Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue


Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

September 23, 1987 - Image 35

Resource type:
The Michigan Daily, 1987-09-23

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

of the engineer is rooted in the society," says
MIT president Paul E. Gray. The institute
also figures that better communicators not
only will promote technology more effec-
tively but also will promote themselves into
management. "Broadeningtheireducation
will, in fact, maximize their careers," pre-
dicts Samuel J. Keyser, associate provost
for educational programs and policy.
These goals, while lofty, sparked contro-
versy. Angry students quickly cobbled up a
critique of the curriculum reform-an im-
pressive act considering they prepared
their attack in the stress-packed final days
of the spring 1987 semester. They weren't
upset at having to learn about Spinoza;
most were angry that students had not
been consulted on the changes. Worse, the
student report claimed, the ┬░new rules
would narrow course options without
broadening the educational experience
and end up eliminating more offbeat hu-
manities classes.
No strings, please: Packed solid as it is with
finely tempered minds, young and older,
MIT is no stranger to either dissent or
academic controversy. MIT scholars bris-
tle at corporate research grants that ap-
pear to have strings attached. In a 1982
incident, for instance, 33 tenured faculty
members signed a protest letter claiming
a $7.5 million grant to produce a biology
research center was too closely tied to the
donor's business interests. (MIT took the
money.) Military research also produces
mixed emotions and responses. MIT's
technological contributions, such as over-
the-horizon radar, helped immensely to
win World War II, and the school is one of
the largest recipients of Pentagon research
funds-nearly $400 million on campus and
at the affiliated Lincoln Labs in fiscal 1987.
At the same time, however, 70 faculty
members signed a pledge to refuse work on
the Reagan administration's Strategic De-
fense Initiative (Star Wars).
Thus politics in its way rivals science
and engineering for MIT's attention. Now,

No room for dweebs: Fraternity house
turned the 40,000-item collection into a
fun house, with scifi paraphernalia cover-
ing the walls and ceiling. The question
many students must ask, says member
Tom McKendree: "Should I do my home-
work and pass or choose a random science-
fiction novel?"
Despite demonstrably varied student in-
terests, MIT's historic attitude toward the
humanities has been, well, relaxed. A
study of the 1985 graduating class revealed
that 31 percent did not take a literature
course and that 62 percent did not com-
plete any undergraduate class in history.
The curriculum reform is intended to
change such figures-not by increasing
the number of required courses
but by reducing the number
of course classifications so
that students cannot substitute
esoteric-sounding courses like
Creative Seeing for funda-
mentals. And the Undergradu-
ate Research Opportunities
Program lets students do re-
search directly under faculty
Why make engineers read
Shakespeare? MIT hopes bet-
ter-rounded scientists and engi-
neers can appreciate the social
consequences of technology-
the better to understand, for ex-
ample, the cost in human terms
of a shuttle explosion or a Bho-
pal catastrophe. "The activity High-pow.

Pressure and relief: Taking a chess break
more and more, so do such subjects as archi-
tecture, the traditional social sciences and
newer ones like women's studies. Always,
though, the institute imparts its own tech-
nological tinge. MIT sociologist Sherry
Turkle has produced ground-breaking
studies on the ways that computers and
people interact. Even the fine arts have
a high-tech gloss: the stunning arts-and-
media-technology building, designed by
architect I. M. Pei, houses bold artistic ex-
periments in everything from computer-
aided images to artistic skywriting. Nor is
it business as usual at MIT. The new dean of
the Sloan School of Management, econo-
mist Lester Thurow, is retooling the pro-
gram to concentrate on the troubled area of
manufacturing-calculating that MIT can
lead the way toward restoring its health.
None of this will change
MIT's image in certain artis-
tic eyes. The late poet Rob-
ert Frost, for one, waxed acer-
bic when asked his opinion of
an earlier change in MIT policy
allowing students to take half
their courses in the human-
ities. Gibed the poet: "They
are now allowed to become 50
percent cultured." Skepticism
aside, MIT simply isn't satis-
fied to be the best at scientif-
ic teaching and research. With
its reforms, the institute hopes
to produce scientists who can
comprehend humanity better
than most humanists can com-
prehend science.
)pen JOHN SCHWARTZ in Cambridge

red classrooms: Engineering professor Eric Ip



Back to Top

© 2020 Regents of the University of Michigan