4 OPINION Page 4 Sunday, January 9, 1983 The Michigan Daily Decisions on a forest and a fire A FTER MONTHS of demonstrations, investigations, and rumors, the verdict finally came: The University's top budget committee had recommended massive changes-and massive budget cuts-at the School of Natural Resources. The proposals of the Budget Priorities Com- mittee, made public Thursday, would cut the school's budget by 30 percent, greatly reduce the number of undergraduates in the school's programs, and place a greater emphasis on the school's doctoral program. Several natural resources faculty mem- in Review.r bers-including the school's outgoing dean- said the proposed cuts are too large and that a 20 percent cut is the most that would allow the school to achieve quality. Other faculty mem- bers criticized the entire review process and suggested that the BPC knew all along how much it wanted to cut from the school's budget. Other faculty members were critical of the committee's decision to de-emphasize doctoral programs at the expense of master's programs. The professors said that shift showed great ignorance of the employment needs of students. Reaction from students in the school was immediate and largely critical. "I'm not satisfied at all with the results of the report," said Jeff Cox, a student who had helped organize support for the school during the U' v. state I N THE LONG history of the divestment controversy, the traditional standoff has been between the University and the students. The 1970s were a highpoint of student protest against the University's policy of investing in companies working in racially segregated South Africa. But for the 1980s, the new showdown may be between the University and the state. The con- flict hinges on legislation signed last month by former Gov. Milliken-and sponsored by Rep. Perry Bullard (D-Ann Arbor)-which requires the University to withdraw all holdings in com- panies connected to South Africa. But, just as it ignored student pleas, the University may decide to ignore the new law. Administrators and Regents question the con- stitutionality of the legislation, since the Michigan constitution states that the Regents have "control and direction of all expenditures from the institution's funds." Bullard, however, claims that the state can enforce what it considers civil rights legislation. The University can either obey the law, take the state to court, or do nothing until the 1984 compliance deadline and wait for the state to make the first move. Although the Regents are unsure what their next move will be, one thing's for certain. The University really doesn't seem to care much what anyone else-be it a student or a state senator-thinks about its divestment policies. Blanchard's problem O NLY NINE days into his first term as governor, James Blanchard has a problem-a $700 million problem. That's the size of the state's budget deficit and it does not bode well for Michigan or the University. The $700 million shortfall means the state Wasserman 4 4 Arroyo: Receives sentence probably will have to slash some of its programs and take more from taxpayers in or- der to balance its budget as required by state law. If past actions are any indication, the state will undoubtedly use funds set aside for state universities and colleges to mop up a significant portion of the state's red ink-funds this university says it can't afford to give up. "We're already trying to absorb enormous decreases as it is," runs the lament of the University's top liaison with the state Richard Kennedy. "We're hard pressed to figure where we can cut this place anymore." Kennedy and friends had . better start figuring a little harder. Tax hike or no, state House Speaker Gary Owen said the cuts in state funded programs this year will be large- significantly larger than last year's cut of $15 million to the University. State budget officials said they hope the governor will be able to come up with some hard figures and proposals by the end of the month. In the meantime, University officials are planning for the worst and waiting to see where the ax will fall.l A final plea JUST MORE THAN one year after the Economics Building burned to the ground, Arthur Arroyo last week was sentenced to five to 10 years in prison for lighting the match. His conviction effectively swept away the last reminder of the Christmas Eve tragedy. With Arroyo off to Jackson and out of the headlines and with the grass growing thick and green where the historic building used to stanc on the Diag, there will be no hint to incoming freshmen about the year-long drama. Soon forgotten will be Arroyo's tearful testimony during the trial, his sad accounts of drifting from city to city during his early adulthood looking for answers to why he just didn't "fit in." In the end, during his sentencing last Friday in Ann Arbor's downtown Circuit Court, Judge Henry Conlin listened to Arroyo make a firal plea for sympathy. "I have serious personal problems I have yet to overcome," the 31-year- old former University employee told Conlin.."I realize now that I am not capable of living freely in society-please sentence me in a way that can best enable me to do so." Then Conlin read his sentence, two con- secutive terms-one for the arson, the other for earlier breaking into the building and stealing a typewriter-with the promise of protection from other prisoners. The Week in Review was compiled by Daily staff writers Julie Hinds, David4 Meyer, Kent Redding, and Charles Thom- son. Bullard: Ignored By 'U'? review process. "I think all of my efforts have fallen short-it hasn't paid off much." Said another natural resources student: "Nothing really surprised me . . . We're ob- viously not going to sit back and say that's what we expected, but we were really not sur- prised." The next round in the saga will come January 17, when the University's executive officers will consider the BPC recommendations. Stay tuned. Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Vol. XCIII, No. 81 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board Chesbrough's decision I I-I'r aM' L An, HIM I V. 4 EVERY ONCE in a great while a political issue is decided by the vote or actions of just one politician. Such is the case with the city's marijuana law and Councilmember Joyce Chesbrough. For a while, of course, it had seemed that Ann Arbor's liberal pot law, which sets the fine for possession of marijuana at $5, was relatively safe. The efforts of an anti-marijuana citizen's group had ended in apparent failure; the group was able to get only 2,000 of the 5,200 signatures necessary to place a proposal to change the law on the city ballot. But when the group changed its tac- tics and decided to press the city coun- cil to put the issue on the ballot, the tables turned. It would take seven of the council's 11 members to place a proposal on the city ballot. With all four Democrats firmly against the proposal, the anti- marijuana group needs every one of the seven Republicans to win. This week, with the help of Republican Chesbrough, the anti- marijuana group might get just what it needs. Until a week ago, Chesbrough was the only Republican on the council who had not announced open support for putting the proposal on the ballot. The Fifth Ward Republican said that she didn't feel strongly on the issue, but that she was inclined toward suppor- ting the existing law. Unfortunately, Chesbrough has now _ It decided that instead of being an in- dependent-minded councilmember committed to the views for which she was elected, she will be an obedient Republican caucus-member and go along with the mayor on this one. Chesbrough has indicated that when the issue comes up for a vote before tomorrow night's council meeting, she will vote to put the anti-marijuana proposal on the ballot. Chesbrough may have made her decision to smooth things over for the Republicans on the council, but here reasoning is shortsighted. In the long run, she is letting her party in for more trouble than she knows. Mayor Louis Belcher saw the poten- tial danger last year when he backed off the marijuana issue in the first place. He recognized that a proposal to end the city's lenient marijuana laws could draw swarms of students to the polls-swarms of students, that is, who are inclined to vote Democratic. After a brief flirtation with the anti- marijuana faction, Belcher withdrew, apparently content to leave the marijuana laws-and the student voting patterns-just as they are. We certainly harbor no special fon- dness for the Republicans on the coun- cil or for the current level of student voter apathy. We are fond, however, of the state's most progressive drug laws, and we urge Chesbrough to save her- self a lot of trouble and change her mind. Quickly. 4 4 : J THE SENA- PRECOGNZES THE Th&TIO&UI.SD GENTLEMRO NRH ARTI The bizarre abduction of Illinois abortion clinic director Hector Zevallos and his wife last August shocked the nation when it exposed the extreme methods that some anti-abortion activists are willing to use. But the kid- napping was only the most dramatic episode in a continuing pattern of violence against abor- tion clinics and personnel, ex- ceeding in severity and frequen- cy the first major outbreak in the late 1970s. Records from the Planned Parenthood Federation (PPF), which has 37 abortion clinic af- filiates, and the National Abor- tion Federation (NAF), which represents 250 clinics nationally, indicate the number of violent at- tacks in the first eight months of 1982 roughly equalled the total number of incidents which oc- curred in the entire three years ending in 1979. Included were firebombings, bomb threats, ar- son and vandalism. NAF director Uta Landy says the figures un- derestimate the problem, as "some clinics simply don't report these incidents because they are taking them for granted." FOLLOWING are examples of violent actions against clinics this vear. An ti-abortion crusade: Frustra tio n to violence By Charles Pu/er be related to feelings of betrayal on the part of "extremists," who4 maintain that President Reagan has not done enough to fulfill his campaign promises about restricting abortion. LEGISLATIVE events regar- ding abortion seem inextricably linked to the current situation. Pierce says, "I would directly at- tribute these attacks to their (an- ti-abortion interests) being th- warted on legal and legislative grounds." Landy agrees, noting -that "it has to do with some level of frustration the opposition feels with being unable to outlaw abor- tion." Majorities in Congress and many state legislatures are holding fast on the issue, presumably fueled by polls con- sistently showing most Americans to be "pro-choice." Another reason for the violent4 tactics may be that, to some ex- tent, they get results. At least five clinics have been temporarily shut down due to arson or van- dalism this year-including three that were destroyed. But the long-term effectiveness of violence or coercion is questionable. In Cincinnati ald elsewhere, PPF clinic personnel are trained regularly in 0 .-"i 1 i s o r I l car into the building. " In August, at Planned Paren- thood of San Joaquin County in Stockton, Calif., vandals flooded examination rooms, disconnec- ted telephones and glued locks. " The Cherry Hill Women's Center in New Jersey was destroyed by a firebomb in Oc- tober. The violence has come on top of increasingly frequent picketing at clinics and harassment of clients and staff-called a "way of life" by an employee of a van- M a n n n PPF af in Florida clinics and one in Virginia. ANOTHER group, Chicago- based Pro-Live Action League (PLAL), has organized many demonstrations against abortion clinics and hospitals. At times, these have included vandalism and a bomb threat, though Joseph Scheidler, head of PLAL, disavows such tactics. He does endorse the use of criminal trespass, however, which has in- volved sit-ins and disruption of clinic activities. . :" '3y r ;