OPINION Wednesday, November 11, 1987 Page 4 The Michigan Doily 40 1Ib Sidhwn i aiIa Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Cement offends the'Fatman' Vol. XCVIII, No. 45 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Unsigned editorials represent a majority of the Daily's Editorial Board. All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. What are they doing to our Diag? Why in the name of Gene Autry do we need more foot paths? More cement? It's all part of the master plan... to connect the cement idiocy of Regent's Plaza with the cement idiocy of the Business School. Don't worry though, they'll leave some trees with nice circular patches of dirt around them. You know the design-it makes the trees Our policy vs. their's IN ITS OCTOBER ISSUE, The Michigan Today ran a letter from a University alumnus concerned with the declining quality of University admissions standards. The letter was patently racist and should never have been printed. John D. Reed of the class of '37 wrote to the Today, the alumni newsletter, and complained that the University, by accepting people of color, is compromising its integrity and quality. The anti-racist activities of the last two semesters is dismissed by the author as "newspaper dust- ups," and he says that graduates of his class can "...only wonder...at ...'demands' for 'equality."' Said Reed, "We're outraged that our Hallowed-Halls-Of-Ivy are taken over by gangs of various colored skins!" Reed sums up his point by concluding, "There must never be various levels of quality based on skin-color to appease demands." This archaic position is an outrage. The dated and incorrect world-view of one man, however, is not as dis- turbing as the Today's irresponsible FAT AL decision to run the letter verbatim. Every responsible newspaper in this country has strict policies about run- ning overtly racist or otherwise offensive wording. The Daily's pol- icy on letters is to identify racist, sexist, or otherwise offensive or de- grading phrases in a letter and request the author or authors to change their wording. If they refuse, the Daily will not run the letter. Policies such as the Daily's do not violate the First Amendment. Judicial interpretations of the amendment do not consider intentionally or patently offensive phrases protected under the right to free speech. Also, while any- one has the right to express their views, newspapers such as the Daily also have the right and responsibility not to run something that would be directly offensive to its readership. As a matter of policy, the Daily will run letters representative of any view or bent, as long as it does not attack or defame any person, race, or creed. Running a letter like the one the To- day did is irresponsible and would violate the standards of any responsi- ble newspaper. , a look like part of a Lego set. Let's put a tree here... tree there... bush here. Oh yeah, and maybe they'll leave room for some more of those nice fountains like the one by the Union... garden hoses surrounded by, guess what, cement. The folks who do the planning around here wouldn't know nature if it sat on their faces. So Reagan's homeboy got shot down because he smoked a little reefer? Pretty amusing, huh? Ginsburg, that Johnny come lately darling of the New Right, who abandoned his wild beard and pot-puffing Ivy League buddies for the neatly trimmed and respectable look of the despicable New Right, fell because he indulged in a little bit of illicit toking. Now, the Fatman's not one to think anybody's personal life should exclude them from public service. And I surely don't care if someone smokes dope. In fact, normally, I'd be outraged an a-bitchin' and a-moanin' about the stupidity of ax- ing a Supreme Court nominee for blowing a spliff and listening to Bob Marley now and then. But, in this case, the irony is just too great. To hear Reagan and Meese, the keystone cops of American morality, swal- lowing hard as they attempt to stand by their fallen saint is too funny for words. The folks behind "Just say no," and the attempt to enter your bedroom and steal your pornography have to admit that it just doesn't matter when you do after you punch your clock. "He's not an addict," Reagan said. Boy, he sure knows a lot about reefer, doesn't he? heh-heh--heh. Fat Al, Ah, you did hit one in your column a couple of weeks ago (tough for you, wasn't it Fat Al?)-TV timeouts do suck. But television is what really sucks. Television rots your mind worse than Whitesnake turned up to eleven. If there exists an An- tichrist today, have no doubt that it's com- ing through those TV transistors. You ought to be on TV Al. 'The folks who do the planning around here wouldn't know nature if it sat on their faces.' Huh huh. Dick Smith This is really my name you sod- bet your's ain't Fat Al, bet all your fat's in your head too, idiot. Yeah, yeah, I'm a fathead and you're a peanut head DICK. So Dick Smith's your real name, big deal. That's even stupider. Who were your parents hiding from? You did hit the nail on the head though -tough for you isn't it punkhead - TV is vile and brain rotting. You'll love this next letter. Fat Al, That's it. I can't sit still for this. You not only berate my favorite columnist and bestest pal Bob Talbert, but you try to in- sult the 'Eight is Enough' special as well. Well let me tell you buddy, it's going to take more than your your measly little words to stop Bob, my fellow Americans, and me from watching good, wholesome TV. Bob and I shared many a laugh, tear, hug, and smile during that two hour block. Who would have believed Nancy married a sheepfarmer? We both agreed it was great seeing "our family" grow and prosper. If that upsets you; tuff-cookies. Why doesn't this paper fire you and crap off to Saska- toon and get a real columnist like Ed Anger. One who has the guts to say what's true, not what comes to mind after a mind after a night of beers and corn dogs. Nuff said? Jake Sedlock You sound like you just stepped out of ' Norman Lear's nightmare. You probably like cement on the diag. see above and, oh yeah, don't call me buddy. Dear Fattest Al, Last week my dad, an Empire State stockbroker, informed me that we are now financially destitute. Furthermore, he says that he no longer can afford to pay for my '87 Toyota Supra, or my membership at the tanning salon. He even asked me to stop using his Visa card to buy my new clothes! Do you think he's being just a lit- tle bit selfish? I mean how can I possibly look my friends in the eyes without that stuff? Please help me to cope with this problem. Surely you must have some worldly fat wisdom to give. Sincerely, Lost w/o $. Hmmm. Your letter's a tough one; Lost. I'd like to laugh at you heh-heh-heh but I must restrain myself. You ain't a bad sort, you just don't know better. Lookee here, you're born with yourself and you die with yourself. That's it. You're looking at this situation all wrong anyhow. It's a great opportunity to get your life together. First of all, get rid of that foreign car, then stop radiating yourself to death, and then tear up that damned credit card. It's a trap. Lastly, look your "friends" square in the eyes, spit on the ground, and tell them to ride their imported cars to hell (or the Em- pire State.) : Fear, Greed on Wall St. Wasserman AS A RESULT OF THE STOCK market crash of October 19, "Black Monday," a Florida man walked into a Merrill Lynch office and shot his broker and himself. This action was an extreme case of paranoia, yet it is indicative of the psychological trauma that made the Dow industrials fall 508 points in one day. The stock market can be thought of as operating through fear and greed. Greed causes the market to go up as people rush to buy stocks and make more money. Fear sets in when prices fall, and investors rush to sell-out before they lose even more money. We have been seeing much of this lately. Wall Street, and other stock markets, are designed to be places where companies can obtain financing as they sell stock to the public. After that, investors buy and sell stocks as the perceived quality of companies rises or falls. In the last few years, hoards of new investors and speculators entered the market hoping to profit from skyrocketing stock prices. This speculation has taken over Wall Street which has degenerated into insider trading, take-over greenmail, and paper shuffling. Speculators have been, and continue to be, simply buying a chunk of stock one day and selling it the next. This is how they make their living; handicapping and betting on companies as if those companies are horses. The speculators make'plenty of money, but nothing is produced in return. Greed, not production,, motivates them. The flurry of activity by speculators can produce quick price changes. In the bull market, prices rose very fast. But when bull turned to bear, or at least threatened to, everyone rushed to divest. Then the mass selling of stock pushed the price of stock down faster than people could unload. This happened in October 1929 and again last month. The problems associated with the crash should not be exaggerated. It is obvious now that the trade and federal budget deficits, as well as increasing interest rates, are serious economic problems and need to be solved. But to believe that traders all over the world woke up on October 19 and realized this for the first time is foolish. The crash was caused by the perception that a recession is coming. Speculators saw the value of many companies going down because of this and sold. Like sheep, others followed quickly to minimize losses. So the crash became a self-fulfilling prophecy. Speculators and investors alike feared lower stock prices and recession. They panicked and got out at any price. Stock-players simply lost money because they feared they would. We hope that Presidential and Congresional action can assure investors worldwide that the events of the next weeks will not be earth- shattering. Only if rationality prevails and fear is checked, can stability return and recession be avoided. USLETIN TERINDS: C$ANGe LSETTERS: WAS DVMW INTO PI%6RACE PA~ f~ WANHT To Q ASI U. A IS WhW W~ VILL o THE s&M A Y 00 4 M /4.9 ,of t Y 4 O , A Racism pervades American history 4 To the Daily: I write this in response to a week's worth of editorials and articles on the recent high-pro- file racist incidents on campus. Specifically the incidents involving Mary Clark and the first year student who was re- cently accosted and asked "where's your tail?" In reviewing all that the Daily has published on these subjects, I find a widespread misunderstanding of what racism actually is. It is not a "when in doubt, cry racism" attitude (Daily, 10/26/87), nor is it isolated incidents such as have occurred recently. These are encompassed within racism, but the actual beast is much larger than we care to recognize very often. These upsetting events are only the ugly off- spring. Racism is one of many means of systematic oppres- sion of one group by another for the gain of the dominant group. The oppression is then justified by a factor such as race, sex, agefclasssor re- ligious beliefs. At its core it is a means of oppression and nothing more or less. And when one takes the time to unravel the reasons for this oppression, one finds they are paranoid and rationally un- system to which they had be- come accustomed. And so they used slavery. They justified the systematic oppression of a group by the color of their skin. On the basis of skin color our "founding fathers" tore these people from their homes and culture, labeled them inferior, and forced them to assimilate into a foreign culture by enslaving them. Well, that took care of the cheap labor force. Now, to return to the pre- sent, the way this affects us today (and when I say "us" I mean all of us living on the planet today, because racism does affect all of us even if we are not individually racist) is that it sets up a clear ex-ample and message for all to see. This being that it is acceptable to exploit, persecute, and not care about the humanity, dignity or rights of a person of color be- cause the way to be is white and male; if you are neither, then according to our society you are worthless. And not only is it acceptable, it's built into our society and culture. The provisions for racism are present in every institution in this country. They are in the schools, the legal system, the hospitals, the newspapers, the corporations, the White House, whereas the life expectancies of white men and women in the United States are 70 and 71.7 respectively. Numbers alone tell how deep the roots of racism run in our society. The upshot of these statistics and analyses is that if we truly wish to eradicate racism it is not enough to be simply "educating the University community about racial differ- ences" (Daily, 10/28/87). That is a beginning but it is in ef- fect only scratching the surface. Because it is a societal issue, to get rid of racism we must change the structure of society itself. No easy or simple or painless task, but incredibly important. Because, until all people are valued equally by society and everyone in it is treated as such, the beast we call racism will continue to exist and will overshadow ev- ery facet of our daily lives. Some will say this is an idealistic view and that to hope to accomplish it within a life- time is unrealistic, and they will be right. But to use that as grounds for not doing any- thing, for not "crying racism," is wrong. Because we have a responsibility to start doing everything we can, where and whenever we can, to kill the beast. I welcome and would like to respond to conflicting ideas on this page in the future. Please, in other words, respond. -Heidi Marie Domzalski November 8 Oppose anti-Arab predjudice ....Ofv }* .f * .i':4' 'S i'iiaS"."}:{**"?:: *^.,::};':}ih*ti}:"::****i:}'"X":"."..:... . . . . . .t ..::r :.":.;.". " X*'.r. " ?.ia~.VV.. . n::: .."r:w.:4:. :}v:.':. . . . . . . . . . .....~tflwn .... X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . ..w To the Daily: The September closing of the Palestinian Information Office in Washington D.C. was a direct attack on constitu- tional and First Amendment rights. As part of our focus on racism and civil rights, the Arab-American University Graduates are sponsoring a film entitled "Gaza Ghetto," an in- depth look at human rights The award. winning documen- tary will be shown free of ad- mission in Angell Hall "B" on November 12, at 7 p.m. and 9 p.m. In view of the many racist incidents on campus this semester, the significance of this film cannot be overlooked. -Basil Salah Arab-American Fat Al would like to hear from you. To let Al know what