p __ _ _ __ _ _ a Page4 Saturday, November 17, 1990. The Michigan Daily .a ..i I ab td$cW uIg NOAH FINKEL DAVID SCHWAKIZ Editor in Chief Opinion Editor Unsigned editorials reprent a majority of the Daily's Editorial Board. All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. Deputization Movement should be focus FOR THE FIRST TIME IN M A N Y years, this campus has seen a broad-based student movement protesting University policy. The issue at hand is the University regents' decision to deputize campus se- curity officers without student and faculty input or conclusive evidence that such a move will be effective in reducing vio- lence and crime on campus. The large protests which have been tak- ing place since Wednesday have shown student apathy is coming to an end. The students have come to realize deputization poses some threat to every member of this community and that they must work to- gether to get their voices heard. The organizing committee's decision to sit-in at President Duderstadt's office, as well as to set up protests in front of the Fleming building, Duderstadt's home, and the Michigan Union have been effective measures for drawing attention to the is- sue. While the movement's leaders set the arena for dissent, much of the success lies in the large number of students who showed up. This week's activities have placed stu- dents in a position of advantage, which should be utilized to its full extent. The movement may become stagnant if it relies solely on the wave of protest. The most beneficial path for the movement to follow would be to use the attention brought about through protest, in order to initiate some sort of dialogue with the ad- ministration. sed, remain positive Although there have been claims by both students and the administration of the other side's unwillingness to negotiate, the opportunity to establish open commu- nication still should not be overlooked. Protest alone will not achieve the goals of the student movement. Positive, thoughtful action must also be included. However, the spirit of activism should not be abandoned. Negotiations should take place with adequate media access and good faith must be assured on both sides. If this good faith is betrayed by the admin- istration, then protest must again become the primary focus of the movement. In addition, it is important the move- ment stay focused. Evident at Thursday's rally was a tendency to cloud the issue of deputization with other causes. In order to achieve the goals pursued by the anti-deputization movement, it is imperative other goals and aims do not confound this movement. The most effec- tive attack will be a concentrated one, and incorporating other issues only serves to dilute the issue. In addition to staying focused on the issue of deputization, the struggle should remain consistently against the regents. The fight against deputization has fi- nally come to a head, and students are ac- tively pursuing their laudable wishes. Only by following a positive and focused direction will the movement continue the success it has already enjoyed. n}3-4iv v:{}}' ~ -}}:'.Y-+{e; r i{x{vm{r? .:{{?:?vie; iX.Y'w p o Y i:4}:?.. {i nt . / +.v 4; 1fK% Sj t r$fr.I,..t... ."+ r.}.r}}'. $:.hn $~ +"'- . ?-.v - 2 A T...x.r:n.........r ::,x:. .. ..{. . .: :T rr ' n.. ....w: v.n ..........r:v:..:v::::::::-:v:. Y S }: . A LL.. ::...{. .... .. ,., v$=$C:iY:X' rv:r$ $:.rx f" ?3}{. :::: :; ~ . ::::: - .'a}: ;:r:,{v--:::M .: :1i: Ti..,,..w::: f:: :: v}::r.;:C{-r ..:.......: :fi'"l v.. vt n Y:{i~}::-::v: :iJ.}:v . {?4? II PE Vol. CI, No. 53EXTRA Ann Arbor. Michigan -- Saturday, November 17, 1990 CC winS 10 of 24 .fi.. T+ ~ seats on . by Christine Kloostra Daily MSA Reporter In an election Pete Rose would V not even bet on, the Conservative Coalition (CC) took 10 of the 24 seats available on the Michigan Stu- dent Assembly. Six Action party candidates took seats, as well as three independents. The Abolitionist party failed to win any seats in this election, in which z no one was willing to predict a winner. Results will remain unofficial . . . until the Election Court verifies them. Election Director Catherine Fugate will submit the results to they satuda! jjxu"iI l" err J' I 4tl> rI vo I NO< JOK 0 */ "j? O\Yr0 i5. {'o V2 Regents Student input can no longer be ignored f2 ias a r d s you are b ar s + e c t ( JV j\ 10 - s NSA elections '90 court Monday. In the highly-contested LSA race, students voted in six CC candidates and three from the more liberal Ac- tion party, a significant change from last term's results. In last winter's elections, Action took eight of the nine available seats for LSA. However, the party will maintain a majority of LSA seats with 11 of 18. Students in the School of Engi- neering - usually staunch support- See MSA, page 2 Deputiztf by Josephine Ballenger, Julie Foster and Lee Shufro Daily Staff Reporters Students rally outside the Union Friday at noon to protest the deputization of campus security officers. tion protests c Students rally, march through gun.° campus, organize movement \1cY&s pi SON T (%Tr (9P & I IN RESPONSE TO THURSDAY'S - ~ protest against University deputization of security officers, the Board of Regents moved their monthly meeting from the Fleming Administration Building to Crisler Arena. In addition, the traditional open access to these meetings was denied, and the doors to Crisler were locked. This act was a blatant attempt to quell opposition to deputization. In addition, the decision to conduct the meeting in private is a possible violation of the state's Open Meetings Act. Realistically, the regents do not have to entertain any form of open debate on deputization. They are deputizing officers under the county sheriff, not under the state legislation which requires public fo- rums. However, the fact that a significant number of students are extremely dis- turbed by the issue - as well as the pro- cess by which the question was decided -should elicit some sort of constructive response from the administration. The re- gents should at least address the concerns of the students, if not in fact concede to them. The regents should take heed of this week's activities and realize that ignoring the students and the situation will no longer work. This issue will not die until the regents sit-down and talk with the stu- dents. The rallies, protests and sit-ins should serve as a wake-up call to the ad- ministration; the regents must take student input as a valuable part of the University decision-making process. It is time for the regents of this Uni- versity to realize that an obstinant stance on this issue is counter-productive and an ineffective technique for quelling student opposition. If the regents continue their staunch opposition to student input, it will eventually lead to their downfall. NviN ( I Awn . - - -c A J 1(ll~ USCG TR v ' dlc -S tP 4 - &vr' 11 V- d. More than 1,000 students blocked traffic and sat on State Street yesterday at a rally in front of the Union to protest the deputi- zation of campus security. Students voted down a pro- posed boycott of University classes, but plan to hold a teach-in on the issue of deputization Mon- day. The rally was a continuation of a three-day protest against the cre- ation of a deputized campus police force and the establishment of a code of non-academic conduct. It was followed by an hour-long march of approximately 800 protesters around campus. Michigan Student Assembly President Jennifer Van Valey pro- posed students strike from classes Monday. Van Valey encouraged students to: Boycott all University classes; Form picket lines around classroom buildings; Hold a teach-in on the stu- dent movement and plan for future WJv - #~ Y Ct'j AI ,0A \l , ' ) action; Encourage faculty to hold alternative classes off campus to discuss student rights But students opposed the boy- cott when Van Valey brought the proposal to a vote by asking all in favor of the strike to sit down in the street. When less than half of the crowd sat down, she resolved to delay the strike, but said "go ahead and have a teach-in on Mon- day afternoon." Several students spoke against the strike at the rally. LSA junior Jesse Walker said, "I say we put off any decision about a strike until after Thanks- giving and until we've had a chance to talk to more people." LSA senior Reg Goeke said most of the students would rather be in class than participate in the boycott because the majority of students are not behind the move- ment. "You will not have a majority, and it will seem like a failure," Tenuous re frustrate di,, by Josephine Ballenger that sh Daily Crime Reporter admini agreed Srinivas Cheruvu, an MSA engineering rep. "I am against deputization, but we will shoot ourselves in the foot because a strike will not work," he said. MSA Vice President Angela Burks spoke in favor of a student strike. "The administration is she sa Wh propo! Baker that is very for th overti to pro Ho \1 \(At Ul -(- t 06- VA-UR o'wN~- It's nothing new that students and administrators clash on University policies. Daily But it hasn't al- News ways been true that Analysis both sides have admit- ted having bad rela- tions. Michigan Student Assembly President Jennifer Van Valey has publicly said during student protests concern Exe Relati that c admini staff is The has led lies, m deputiz cY.AJ ,51 Green t t 4, ! . I i .j