4 OPINION r Page 4 Friday, September 21, 1984 The Michigan Daily{ . Trying to get a grip on going Greek By Sue Barto And now for the perennial question: To be or not to be - Greek. For those non-affiliates among us, ' Greek" is a member of a social fraternity or sorority. He or she is of college age, is often seen wearing Greek. letters emblazoned on sweatshirts, pan- ts, and visors, and is usually the object of heated controversy and criticism. He or she is also, at this very minute, engaged in"Rush," or the semi-annual ritual of acquiring new members. There are well over 3,000 of them on campus, constituting about 15 percent of the undergraduate population. That's up about 4 percent since 1979. The num- bers are growing in what Greek-haters would call epidemic proportions. My god, they say, if this trend continues, coupled with declining enrollments, the University will be overrun by Greeks by the year 2020. The PSN will stand for Proliferation of Student Nepotism and MSA for the Michigan Social Arena. Sonya and Harry Jr. (great grandkids of our fearless Greek council leaders) will oust Scottie and Stevie, and the U- Club will be renamed I Ate A Pie. But think how easy the ad- ministration's job will be. The only. courses they'll have to offer will be Home Economics and Bartending. Of course, we'll still need counseling ser- vices for the massive influx of student alcoholics. Well, worry not your little hearts. This apocalypse will never occur because there will always be the GDIs (God Damned Independents) who think only a diseased, demented, insecure, or lobotomized individual would sacrifice his or her identity to "the system." I beg to differ. Yes, I am Greek. And the following is nothing more than a self-conscious justification for belonging to an organization . that blatantly excludes people on the sole basis of their sociability - on their knack for keeping up a conversation. In one sense, the rules are very simple: If we like you and you like us, you're in. But in another sense, the rules for both sides are entirely subjective. When a student participates in Rush, he or she gives the other participants license to judge his or her worth as a social being. Why would anyone subject them- self to this kind of scrutinization? Let's start at the beginning. The first Americans to "go Greek" were five men at the College of William and Mary in 1776. They gathered in a tavern (that's right, a place where they serve up the strong stuff) and called them- selves Phi Beta Kappa. They "formed the bonds" in the name of friendship, morality, and literature. Phi Beta Kap- pa is now an honorary society whose members are selected on the basis of scholarship, but the guiding principals of these five "revolutionaries" are still basic to social fraternities and sororities. But none of these principals, alone or together, justifies "the system." Take friendship. A Greek letter society provides a meeting place and a full social calendar. It provides the camaraderie that may otherwise be lacking at a huge University. But most of the Greeks I know had plenty of friends before they signed up and are continuously making new non-Greek friends. Chances are, if they didn't, they are not terribly social people and would not have gotten a "bid," or in- vitation to join, in the first place. Morality. Philanthropies are a big part of Greek life. No, this does not mean Greeks define their morality in direct proportion to the amount of money they donate to charity, but some do it as a justificatin for banding together. Zeta Tau Alpha sorority for example, made approximately $3,000 last year on Mr. Greek Week and a carnation sale, all of which they donated to charity. Few other campus organizations, none from the dorm did not Rush because they simply could not afford it. And I know of people who have pledged houses only to realize that they could not handle the financial obligations. These finances are sometimes brushed under the rug, despite the ef- forts of the Panhellenic Association (the governing council for sororities) to make the costs widely known. Rush is also very superficial.. But socializing, like baseball or bowling, is a skill. Fraternities and sororities do discriminate - on the basis of whether or not they like the rushee. I remember a woman who came through Rush last year who thought she was a shoe-in. She was well-dressed, attractive, captain of this, chairperson of that, involved in her church - by all of society's stan- dards, this woman was a winner. She'll probably be running a Fortune 500 company before the century's up. But I didn't really like her. I didn't enjoy her company. I didn't care what kind o status she would bring to my organization or what she would think if we "cut" her. She wasn't mean and I wouldn't mind working with her, but I did not choose her to be in my sorority. Some humble advice: If you go through rush, be honest with yourself. Am I comfortable in this house? Do I like these people? Do I really care what they think? If you are not sure that you like yourself, if you are looking for house to define your worth - you're looking for trouble. Being Greek is rewarding and lots of fun. Panhel and the Interfraternity Council do their best to keep enough houses on campus to accommodate everyone who wants to experience Greek life. But all Greeks have the responsibility of being up front about what and wly we are. That way, our pleasure is not another's pain. Barto is the Daily's Personne Editor and a member of Alpha Phi sorority. Daily Photo by DOUG.McMAHON' "Rushees" pick up their time schedules at the corner of South University and South Forest Wednesday before going to that evening's set of five parties. A record number of women - over 1,000 -registered for Rush this fall in hopes of finding a house that is right for them. that immediately come to mind, can boast this kind of accomplishment. But, according to ZTA's treasurer, the house's social budget last year was $6,000. This year it is $7,300. If these women were so utterly altruistic, they would be volunteering in a Third World country or inner-city ghetto and not spending twice what they give to charity on fun and games. The fun- damental motivation for joining a house is not to help the sick and needy, but it is constructive to channel all the time and energy it takes to have fun in- to a worthwhile cause. Scholarship. The grade point average among sororities is 3.17 - more than two-tenths higher than the campus average. Some fraternities boast 3.3 and higher for overall GPAs. Most houses have scholarship chairpersons who encourage good study habits and provide information on other members' majors and interests so they can help each other out. The old beef about the Greeks' unfair access to extensive test files is mute now because most professors supply old tests so everyone has a fair chance. And again, who's to say how high each individual's grade point might have been had they not gone Greek? But still I can't name one Greek: acquaintance who joined because he or' she wanted a place to study. Students do not go Greek to get good grades, help the less fortunate, or fill a massive void of friendship.. The system provides organized social activities and a "home" with traditions. They provide a sense of family, that one's "brothers" and "sisters" accept you for what you are. It's a good time. The problem is that the Greeks' good time sometimes hurts others. The hurt stems from students not being fully in- formed about the mechanisms of rush. It is expensive. The average cost for the first year in a sorority - for "pledging," "initiating," and in most cases several meals and other social activities - is $495. Granted, sub- sequent years are considerably less ex- pensive and room and board is com- petitive with, and often a better deal than the dorms. But several of my pals G Edfitm dbtna nig an Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Sinclair VJARN(N4LAWEL5 .. Vol. XCV, No. 14 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board Toward equal education J UST TWO summers ago the Presi- dent's Blue Ribbon Commission on Education declared that there was a crisis in American education. A "rising tide of mediocrity" was sweeping the nation's schools and something had to be done. Everyone began to point his or her finger at the teacher, the student, and the school administrator: who was responsible for this loss of excellence? Wednesday, the College Board, an organization of around 2,500 high schools and colleges that sponsors the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and other college admissions tests, gave the public some good news: average SAT scores rose four points this year over last year, suggesting that there may not be a loss of quality after all. In fact, there seems to be significant progress taking place in American schools, though it must be noted that higher SAT scores alone are by no means an exact -barometer of educational success. Nonetheless, George Hanford, president of the College Board, said, "We seem to have turned the corner in seeking to im- prove American education." And indeed, maybe we have. Yet it might just be the attitudes teachers hold regarding the ability of individual students that has provided an improved education more than plain sermonizing about a need to go back to the basics. This is perhaps reflected in the progress women and minority students have made in recent years. The trend in falling scores began to break in 1980 after 17 years and was followed by a period of stability. Then, most en- couragingly, in 1982 higher scores achieved by minority students reflec- ted actual gains. This year, scores revealed impressive gains by female students in the math and science area. The public, therefore, should not be fearing the downgrading of education in this country, rather they should be rejoicing in a change which has produced more equality in the system. Education is not just for the rich, white male in this society. It is one of the ways that American democracy tries to insure equality of opportunity. CoNSUMPTiON OF TH4ESE CAE ESE NREw 3COUL P TURN ' OuIg TERIES INTO SLIME- ENCR~USTED 0 SCHUCK(* AFTER ELEGTIoN. WARNM(r USE OF Tris WEAON COULD CAUSE END OF RUMAN LIFE AS WE KNOW IT. 4 A (1/r I 4 I ( .W i 1111II l , S~ o, aUEMa1 AN~ 4 LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Does Brian the Wild like Reagan? To the Daily: King Brian the Wild is at it again. This time Mr. Leiter has the gall to equate Ronald Reagan with Fidel Castro in "Picking the lesser of two evils" (Daily, Sept. 18). That's no way to treat a greatly admired world figure. Look at the words Leiter uses to refer to that great leader of the masses, Dr. Castro: "Im- perialistic," "dogmatic," "ex- cessive centralization," and "not committed to pluralism." This is typical revisionist neo- liberal thinking. Dr.sCastro is much 1nved hv the nOnnle nf Cha illiterate democracy. Leiter charges Castro with jailing people due to their political beliefs. This is absurd. Castro only jails dangerous non- conformists who don't fully sup- port the revolution. To equate that with Reagan's jailing of people who kill policemen and commit other acts of revolution is ludicrous. Even more upsetting is Leiter's charge that Castro supports "fascist" governments. Fidel supports only indigenous RLQOM CfU TWTY revolutions and previously' established Marxist-Leninist governments. To suggest that these governments are fascist is to imply that Marxism-Leninism and fascism are equivalent. Susan Sontag made that claim three years ago and we booted her out of the "We Know Everything Intellectual Society." Even though Leiter is a charter member of our group, we may have to reconsider his member- ship if he continues this revisionist thinking. Brian Leiter at first brought a new light to the Opinion Page. Now he is just like all of you fun- ctionally illiterate anti-intellec- tual capitalist morons: a 4 kneejerk anti-revolutionary reac- tionary. How dare he even im- plicitly criticize that great unelected leader, Dr. Castro? Until he equated Reagan with Castro I didn't know that Leiter liked Reagan so much. Shame, Brian. - Steve Angelotti September 18 KH Up.r1s U.. bs a 17