a0 OPINION Page 4 Sunday, October 3, 1982. The Michigan Daily New Review, old reviews fire up T HIS WEEK, students and professors put on their heavy armor to battle the dragon known as the budget review. ,,The three castles in danger-art, education, and natural resources-are arming themselves with pen, paper, ideas, and mass meetings to slay the dragon, of the reviews before it effec- tiely slays them. ''"n Tuesday, art school Dean George Bayliss spoke to a gathering of roughly 100 art studen- ts; Using the most chivalrous of a knight's vocabulary, Bayliss said, "I urge you all to mAintain courage and forbearance." jhree days later, 300 supporters of the School of Natural Resources met in Rackham iuditorium before the review committee. Student's, professors, and experts outside the school urged the committee to spare natural resources any large cutbacks. The natural resources meeting was a direct defense of the school before the review com- rhittee, but the art school meeting was a forum Thu the dean to urge students to action and to calm the fretful. "It's not a time to get all panicky and fret- ful," Bayliss said. "I see this (review) as an opportunity rather than a threat. We have to, in a sense, strut our stuff." Are the reviews a good opportunity or a bad threat? The dragon, it seems, must be fought with a double-edged sword. Do not pass go STUDENTS TRYING to make their way around the board game called College Review? Yes, the conservative wave that has swept the country has finally hit Ann Arbor, that mecca of liberal activism. Starting in November, the first publication with a noticeably conservative slant will-appear on campus. The paper will "challenge the existing archaic liberal establishment," vows Review founder Tom Fous. But, its editorial staff promises, The Michigan Review will also in- clude a broad range of opinion, including some from the left. Shunning traditional advertising at first, the Review hopes to solicit money from conser- vative groups and corporations. So far, money has not been pouring in, but support has-such conservative notables as Prof. Paul Mc- Cracken, Russell Kirk, and Irvihg Kristol all pledged support to the publication. Even William F. Buckley has sent a telegram of congratulations to the staff. William F. Buckley patting an Ann Arbor publication on the back? The times certainly are a-changing. Herpes complex H ERE IT IS! The new, exciting controversy over HERP-EZ! Advertising for the drug, which is promoted as a treatment for Herpes Simplex, has ap- peared in college newspapers across the coun- try-The Michigan Daily included. The ads have sparked some sharp criticism. While marketers of the drug claim it is the most effective treatment around for herpes, University doctors and researchers fear it may be offering nothing but false hope. The ads-which make clear that there is no known cure for herpes-do claim that HER- PEZ' main ingredient - 2,6-di-tert.-butyl-p- cresol, or BHT-is a potent inactivator of the virus. A University pharmaceutical scientist, however, asserts that the drug has never been Here itisi x AA 6 6 01 Playing by the new rules: $10 late drop/add fee were confronted with a new rule this week. Apparently University ad- ministrators-playing both banker, scorekeeper, and referee in the game-grew fed up at students changing schedules after the third week of classes. Fearing that a big, fat "W" on transcripts was not discouragement enough for late drop/adds, administrators changed the rules-now a big fat $10 fine for late CRISPing must be paid to the bank, uh, University. Is the rule a necessity for saving time and money for CRISP? Or is it merely a convenient way for administrators to prod lazy students into action? The verdict will be out on that until this year's CRISP results reveal whether or not the fine has led to substantial savings. With rules like this, though, the education game is becoming increasingly difficult and expensive to play, as penalties pile up for students trying to go around the board four times-without going to jail. Changing times ANN ARBOR - the home of Vietnam teach- ins, Tom Hayden, the SDS, and the staun- chly conservative Michigan Review. Michigan Controversial remedy tested on humans, although it has worked on animal cells and isolated human cells. The drug has not been given the Food and Drug Administration's stamp of approval. HERP-EZ manufacturers say theyjare not ac- tively seeking the FDA's blessing, since BHT is already available to the public as a food preservative. Act now, choose your side in the HERP-EZ controversy. This is a limited offer only. The Week in Review was compiled by Daily staff writers Richard Campbell, Mark Gindin, and Julie Hinds. teb stutsat Tn atly Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Wasserman Vol. -XCIIINo. 22 420 Maynaro St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ' 4,;._ z .. WRPdI 11t MRTT 1 6 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board M 7NT's NOWUN& - T1 PAPE'S ULL fnr llr o E.T . and the U.N. SOME CRITICS charge that the United Nations has become as im- potent and ineffective as the League of Nations was in the 1930s. Well, the diplomats at this vear's session of the U.N. General Assembly certainly have squelched those rumors and shown those skeptics. They've got- ten right down to that decisive, for- thright action that is the U.N.'s trademark these days. The U.N. has come out strongly in support of that great humanitarian, that controversial peacemaker - Steven Spielberg. - Yes, Spielberg was lauded by the U.N. for his efforts for peace. He, in fact, Vas given a nifty little peace medal. Why? He has accomplished a lot of impressive feats. He's grossed millons (the U.N. certainly lauds initiative); he's gone on location throughout the world (an impressive 'how of international egalitarianism); and, of course, he's created a lovable space creature (E.T.'s about as peaceful as peaceful gets). But more important than why Spielberg was singled out is why the U.N. turned its attention to him in the first place. Perhaps it's petty to quibble over whether or not Spielberg should have gotten the medal or not. Picking on the U.N. for indulging in a little levity is un- fair, but the fact is the U.N. is growing increasingly useless, except where levity is concerned. The U.N. seems to become less and less influential each year. Its man- dates are continually ignored or defied; several nations refuse even to bring their problems to its halls. For what aspires to be a worldwide peace- keeping body, its power is pitifully limited to lower-level diplomatic cir- cles that inhabit New York. The most important conflicts-the ones that demand and merit im- mediate attention-often are not even brought before the General Assembly. Like the League of Nations before it, the collection of states in the United Nations seem intent on resolving their conflicts only on their terms. They con- tinue to refuse to sacrifice the smallest bit of their sovereignty; they fear that U.N. deliberation will lead to another failure-either deadlock or outright defeat. Instead of addressing its ineffec- tiveness or redefining its role or pur- pose, the U.N.'s diplomats are drawing their ranks closer and turning to the easier issues, the safe, vacuous issues on which everyone can agree to agree. It's a trend that eventually will turn the U.N. into a nice little club in Manhat- tan that occasionally hands out a slap on the wrist or an innocuous medal-to nobody's interest or concern. Steven Spielberg is nice. Handing out peace medals is nice. But the U.N. is not meant to be a pleasant body, it's sup- posed to be a forum for the rational 'discussion of the crises and conflict that threaten the entire world. It's supposed to be a body that effectively promotes world peace. That would be nice. IN 'TrE W-OLE (OUNWTRY ~T RE ARE ONLY A WIIUON JQB Ogs Ei Ur rt~r G~I \0 Mtlu0N MeO 0v% LGOKIW@ OR WORK 0 50? r v- e.. 4 a O 8 HOW Fl6 A SEETIO DU YOU NEED? ---- -Z . .F -3 0 0 LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Blame for massacre unfairly placed 04 To the Daily: As a Jew myself I have to speak out against some of the opinions expressed by David Spak in his article "Now is truly a time for atonement" (Daily, Sept. 29). The beginning of his article is directly on target, but he deviates in the middle, especially when he places the Israeli government at total fault. First, by no means do we all feel guilty because we are Jews- we do not have feelings because of our religion. No, we have feelings because we are all human beings. Just how much is in some of us, though? The massacre which recently occurred is by no means the first in Lebanon. For seven years the city of Beirut has been plagued with a civil war. This an area which has been in the news. Had they occurred a few months later, after tensions had died down, the coverage of this event would not have been so ex- tensive and in-depth. As a journalist I am sure that Mr. Spak is fair in his judgmen- ts. If this is true, I find it difficult to accept his harsh statements against the Israeli government. A formal inquiry is going to be made soon. When the results of it are released, and only then, can the guilt be placed on the respon- sible party. It is quite unfair to call Israel guilty until proven in- nocent-this violates the Con- stitution of the United States and journalistic rules as well. A second point I wish to make is that it is humanly, impossible to be everywhere at once. The Report quotes a former U.S. Ar- we are all qui my captain who served in Viet- one has any ri nam as stating, "When we tried we impose Lt. Calley for the My Lai stipulations or atrocities, no one demanded the not place upot resignations of General West- truly a timet moreland or President Johnson. involve ever' If some Israeli officer in the field planet, forN knew this was happening and terrible, inhu stood by, can we demand the too many tir resignation of Begin?" places over th I am sorry Mr. Spak, but you have overextended yourself. The preceding quote has shown that A total rag ite hypocritical. No ight to demand that conditions or n others that we do n ourselves. If it is to repent, it should y human on this we have let this mane event occur mes in too many e years. -Eric Gould Sept. 30 .:: . ^ . \ vv,.. ...,. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..v:=:':C:;::v:^. 4::::'"::":"'"p.i: ::::.iS}:^:-.::::t}}:i?... . . .:::ii. To the Daily: Abandon all hope, ye who read this paper. What is going on at the Daily? Have you hired Bob Talbert to write your articles? The column subversion of values-values of. language, taste, and intelligence. Why do you include horoscopes in your paper? Horoscopes are games. They are superstitious. They are mindless. They do not Editor ials appearing 4 .1 r" 7 on the left : r I * side of the 0~ 1 __i f m