C I te LiEi Wan 1E3ail1 SVol. XCIII - No. 1 Ann Arbor, Michigan - Thursday, September 8, 1983 Page 15-A r 'U' investments s By BILL SPINDLE The University used its corporate voting power this year to reject a proposal for a nuclear freeze, to support the production of nuclear weapons, and to support the sale of oil to the South African Government. These investment decisions, however, were made by University administrators without any consideration of their potential ethical con- sequences. AS AN INVESTOR in many corporations, the University votes on a variety of. shareholder resolutions each year that encompass a broad range of social issues. And almost without ex- ception, administrators vote with management - against the resolution - because the Univer- sity Regents have never told them not to. This year the University voted every share of its $1.7 million in General Electric Company against a resolution asking the company to stop its production of nuclear weapons and support a bilateral nuclear freeze. By voting against the resolution, the Univer- sity rejected the proponents position that the production of nuclear weapons is promoting an arms race and making nuclear war more likely. THE UNIVERSITY also voted its $1.6 million of shares in Motorola Company against a proposal that would have banned oil sales to the military and police of the apartheid gover- nment in South Africa. Proponents of the resolution argued that the police and military are "the instruments by which the South African Government enforces apartheid," and that oil was a key to that en- forcement. The proposal asked Motorola to enforce a stricter embargo on oil sales to South Africa than the U.S. government requires. THE UNIVERSITY sided with Motorola's u portI management, who said that the policy would amount to a criticism of U.S. foreign policy. It is not the place of private corporations to criticize foreign policy, the management said. With neither of these two decisions, however, did anyone at the University research or debate the issues involved. Administrators, in compliance with a 1978 Regents resolution, simply voted in favor of management because the Regents never told them to do otherwise. Investment officer Norman Herbert, who casts the University's votes on the resolutions, said that his office is instructed to consider only the financial implications of proposals. It is up to the Regents to decide on resolutions in- volving social or ethical issues, he said. NONE OF THE REGENTS interviewed, however, knew of the specific resolutions the University voted on, although several said they were aware of what types of issues are brought up in shareholders' resolutions. iuclear In fact, the Regents have specifically asked that the investment office not inform them of what resolutions the University votes on each year, said James Brinkerhoff, University vice president and chief financial officer. Herbert also said he does not inform the Regents of each year's resolutions. To get that, information, the Regents would have to ask for it specifically or have citizens bring it to them at the public comments section of each Regents meeting, Herbert said. AS PART OF a 1978 resolution on investment issues, the Regents instructed administrators to vote with management on social issues unless the resolutions involve "serious moral or ethical questions which are of concern to many members of the University community." In cases where "serious moral or ethical questions" are involved, the Regents decide personally which way the University should vote. weapons The only cases the Regents have ever con- sidered, however, are resolutions involving South Africa. And even here the policy lacks the breadth to allow administrators to consider many resolutions, including sales to the South African government. THE SOUTH AFRICAN issues are only the exceptions to the Regents' policy of voting with management because they are the only issues on which there is broad agreement among the community, said Regent Thomas Roach (D- Saline). "I have not felt any issue out there that en- joys the consensus that the South African issue did and I don't see any on the horizon at the moment," he said. The strict policy on voting with management is based on two assumptions, several Regents said. THE FIRST IS that the primary purpose of See 'U', Page 7 E0 Engineering I may cut Humanities Department By JIM SPARKS Tucked away in the College of Engineering is a department where students study Chaucer, Shakespeare, and the films of Ingmar Bergman. That department is on the way to elimination, because the college feels teaching engineering students .liberal arts should not be part of its business. BUT AS THE recommendation for closure nears, faculty in the humanities department face an uncertain future. "My understanding is, come Septem- ber the department will simply cease to exist...obviously the question we have is where do we go and what do we do then," said Gorman Beauchamp, an associate professor of humanities. If the department is closed, LSA would gradually take over the task of teaching humanities to the 4,000 engineering students. THE FATE of the department is not completely sealed, but administrators and faculty do not expect a reprieve in the next month or two. The University will recommend closing the depar- tment to the Regents in September, and "unless some unanticipated infor- mation emerges...the recommendation will go forward," said Robert Holbrook, associate vice president for academic affairs. Although some of the humanities professors will probably stay in the college if the department is closed, teaching courses on Technology and Society and technical writing, the future of the 11 literature professors is upin the air. A panel which reviewed the depar- tment suggested instituting freshman composition courses in the college. which some of the literature professors could teach, but that idea has received little discussion lately. "The primary difficulty with that is they clearly believe themselves to be, and definitely are, capable of teaching things beyond that level," said Charles Vest, associate dean of engineering. IF PROFESSORS are not able to find jobs within the college, a likely "solution" is that some may either retire early or leave for jobs elsewhere. Seven of the current members of the department will reach the age of 65 by 1991, and although the mandatory retirement age is 69, the University may offer incentives to get professors to retire early. "Obviously a person whose program is being whittled away may find retirement attractive," Holbrook said. Holbrook said if professors are reluc- tant to accept the reduced benefits which come with early retirement, the University may negotiate supplements for them. If some professors receive job offers for less than they make now, the University may come up with paymen- ts to lessen the difference, he said. TRYING TO get professors to retire early can be a tricky business, however. ThebUniversity can present it as an option to the whole group of professors, but it cannot lean on in- dividual faculty members to retire against their wishes, according to Wilfred Kaplan, president of the local American Association of University Professors chapter. "It is improper for the administration to approach someone and say, 'we would like you to retire early'...it's illegal and against University policy because it's discrimination on the basis of age," he said. Under a review panel's plan, engineering students would take their humanities education in LSA in a gradual process. As engineering professors retired, LSA instructors would be hired to replace them, and students would be transferred over. SOME PROFESSORS may find jobs in LSA, but that will Abe decided on a See HUMANITIES, Page 6 z_. oily Photo by ELIZABETH SCOTT When students left school last April, the inset photo shows about what the new ice cream shop in the Union basement looked like. This summer, Daily Photo by DOUG McMAHON however, the shop along with six other fast-food restaurants opened for business. Union s new look nearly Complete By KAREN TENSA By the time students finish paying for remodeling the Michigan Union, it might be time to renovate the building again. Every year until theyear 2007, $15 of each University student's tuition will subsidize Union . renovations. But students won't totally lose out. The renovations include six fast-food restaurants in the Union basement which are expected to open in September, said John Christodoulou, food services manager for the Union. CONSTRUCTION HAS been behind schedule, Christodoulou said, adding that the restaurants may not be open until October. Currently, the main student attraction to the Union is the automatic bank machine in the basement and the Space Invaders video game in the lobby. The renovations, in part, are intended to change students' attitudes toward the Union and make the building the "center of campus activities," like it was in the early '50s, said Union Director Frank Cianciola. After its heyday in the '50s the quality of the Union, as well as the number of students using it, began to decline. By the late 70s "the Union began to look like a bus or subway station, especially in the basement," Cianciola said. NOW, HOWEVER, Cianciola hopes that "in- creased activities in the building will benefit students and the Union." When the renovations are complete, students will be able to grab a snack at one of the six fast-food counters in the Union basement. The restaurant village will feature a separate counter for ham- burgers, deli-sandwiches, pizza, ethnic food, salads, and of course, ice cream. ALTHOUGH STUDENT complaints about deteriorating building conditions and lack of services in the Union prompted the renovations, many studen- ts were critical of the changes when higher rent rates forced the University Cellar, a non-profit, student- run bookstore, to move out of the Union basement last summer. The cellar moved to the corner of Division and Liberty Streets when the Union raised rent as part of the renovations. The fast-food restaurants now oc- cupy the Cellar's space. Another sacrifice of the renovations was losing the more than 50-year-old bowling alley in the Union basement. THE ALLEY, used mostly by West Quad residents living next door to the Union, was replaced by a $230,000 computing center dubbed UNYN. (Some students insisted the center be called BOWL in remembrance of the alley. UNYN will supplement the main computing cen- ters on Central and North: Campuses as well as draw more students to the Union, Cianciola said. Another key part of the renovations was the Cam- pus Information Center (CIC) desk in the lobby. CIC keeps central records of Campus events and concert information. CIANCIOLA SAID the renovations were carefully See UNION, Page 6 __j Campus gc By JACKIE YOUNG "The day I was 'out' was the day I looked in the mirror and said, 'let's face it hun, you're queer,' " said a lesbian at a workshop during Lesbian and Gay Pride Week last June. But for many attending the workshop, dealing with their homosexuality didn't come as easily. "I thought it was a problem I'd over- come," said one gay man. "I got married at 17, to a high school sweetheart because I thought that would cure it." ONLY AFTER a long and aggravating divorce was he able to admit to himself and some relatives and friends that he was gay. Still, he said, "it can be really tough if you are feminine and ma1 - vnu inut don't tys come out professors, fearing they will lose their job or be denied access to graduate s school.I Even during Gay Pride Week, when a homosexuals were fighting the d discrimination that has kept them hiding, gays expressed fears of being v discovered.I "I HAVE FEARS of my co-workersC and bosses finding out, fears of beinga seen in public even though I'm out,"e said one lesbian. "I'm afraid somebodys that I know, who doesn't know I'm out, will see it."s One gay man added: "I have a reasonable idea that if I told my em-a ployers I was gay, I would run in toc problems. I want to avoid the incon-I venience (of being 'out')," he said. r Another gay man talked about thes sneoia1 nrnhlms nf ga vstudents. politically Using a rally last winter as a base for support, organizers helped to form the Lesbian and Gay Rights on Campus organization (LaGROC) to fight gay discrimination on campus. This February, after a long debate on where to go for insurance that homosexuals on campus will not be discriminated against, LaGROC decided to approach the University executive officers, said LaGROC spokesman Bruce Aaron. With financial support from the student government, the Michigan Student Assembly, LaGROC prepared a paper outlining the goals of the organization and the need for a "formal policy" to protect the rights of homosexuals on campus. The paper said that the University's bylaws chn iar in1,n a a il a inrntintin I