OPINION a - i - - i i Page 4 Tuesday, April 10, 1984 The Michigan Dai Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Jackson sets black agenda V 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Vol. XCIV-No. 152 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board Destructive engagement ECENT agreements between apartheid South Africa and neighboring black-ruled nations should not fool anyone into believing that temporary peace in the region means an end to the internal oppression of South Africa's black majority. The adoption in November of a new South African Constitution which recognizes the political rights of some non-whites may have been a positive step, but the overall picture remains bleak: the new political system ex- cludes the nation's 22 nllion blacks. Reagan administration policy makers may try to claim that their 1981 "constructive engagement" policy - softspoken diplomacy in contrast to Carter administration restrictions on trade - has helped bring about the peace agreements in Mozambique and Angola. But the painful truth is that the internal war against blacks in South Africa is still being fought. "Constructive engagement" has done nothing to end this -war. In fact, if anything, the nice-, sounding policy has made South Africa a stronger nation economically and militarily and better able to continue its apartheid practices. The policy has certainly boosted U.S. multinationals' profits and investments in the region. It is not a policy of peace. South Africa, even with the new Con- stitution, maintains racially segregated residential areas, has laws preventing marriage and sex across the color line, and requires that all blacks 16 and over carry a pass. Since the Reagan administration's policies took effect, the United States has replaced Britain as South Africa's primary trading partner, and its largest source of corporate investment. How can the United States claim that it is anti-apartheid? Recent United Nations surveys show that "constructive engagement" has shot up U.S. corporate investments-by some $8 billion over the past three years. So, while more than 1,000 cor- porations profit from the racist regime, studies show that there have been no significant improvements in the living standards of South African black workers relative to whites. In some sectors of the economy, the in- come gap between whites and blacks has actually widened. So what may appear to be diplomatic breakthroughs for the Reagan ad- ministration, and what may seem like a bend in South Africa's rigid, racist system turn out to be no solutions at all to the real problems at hand. Pretoria's stand against com- munism makes it a nice cold war ally, but some sanctions need to be put back in place if Americans wish to separate themselves from apartheid practices. Three House bills, if passed, would begin separating the United States from South African racism and weaken the economic and military power of the white minority which rules. The first would ban the import of South African currency and put an end to U.S. bank loans to South Africa's public sector. Most importantly, this bill would make mandatory adherence to the Sullivan Code - a restriction en- suring that black workers in U.S. com- panies operating in South Africa receive equal pay for equal work. The second would revive the export con- trols imposed by the Carter ad- ministration and halt all exports that would sustain the South African military machine.The third would ban all new investment in South Africa. A 1983 study showed that despite the fact that blacks make up 80 percent of South Africa's workforce, they still hold less than 1 percent of all managerial and administrative positions and hold less than 25 percent of all professional and technical jobs. In encouraging U.S. corporations to expand in South Africa the U.S. gover- nment is encouraging racism. That is far from a "constructive engagement." By Phyllis Crockett Jesse Jackson's strong showing among black voters means he will have a major voice in negotiating the national political agenda at the Democratic National Convention in San Fran- cisco. He is clearly in a position to make significant gains in a way blacks have never done before. "Jackson's leverage comes from being a powerful Democrat," says Roger Wilkins, senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. "He is one of the most significant members of the Democratic Party in the country. That wasn't true four months ago." JACKSON'S power derives from grass-roots blacks. In Chicago and New York, they gave him 80 percent of * their votes. In the South, particularly in Mississippi and Virginia, where blacks have had little voice in party politics, the tur- nout for Jackson exceeded all ex- pectations. This strong showing comes despite the fact that many black leaders have endorsed Mondale or remained uncommitted. But Jackson's proven ability to deliver the black vote, and the Democratic nominee's need for that vote, means Jackson will play a major role at the July con- vention. "Blacks have a chance to get their agenda through because of Jesse Jackson," said Maxine Waters, California State assen- blywoman from Los Angeles. "There's absolutely no doubt about it. The Democratic Party, must take us seriously." SAYS ROGER Wilkins,"There will be two black agendas - one to deal with the Democratic Par- ty, the other to deal with specific programs." Though described by some as a Jackson adviser, Wilkins holds no official post in the Jackson campaign. "Jackson will say to the party, 'Blacks have supported the party reliably for decades and got little or nothing. Now we want guaran- tees that the party will help black candidates,' " says Wilkins. "Jackson will also want the party to develop black candidates and run them throughout the coun- try." Voting rights is the top item on Jackson's agenda, according to Dr. Ronald Walters, Jackson's deputy campaign manager for issues. Most important, he said, "Jesse Jackson will find it im- possible to support any Democratic Party nominee for president who does not support our second primary challenge." THIS REFERS to runoff primaries in the South where blacks have run for Congress and won in the first election, but must face a runoff if they poll less than 50 percent of the vote. At that point, says Walters, a political science professor at Howard University, "The blacks lose because the black vote is then diluted." He explains that this is key to Jackson's agenda because "without the second primary, maybe as many as 15 blacks could be elected to Congress, and with their numbers added to the blacks already in Congress, more progressive legislation could be passed for everyone." Jackson feels so strongly about this issue that if the Democratic platform fails to include what he wants on voting rights, he may run as an independent. Walters admits that's a possibility. "Jackson would lose his leverage if he said flatly that he wouldn't run as an indepen- dent," he explains. However, he thinks this is unlikely "if the Democratic leadership deals fairly with him." JACKSON'S agenda fits into a national black agenda called the People's Platform, which grew out of a year-long series of meetings involving more than 50 black civil rights, religious, business, community, and social organizations. The 55-page plat- form calls for huge cuts in defen- se spending, repeal of recent tax cuts, and restoring social programs with adjustments for inflation. It also calls for specific changes in welfare programs to emphasize education and job training. Jackson will be the chief broker for blacks at the convention, but not the only broker. "The problems are too broad, too much is at stake, for any one person to broker on behalf of the black nation," says Joseph Lowry, president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and chairman of the group which put together the People's Plat- form. "We agree that Jesse Jackson will play a pivotal role at the convention," adds M. Carl Holman, president of the National Urban Coalition and co- coordinator of the People's Plat- form. "But the nominee and the party must also respond . . . to what other black . leaders are saying as well." Holman and others say Jackson and nearly every other black at the conven- tion will be pushing the same agenda - the People's Platform. ALTHOUGH Jackson has had his difficulties with some of the nation's black leaders, there now appears to be an effort to set dif- ferences aside. In fact, it now is difficult to find a black leader who will publi'cly say anything against the Jackson candidacy.' "They have been silenced," says s California's Maxine Waters. "Jackson's campaign has made believers of them - or at least the grass roots have made believers of them." Many political observers won- der what will happen to the tremendous momentum built up by the ever-growing numbers of blacks voting for Jackson. Can that momentum be sustained in November when Jackson is net the nominee? The consensus is that it all depends on the Democratic Party. "Blacks will not come out in huge numbers just to vote against Ronald Reagan. They have to feel they have something to vote for," says Roger Wilkins. if Jackson comes out of the conven- tion enthusiastic, winning some key planks in the platform,,and Mondale has the nomination, and everyone can see that picture of Jesse holding up Mondale's hand and beaming, if blacks can see that enthusiasm and then, if Jackson and other black leaders -get out and stump the country for the Democrats, blacks will again come out tosvote in great numbers. "The Democrats have some impressive black elected officials to field," he adds, citing- especially mayors of some of the country's largest cities. "If all these people get behind the nominee, the knowledge that blacks have something positive tb vote for, coupled with the knowledge of how hostile the Reagan administration has been toward them, then you will see a black voter turnout like you have never seen before." t I) J 7 7 Crockett is a producer National Public Radio. wrote this article for Pacific News Service. wi S fj th he 'he LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Computing procedures disc Hidden policy T HE REAGAN administration is playing a dangerous game in Cen- tral America. It is substituting covert operations for foreign policy and placing American interests above the interests of those that it is ostensibly trying to protect. Reagan is im- plementing his own questionable policy and avoiding the analysis and evaluation that diplomatic arena requires. It was revealed last week that for the last few months, Americans working for the CIA have been super- vising the mining of Nicaraguan har- bors and shipping lanes. The actions represent the first direct American: military involvement in that nation and call forth questions concerning the means exercised by the administration to advance United States interests in the region. Since 1981, the United States has used advisors in Honduras to monitor rebel operations within Nicaragua, but the recent mining involves a direct military commitment. As one Senator noted, the mining "crosses a threshold that brings us closer to a direct con- frontation with Nicaragua." This intensified confrontational Cfndnr%'O : n c ni lnnfl...M-r na -n : i sources within it. This kind of hide- and-go-seek does not befit a diplomatic arena as sensitive as that in Central America. The United States needs a much more conscientious and well- reasoned approach to its policy in the region. An administration official justified the mining saying: "If the country whose ports are being mined is con- sidered responsible for some kind of aggression, in this case support for guerillas in El Salvador, then mining is considered an act of self defense just like any other use of force." However, it is likely that the administration would have difficulty standing behind this reasoning were Nicaragua to mine Long Island Sound in response to American support of rebels in Nicaragua. The mining is also of questionable benefit to American interests. In the last month-and-a-half it has damaged vessels from 6 nations - including a Soviet ship - and brought disapproval from European governments. France, in fact, offered to help the Nicaraguan government clear the shipping lanes of American mines. The mining has raised eyebrows in Europe, strained relations with the Soviets, and done lit- tlen Th CTA igAing to nnawful To the Daily: I am a student in Computer and Communication Sciences 274. As a single parent and a feminist I have found it discriminatory to work within the system of rates and hours at the Computing Cen- ters. Since the rates are lower students are encouraged to use the Computing Centers at night. The lowest rate is from 2 a.m. un- til 7 a.m. which makes it the op- timal time to do work. However, it is unsafe to be on the streets at this time; the noise level in the Computing Centers themselves makes it unlikely for a woman to be heard; there is poor lighting around the centers; the parking is located at an unsafe distance; and access to various centers makes it hard to escape, yet easy for an attacker to hide. Besides if a woman were attacked, it would be considered her fault (being out that late at night, "she was asking for it"). Therefore, women are less likely to use the Computing Centers at night. Thus, we are forced to use our money at a more expensive time, which means we get less ex- perience on the terminals. As a single parent I am forced to findchild-care at the ungodly time of 2 a.m. to 7 a.m. In order not to totally disrupt our lives I am forced to find overnight ac- comodations for my son. I have child-care during the day but I can't take advantage of it because of the high rates. And with the amount of business con- cerns taking up C.P.U. time during the day, the shut-downs are more frequent, and the waits for printouts longer. I see this as a feminist issue because the majority of single parents are women. I also find this system discriminatory against working- class people. A working-class student will probably have to work at night, and therefore she/he cannot takenadvantage of the lower rates, yet she/he is the student least able to buy more computer time. Statistics show that by the turn of the century the majority of those below the best interest of equal opportunity that learning students be exempt from the current rating system. Thus, students would have a flat 24 hour rate. This system could be easily implemented by a section in ccs To the Daily: As a representative body of un- dergraduate computer science students (and computer engineers until a larger organization can be formed in the fall), one of the main respon- sibilities of the Undergraduate Computer Science Organization (UCSO) is to provide the students with reliable information. Such is also the responsibility of the journalist. UCSO is deeply disturbed that this responsibility was not met in the article "Computer merger spurs student questions" (Daily, April 3). It is even more distur- bing that after being notified of the factual errors and vague- ness of certain points, the Daily did not print a correction which would clarify these points. The following is a list of corrections: 1. The name of the new depar- tment is the Department of Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Sciences (EECS). Dr. Gideon Frieder is the Chairper- son of the Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Division within the new department. 2. The statement "but next year all courses will be changed" is false. The courses will remain BLOOM COUNTY computer identification numbers representing our student status. The University has stated that it has a commitment to women in the sciences. If it truly wishes to help women it will stop this discriminatory practice. If you questions cleaj the same, only the course num- bers will change. 3. There is no "new plan" scheduled to start in the fall. The Computer Science and Computer Engineering degree programs will not change until the faculty of the CSE Division, with the in- put of students through the un- dergraduate organization, vote on changes. Like all other degree requirement changes, students will have the option of applying the new requirements to their degree program. 4. Computer Engineering students will remain in the College of Engineering and Com- puter Science students will remain in the College of We encourage our rea discuss and respond to Whether those topics co bor community, state, n issues in a straightforw manner, we feel such aa tion of the Daily. Let should be typed, triple-sr . . rimina te agree with me please mention this to others, as only by making people aware of the problem can we hope to correct it. -Robyn Maynard April4 red up Literature, Science, and the Ants. A core of common lower level classes will be developed. We hope that this letter clears any misunderstandings or con- fusion caused by the original ar- tile. If there are any further questions, please leave a note, in the UCSO mailbox in the CCSpf- fice (221 Angell Hall). UCSO Nyill be happy to answer them where possible or refer the question to people who can. -Allen Falcon John Underhill Janet Onstott Oscar Lankford April5 ders to use this space to issues of their concern. ver University, Ann Ar- ational, or international yard or unconventional . dialogue is a crusial fun- ters and guest columns paced, and signed. by Berke Breathed SURPRI% ST Vie P1NNR"5 ON 7W-,J ..ANP A MYsE F I THO6H uTT1.e THE BACK (41NP0W MOTHER. Wtf H A ORICK. o \ 0I Q/' 11f " . r OH5T BA AHAY. ROUG&H PAY. NEED 10 UNWIN .. 0 Y&R...TONWI tT' 7rNE'RMIY I5 56T... 0 0f _O DM2W 1 A COUPLE OF A WTrn. TV., AI M EL ... 516H,,. I I YOU XWW T i