0 OPINION . , A V k M Page 4 Thursday, April 7, 1983 The Michigan Daily' ------------ Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Wasserman WTRtD UTS COMMIS4TS N~ fAWD TNRAEWs OQUR, K NATIOWAUiz MStND N3Nl FRECH PTRADITON OFOUINSSS.. RIDEPENDENT ?OUT~Ic A T1LITY 1w INSTY M :. ,. . , , . , ,. X " 0 ; *! M- M w t' r w k Vol. XCIII, No. 148 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board In defense of peace +!/ a. it4 cam,,, / ,. ALTHOUGH A committee of U.S. Roman Catholic bishops toned down its anti-nuclear arms statement, the revised version is still a long- overdue, and forceful anti-nuclear ar- ms statement. If the bishop's commit- tee can agree finally on a draft of the letter, the task will be to use the statement to form a unified stance toward achieveing the ultimate goal of disarmament. The new 150-page draft of the letter backs off of the previous versions' total opposition to any use of nuclear arms, but repeats its call for total opposition to nuclear war and first strikes. The bishops stood firm on their resolve to protect noncombatants from any nuclear attack. The letter also makes a major con- tribution to the discussion on nuclear arms and nuclear war because of its concern for the welfare of the masses of people who would be killed in a nuclear attack. The statement distinguishes itself from most other, commentary on the likelihood of nuclear war - which has focused primarily on the conflict between the Soviet bloc and the West. If the bishops maintain that con- cern for people, rather than political entities then they probably have the best chance for contributing to the push for disarmament. But if they get themselves mired in the political debates, their statement could be doomed to become simple rhetoric. Keeping politics out of the bishop's letter will be a difficult task because the impact the bishops seek is largely political itself. Nationally, the im- mediate goal of the statement has to be to persuade the Reagan administration to soften its position on nuclear arms negotiations. Internationally, the goal is to demonstrate to the Europeans that U.S. citizens want to end this nuclear madness, with or without the support of the government. It is too much to ask that one statement, no matter how eloquent, be able to accomplish all that it sets out to do. Thatis why the bishops need to con- tinue their work toward disarmament long after this letter has yellowed at the corners. OU \ SPNING.. f/el- 1ND WEM PNC aU RU RIND4o NOW EtMoS CURREN C oWToLItT CZN MAN W 'L I AVE iTo VACATION L.. .4 d ~0 ' / a N _ ' N Q . Q 0 / fV LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Cutting humanities: The price is high' Forsaken ideals W HEN ROBERT MUGABE was elected prime minister of racially divided Zimbabwe more than three years ago, he received instant in- ternational acclaim for preaching a theme of national conciliation. Now, Mugabe is more and more backing away from political dialogue and back to violent political conflict. After years of struggle and great bloodshed, whites and blacks in Zim- babwe (then Rhodesia) agreed in 1979 to lay down their arms and work together to form a black majority government. The settlement was hailed as proof that bitter political and racial divisions could be worked out at negotiating tables, instead of on the battlefield. Recent events have changed both that perception and the political climate in Zimbabwe. Violent conflicts have broken out in one province where several whites have been killed and just recently, Mugabe's one-time ally and now chief rival Joshua Nkomo, fled the country under threats from the government. In his quest for a one party state, Mugabe has increasingly ignored or attempted to trample on dissent, be it from the white minority or Nkomo's rival faction. While much of the strife has arisen out of deep political and ethnic division, instead of trying to allay fears and alienation, Mugabe has embarked on a hardline course. in which he asserts that only military force can bring about a resolution to the recent conflicts. Clearly, the embattled prime minister has forgotten the past, has forgotten how he himself forged a workable compromise in the war-torn nation. Now he talks of war, instead of negotiations. And rather than form a coalitional government or invite Nkomo -or his associates into his cabinet, Mugabe has booted them out and further polarized the nation. If Zimbabwe is to survive as an example of successful and useful political dialogue in an extremely volatile situation, it will only do so on the basis under which it achieved in- dependence. But if its leaders refuse to follow the path they originally set for themselves, Zimbabwe will join the long list of other nations who have for- saken their original revolutionary ideals for authoritarianism. To the Daily: At this point, I am not prepared to respond to particular points expressed in the review commit- tee's report on humanities depar- tment of the College of Engineering. However, I will say that I do not find the report at all responsive to the issues. In that sense it both disturbs and per- plexes me. That is, the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the Dean and Executive Committee of the College of Engineering formed the commit-, tee to seek ddvice on issues con-. cerning the administrative future of the department. The charges to the committee were quite specific - indeed overly so in the eyes of a number of people - but specific nonetheless. Moreover, the criteria for evaluating alter- natives were clear: quality, cen- trality, and cost-effectiveness. In their response to these charges the committee has given advice which does not really deal direc- tly with the issues raised in the charge or with the criteria. They have given advice not on the ad- ministrative issues but upon. curricular issues. What perplexes me par- ticularly is the question of how Vice President Billy Fyre and the dean and executive committee can act on advice which is so heavily curricular. Curriculum is, after all, the responsibility of the faculty, not of the ad- ministration. Thus I cannot imagine what the administrative officers will make of the report which recommends that we cease offering Great Books instruction and that we replace it with Freshman Composition. Certainly, it is true that the report indirectly addresses issues of quality, centrality, and cost-effectiveness. However, these issues are really handled explicitly only in the appendices of the report, and it is clear that at least quality and cost- effectiveness were not major fac- tors in the committee's thinking. A lternatives to the norm To the Daily: I would like to acknowledge and thank all the attendants, sponsors, participants, and especially the organizers of the Alternative Career Fair, held April 1 and 2. The Fair, held as an annual event, is a valuable means of providing information and access to people and organizations involved in socially concious work. The fair gives students incentive to search out wavs of making a living after In short, the committee was asked their responses on two quite specific questions and was given three criteria by which to evaluate alternative answers. It appears to me that they have not really addressed any of that ex- plicitly in their report. If we leave aside the question of how the recommendations of the review committee might be im- plemented by the administration, it is clear nonetheless that-if implemented-these recommen- dations would result in a great loss for the engineering college faculty and students. If the recommendations are followed, a lot Df faculty members and staff who have served the University well would be very unfairly treated; a lot of students would find their choices of curriculum diminished. Moreover, we would have thrown away a program which has established a solid national reputation in terms of both curriculum and scholarship. The price of the long review procedure has been high already; the further price which one can envision as the possible result of the review report seems in- tolerable. --Dwight W. Stevenson Chairman, humanities department College of Engineering April 1 4 e f}y, b? 1 a+ { ! V Reviewing Daily coverage ' v w To the Daily: I appreciate - I think - the coverage the Daily gave to the meeting of the engineering college faculty meeting at which the review report on the future of the humanities department was discussed ("Humanities prof. at- tacks review committee's plan" Daily, April 6). However, two points about my presentation must be clarified. First, I am misquoted - and in bold face yet. The sentence at- tributed to me is missing two words whose omission makes syntactic hash of what I said; and since I do, on most occasions, use the English language with some precision, I would like to offer the sentence as I wrote and read it: "We cannot believe that a single faculty memberhof that commit- tee - indeed, of this university - would personally accept the role that they envision for us as one with any dignity or profesional viability." A poor thing, perhaps, but mine own. Second, and more important, much of theastatement that I read for the literature faculty of the department was conditional: that is, if x, then y. This distinction is crucial because I did not state that it was the desire of this faculty to be transferred to LSA - the impression left by your ac- count. Rather, I argued that if all our students are transferred to LSA for humanities instruction, then a good-faith effort must be made to transfer the faculty as well. I do not necessarily desire the transfer of either - nor do most of my colleagues. I and they are committed to continuing to do what we have been doing - teaching in the engineering college. The decision about that, however, is not ours to make; but if x, then y. Unconditionally, however, we urged the rejection of the entire report because it would result in an enormous waste to the engineering college and the University or our experience, training and ability. For anyone interested in the full statement of our position, copies of it are available from the humanities department office. Finally, I hope it will not seem. presumptuous of me to suggest to your reporter that he missed the real story from this meeting. That the literature faculty would urge the rejection of this report is a case of dog bites man. That one of the committee members, Prof. Root, repudiated the report at the meeting - now that's a case of man bites dog. Doesn't the Daily know news when it sees it? - Prof. Gorman Beauchamp April 6 Unsigned editorials appearing on the left side of this page represent a majority opinion of the .Daily's Editorial Board. Letters and columns represent the opinions of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the attitudes or beliefs of the Daily. t E' U t to t 4 r ' -S 5 " t" 1 4 . $H y M d M F tr f A N t 1 e 1 F 4 ' F 4 Y * s iY b f d bh 4 i i f} } i 6 i M R Y f i s 4Pt f f U " W 4p J' d A X M p w iF t M i i q rte. * 1 t *UaiEuu1invA~ I ~ I ~ I' I I I ~