ARTS The Michigan Daily Tuesday, January 17, 1984 Page 5 No By Joseph Kraus B EFORE YOU read this review, you should realize first, that you can jurge all stories the same way. Second, when you're judging the tradition of Jewish storytelling, you're in another ball park altogether. With that in mind, we can talk about Joseph Buloff and the stories he told Saturday night. Buloff is certainly a fantastic storyteller. Note, however, that he tells Jewish stories. That's not a judgement at all, simply a clarification. A Jewish story differs from a goyish story, in two important ways. First,. there is less emphasis on a punch line or resolution. Like all stories, a Jewish story creates tension, comic or other- wise, but because of the lighter em- phasis on resolution, this tension is not fully resolved. Somebody not ac- customed to Jewish stories might feel almost cheated at this. However, the second distinction more than makes up for the first. Most of the humor in a Daily Photo by DAN HABIB Joseph Buloff intrigues his audience Saturday night with his stories of Jewsish history. wive's Jewish story comes from the way the characters look at life and each other. In other words, a Jewish story is. a celebration of its characters, their foibles, and ultimately what makes them loveable. Enough technical talk, I want now you should hear the good stuff. Buloff'put on a very good show. He began by reading a story in Yiddish. He made clear in his introduction that he felt torn between doing the entire show in Yiddish for the sake of those in the audience who could speak the language, and therefore longed to hear it, or to do the show in English so that he could share that world with more people. His compromise was to read only one five-minute story in Yiddish, but even then he didn't forsake his English speaking audience. He read the story with such vigor and with so many "noises" that obviously couldn't have been a part of the language, that even we English speakers were gept enter- tained. He followed by reading another story, this time in English, and then moved in- to several anecdotes about the Yiddish theater, which had its heyday almost a century ago. Buloff was himself an actor most of his life, but, he said, "I became an actor accidently. If you want to know that I had any outstanding qualities (when I was a youth), the answer is no. I used to get a 'one' (for my grade in school), you know, the worst ever... (but) I was the best in reciting poetry." Comparing his current career as a storyteller with his earlier one as an ac- tor both on Broadway and the movies, he said, "I like better playing theater, but I know one thing (about the storytelling), if it's a good audience, they like it. I entertain them in a serious way by telling them something they already know but never talk about." An important part of ]uloff's work is reminding people of the artistic con- tributions that the Jewish people have made. "The Jews had great writers and ,some of their things are great tales things-extraordinary things-but they starved to death," he said. Buloff was somewhat evasive when it came to predicting the future of Yiddish culture. "Who can foretell, we don't know what may happen. .. I'm not the man to judge, nobody can judge," he said. He went on to say, "However, I'm not a pessimist so I should tell you something that would be a more positive thing-you see there are two things (in this world), one thing I don't know, the other I don't like. What will happen I don't know; what happened everybody knows but doesn't like. I am in the midst of it." In short, Buloff gave us a picture of another world, about which he said, "We are all very far away from that world, that world does not exist any more." But through his stories, Buloff made that world live again, at least for Satur- day night's audience. The movie that.was a fop By Emily Montgomery VERY ONCE in a while a movie comes along which is exciting, spgctacular, captivating; and a "must- see" for viewers of any age or gender. The Man Who Loved Women is not -such a film. As I watched The Man Who Loved Women I found it hard trying to picture just who the intended viewer was. I could not imagine any females enjoying it. I was highly offended, myself, by its ignorant depiction of women as sex- starved, mindless devotees to this one man (Burt Reynolds), who changes partners as often as he changes socks and he does both with about the same amount of consideration. So, it's meant for the male (T & A) viewer, then, correct? Not unless he has a very vivid imagination. There is only one real skin scene and even that is not explicit enough to endear the film to this type of viewer. What kind of viewer would enjoy it then? Well, that's just the question I pondered while watching TMWLW. } The movie certainly did not offer any other, distraction. The conclusion I finally came to was that nobody would enjoy it.. Blake Edwards has directed some hilarious comedies in the past (10, Vic- tor/Victoria, and of course seven Pink Panther films). So what went wrong this time? ' The main problem is believability. The Man Who Loved Women has none. Eight women, if my count is right (and 'it: was implied that there were many, ,many more), fall completely in love with, and practically donate their bodies at the drop of a hat (or shall we say pants) to a man, Burt, who they have just barely met. Yet they feel no jealousy whatsoever toward one another when they find out that there are others. C'mon, Blake, you don't really expect us to swallow that, now do you? These women would be scratching each other's eyes out, not hugging and comforting each other about their common loss. And while we are speaking of believability-what about that krazy glue scene? Krazy glue might be "powerful enough to hold a man suspended in air," but one little tube could not possibly glue Burt's feet to a rug, his hand to his mouth, his other hand to a dog, and a woman to his belt. There are limits, you know. Despite all this inconceivable ac- tivity, The Man Who Loved Women still manages to drag in places, most noticeably in the scenes between David (Burt) and his psychiatrist (Julie An- drews). The only mildly exciting part conmes when David meets up with the mayor of Houston's nymphomaniac wife (Kim Basinger) who molests David in every possible setting: a carwash, a race track, while getting written up for a speeding ticket; this woman knows no shame. Julie Andrews as David's psychiatrist is as interesting as lint. She tries to cure him of his girl- collecting tendencies and ends up, as is the inevitable fate of every woman in this film, in his bed, babbling of her un- deniable devotion to him. David throws her on the pile with the rest of his conquests and is once again hot on the heels of all woman-kind. I think a bet- Reynolds, and Andrews bore audiences with their listless, predictable romance in Edward Blake's latest film 'The Man Who Loved Women.' ter title for this film would be The Man Who Used Women. And now a look at the hairy chest who supposedly inspired all this rampant admiration, David Fowler (Burt Reynolds). Burt, as David, does as well as could be expected from any man with this extremely demanding part. However, Reynold's performance isn't, nor should it have been expected to be strong enough to carry the weight of this slow moving, highly improbably film. As should have been self-evident with the remake of Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless, redoing French films is not always such a good idea. Blake Ed- ward's explanation for deciding to do The Man Who Loved Women after Truf- faut's film of the same title was that he wanted to raise some questions as to whether the lead (David) was'a "lover or a womanizer." Unfortunately, after watching this movie the only question raised in the viewer's mind is why he just wasted $4 and two hours of his time on this literally impossible, outwardly in- sulting film? 1984 HOP WOOD, UNDERC LAS SMAN A WARD Academy of American Poets Bain-Swiggett and Michael R. Gutterman Poetry Awards Roy W. Cowden Memorial Fellowship READING BY NOVELIST WILLIAM GADDIS AUTHOR OF "The Recognitions"JR OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Wednesday, January 18, 4:00 p.m. Rackham Lecture Hall (main floor) 11 Licad's performance has a competitive edge y Anne Valdespino ROM THE MOMENT she stepped F'on stage Saturday night, pianist Cecile Licad gripped the audience with her commanding presence. The opening unison passage of Beethoven's Sonata in D Major Opus 10 was executed with a sure touch. Her solid attacks were later tempered with quiet releases in more lyric moments. Although not exceptional, her ren- dition of the piece was confident, clean aid faithful to the score; all qualities which might be attributed to the in- fluence of her former teacher Rudolf Serkin. aBut this careful approach dissap- peared when she beganthe first of four works on the recital by Frederic Chopin. A new surge of self-assurance changed her whole demeanour and revealed a phenomenal technique as she brought hands to the keyboard to begin the Scherzo in B Major. Using relaxation -rather than force she balanced and redistributed her up- per body weight as skillfully as a supreme master of the martial arts. This natural strength flowed through her arms in abundance when she played full chords in both hands but was withheld, concentrated in the finger- tips, to play passages marked delicatissimo that virtually fluttered away. During the Ballade in g minor Licad proved her interpretive powers were also exceptionally mature. In contrast to the usual sentimental self-indulgence of many of today's young virtuosos, no lesser phrases were overdone. Focusing on long bass lines for direc- tion, Licad moved the piece forward in sweeping dramatic gestures. This was the delight of her Chopin playing-its great continuity and expert timing. In contrast to the intensity of her Chopin set, Licad's selection of Scliumann's Carnival to end the THE UNERST program was just for fun. She painted colorful tone pictures of each character in the short vignettes; among them the dreamy Eusebius, ardent Florestan and passionate Chiarina. In Pierrot, Arlequin and all of the waltzes her elegant ease in performing difficult leaps made her as thrilling to watch as a graceful tightrope walker. But in this performance Licad's magnificent artistry was often over- shadowed by her unusual stage depor- tment. A smile rarely escaped her lovely face. Eye contact with the audience was kept to a minimum while she crossed the stage and was com- pletely impeded by her long dark hair which continually fell like a curtain in front-of her. This certainly could not represent the behavior -that won her the Leventritt Medal. But perhaps for Licad the con- test is not over. Her choice of a strenuous program and encore (Chopin's Revolutionary Etude) coup- led with her severe manner may be making a statement about the unyielding pressures of an early suc- cess. Daily Classifieds Bring Results An AlternativeP Art xprience y. '- f1"e e V - I University Artist and Craftsmen Guild Calligraphy Acrylic Painting vv VIIE C 5 5LS moss meeting TONIGHT 1T ANN:1ARBOR i INDIVIDUAL THEATRES -5+ Ave ofLberty 761-0700 1:00 P.M. MATINEES MON. THRU FRI. $1 .50 TUESDAY ALL DAY - t I f Drawing 1&2 Ceramics Bookbinding Drawing on Right Side Silk screening on Fabric of the Brain Graphic Design Weaving Leaded Glass Quilting qr t M