OPINION Thursday, February 9, 1989 Page 4 The Michigan Daily al I e kb jau aiti Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Unite to fight AIDS Vol. IC, No.93 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor; Mi 48109 Unsigned editorials represent a majority of the Daily's Editorial Board. All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. 'U' overlooks Chicanos THE FAILURE to celebrate Chicano History Week at the University is just another reminder of the lack of repre- sentation of Chicanos and Chicanas here. Officially sanctioned by the state of Michigan, February 2-8 was in- tended to recognize the contributions of Chicanos to society. It is important for members of a minority group to come together to share their history, which has been largely ignored in mainstream scholarship and the media. Unfortunately, Chicano History Week has not been celebrated with the amount of support it deserves here be- cause there are simply not enough Chi- canos and Chicanas at the University of Michigan to organize a large enough educational program. It is not, how- ever, the responsibility of Chicano students to educate people about the history of racism and exclusion which has kept the University closed to them. The^University administration should take responsiblility for recognizing and encouraging cultural diversity, and should take an active role in educating itself and its students. This is not achieved through once-yearly symbolic marches and cries of "Hey hey, ho ho, racism has got to go" by administrators who actually implement marginalizing and racist policies. It is not achieved through placing the burden of righting the wrongs of the system on the stu- dents which it wrongs. It is achieved through active recruit- ment, acceptance, and recognition of underrepresented minorities. Hispanics at this University have been traditionally underrepresented, and statistics say Chicanos are among the most underrrepresented. Currently there is not one Chicano or Chicana faculty member at the University. The University does not break the extremely diverse "Hispanic" group into its different parts. The result of this is an inaccurate representation of people from completely different back- grounds. This is nothing new; the Just call WHILE RONALD Reagan used his acting skills to dupe the people in this country into giving him extremely favorable ratings in polls at the end of .his role as President, George Bush is using a different, maybe even more 'effective screen: the nice-guy approach. Though it seems an unsurpassable achievement to cajole the people into acquitting oneself of a crime against the entire world - the contra-gate scandal --Reagan is at peril of being outdone :by Bush. Although only 27 percent of all U.S. -citizens voted for Bush in an election -with a 48 percent total turnout, Bush - still has plenty of time to boost his ratings in popularity polls, just as Reagan did. Currently, however, Bush is working on winning Congress over to his agenda - something Reagan could never do - and has been disturbingly effective in his efforts so far. In just the first few weeks of his administration, Bush has spent an inordinate amount of time with Congressional leaders. He addresses them by their first names, jokes around with them, and is nice to them in speeches (unlike Reagan). Bush even invites them over to his house, the White House that is, to win their friendship. His whole one-of-the- boys approach can be summed up by his recent statement to a male member University also refers to "Asians" as a homogenous group. As a result of misrepresentation and underrepresentation, many people do not even know what a Chicano is. Chicanos are the descendants of the Native Mexicans and Spaniards who migrated north from Mexico to what is now the Southwestern United States long before the United States' Westem Expansion. The term derives from the name of the Native Americans, or Mexicas, who were brought north by the Spaniards. It is a political term, used by the members of the Chicano Movement of the mid-1960s to express their pride in their own culture, as op- posed to those who called themselves Mexican-Americans and attempted to assimilate more into mainstream Also as a result of the suppression of this history, many people believe that Chicanos are the Mexican immigrants which the United States has alternately recruited and deported according to the demand for cheap labor. Mexican- Americans are often used as scape- goats when downturns in the economy bring higher unemployment. Widespread ignorance of Chicano history, especially the fact that Chi- canos have lived in the United States for more than three centuries, fuels isolationist, xenophobic attitudes. Such attitudes have led States like Arizona to pass laws making English heir official language, effectively stifling the Span- ish language, an important facet of Chicano culture. Chicano culture and history has been overlooked by unilingual, unicultural education in the public schools. Chi- cano children have few role models in their teachers. They are tracked into curricula which prepare them not for college, but for obtaining low-paying, undervalued jobs. The University perpetuates the prob- lem by not recognizing Chicanos as a group, by not actively recruiting Chi- canos and Chicanas and by providing a climate of indifference and misinfor- mation for those few who do get here. By Cathy Cohen and David Fletcher AIDS is an anti-racist issue. 80 percent of women with AIDS are Black and Latina. 26 percent of all adults with AIDS are Black and 14 percent are Latino, both numbers double their proportions in the population. Currently, the fastest growing sub-population of people with AIDS is children, 76 percent of whom are Black and Latino. The early fight against the epidemic fo- cused on the condition and needs of white gay men, a population that is now beginning to show some optimistic developments in their fight against AIDS. In a few states, including Michigan, the proportion of new cases among gay men has leveled off. Further, the general trend regarding the development of new cases among gay men has dropped below initial expectations due primarily to the extensive education in the gay community. However, the growing devastation in Third World communities, already con- fronted by economic and political oppres- sion, points to new challenges not only to the powers that be but to AIDS organizers and anti-racist activists. From the start of the epidemic, the fed- eral government and the various sectors of the health care delivery system had to be pushed to allocate funds for AIDS preven- tion, treatment and research. Much of this work was done by gay activists and their sympathizers. The networks through the white gay community, their access to re- sources as well as the focus of the entire community's power on the single goal of saving lives facilitated this early push. However, when these activists and the community as a whole were criticized for only addressing the impact of the disease on middle-class white gay men , exploit- ing their class privileges to meet their immediate needs, most organizers excused themselves and their strategies by suggesting that expanding their efforts to Cathy Cohen is a graduate student in political science and a member of the United Coalition Against Racism. David Fletcher is in the School Of Public Health and a member of the United Coalition Against Racism. other hard hit communities was impracti- cal and just too difficult. They emphasized the lack of networks in those "other com- munities" (IVD users, Black and Latino gay men) distancing themselves and their experience with the disease from the real- ity of those other "marginal communi- ties." Now even as networks develop through other at-risk communities gay or- ganizers are still reluctant to align them- selves with the plight of all people with AIDS. Much of this separation between differ- ent communities of people with AIDS can be understood in terms of a more funda- mental analysis of organizing strategies. As with any issue, the AIDS epidemic presents organizers with numerous per- spectives and strategies which can be put forth to the general public. We make choices between focusing our analysis on the least common denominator - that people are dying (often the less threatening approach) - or on a more complex We, on the other hand, believe that pulling together the complex intersection of race, class and gender behavior choices will save more lives and will make for more effective AIDS organizing. Individu- als. in Third World communities must be- come central to the fight against AIDS if we are to garner the numbers and power to fight not only the disease, but also a soci- ety built upon inequalities. Fighting against AIDS means fighting for all hard-hit communities. It means de- manding enough experimental drug pro- grams so that all people with AIDS, even a poor IVDU with no health insurance is included in such programs. Organizing around the complete needs of those with the fewest resources in society, necessarily means that those with more resources will also benefit and become liberated. Third World communities' struggles to fight the misery imposed by the epidemic should be central, thus empowering all struggles against AIDS. This sort of link points to A Individuals in Third World tral to the fight against AIDS communities must become cen- if we are to garner the numbers and power to fight not only the disease, but also a society built upon inequalities. analysis which again emphasizes that people are dying , but connects their death to the condition and the treatment these individuals received in society. This second strategy, which will ulti- mately have a more profound impact on the epidemic, suggests that the fight against AIDS must also be connected to our fight against racism and classism in the health care system, the fight for equal distribution of wealth and access to educa- tion, employment and housing, as well as the fight against homophobia in society. Some will argue that the immediate and pressing loss of life at epidemic levels ne- cessitates that we accept and put forward the easiest and most acceptable strategy to the general public. These individuals contend that if more money for research and treatment can be raised by not empha- sizing what they see as "adjacent issues" of homophobia, racism and classism then our concern for saving lives should dictate this less complex strategy. the very progressive potential for AIDS organizing - the - potential to view AIDS not only as an issue for gay communi- ties, but also as an issue for anti-racists activists. As with any struggle, the direction it takes often depends on the vision of the organizers as well as those involved in the movement. Understanding of the chang- ing face of AIDS informs the direction the struggle will take. We must create a movement that includes as a focus the fight against racism, classism and homo- phobia in the society. We must create a movement which links the efforts of gay communities to the efforts of anti-racist activists. Only through such a movement can we bring true liberation and stop the deaths of all people with AIDS. The intersection of race, class and gender in the fight against AIDS will be the topic of this week's brown bag discussion at the Baker-Mandela Center for Anti-Racist Ed- ucation. t ~j~et~er t. tb" 21.dito me George) corporations form a fourth branch does not give Bush an excuse to merge his executive branch with the legislative branch to maintain the three-branch il- lusion. The branches are intended to operate independently so as to make the system of checks and balances possi- ble. If Bush becomes too friendly with Congress, it will not properly be able to keep him in check. As it takes two to tango, there is an- other party at fault: Congress. The first major indication of Congress getting weak in the knees was the gesture of friendship that House Speaker Jim Wright made by shelving the bill requiring the President to notify Congress of covert operations within 48 hours. This was the only legislation to result from the Iran-Contra affair and by shelving it, Congress is sending a symbolic message to George Bush: feel free to do it again because we trust you, no matter how many laws you violated or governments you destabilized. Jim Wright incurred the wrath of the Reagan administration and was reviled in the media last year for having publicly acknowledged what everyone already knew: that the United States was engaged in illegal efforts to destabilize the government of Nicaragua. The fact that he is so easily reversing his course indicates that the Misplaced criticism To the Daily: The recent letters printed in the Daily in defense of the work of Dean John Cross and Dean Peter Steiner are quite intriguing. One signed by five current or former chairs of the economics department criticizes a Daily reporter, Jonathan Scott, for his "brief, unin- formed, and sophomoric at- tacks" on the research of Pro- fessors Steiner and Cross. This criticism of Jonathan Scott seems misplaced since he did not attack the research of Professors Steiner and Cross. He merely reported that others had called the quality of this research into question. Presumably these members of our faculty are more careful in their academic research. The second letter, by Profes- sors Bergstrom, Binmore, and Varian raises two distinct is- sues. Certainly they are correct in pointing out that Professor Cross' view, that individuals are motivated by quantifiable "jolts of happiness", is not in- consistent with the mainstream of economics. Their later assertion, that the techniques employed by economists are not an appropriate subject for a student newspaper, is far more questionable. As someone who has taught introductory microeconomics, I have often encountered students who recognized the inherent absurdity of basic assumptions tion. It is discouraging that the professors who responded with such indignation to Scott's news article resorted to "proof by authority" rather than di- rectly addressing any of the substantive issues raised in the article. It may not be surprising that economists, like astrologers, phrenologists, and physiog- nomists, would resent having their techniques subjected to public scrutiny. However, since they do have a tendency to insist on lending their "expertise" to public debates, it seems appropriate that the ba- sis of economists' claim to ex- pertise remain open to public investigation. Perhaps we can arrive at an agreement, where economists refrain from at- tempting to influence debate on issues of public policy, in ex- change for the rest of the public ignoring the questionable foundations of the discipline. -Dean Baker February 8 Letters miss the point To the Daily: I am amazed that the Daily bothered to run two full days of letters condemning a recent editorial on Ethiopian Jewish immigration to Israel. One er- ror-ridden letter should have sufficed, rather than indulging in shrill redundancy. The writ- ers all missed the point of the The government of Israel wants to rescue Jewish Ethiopians by bringing them to Israel. (Imagine a similar situation: the Eastern seaboard of the U.S.A. is starving; Southern Africa offers to rescue the white citizens only.) Why should only the Ethiopian Jews be taken from Ethiopia when the entire coun- try is suffering? If Israel is such a humanitarian nation, why does it not help the coun- try of Ethiopia as a whole? Granted, Ethiopian Jewswould be fed in Israel, but the "rescue" must be seen for what it really is: a good public rela- tions ploy and a policy to in- crease Jewish population in Palestine. The editorial closed with the statement "the Palestinians should be returned to Pales- tine." Yes. And Ethiopians of all creeds must be helped, but not used in order to improve Israel's tarnished public image. -Hilary Shadroui February 7 Abortion is not the solution To the Daily: I'd like to respond to Libby Adler's letter to the Daily on January 20, 1989. There are a number of very interesting points that she makes. I hope that Ms. Adler is truly the proponent of human rights that she makes herself out to be. However, in all of her rhetoric, she completely forgets to ad- of sorts. Now no one ever hears that issue addressed. The fact is, it is very clear that the fetus is a human being. A tu- mor doesn't have its own blood type. The segment of our so- ciety called the unborn is being killed off at the alarming rate of 1.5 million per year. No attack on any group has ever approached the 22 million (since Roe vs. Wade) that have been slaughtered in this man- ner. How can the right of a woman over her body be used to argue for abortion? No one, man or woman, has the abso- lute right overahis/her body. Suicide is illegal. The taking of certain drugs is illegal. there are many laws that re- strict the right we have over our own bodies. And abortion is the taking of another's life. It is the ripping and tearing of a person who is totally depen- dant upon another for exis- tence. It is treachery brought to its sickening conclusion. I I agree that women are poorly treated in our society. One of the greatest ways that this happens is when a woman is told that it is okay, even courageous, to have her baby killed. We have thousands of such victims every year. What our society desperately needs is the termination of le- galized abortion. We then need the means of caring for the many unwed and poor mothers that will be in great need. This can be done. We must allow our youth a chance at life. There will, of course, be many women who will have great 4