daily Sports Writer Mike Rancilio caught up with Hoard in between Cleveland practices and talked with him about the transition from college to pro football, and the current state of the Wolverine squad. Daily: What do you think of Bo's current exploits involving the Detroit Tigers? Hoard: I haven't really followed them. I have no bad feelings toward him. D: Do you keep in touch with any of the guys you played with at Michigan? H: (Jarrod) Bunch. Last weekend I saw (Greg) Skrepenak (when the Browns played the Los Angeles Raiders). When you see the guys on different teams you go over and talk to them. We played Minnesota in the preseason and I saw Tripp (Welborne). He's healthy now, it was good to see him. D: Do you stay in contact with the current Michigan team? Do you talk with Coach (Gary) Moeller anymore? H: Not really. Mo was the offen-. sive coordinator when I played, so I talked to him the first year after I left, but not much anymore. D: Do you think Michigan has a chance of winning its fifth consecu- tive Big Ten title, or possibly a na- tional championship, this season? H: Definitely. Everyone is mak- ing a big deal about Elvis' (Grbac) poor play, and that Collins should start, but you shouldn't lose your starting job because of an injury. What, is Elvis going to go from Heisman candidate to not even playing? Talk about ruining his ca- reer. There's no question he can still do the job. I mean, the backup had a good day, but that's what you expect him to do. You don't expect him to go in there and have a bad day. All back- ups have to perform as close as pos- sible to the starter's performance. That's the idea the coaches have when they coach the backups. That's why you have all that depth. D: Speaking of depth, you had to share backfield time when you played at Michigan, just as Ricky Powers, Tyrone Wheatley, and Jesse Johnson do now. How does that af- fect the individual, and in retrospect, do you regret coming to a team-ori- ented program? H: The three-back system is bet- ter for the team; anytime during the game, Michigan can bring in a fresh creased my worth. Like you said, I wouldn't have padded my stats be- cause of the offensive structure. I would have had to share the load with other backs, so my yardage would have been low. It was a weaker year for running backs, and I knew where I went de- pended on my work-outs. After my 40 (yard dash) time in the combines, I knew I made the right decision - that was the best I was going to do. D: Your transition was publicized as being difficult from the physical standpoint. Do you believe everyone has a problem with the training and preparation involved with profes- sional football? H: I stopped working out alto- gether about a month before I re- ported. Normally, if you are working out, training camp isn't much more difficult than college. Desmond (Howard) plays a different position. You play wide receiver and you are always in shape because you have to run so much. You always have to maintain your speed. There won't be much of a change, maybe the things that he does will be different, but it will basically be the same type of training. D: What about your transition mentally? You again experienced some controversy for your off-the- field antics. Did those incidents have hands of the agents as much as pos- sible because they know from being around what you're worth. D: When you held out, did the team try to put pressure on you to sign and get into camp? H: Not really. It wasn't a really long holdout, but Desmond might have felt some. When it gets close to the season everyone starts to panic, and you may be reading the newspa- per and start to panic, too. In the beginning, there's a disagreement and no one really worries - but when the season's about to begin you have to get it solved because ev- eryone starts to panic. D: How do you think Desmond will react to the transition from col- lege to professional football? H: There's not that much differ- ence between college and the pros. I mean, there's much better athletes, but he's one of the top athletes in the country, and he's going to be one of the top athletes against anyone. He's not going to just pan out against tougher competition, but his athleti- cism will take care of itself eventu- ally. Soccer gets kicked around at Michigan It is a so-called "hot topic," this gender equity thing - has been for months now, and likely will be for some time to come. Anniversaries tend to bring these types of results. You take some event in history, wait until a nice, round-number of years passes and then you rehash it trying to find some hidden lesson. Or try to assess how far we've come since then. Take Watergate, for instance. We "celebrated" the 20th anniversary of that great episode in American political history this summer. What did we learn? How have things changed? The media beat us over the head with documentaries exploring the myriad of answers to those questions. On a smaller scale, we are doing that now with the debate over gender equity - in particular the Big Ten Conference's mandate calling for member schools to reach a 60-40 ratio in participation between men and women in varsity athletics. The original ideal of a 50-50 split (or a split that offers a better representation of of the actual makeup of the student population at large) is the next step, officials say hesistantly, and there is talk of a target date set early in the next century. As a concept, it all makes sense. Do the right thing. And do it now, because there is plenty that needs fixing. The women's soccer team is a perfect example of just why that is so. For nearly a decade, members of the club team have struggled to achieve varsity status. Doors consistently slammed in their faces, their pleas apparently falling on deaf ears. What they were asking for is a mere pittance - less than one percent of the school's athletic budget. Michigan spends in the vicinity of $25 million annually on athletics. The women's soccer club wanted $50,000. Pocket change. But $50,000 buys a lot of Umbro shorts. It's an isolated case, sure. And one with mitigating circumstances on both sides. But it does speak to a larger issue. What do these women have to do to get their fair share? That's what gender equity is all about. For so long, schools refused to do what not only the law requires, but what is essentially right: Afford women the same opportunities as men in college athletics. For 20 years - since Title IX was passed way back in 1972 - that noble ideal was been broomed under the rug. Most women didn't want to play sports, came the retort from the athletic establishment. They just want to be cheerleaders. And if they wanted to play sports, who's stopping them? They don't really care if they don't get the same attention as the football team. Tell that to Shannon Loper. She collected cans Sunday afternoon to help her club soccer team - Michigan's club soccer team - keep its head above water financially. Right after she and her teammates beat Valparaiso, 6-1. Loper is a senior now. Her career as a college student is almost over, while her career as varsity athlete never got started. "When I was a freshman, all the seniors told me, 'Shannon, one day they'll realize and they'll make soccer a varsity sport.' Now my dream is over. It just seems like we're fighting a losing battle," Loper said last week as she sat at the Michigan women's soccer club's booth at Festifall - the one right next to the folk dance club. Eight years they've been trying to get a piece - just a small piece - of that monstrous athletic budget. Eight years. Still no progress. It is hard to understand. No money. Why not? There has to be the money somewhere to give these young women an opportunity to compete on the varsity level. The answers they got from the athletic department were standard. Not enough money in the budget ... don't even have enough money to support the sports we've got now. And to make matters worse, the athletic department added this reasoning: If we're going to add a sport, we're going to go the whole nine yards. New facilities, new everything. "They want to make it an all-or-nothing sort of thing," Loper said. "That was the problem. We just wanted enough to cover costs, and to get us started. "I mean, they wanted to give us academic counselors. We don't need that. We just want to get varsity status." Until they do, they will be forced to find the money from other sources. They will continue to raise their own funds somehow - by doing everything from soliciting advertising for their own media guide to collecting cans on Sunday afternoons. And they will continue to pile into a convoy of assorted sedans in the parking lot next to the School of Education Building before heading out on the road each time they have an away game. Their own cars, their own gas. Each vehicle with a Michigan Soccer bumper sticker affixed, each player with her Michigan Soccer sweatshirt. "We consider ourselves a varsity sport," Loper said. "We bear the name 'University of Michigan' when we go out there to play." But the problem is that no one else considers them a varsity sport. They were forced to play seven games in a stretch of nine days before Labor Day because NCAA rules prohibit varsity teams from playing club teams after that date. "It's really frustrating, because we go out there and it's a big deal for See NIYO, Page 7 ALA WE LOVE OUR PLEDGES! FILE PHOTO/Daily Shown here high-stepping against Ohio State, Leroy Hoard was one of Michigan's premier running backs. Despite playing only three seasons, his 1,706 net yards places him 19th on Michigan's all-time list back. But it isn't better for the indi- vidual. Still, I don't regret my deci- sion, you can second guess every- thing. D: Suppose you went to a school that gave you the football 30 times a game and you could have padded your statistics. Would that have made a difference in the draft or your pro career? H: No. Nowadays no matter what statistics you achieve, they are still going to look at what kind of agility you have. The statistics help in the area you get drafted as long as you are the elite player. There are hun- dreds of backs with 1,000-yard rush- ing seasons. It's your athletic ability that makes the difference. And that is determined in the pre-draft work- outs. D: What if you would have come back for your final season of eligi- bility? Would that have made a dif- ference in your draft selection? H: I chose to come out early be- cause I felt that I wouldn't have in- anything to do with your publicized problems at Michigan? H: Those problems at Michigan were blown out of proportion. I've made a few mistakes, but I haven't received a fine in two years and I don't plan on it. D: You held out for two weeks of training camp prior to your rookie season, and your current contract expires following this season. Do the players take active roles in contract negotiations, and how does the looming contract affect the individ- ual athlete? H: You really try to stay out of it as much as possible. The agents know more about it than you do, and you really have to just stay out of it. It comes to a point where you may feel they are asking for too much and are being too nitpicky; then you'll have to step in. The owners and the people doing your contracts for the team might try to put some pressure on you to get it over with, but really you try to leave it in the D: Is there as great an emotional emphasis on winning in the pros as there was in college ? H: Definitely. Coaches use every tool possible to motivate the team. The older guys may not show emo- tion towards winning as much as the younger guys, like in college, but everyone wants to win. When you're on the field you forget about being paid. Everyone is a competitor, re- gardless of how long you've been in the league, and pride takes over. D: How do you succeed in the NFL? What type of things do you have to do differently than you do college? H: You have to work a lot harder and train harder. You have to be a more complete player. Now, I'm a receiver back and a blocker, where, in college I was mostly just a runner. Desmond will have an advantage on other wide receivers because Michigan teaches you to block, which is mandatory in the NFL. Most college athletes have to come in here and learn how to block. Canham to receive Homer Rice Award The University Activities Center is creating new positions . .. Donald B. Canham, athletic director at the Michigan for 20 years, has been selected to receive the fourth annual Homer C. Rice Division I-A Athletics Directors Award. it was announced last week. The award, named high jump title with a leap of 6 feet, 6 3/8 inches. Canham returned to his alma mater in 1946 when he was named assistant track coach. Within two years he became the head coach for the Wolverines, winning two V.P. of MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NORTHERN LIGHTS COMMITTEE CHAIR