* Battle of the Orthodoxies 0 by Jesse Walker A number of student groups, including the Homeless Action Committee (HAC), the Ann Arbor Tenant's Union, and ACT-UP, recently sponsored a "Disorientation" as an antidote to the University's orientation seminars. The slogan of the series of events was "PC and Proud." "PC," or "Politically Correct," is the buzzword of the year. Originally used in radical circles to describe progressives better at reciting the party line than understanding it, it has come to symbolize all that critics ranging from Allan Bloom to Nat Hentoff dislike about the modem university. But beneath the hype and the hot air, there ira phenomenon on campus worthy of public discussion. It is a conflict between orthodoxies, in which the conservative views of men like Bloom are challenged by a newer wave of left-wing dogmas, with neither side capable of accepting free discourse. I myself have no desire to be caught up in a debate between Politically Correct leftists and Politically Pristine conservatives. Critical thought knows no dogma; freedom, no enshrined authority of any political color. But with only a few honorable exceptions (Hentoff, various libertarians, the American Civil Liberties Union), most participants in the PC debate have simply chosen their orthodoxy and defended it blindly. Hence the "PC and Proud" slogan; hence also George Bush's ability to condemn political correctness even as he attempts to ban flag-burning. Either you want to restrict Afrocentric scholarship, or you want to suppress race-IQ correlation studies. Either you try to ban "obscenity," or you try to ban "racist speech." Either you exclude non- Western writers from the academic canon, or you throw out Shakespeare to make room for the new additions. Those of us who are for free speech, free inquiry, and the freedom to make mistakes arwstheboadare left out in the cold. It is fashionable in left-wing circles these days to pretend that there never was a threat to individual freedom from their side of the spectrum. The record speaks otherwise: * In 1987, the United Coalition Against Racism (UCAR) and other groups led an assault on student radio station WCBN-FM. As a result, the station came very close to being put under the direct control of the University administration and losing all of its nonstudent dj's. Its crime: playing a runaway slave song that included the word "nigger." * In 1988, the University passed an "and-harassment" policy that radically restricted students' freedom of speech. Among the activities a University pamphlet described as "harassment" were "display(ing) a confederate flag on the door of your room in the residence hall" and being a member of a student organization that "sponsors entertainment that includes a comedian who slurs Hispanics." The policy was eventually declared unconstitutional in court. * Twice during the 1988-89 school year, the Michigan Student Assembly attempted to derecognize student organizations for exercising their freedom of speech. One, Tagar, was attacked for painting the slogan "Stop Arab Terrorism" on a shanty they built outside the Graduate Library, a slogan that implied that all Arabs are terrorists. The attempt to derecognize the group continued atn afterAyapogidandpaitmlon a nw slogan. The other, the Cornerstone Christian Fellowship, was denounced for sponsoring a folksinger who sang an (admittedly offensive) song called "God Hates Queer." When that attempt failed, the attackers changed their approach and accused CCF of discriminating against homosexuals in its membership policies - despite the fact that the group has no membership. Weekend Essay " That same year, a moderate-to- liberal MSA member was accused of racism for criticizing assembly representatives who were minorities more often than he did those who were white. Whether or not his criticisms were valid was not addressed, but to accuser Bruce Belcher that did not matter. What mattered was the notion that, as he wrote in the Daily, "Within MSA, there has been an attempt to put minorities into a position of leadership. Therefore, it is clear that attacks on minority members of MSA should not be tolerated." The fact that the accused man was potentially a viable opposition presidential candidate presumably had nothing to do with the attack. With the removal of the old clique from power in the 1989 student elections and the fall of the United Coalition Against Racism, such incidents became more rare, though anti-freedom points of view continue to be expressed by leftist sources. At other universities, however, similar activities continue to occur. Earlier this year, a lindprofessor at the University of Texas received constant harassment, including threatening phone calls, for his opposition to a proposed course requirement, until he finally had no choice but to leave his job. The conclusion should be obvious: the left's hands are not clean. But what of the conservatives? How legitimate is their opposition to PC? "PC" was never anything more than a convenient label applied to a set of organizations and attitudes. It was never an organized movement, any more than "racism" is. But the overwhelming majority of anti-PC spokespeople have behaved as though there was indeed such a conspiracy, made up of "tenured radicals" who attended college in the Sixties and now hold teaching posts. The charge is absurd. The impetus behind compulsory classes on racism, speech codes, etc. has come from students, not faculty. The victims of PC have often as not been liberal professors who were active in the civil rights and anti-war movements of the Sixties. And most importantly, until the recent "PC and Proud" boom, nobody ever went around calling themselves "politically correct." "PC" originated as a term of derision among leftists. One designated as "politically correct" was a person more concerned with style than substance, with fashion than critical thought The earliest use of the term I have seen is in an essay written by Dana Beal in 169; from the context, it is clear that the phrase was well-established even then. Clearly, the label fits many of the latest crop of left-wingers, who would rather "do something" visible, regardless of unintended consequences, than use the less flashy means necessary to attain their ends. But these people never thought of themselves as "PC," any more than the Federal Reserve Board thinks of itself as the"white male Establishment" Now, in the hands of conservative critics, "PC"means anythingunlikely to be heard at a Rotarian meeting, be it opposition to Operation Desert Storm, suggestions that John F. Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy, or anything else outside of the bipartisan consensus. Scholarship that criticizes that consensus, they proclaim, does not belong on campus. Obviously, much of the new scholarship is crap. I would not weep if psychohistory were to disappear from the scholarly map. But much of the old scholarship is crap, too. And, more importantly, much of the nw scholarship is worth keeping, no matter what the excesses of its worst examples. The point: some conservatives are now using "PC" in the same way that the PC used the word "racist' -to smear any idea they don't like without bothering with such formalities as rational debate. What we are witnessing is a battle of the orthodoxies. On one side, Official Reality. On the other, The Left-Wing Opposition. There is a cozy relationship between those two. If all they have to do is challenge the other, neither has to deal with serious criticism. If one is tired of one camp, the other awaits with open arms as the officially designated "alternative." Each side uses the other to its own advantage, as occurred when UCAR did the Administration's dirty work in attacking the genuine progressives at WCBN. This should not be surprising. Both sides are inherently dogmatic and authoritarian, and thus know how to deal with each other. And are the noble goals claimed by the left- tolerance, justice, personal freedom - served by intolerance, injustice and repression? Undoubtably not, implying that what PC claims to speak for is not at all what it is. Jay Kinney wrote about what we are seeing now over a decade ago: TAose awaiting another mast upurge ofpoicalfommta lathe '60s willsoon begranted thirmis, I redon, thoug they'llalo quily depairatalthewdy garAgeaanmpanyingsud an upsing. Wifashionabzlky coma eslygrin of the anointed, thoseho are "into"a happ ingthing Ept#tatinpolitivthe enotion-of- dangeis notagrin buta grima-the shout ofangeroer outrageous mifoine. The angeris .justified, undmiably, but wkn fashionable it ferfAi dforitsronsak.The demonstraftonhammer the catharic aing out of Aepridemoton. Usually, no goal isreddotaerageradeand is unleshedagain. Theaodswxls,ps, anddirsipate. Fashion departsndthose forwhom ithasromea way of hfestay on, errageattheirown impO'en increasdby thir newunfashionabilty. The1a/asetsin-whidirnotingso much as thefinally 0p sfrustradon of the poorfool ho priously hadto put up withthe righteous outrage ofthe fashionable. ("Politics as Fashion as Politics," CoEvolution Quartely, Winter 1979-80.) The fashion cycle is at its ebb now, as it becomes chic to condemn the PC crowd; and soon, no doubt, the left will be hip again. But no matter who is in charge, the problems of war and bigotry will continue. Without them, what would our politicos do for a living? The Ark (761-1451) Friday: Joel Mabus, dancing guitar. Saturday: Mr. B, boogie piano. Sunday: The Bobs, weird a capella. Monday- Tuesday: Peter Himmelman, singer- songwriter-musician-mystic. Wednesday: Open Stage, you perform. Thursday: Liz Story, piano with flair. Bird of Paradise (662-8310) Friday-Saturday: Oasis, a great band from Flint. Sunday: Paul Finkbinder and Friends, Session night, no cover. Monday: Bird of Paradise Orchestra, big band. Tuesday: Paul Keller and Company, jazz. Wednesday-Thursday: Ron Brooks Trio, jazz. Blind Pig (996-8555) Friday: Jeanne and the Dreams, local rock. Saturday: Rationals, Scott Morgan and co.'s reunion. Sunday: Voodoo Love Party with DJ Jeffre L., spinning alternative and progressive music. Monday: Gary Detlef's Bad Attitude Arts Ensemble, blues jams. Tuesday: The Chanel Club, gay entertainment. Wednesday: Loudhouse, Detroit rock. Thursday: Southgoing Zak, Ann Arbor 0 rick. Club Heidelberg (994-3562) Friday: Holy Cows with Dag Blasted, rock. Saturday: Destruction Ride and Eat, rock. City Grill (994-8484) Friday-Saturday:Johnnie and the Voomers, rock and covers. Del Rio (761-2530) Sunday: Paul Voomhagen, Rick Burgess, and friend, jazz. The Earle (994-0211) Friday-Saturday: Rick Burgess Trio, jazz. Monday: Rick Burgess, jazz piano. Tuesday: Rick Roe, jazz piano. Wednesday: Harvey Reed, jazz. Thursday: Rick Burgss,jazz piano. Mainstreet Comedy Showcase (996-9080) Friday-Saturday: Bill Toman. Tuesday: Showcase Night. Wednesday-Thursday: Best of the Midwest. Rick's American Cafe (996-2747) Friday: Frank Allison and the Odd Sax, rock Sundc Wedi I STEP BACK IN TIA Visit Historic Parshaliville Cider MlT CIDER, DONUTS, CARAMEL APPLES We're Open Daily I SMILL PARSHALLVLLE CLD LANS.I~~\~ ~' 22 O TROi TO ANN ARSWg 8507 No. of Left IN IRES1'NSE TO -W H1EP1IA$S INS15&FNCF ON PR"c*TING I5SUM5 PFAL JNG WITH HIS MAJES-1Y , DONS p Tf:UfP, W4E 16SUE 7N5FOL4. o(, jI . By UDONC I OK U j DO IT! i b 'o l r, o 3361/2 w / *1 ~1~~ ~zQ~ 0~ I I APPPaA A o., a . v /, ' t , r y ', , IO DoONAL.D, WE (3IVEA SW~IFT KICK. IN TH-E PANTS AND A FALL VO 4N A 6TMNWJ- / HOW S A 64VT WiWE FL A N N A C A RL S. L M R 8 O R orchestra U S IC D IR EC T OR :., _ £, Opening Night Celebrate the last full season with Maestro St.Clair as AASO Music Director. Saturday, October 5, 1991 8:00 p.m., Michigan Theater Carl St.Clair, Conductor Stephen Shipps, violin Korey Konkol, viola Mozart: Sinfonia Concertante Brahms: Symphony No.1 FORM CRAFT The Rock Each carv from a sin piece of Each a ur different masterpie TiI swis roger's thesaurus by benjamin holcomb HE~Y ROGER[! , THERE.5 Ms. ithRR CRARE 4~ T ACERf! j L5HOPiNCO URSE. HAT, OU'S y T ACHER5 Age 'V Pop- TO GOOD ONE, MO! Now o SA'YKNI ) Tickets: $12, $15, $18 V Michigan Theater Box Office 668-8397 u y _ . . . a E r October 4,.1991 XWEKEND Pap.+ Page9. WtKENI . Oct