4 OPINION Saturday, March 5, 1983 Page 4 The Michigan Daily e IItd4gau iatj Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Stewart I t1 h4A ~ o'.T TRAT iZlON L-1f I- L~NA_ W YonJ pR Su vN Vol. XCIII, No. 120 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board A fix for the state N LESS THAN 30 minutes, House l Democrats were able to override Republican opposition Wednesday and 'pass a much-needed state income tax hike. But unless Senate Republicans drop their rhetoric and acknowledge the state's long-term budget crisis, a workable solution to the problem will "fail. Third in size to New York's and California's deficits, Michigan's $900 million projected shortfall for 1983 comes on the heels of several years of accumulated deficits totaling an ad- ditional $820 million. In spite of the chronic problem, however, Republicans still insist that the tax hike should only be short-term. The recurring nature of Michigan's fiscal crisis, which Republicans seem tobe ignoring, demonstrates the need for a more permanent solution. State agencies and institutions such as the University cannot reasonably function and formulate rational future plans when their chief source of money is un- stable each and every year. A tax hike would return stability and confidence in state institutions, among those both within and without the state, that is so essential for their long-term success> But by focusing their efforts on a short-term hike, Republicans in the House (who all voted against the hike) also miss the genius of the Democratic plan. The proposal ties the taxation rate to the unemployment rate, a chief indicator of state revenue. As the number of unemployed decreases, so does the tax rate. Once the jobless rate dips below nine percent, the income tax rate will automatically revert to the current rate of 4.6 percent. Such a mechanism provides for stability and would probably almost eliminate the spectre of huge budget cuts that have been a disaster for state programs in the past. Democrats need Republican support in the Senate if the plan is to have any chance for success. The Democratic majority consists of merely two votes in the Senate and in the House, four Democrats crossed over to the Republican opposition. Without bipar- tisan support, the plan will undoub- tedly fail, as will the state's way out of its fiscal quagmire. CAPAPU~t\% /P A ME"xr ~s ,S Tt GRTN c CU T M~7PJ-r TL) A.... I t. 1~ m W~ IDEA (S Mpi. --}vMP !Rt- NOW1 -S oT .'- ( FIREI-FILL iN >c P C a NE6 to{ F S s- ThME oN I t(C- H x--4oCA-I. I I t~ 1 t../ 1 _ I :PLA'41ING WITH US 7"G~I 1 r'^. . ' ./ _. - lN 14 Prison riots: The politics of Recovery of jobs violence or just T HE RECENT surge in the nation's leading economic indicators has led some conservative Republican senators to call the jobs bill just passed by the House unnecessary and a possible hindrance to economic recovery. Critics of the bill need to be reminded that though the recovery may be just getting underway, the jobs bill is still a necessary step to put people back to work and to help stimulate the recovery. The 3.6 percent jump in the indicators is welcome news, but it needs to be seen with caution. These indicators have been rising since February, 1982, but the recovery didn't begin until 1983. Thus, there is much speculation as to just how accurate the predictions are. One good sign was the rate of the in- crease. It was the biggest single jump in over 30 years and the second biggest in the history of the index. : The increase was due in large part to :positive signs from the housing and construction industries, the stock market, and interest rates. But all the signs are not so good. Even the Reagan administration is saying that unemployment is likely to stay above 10 percent through the end of the year. First time unemployment compensation claims rose yet again in the third week of February. And heavy industry is still in decline. So, while some cautious optimism might be called for, cancelling the jobs program is not. The House recognized this by passing the $4.9 billion measure by an overwhelming majority even af- ter hearing the good economic news. The Senate now needs to follow up the House's actions and quickly pass the bill. The sooner the Senate acts, the sooner hundreds of thousands of unemployed people can be put to work-putting money in their pockets to spend and creating tax revenues from those who for so long have only been using tax revenue to survive. By Frank Browning SAN QUENTIN, - These facts are known about America's prisons: They have more inmates than ever before. They are more crowded than they have been in decades. The age of the inmates grows younger every year. Internal racial divisions and antagonisms have reached a new pitch. And there is one more fact: Across the country, there is a new fear rising among guards, inmates and their families that the entire prison system is a bloody explosion just waiting to happen. YET WHEN prisoners at Ossining State Prison in New York seized 17 guards hostage in early January, they not only avoided violence but even chanted insistently, "We don't want another Attica," referring to the outbreak at Attica State Prison 12 years ago that left 43 guards and inmates dead. The dramatic contrast between the peaceful rebellion at Ossining and the gore of Attica and of an uprising at the New Mexico State prison three years ago only underscores how little most outsiders know of the shrouded world of America's prisons. The narrow, specific content of the Ossining . inmates' demands - better food, heating, and exercise space among others - also was an extraordinary counterpoint to the radical "prison movement" of a decade ago that propelled the issue of prisoners' rights into the forefront of American political debate. AMERICA'S prisons, George Jackson and Eldridge Cleaver wrote then, were extensions of the visible territory of . America's dispossessed, crucibles of injustice which would transform themselves into the cauldrons of a new revolutionary political movement. Now, a decade later, George -Jackson is dead, slain in a prison shootout. Eldridge Cleaver has become a clothing designer and a Moonie. Despite steady deterioration of prison conditions, the "prisoner unions" that once proliferated have all but disappeared. John Irwin, a nationally respected sociologist at San Francisco State University and himself an ex-con who has written ex- tensively on prisons, attributes the change to a wholesale shift in the attitudes of both prisoners and the public. "THE POLLS taken after Attica said that people believe the prison administrators were responsible for the violence there," Irwin says. "If the pollsters asked the same thing today, the results would be totally different. The shift in the sympathy of the general public is immense." There is more, Irwin says, than a decline in sympathy, for with it has come a growing social readiness to write off prisoners as people whom society does not need or want and whom it therefore does not care about. The result is that the nation's prisoners are more cut off from the outside world, more atomized, more violent toward each other and toward their keepers. Authorities across the country agree that violent prisoner assaults on each other and against guards have risen sharply in recent years. Beryl Harris, president of Family and Friends of Inmates in New York, is especially alarmed at the volatile conditions she sees mounting in that state's prisons. The old prison movement, she says was diffused by segregating any inmates who demonstrated leadership potential. Former outside support organizations have also disappeared. "I DON'T KNOW how many times inmates here have reached out for community sup- port," she says. "They just can't hook up with anything now. Nobody wants to listen." A worse problem, she fears, is the large in- flux of adolescent inmates whose only ex- perience is violent street life and who refuse to respect any of the standard codes of prison behavior by which most older inmates live. "There is a sense of unity and control in New York prisons, but if anything blows it up, it'll be having these young kids in there...They come in with a do-or-die attitude, an 'It's me against you whether you're a guard or an inmate'attitude." HOW VALID Beryl Harris' fears are is dif- ficult to assess. San Francisco State's John Irwin says that the two state systems to watch are New York and California, where both in- ternal tension and overcrowding are especially high. But Robert Gangi, president of the New York Correctional Association, one of the nation's oldest prison watchdog groups, sees a clear danger of more situations like the ghastly riots that broke out at New Mexico iolence? State Prison where 33 inmates were killed in their cells. "There's no vision inside the prisons these days, no larger community," Gangi says. "When they broke loose in New Mexico, there was no internal organization and the men just went on a rampage and slaughtered each other." TO A CONSIDERABLE degree, Gangi believes, the broader political perspective of prisoner movements in the '60s and 70s helped to channel the anger away from such random violence. Indeed, at San Quentin prison where George Jackson once held heroic status among black inmates, violence has been rising .steadily. Sixty-seven men were injured here in a confrontation that broke out last June between gangs of Hispanic and black inmates. According to lawyer Michael Satras, who runs a nonprofit Prison Law Office for in- mates just outside San Quentin's gates, frustration has been rising. Inmates now are far more restricted than they once were; they are no longer permitted to build closets for their rooms; they may no longer keep pets, and exercise is restricted. "Prisoners are complaining bitterly about what's happened to them," says Satros. "There's a much greater potential for violeh- ce than before." John Irwin says the same volatile situation exists in prisons across America. Where once nearly all prisoners "used to have a strong af- finity for each other - kind of like vets who had been in Vietnam," today there is a "resurgence of the super dog-eat-dog world," he adds. Nevertheless, as the peaceful nature of the Ossining protests suggests, it would be premature to argue that all of America's prisons - and prisoners - are inevitably headed toward horrors like those at New Mexico. Perhaps the only thing that can be said with certainty is that the world inside the peniten- tiary, and the rules which govern it, remain more than ever terra incognita to those out- side. Browning wrote this article for the Pacific News Service. b' .- r- "" "'----- ''' i t s. i,, ;, ; c,., \' ,. ,: s;" + LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Clearing up the myths of To the Daily: Will the University go for gay rights or for it's military assets? "Gays deserve rights," pleaded the Daily (Feb. 18), all the while conceding that gay people on campus are too helpless to win them. Have heart, Daily. Chins- funding" issue is actually a false issue. That is, a University decision to adopt LaGROC's gay rights proposal does not, in reality, mean the loss of military recruiters, ROTC, or military- funded research contracts. How can I say the military decide to bar recruiters. Then the military would issue a threat to cease military contracts. But the military has never ac- ted on this threat. Last summer, six law schools took part in a ban and received such threats. Some, like the University of Pen- ray rights- provide universities like Michigan an excuse for blocking gay rights proposals and in some cases, for rolling-back hard-won rights like at Penn. We, as gay rights advocates, cannot afford to play-into this hypothetical trap. Gay civil - ->--- -. K~.c,.