I OPINION Page 4 Tuesday, February 19, 1985 The Michigan Daily I Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan The mediocre American way Vol. XCV, No. 116 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board A victory for students By Brian Leiter It's the American way. Quality rises to the bottom. And, of course, you know what sinks to the top. And so we come to Ronald Reagan who, for those of you who might have missed it, still reigns and continues to befuddle the press periodically with his ground-breaking con- ceptions of English, sentence structure. Asked if the Soviets enjoyed military superiority, the President, always one to think on (with?) his feet, retorted: "The-and we have been for quite some time-we have fewer, for example, nuclear weapons." Now wait, you say, this is a cheap shot: surely we all boggle the language now and then. Surely, when speaking about-we have trouble-we don't always, that is, in using the language-use it properly. But with Ronald Reagan, the hyphenated sentence (that euphemism in print for the boggled thought or LAST FRIDAY'S regents' meeting was a milestone in the develop- ment of one of the most important student organization on campus. In a 6- 1 vote, the University regents ter- minated a special funding contract for the Public Interest Research Group In Michigan (PIRGIM). While PIRGIM and its supporters are convinced the decision is a serious blow to the group's funding, termination of its funding con- tract was justified and in the best in- terest of PIRGIM and the entire University community. PIRGIM's contract with the Univer- sity previously had allowed the group to use the class registration process as a method of reaching University students for funding. After the March registration, however, PIRGIM will once again have to present the regents with petitions totalling 50 percent of the student population to regain their spot in the CRISP lines. PIRGIM has consistently failed to garner enough student support to warrant special treatment by the University. The group was first placed on registration forms in 1972. At that time, PIRGIM easily met the 50 per- cent requirement. University by-laws stated that the group had to keep the support of one-third of the students in order to remain elligible for the special process. In 1978, however, that requirement was reduced to 25 per- cent; then later to 20 percent; and finally the requirement of student sup- port' was waived entirely. In their most recent petition drive, PIRGIM- managed to get the signatures of just over 11 percent of the students. To its credit, PIRGIM. has established a record of service that clearly surpasses that of any student organization on this campus. * It has done comprehensive con- -sumer surveys of area banks, grocery stores, and textbook prices. One year, members even compiled a comprehen- sive directory of area physicians com-' plete with information about doctors' individual attitudes toward, and methods of, health care. * The group has researched methods of energy conservation in Ann Arbor. * Members have advocated several, programs for women's safety. PIRGIM co-sponsored several "Take back the night" protests and called for an emergency outdoor phone system on campus. " It fought for tenants' rights and set up a grievance board to serve renters in the community. * In 1983, PIRGIM lobbied for a five) dollar penalty for alcohol consumption by 18- to 21-year-olds. This proposal was made in response to Michigan's reinstatement of the 21 drinking age.. " The group opposed rate hikes by ,local utilites. o Members continue to address en- vironmental concerns. Currently, PIRGIM supports the Right To Know act, which would require employers to inform their employees and the com- munity of potential harms due to toxic waste. , PIRGIM even assisted in efforts to register student voters in last year's presidential elections. Despite an industrious and often fruitful past, PIRGIM's removal from student registration forms is a victory for the University community. The consensus on what constitutes "public interest" that existed in 1972 is clearly no longer present on campus. Only 11 percent of University students are willing even to contribute two dollars a term to the cause. PIRGIM may suffer from the regen- ts' decision, but it will suffer no more than any other student organization on campus. The decision will force PIRGIM to do what it has needed to do for a long time: to actively solicit funds from students. In doing so, the group will certainly get a better idea of what students want from the campus' leading public interest organization. PIRGIM should look on this decision as a shot in the arm, a chance to truly get the mandate of the University community by being allowed to ac- tively pursue it. If PIRGIM is a worthy cause in the eyes of the student population, the group will have no dif- ficulty gaining support - with or with- out the help of the University.. than the rest of you." A lot longer. But age doesn't deserve all the blame. During his gubernatorial days, Reagan delivered quite a few memorable (mis) statements as well. And surely we know older folks with more wits than most of our peers. No, no, there must be something more. I think those people who regard Reagan as an "evil" man have missed the point. Ronald Reagan, once displaced from his Presidency and plopped down at a bar, in an office, or as someone's senile grandpa at the head of thF table on Thanksgiving Day, takes on his r'al dimension. Ronald Reagan is a mediocre man. He is a witless drudge propelled by the moment to a place that is totally dispropor- tionate to what he is. If Ronald Reagan perpetuates inequities and hardships it is because he can only operate within an infantile conceptual framework unable to handle anything more than talk about "hard work" and "individual effort." If he cuts funding for the arts and slashes support for education it is because he himself is intellectually vacant and culturally undeveloped. If he places unbounded and unrealistic faith in the business community it is because that is what he knows: he was brought to power by businessmen, he socializes with them, dines with them, lives with them-he sees the world from that narrow and biased corner. Being a witless drudge makes it tough to escape one's limited perspective to a new one. To be a mediocre person in the way Reagan is mediocre is not an "immoral" state: if anything, it is pathetic. But it certainly takes on new dimensions when one's witless and one-dimensional vision is elevated to the status of national policy. Sympathy is displaced by disgust (or laughter depending on the degree of irony in one's humor). Yet still, what we see all about Ronald Reagan-the intellectual poverty, the concep- tual simplicity, the degradation of the worth and sense of language-is the natural outgrowth of being leadby a witless man. One must laugh about it sometimes. If a man thinks less people should go to college, if he would encourage his own son to skip college and start his own business (when business failures are at their peak since the Great Depression), if he wants to slash federal loans on the theory that everyone who reaches the magic income level of $32,500 can now afford college if they would only stop blowing those dollars on T.V.'s, stereos and vacations-well, then, naturally we make this person Secretary of Education. But if he held the view that there should be less public parks and that public lands should be given over for private use and exploitation-then, naturally he should be our Secretary of the Interior. On the other hand, if he had served as an executive with a major defense contractor, then naturally he should be Secretary of Defense (who better to determine the need for aN military hardware?) If he was a two-bit lawyer for his rich friends and with barely even a local reputation, then naturally he should be Attorney General. And when he leaves, we'll be sure to find someone with comparable qualifications. It's the American way. Quality rises to the bottom. Some will say that this is just a mat- ter of political prejudice. But it's not. Reagan is witless, he is surrounded by visionless and narrow people, and almost everything they say stinks of its own hypocrisy and vacancy. If you don't see it, I'm sure I can't "prove" it to you (whatever that means). To paraphrase what Louis Ar- mstrong said when someone asked him what jazz was: Man, if you don't know, you ain't never gonna understand. The Reagan years are American in the ex- treme: quality has risen to the bottom, fled to the outskirts. Men without honesty, charac- ter, or wits reign.'Some will be infuriated by these claims. But the bottom line is that the imputation of mediocrity is always most deeply resented by the mediocre. 4 stunted articulation) has assumed a new stature. Just look at any transcript of a Reagan press conference. We are witnessing the dying stages of a human mind. Reagan, himself, hit part of it on the head the other day in The New York Times: "If-and we've seen, I've just lived longer Leiter is a graduate student in law and philosophy. 1 Wasserman IN ;MY 5oYEhl2S OF PUBLIC LIFE, I'VE NEVER SEEN / AMAN~' M~ORE 'oPULA.R A ANAWSo UN(OUELY EMP~OWERED -To ON IRE P9DeLEMS oP~hvt .. -THE.DEFICIT5,.. TH~E MLITA12Y BUDG&ET,.. TA.XES... A DIVID~ED ; I LOVE To SIT BACK AND WATCH HI STORY UNFOLD L Letters PIR GIM objects to Daily coverage 4 Another consideration MIDST THE controversy around PIRGIM's spot on the Student Verificaiton Form for CRISP registration, the other side of the SVF. has been entirely neglected. That "other side" is a survey put out by the Office of Student Services on behalf of the Office of Ethics and Religion. It is entirely optional and it asks students to put down their religious preferences. The information is used strictly by the Office of Ethics and Religion. The survey has been a part of the SVF since CRISP was first implemen- ted, and the University conducted a similar survey in the days of the first- come, first-serve registration in Waterman Gym. In spite of its history, it may be time to stop the survey. It is inefficient to ask essentially the same students the same question each term. If a student chooses not to answer it one term, it's doubtful he'll choose to the next. .' 1 . - - T . A .c. a part of every student's life that the University is hardly supporting it by offering students an opportunity to express their religious preference. Nonetheless, there are other aspects of student life - bars for-one - that con- cern more students than church, and if .the sole reason for permitting the sur- vey to be on the SVF is one of popularity, students should have a vote to determine its existence. The survey does potentially benefit students, however. There are many students who are concerned about maintaining religious practices in their college town, and the Office of Ethics and Religion can provide them with the necessary information when they request it. The best course would seem to be to find a new way to provide religious information to interested students. Other universities let students choose whether they would like their To the Daily: I'm writing in response to the February 16 Daily article, "Regents Turn Down Pirgim". There were several points which were never mentioned in that ar- ticle concerning - PIRGIM's representation at the Regents meeting and on campus and even some innaccuracies in the repor- ting in that article. First, the words of Regent Deane Baker and graduate student Steve Angelotti received a greatly disproportionate amount of publicity by Daily reporters. Baker and Angelotti were the only two people present who spoke in opposition to PIRGIM. The words of PIRGIM supporters Professor Richard Mann and MSA president Scott Page, as well as those of two other students supporting PIRGIM were ignored. Mann ex- pounded on PIRGIM's educational value and Page yoiced the MSA endorsement of PIRGIM's proposed funding ex- tension as well as PIRGIM's vir- tues as seen by a student leader. Regent Baker was the only regent not in support of the type of activities engaged in by PIRGIM. Another fact which should be made known to the 'University community is the overwhelming support PIRGIM's proposal received from students, student organizations, faculty, and com- munity organizations. PIRGIM Concerning the actual agreement reached by the regen- ts, PIRGIM was not actually "turned down.': The regents voted in favor of a modification of PIRGIM's original proposal. This includes a one semester exten- sion of the current funding system during which time PIRGIM must gather con- siderable student support in or- der to continue the use of its fun- ding mechanism. We at PIRGIM feel this is a fair compromise on our original request of a one year funding extension. Furthermore, it doesn't change our plans for ac- tivity on the University campus. Our plan remains to increase student participation in the organization and continue work on forward-moving issues. We at PIRGIM feel that the Regents presented us with a workable proposal and are op- BLOOM COUNTY timistic. about the future. Through our petition drive we gained several new enthusiastic volunteers. We want students to understand that this organization belongs to them. Any student can come to PIRGIM and work on existing projects or initiate a new project on some issue which con- cerns them. PIRGIM will continue to act as a service to students and a chan- nel through which they can make their voices heard. There is more new life and enthusiasm in the organization at this point than at any other time I can remember. - Phillis Engelbert February 16 Engelbert is a member of PIRGIM's board of directors. 4 Letters to the Daily should be typed, triple- spaced, and signed by the individual authors. Names will be withheld only in unusual circum- stances. Letters may be edited for clarity, gram- mar, and spelling. 4 by Berke Breathed PfP YOU/ LECTU7 lHEM~ BACK'. t7mA'o 7W ' 6&Y \CRYIINA MOK IHE AMRCA CX 5 6$ AP TAWY 1 P/P. fU AP YO(. I I PO N ANXIfl' W45... GTY. WAqT.'wAwr' mwr Ma /W.' 501 WPr OLT NP 1 ~0 /.9vIf55 P OVA H, 41MOR L~/ 7 CN/AGIY. /1-