OPINION Page 4 Thursday, February 1, 1990 The Michigan Daily Israel, the intifada and Jewish identity Last week, Daily Opinion staffer Liz Paige interviewed Marc Ellis, professor ,of religion, culture and society studies at the Maryknoll School-of Theology. Ellis, the director of the Maryknoll Justice and Peace program, came to the University to speak on Jewish theology and issues of Is- raeli state power. Daily: Could you tell us what your def- inition of zionism is? Ellis: First of all, I think its important to say that the labels of zionist, anti-zion- ist, and anti-Semitic are not really help- ful; most often when those labels are used they are not a probing for truth but an at- tempt to shut down Jews who want to speak the truth. So if you are critical of zionism you become an anti-zionist, and if you're an anti-zionist you must be a self- hating Jew, and if your a self-hating Jew you want the Jewish people to be de- stroyed. What do these words mean and who uses them? Daily: What is the "truth" that you're speaking of? Ellis: It is to feel oneself connected to a people, to place yourself in the long av- enue of Jewish history, to see our people as a people who have struggled, suffered, and celebrated, and to say that I am here as a part of that tradition, and enter into the conversation that has been going on since the beginning about what it means to be Jewish, what it means to be human, what it means to be good, what it means to be bad, what it means to enjoy the earth, what it means to be just, what it means to be unjust. To be Jewish is to simply say I am here in this history and I welcome that - but then to ask, who are we as Jews? Who are the Jewish people? Daily: Who are the Jews as a people now? Ellis: We are now a people that has come through a tremendous suffering - 1,500 years of European history culminat- ing in the holocaust; and a people now who have recently been empowered. And although I affirm empowerment as a peo- ple, the question is what kind of empow- erment. Are we after that 1,500 years of suffering, after 5,000 years of history, simply going to be a people who uses their power to oppress another people? We have become a people who op- presses another people - and that is the Palestinians. Daily: Can this be reversed or changed? Ellis: We can begin to change it by be- ing honest about who we have become, which raises the question of who we want to be, because when we really recognize who we have become I believe that we do not want to be that way. So if we do not want to be what we have become how are we going to move? That is the question. Theologians, Rabbis, and directors of Hillel have a responsibility to help us cre- ate a framework for the next step. Those who do not, those who lie to themselves and to their students, are guilty of crimes against the Palestinian people and against the Jewish people and Jewish history. The role of Jewish leadership Daily: Could you expound on what has been the effect of the American rabbinate, theologians, directors of Jewish institutes such as Hillel? Ellis: In general, they have been a scan- dal to the Jewish communities. However, there are some exceptions. But by in large they will be remembered as a scandal to the Jewish people. Daily: Why do you think the Jewish community as a whole has had a reac- tionary response to what you have said? Ellis: This is simply untrue. I get let- ters every day and I get people flying in to meet me, who are Jews, who are so moved by the prospect of theology that speaks to their spirituality. We have many Jews all over the world who are working for justice but lack a spirituality to call their own. We are a people hungry for a religious framework, but it cannot be a religious framework that is filled with lies. They are hungry for an authentic Jewish response to our history. The tradition of dissent Daily: What is the tradition of dissent in the Jewish community? Jewish state power is what we are con- fronting. We are not confronting Jews in Israel. Jewish Israeli society is split. We are confronting state power in Israel which has, in concert with the population but also sometimes outside of it its own rea- soning for being, its own plan which does not if it could include any Palestinians. Anyone who tells you any different is not telling the truth. If you want an exclusive Jewish state, Palestinians are not to be welcomed. Its the logic of the state so we afr 3j - IQ Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan have to break that logic. The logic of the state has to be changed. Israel's challenge and the Palestinians I want to also stress that there is a posi- tive role for the state of Israel. It is to do what no other state seems to do - trans- form itself, move against its own per- Vol. C, No. 84 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 'Some of the most famous Jews in the world, Martin Buber, Judah Magnes, Hanna Arent were zionist but dissenting ones believing in a Jewish homeland but not a Jewish state. We have many other Jews who were interested in neither a Jewish homeland nor a Jewish state; they are all part of our community.' speak. So don't blame it on Shamir, or don't blame the Sephardic Jews. Take it where it should be, it is all of us. How are we going to be neither victim0O nor oppressor? That is our challenge. It is not a solution; that is a path. As we walk that path things begin to fall into place, things become clearer.If we refuse to walk that path then we look for solutions that are of course impossible to find because of them [Arabs]; not us, of course, no, not us, we [Jews] are innocent. We are no longer innocent; we are hu- miliating a people in exactly the same way we were humiliated. When you talk to Jews about the Holo- caust it's not the number of dead - its too much to contemplate. How do you think of five or six million Jews killed? What gets us is the Jewish grandfathers and grandmothers who were forced to strip in front of their community or Jews who were forced to lick up spit off the side- walks. Everything has been done to the Palestinians in exactly the same way. A story of a young Palestinian man stripped by the Israeli soldiers and placed in the center of town, old men forced out of their homes and made to paint over the graffiti, women who have had their shirts torn open by the soldiers. This is not to talk about the dead but rather about the at- tempt to humiliate a people - the Pales- tinian people. Student struggle Daily: What is the role of students on campuses? Ellis: I have been very impressed in my visit to the University because Palestini- ans and some Jewsare at least trying to speak about this new intimacy. For some Jews, of course, it's very abstract and for Palestinians it must be very difficult to explain over and over again that they are not simply here for us but that they have their own history which we have at- tempted to destroy. I have been very impressed by Palestini- ans who are willing to deal with Jews. I have also been impressed by those Jews who have been willing to chart a very dif- ficult and dangerous terrain that rabbis and Jewish theologians and Hillel directors say No to. Those Jews who are coming into soli- darity with Palestinian people are the ones that are being faithful. What they need is Jewish support from their elders of which they get very little. But that is for me the possibility of what students can be involved in as this new generation of Jews and this new gen- eration of Palestinians fight for both of our last hopes. In this generation, there is going to be a solution to the situation and we are very late and the Palestinians are in great danger and there is only one people now who puts them in that danger - and that is the Jewish people. Unsigned editorials represent a majority of the Daily's Editorial Board. All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. Time to pay up'U ON TUESDAY, students of color met with University administrators to de- mand immediate, tangible action to go along with the pomp and circumstance of Duderstadt's Michigan Mandate and promises for the 21st Century. The six demands focus on increasing people of color representation in the student body to be proportional to the number of people of color in the na- tion. Twenty years ago University Presi- dent Fleming promised the first Black Action Movement that the University would increase Black student enroll- ment to equal the proportion of Blacks in the state, which was then ten per- cent. Twenty years later the University's Black student enrollment is only 6.4% while Michigan's Black population is 13%. The promises the University adminis- tration made to students in 1970 are past due - twenty years past due. The least the University administration can do to make up for the damage done by twenty years of unmet promises is to meet the demands put forth by anti- racist student organizations today. The demands are as follows: 1. The incoming class of 4500 stu- dents in 1990 must be composed of, at minimum, 15% Black students, 9.8% Latino students, and 2% Native Ameri- can Students. Rotating enrollment of students from these under-represented groups should continue until these specific numbers are reached for the incoming LSA class for 1990. In addition, there must be no caps on Asian-American enrollment and under- represented national and ethnic groups within the Asian-American and Latino- American communities should have priority within the Affirmative Action recruitment efforts. 2. The University must drop all uses of standardized tests in undergraduate admissions. In addition, it must be ac- countable for its admissions process and its recruitment efforts. Admission criteria should be made available to the general public, and reasons for rejec- tions should be available to the individ- ual. 3. The University must provide four year financial aid packets to all students who need financial aid. In addition, the Financial Aid Office must abide by the same Affirmative Action guidelines used in admissions to determine finan- b. The OMR will work as a liaison between student and the administration in resolving any problems which would result in the student's departure from the University. c. The OMR will have other func- tions to aid in the retaining of students, such as offering tutorial services, guid- ance/counseling, and specialization in financial areas. d. The OMR will have a Financial Aid Appeals Board, half of which should be composed of students of color from the various groups, with a annual budget of $2,000,000 for stu- dents of color who have financial need (above the financial aid already given to them) or too high of a debt burden. e. The OMR will be involved in cur- riculum review to ensure that each de- partment includes curriculum relevant to people of color. Curriculum review would also include reviews of libraries to insure that they have materials by and about people of color. f. The OMR will participate in review of departments and department chairs to ensure that all departments are meeting Affirmative Action goals. g. There should be significant student of color input in the creation of the OMR. 5. Institute a tuition freeze until the total student population meets the pro- portional representation of all student of color groups. 6. The University must set up an Ella Baker-Nelson Mandela Scholar- ship Fund for economically disadvan- taged students of color. This scholar- ship will provide tuition and all living expenses for the four years of under- graduate work for 100 students of color (70 in-state and 30 out-state) in each incoming class. 6% of the Uni- versity capital campaign should be set aside to create this scholarship fund. Duderstadt's "multi-cultural," "international" University must start with these six demands. Apologists for the status quo cannot continue to pass the buck by claiming that low student of color enrollment is not the responsibility of the University, but only "a symptom of a larger societal problem." Instead of waiting endlessly for reforms elsewhere in the system that will increase the number of "qualified" students of color applicants, the University needs to expand its out- dated, racist notions of what "aualified" is. Ellis: From the beginning of zionism there have been zionist, non-zionist, and others who have dissented. Some of the most famous Jews in the world, Martin Buber, Judah Magnes, Hanna Arent were zionist but dissenting ones believing in a Jewish homeland but not a Jewish state. We have many other Jews who were inter- ested in neither a Jewish homeland nor a Jewish state; they are all part of our com- munity. If I can say that those who founded the state of Israel are Jewish, if I can say, la- mentingly, that Ariel Sharon is Jewish, then I certainly think I can say that people who have opposed the state are Jewish too. I am talking for an inclusive dialogue; those Jews who have dissented are just as Jewish as those Jews who have pushed that state. That is what I am calling the tradition of dissent; we have a long tradi- tion now. Do we know that tradition? Is it spoken about? No. It is repressed and it is suppressed. However, it keeps coming up; even in the Palestinian uprising we have a whole new level of dissent except for one thing: that tradition of dissent has lost ev- ery battle with Jewish state power in Israel - every battle. ceived interests, help us move toward a solidarity with the Palestinian people. I believe the task of theology is to lay the ground work for that solidarity, but we will never get there unless the state also prepares itself for that solidarity. Daily: What is the position of the Palestinian people within this theology and within the transformation of the state? Ellis: The Palestinian people hold the key to our future because they more than anyone tell us who we have become. But they also give us a possibility to be some- thing else. That is the great hope of the Palestinian uprising vis-a-vis the Jewish people. It is our last chance as a people. Is it no exaggeration to say that it is the responsibility of Jewish leadership to help us to be faithful to those who went before us rather than betraying everything - ev- erything we have been given. They are de- stroying our tradition. Don't blame it on the Israelis. Any Jew who does not take responsibility now is participating in the destruction of our tradition. A soldier on the West Bank is simply an extension of the local rabbi if the local rabbi does not .1" I~~ett e rs t}.t IY. Edhir r4rr*.L*.. X.,~~~~~~~~~... {':Y} r4":{":}:"rr4{':} } *.* }:'"4 * " } : r{'::{' rrti'. "" rYr* 14:"{"Y. 1"" : "':""":"::{:" r. r" . : L ::: 1' ... rr 4 . . r. . r1 "1.rrr r1"rL"}rr. rrr " r4' Tanter must resign To the Daily: As you know, the Board for Student Publications, which has traditionally met once a month in order to discuss and carry out the business of the Daily, the Ensian and the Gar- goyle, has not met for the last three months. Several Daily staff members had asked me, as a student rep- resentative to the Board, to ask that Professor Raymond Tanter be removed from the Board due to a conflict of interest. The Daily is in the process of re- searching an investigative story on Tanter, and Tanter has dis- played a marked antagonism toward the Daily since he was made aware of the investiga- tion. Last February, as Daily edi- tors were reading a draft of the story and deciding whether or not it was ready to run, Tanter came to the Daily and threat- ened to sue for libel if it was allowed to run. The Daily is currently continuing the inves- tives from broaching the sub- ject of Tanter's credentials, first by refusing to follow parlia- mentary procedure, which dic- tates that questions of creden- tials be taken before all other agenda items, and then by can- celling the next three meetings. In light of all this, I was glad to receive the memo from the current editors of all the student publications requesting Tanter's resignation. Hopefully Rosenthal will re- alize that problems such as these can not be avoided by re- fusing to hold meetings. The Board must meet immediately 0 in order to deal with this and must convene on a regular ba- sis in the future to attend to the important business of the stu- dent publications. -Cale Southworth January 28 MI'M TRYTOrc)K 'N L' SOF 4' 1 tr - AN R- WORDz --I I a~b~s't T TIN~k WWI'P. \ Ranogs?. fTtNe w I 1 'fl2A A1 ?Y ZZMCWIQ MM& I I MOM ILWM Y A I