OPINION 6 4 - Page 4 Saturday, January 15, 1983 Reagan, Andro ov: Ready, set, sui q By Helen Thomas WASHINGTON (UPI) - President Reagan is beginning the new year with at new, more aggressive search for a nuclear arms reduction agreement w.ith the Soviets. There are also strong signs in the hwindthat a summit meeting may be ;: shaping up in the coming months bet- ween Reagan and Soviet President Yuri Andropov, if only to take each other's measure. THE ACCELERATED drive for a Strategic Arms Reduction accord will begin at the Geneva bargaining table next month. Reagan is being pushed to speed up the process by events at home and abroad. The nuclear freeze movement, headed by U.S. Catholic bishops, with wide public support, cannot be ignored. There is also the question of deployment later this year of 572 cruise r_ and Pershing missiles on European soil. Although the NATO nations have agreed on the deployment, it is expec- ted to be a major issue in the upcoming German elections. Edited and managed b SINCE HE TOOK office on the death of President Leonid Brezhnev, An- dropov has been making several missile reduction proposals and holding out the prospect of a summit in hopes of heading off deployment of U.S. inter- mediate range missiles in Europe. The U.S. reaction to such proposals has been basically negative, although Reagan has indicated he is receptive to a high-level meeting with Andropov with proper preparation - the same condition the Soviet leader has laid down. European leaders are looking for more flexibility from Reagan and are beginning to voice their concern that he will not compromise on his zero option - no missiles on either side - in Europe. DYRING A recent visit to Washington, Hans Vogel, the West German opposition party candidate for chancellor, described the Soviet proposals as worth studying. Since then Vogel has conferred with Andropov and has indicated that his talk with the Kremlin leader has increased his hopes of a nuclear weapons compromise. relations with the Soviet Union is close consultation with our allies on common political and security issues." Reagan said in his radio address last week. ON HIS RETURN, Bush is bound to bring Reagan a message that the Europeans are deeply concerned that not enough is being done to prevent a nuclear clash. Reagan's chief negotiator in Geneva, Gen. Edward Rowny, has spoken of the possibility of an agreement with the Soviets this year. Meantime, the president's arms con- trol agency is in disarray. Reagan named all hardliners to help for- mulate his arms control policy and to negotiate with the Russians. But even they are having their troubles defining Reagan policy and coming up with new positions. , BOTH HIS key appointee, Eugene Rostow, head of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and Paul Nitze, negotiator at the intermediate range missile talks, are having their troubles. Some White House officials have in- Bush and Reagan: A summit in the works? In hopes of reassuring European allies and Pope John Paul II of his sin- cerity in seeking an accord, Reagan is dispatching Vice President George Bush to Europe at the end of the month on what is viewed as Bush's most im- portant mission to date. "The cornerstone of our approach to y stn atg by students at The University~ of Michigan Wasserman Vol. XCIII, No. 86 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board A move on the Mideast FTR NEARLY a month of haggling over what to talk about, Israel and Lebanon are finally going to talk over their differences. But without a big k k .from Washington, ya comprehen- e pice planfor the Middle East lefergetoff the ground.£ After it was announced with much fanfare in September, the Reagan ad- ministration's loud call for peace in the Middle East has grown fainter and fainter. Although the plan was im- o mediately rejected by Israel and not %exactly wholeheartedly endorsed by the Arab world, it presented a "workable starting point for negotiations. But when the heady op- timism over the plan's chances for suc- cess waned, so did the essential en- thusiasm and drive of the only working I vehicle for any kind of Middle East peace - the United States. The Reagan plan is already several months behind schedule. Lebanon and Israel did set an agenda for the coming meetings, but that was supposed to be accomplished early in the fall. The administration's goal was to have all foreign troops - Israeli, Syrian, and Palestinian - out of Lebanon by the end of 1982. Any attempt to achieve a breakthrough in a stalemate that has dragged on for decades obviously in- volves incalculable difficulties and lots of time. But as past diplomatic suc- cesses - and failures - have shown, innovative initiatives must be followed by a sustained effort to develop momentum. Three reasons why the Reagan peace plan needs immediate action: " Whatever one thinks of the PLO, con- trol of the organization currently lies in the hands of moderates - albeit relative to PLO standards. These moderates are being challenged by an organized and radical group who are arguing for a return to the even more ruthless tactics of the past; " In Jordan, King Hussein has just returned from Moscow. He was the first head of state invited to meet new Soviet leader Yuri Andropov. That may signal a renewed Soviet interest in becoming active in the Middle East again, something the Reagan ad- ministration hopes to forestall; " In addition, the president will not want to make the Middle East peace an issue of the 1984 elections. Unless Reagan has some kind of success in hand, the plan will be abandoned by the end of the year. As a prerequisite for comprehensive peace talks, the administration needs to put more pressure on both the Lebanese and the Israelis to figure out an orderly foreign troop withdrawal from Lebanon. The most important objective is to lay more groundwork for a workable plan. This should be followed by the active involvement of higher level U.S. officials as arbiters to demonstrate the president is serious about chances for peace. Any involvement of high level of- ficials would involve obvious risks - risks of failure. But the time for workable negotiations is fading and with it any hopes that the Reagan plan can rise above the spectacular failures of past peace plans. HiWSAb M EE v N K _. The Michigan Daily mmit icated that Rostow may be on his way ut. And Nitze's attempts to find some fiddle ground with the Russians and to reak the deadlock have been rebuked side the administration. The president has been grappling ith the budget and other domestic sues. But time is running out and the essure is on to develop a new gotiating position at Geneva to offset ie Andropov propaganda gains that ive put the United States on the defen- ve. And for all his negative feelings about e Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty at President Carter negotiated with e Russians but did not see ratified, e document is in effect, and both sides :pect to abide by it. SOME OBSERVERS believe that ly a summit by the superpower aders will be able to break the adlock since the authority of the gotiators is very limited. Thomas is the United Press Inter- tional White House correspon- nt. YOO) i&USe 1T? MPTRY politics, there are a number of opportunities for action. First, and most importantly, make sure you are registered to vote in the city of Ann Arbor. Remember, every student spends the majority of each year at the University living in the city (in- cluding the traditional voting months, November and April). Even out-of-state students are considered residents for voting purposes. The Coalition for Better Housing offers additional oppor- tunities to those wishing to put more energy into winning passage of the "Energy Savings in Rental Housing" law. Coalition members will be registering new voters, speaking, writing, working with the media, and en- couraging the voters on April 4, all for a successful ballot drive The "energy savings" law provides a dual opportunity for student tenants. First, it will allow them to exercise control over the costs of their energy consumption and their ability to live comfortably in their apar- tments. Second, it's a chance to contribute to solving our com- munity's energy problems, by conserving energy in an area that is one of our largest users - space heating. It's time to seize both opportunities at once; through support of the "Energy As those who rent off-campus housing know, utility bills are on the rise. Renters paying for utilities in addition to their regular rent have little protection from gas, oil, and electricity price increases. And even those not actively paying for utilities are forced to absorb these in- flated costs in the form of yearly rent hikes. Since few student tenants in Ann Arbor remain in one house or apartment for very long, there is no incentive for them to substan- tially invest in insulating, or "weatherizing," their homes. Many landlords take advantage of this situation by shirking responsibility for helping tenants conserve heat and electricity. THIS APRIL, however, Ann Arbor voters will have a unique opportunity to decide for them- selves just how essential energy conservation in rented homes really is. Members of the Coalition for Better Housing, which includes members of PIRGIM (Public Interest Research Group in Michigan) and the Ann Arbor Tenants Union, worked over the last six weeks - gathering more than 6,300 signatures in a petition drive to get an "Energy Savings in Rental Housing" proposal on the April general city election ballot. Significant student voter turnout could well determine the proposal's fate. nirns f a niin cr- A better way. to "wea th erize" Ann Arbor By Robert Gadon That's an essential factor in helping keep rent costs down. To bolster that, the proposal offers a nine-year compliance schedule, so landlords may extend the costs of installing storm win- dows, attic insulation, and the like. Additionally, the law requires very specific improvements to be made where necessary, following the nine-year compliance schedule. For example, caulking and weatherstripping of doors and windows must be completed after six months, and installation of floor insulation beneath any living spaces about an unheated any health risk, either to tenant or to installer. Most of the materials to be used would probably be found in any home or apartment where the residents live permanently. If anything, a tenant's health may improve is he or she survive winter indoors or a comfortable temperature - and have enough money left to buy food after utility bills are paid. The proposed law is flexible in allowing landlords extensions on their compliance time if they demonstrate financial hardship. The law also partially waives compliance for owners of historic '-~ .A~i ~IJ/~N i~r'MU! I "I ~I VE i1 11UI'