4 OPINION Thursday, February 19, 1987 Page 4 The Michigan Daily The Michiaan Daily Markley vote LETTERS: By Dan Rosenberg VOTE EARLY! AVOID STANDING IN LINE! proclaimed the election day poster Monday in Mary Markley. This was a slight exaggeration. Granted Markley is a large dorm, and many students are registered to vote there (one thousand and fifty), but what did this poster accomplish when not even one person voted between noon and 5:30PM? What is considered a bad turnout? I thought a 25 percent turnout was pathetic. At 8PM when polls closed, I was able to observe the election results at Markley. A grand total of eight people voted! That translates to a whopping turnout of 0.76 percent. Those commercials that say "Every vote is important" really make you think when yours is worth over ten percent of the whole polling place.. Let's consider another aspect of this turnout: money. Three poeple were hired to work for 14 hours and were paid approximately 60 dollars each. This means that just for those three people's work, $22.50 was spent on each vote. This doesn't take into account the cost of the machines, paperwork, labor for moving the machines.or vote counting costs. In case you wondered, it didn't take long to tally the results for this election in the Second Ward. This ward, a largely Republican area (including the dorm itself, which is the home of many young Republicans from Long Island), had one race where there was more than one candidate. This was for an important position--mayor. In Markley, Republican Pual Jensen edged out Gerald Jernigan three votes to none. I have a feeling that some of those votes may have been a Democratic crossover to vote for a less formidable opposing candidate. The unopposed candidates received a few votes also. Democratic mayoral candidate Edward Pierce received one important vote, as did the city council candidate Mary Reilly. The Republican city council candidate M. Terry Martin received a grand total of three votes. I still have one other problem here. There were no write-in votes cast at Markley, and I voted for candidates in both the city council and mayor elections. When you subtract my two votes, that leaves six votes, but when you subtract me from the eight people who voted, it leaves seven voters. But what can you expect when eight voters show up in 14 hours, or a voter every 105 minutes? Don't limit MSA to campus. To The Daily: What should be the role of MSA in evaluating issues that do not directly affect the University community? This question has recently become an issue of great concern on our campus. Unfortunately, it has been plagued by a great deal of misinformation. The initial premise, that there are certain issues that are of no concern to students and therefore should not be discussed by the Michigan Student Assembly, is one that I have difficulty accepting. I cannot delineate between what falls into the realm of student issues, and what is superfluous and hence taboo. Should MSA draw the line between University issues and local issues? Should we pretend that rape and robbery are issues that do not fall within our jurisdiction? Should MSA not advocate improved streetlighting in Ann Arbor because there are local representatives of the City Council that will represent the student body as. Ann Arbor residents? Further, should the assembly ignore the housing crunch and the inflated prices in off campus housing in Ann Arbor? Should we appeal only to the University to improve conditions? In am inclined to believe that these are just the issues with which a student assembly should be involved. Perhaps we should draw the line between local affairs and state affairs. The assemble should not represent University students in Lansing. MSA should not applaud Governor Blanchard when he delegates increasing funds to the University. Nor should we campaign for students rights, freedom of speech or the freedom to protest. Rather, the assembly should watch idly. Remember, we elected representatives in November, in state elections, to champion our causes in Lansing. Should MSA remove itself from national affairs? Are issues such as abortion and separation of church and state clearly inappropriate for our student government to evaluate, as they do not reflect what members of the assembly were elected to consider? These very issues are of immediate concern to every student at Michigan. Articulating and defending the rights of our student body is the responsibility of its student government. It is well within the duties of MSA to express distaste for an administration that continuously attempts to worsen the plight of our constituents by proposing Assembly is the appropri reductions in already forum for these issues to unacceptably low levels of discussed. MSA is thet financial aid to students. opportunity that students Finally, should MSA our University commun remove from issues of have to speak in a strong, f international concern? Should and united voice. If MSA stray away from question is one of cli Nicaragua because there is no consensus among the stud clear consensus of student body, then students should opinion on this issue? made aware of the politi (Students were not affected by inclinations of th the administration's decision prospective representati about Vietnam in the 1960's.) during elections. It is the business of a body Jurisdiction should not elected to represent students to the question. The assem advocate policies consistent speaks for the student body with the best interests of the we do not take a stand students. A government that protect our own rights, not feels compelled to further the else will defend us. cause of democracy throughout the world must be reminded -Gary Perlm that it is not acceptable to do LSA Representat so at the cost of our education. February The Michigan Student Co-rrecting errors iate be one of nity* irm the, ear, dent Lbo ical eir ves4 be bly Y. If to one nan ive 154 Rosenberg is an LSA junior. .4 Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Vol. XCVII, No. 100 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Unsigned editorials represent a majority of the Daily's Editorial Board All other cartoons, signed articles, and letters do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Daily. Save 'U TdDAY THE REGENTS GIVE THEIR final say on the 'U' Terrace housing issue. Students should attend the 12:00-5:00 p.m. regents meeting in the Fleming Building to pressure the regents against tearing down existing student housing. The 'U' Terrace, which is located near the Arboretum, is a group of University housing units which serve mostly married students. Last December, the regents approved the replacement of two units at the 'U' Terrace complex with a parking structure if the hospital were unable to find alternative sites for parking. No one denies that there is currently an estimated 800-1000 parking space shortage at the hospital. According to the residents of 'U' Terrace, there are adequate sites to build new structures near the Childrens' Psychiatric Hospital and behind the Catherine Street parking lot. In addition, the Glen street parking structure, which is currently under construction, should take care of the immediate parking shortage by providing 1000 spaces. Since the Glen ' Terrace structure will take care of the immediate problem, the University should study the effects of the elimination of the 'U' Terrace on the off-campus housing crunch before making a decision. Even if the other sites do not pan out the University is showing a great deal of insensitivity to the housing crisis on campus by moving so quickly and callously to eliminate the 'U' Terrace. While the 50 people who would have to leave 'U' Terrace if the regents approve its destruction have been promised housing on North Campus, this only means that a different 50 people - who would have been able to live on North Campus - will not be able to next year if the regents approve the hospital's plan. Though 50 is not a significant number of people in relation the rental market as a whole, it will undoubtedly have an effect; if only because the vacancy rate rate is below one percent in local rental housing units. If students should express their displeasure at today's regents' meeting, the destruction of the 'U' Terrace can be prevented. aa RossEN "17 Right to lifers stereotyped To The Daily: Once again, our journalistic miscarriage known as the Michigan Daily has struck out in its feeble attempt at "Greek- bashing." It is painfully obviously that little or no research went into the editorial "Greeks of the U' Unite" (Daily, 2/16/87). Not one executive officer of the Interfraternity Council, Pan- hellenic Association, Black Greek Association, or the order of Omega Executive Board was contacted before the editorial was published. It is true that racial barriers do divide the University on many levels, but your editorial only adds fuel to the fire. You claim that Alpha Phi Alpha is a "social affiliate." What is a "social affiliate" - we would like to know: The correct term is "affiliate member," according to the constitution of the Interfraternity Council. Affili- ate members are those groups who choose to utilize their own membership selection process. Currently, Alpha Phi Alpha and Evans Scholars are affiliate members of the Interfraternity Council, en- joying full voting privileges, except for for those matters involving membership selec- tion processes that they chose not to participate in. These groups must follow a mem- bership recruitment procedure that is mandated by their national organizations. The affiliate status was created to protect the differences in the membership selection process, while attempting to integrate the Greek system at the same time. The University chapter of the Order of Omega, the national Greek honor society, currently includes members from Greek organi- zations on campus, including the major Black Greek letter organizations. The Panhellenic Association has stated repeatedly that an affiliate membership status would be desirable in inte- grating the system. In 1982, the Interfraternity Council President Bob Palffy initiated negotiations with Alpha Phi Alpha-the idea of integration is not new. All of our efforts have been greatly diminished as a result of the poor journalism - if we, can call it journalism - 4,f your paper. We learned a long time ago, on our junior high. school newspaper staffs, that responsible journalism requires. responsible research - some-; thing that the Daily has not demonstrated time and time* 1 4 Efforts this summer, under the 1986/87 Interfraternity Council Executive Board, included a preliminary lun- cheon at which officers from both IFC and Black Greek presidents met and discussed both short-term and long-term goals to further integrate the entire Greek community. Meetings on an individual basis and another open forum also took place last term. To The Daily: The letter "Pro-lifers are No Longer Convincing" by Timothy West (Daily 1/23/87) certainly did not convince me of anything. As I read it, a chill ran up my spine, and the hair on the back of my neck stood on end. My eyes bulged from their sockets, and my shin dropped so low that it rested on my collar bone. I sat in disbelief. I support "Right to Life," and was so appalled bygMr. West, that I have to set things straight. First of all, the supporters of the pro-life movement do not refuse to recognize war, nuclear weapons, rampant poverty, Third World hunger, racism, sexism, or child abuse, as Mr. West claims. The movement is concentrated on the issue of abortion. There are many problems in the world, to be sure, but is impossible to focus on all of them at once. However, in a survey of 2400 participants at the 1983 Right to Life of Michigan convention, a high percentage of people were involved in community and charitable activities. Thirty five percent were volunteer workers at hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, or involved in hospice programs. Another forty eight percent helped with aiding alcoholics, tutoring students, youth drug abuse, suicide prevention, or Meals on Wheels programs. Furthermore. fifty weeks, it has all of the physiological characteristics of a human being; therefore, it has all of the rights of one. Killing it is homicide. Mr. West's claim that "It [pro-life] is a mythology that is based on the superiority of the United States of America and the white race" is purely from his imagination. The law would save the lives of all infants, all races, creeds, and colors. The law is universal. Also, the movement does not stop at birth. Such organizations as the Mother Theresa of Calcutta mission sponsor infant homes, hospitals, and schools to support the babies after birth. Lastly, Mr. West's statement; "But as long as the evidence for their compassion is outweighed by their callousness toward the world's most serious problems, I cannot support them!" Isn't human life the most important thing on this planet? And, isn't its preservation the most serious problem? After all, where would the world be without human life? A human mind is a terrible thing to waste. Among all of the abortions, there could be a Plato, an Albert Einstein, or a Mikhail Baryshnikov that world would have benefitted from, had he lived. Abortions should not be allowed to continue senselessly wasting human lives. As President Reagan said "We shall again. Before the Daily states,, "The IFC and Panhel need to make an important first step to. try to remove the barriers ...," the Daily needs to make an. important first step by fully investigating our past efforts,, instead of relying on inaccurate sources. -Denny Kavanagh IFC Presiden,j Julius Turman IFC Vice President Phil Cole 1983/84 IFC Executive Vice President 1984/85 Order of, Omega Vice Presiden'. Allan Lutesf Order of Omega Presidertt 1985/86 IFC President February 18 Error: The editorial "Greeks of the 'U' unite" (2/16/87), misstated the voting disadvantages of "social affiliates" which are called affiliate members in the 4 Interfraternity Council. Afiliate members are allowed to vote on all IFC matters other than rush issues, and are barred from this only because they do not participate in the mainstream rush process.The Daily apologizes for the error and hopes that current efforts being made to bring the two systems closer together are not damaged --+ ,, . ; . nf t 4 ' . ; ,;,; f ;F r7= .-- -w' T GIVE YOU TIRE 2> UNION' 4!m t IIIEE[115F7 :Iiu - I4 ,