.4 OPINION Page 4 Wednesday, September 29, 1982 The Michigan DaiIly Now is truly a time for atonement By David Spak Being a Jew is difficult enough in the best of times. Jews always have and always will suf- fer-if not from overt physical per- secution-from a subtle hatred directed at them because of the religious culture that is their birthmark. Overt persecution has taken many forms over the past 5,743 years. The Egyptians and the Romans enslaved us. The Spanish Inquisition attempted to convert us by killing us. The Germans slaughtered us. BUT WE JEWS survived. And we Jews grew more and more attached to our history of survival and perseverance. As a people and as individuals we are inextricably con- nected to that past. Thus, we all share equally in our injuries and recoveries, our failures and successes.1 It is this very unity that makes the recent events in Beirut so difficult to deal with. BY NOW, the horror of the massacre at the Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps in Beirut is familiar to everyone. The shock waves caused by the cold-blooded murder of up to 1,800 have resounded throughout the world. But the exact number of victims, or the fact that the Christian militia pulled the trigger on them, is not important. What is important for a Jew to remember is that another Jew knew about the horror and did nothing to prevent it. Both Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon and Prime Minister Menachem Begin knew that, if the Christian militia forces were let into the camps, something terrible was bound to happen. The Israeli government may not have known a wholesale massacre would occur, but it had to suspect that something unacceptable or perverse would take place. THAT SUSPICION is enough to make Begin and Sharon responsible for the subsequent events. That suspicion-which went unheeded-was their means to stop the disaster. The Israeli government cannot shirk its guilt. By taking control of west Beirut, Israel accep- ted' responsibility for the safety of the residen- ts. They had a duty to protect the refugees; let- ting the Christian Phalagists into the camps violated that duty. Because of our oneness as Jews, guilt for that violation is shared. Begin's and Sharon's guilt makes the whole Israeli government, Israel as a nation, and Jews around the world guilty. WE MUST MAKE amends for this guilt. Begin and Sharon could have made atonement-and made it coincide with the Hebrew Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur-by starting a complete and thorough investigation on the massacre immediately after it hap- pened. But they chose not to do so until yesterday. Because of their neglect, the responsibility for atoning now falls on the shoulders of Jews throughout the world. We must now show that we will not stoop to collaboration in the murder of even one innocent civilian. We must show that we will not stand for the atrocities we our- selves have been the victims of time after time. We must show that we are truly interested in peace. We must make sure that Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon leave the Israeli government. WE MUST EXPOSE the truth of this terrible slaughter to the world. The first difficult step toward atonement has already been taken by those Israelis who have called for Begin's resignation and a complete investigation of, the tragedy at Chatilla and Sabra. The massacre, however, already has become a black mark on our history. Long after most of the world has forgotten about the tragedy, Jews will still remember it and still atone for it. WE CAN ONLY hope that those who seek the destruction of Israel will see the protests by Jews everywhere and recognize that we don't want war. Sitting at Yom Kippur services Sunday night, I listened to Rabbi Michael Brooks quote Golda, Meir. After the Six Day War in 1967, Meir said she could forgive the Arab boys for killing Jewish boys, but she could not forgive Arabs for making Jewish boys kill Arab boys, evei,' in self-defense. That's because a Jew never forgets his past and can never forgive himself for killing, even in self-defense. We have experienced too much of that - both murder of Jews and by Jews - in our turbulent past to forget. It is our history to remember. Spak is a Daily staff writer. I I Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Stewart Vol. XCIII, No. 18 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board From horror, hope T HE SLAUGHTER of hundreds of innocents in west Beirut can never be regarded as good or wholesome or justified. It was an atrocity, and would be totally unaccep- table in any context. But the repercussions are just being felt, and not all of them are as horrid as the massacre itself. Some, in fact, are quite encouraging. For example, the 350,000 Israelis who took to the streets in Tel Aviv last weekend to protest their government's reaction to the massacre represent one of the most hopeful signs to come out of the area in months. That protest-and its success in forcing the Begin gover- nment to start an investigation- suggest that Israel may be about to make some basic, needed changes both in its foreign policy and in its concep- tion of itself. As a result of the massacre, Israelis and Israel's supporters could start ad- dressing the right questions-and coming up with the right answers. An- swers, that is, that will put the nation back on the road to peace, answers that will get Israel's army out "of Lebanon as fast as possible, and an- swers that will start serious negotiations on the future Palestinian state.- For months, Israel, under Begin and Sharon, has been occupying a large portion of a foreign nation it invaded on specious grounds. Now that regime is coming under intense scrutiny from the world community and from its own citizens. At last, a cloak of contem- ptuous moral certitude is yielding to mnore constructive reason. So far, the Begin government has managed scant remorse over the massacre. It has agreed to start an in- vestigation of the massacre, but it did so only after it had been subjegted to intense pressure. "Goyim kill goyim, and they immediately come to hang the Jews," was the prime minister's response to the furor over the massacre. Thankfully, at least 350,000 Israelis see the question differently. Christians did indeed kill Palestinians, but only under the most suspicious circumstances, the com- plete details of which still remain unknown - thanks to the Begin gover- nment. The question is not of Phalangist motivation or anti-Semitic slurs, the question is now of Israeli aggression and Israeli culpability. Where this questioning will lead is uncertain, although gains - notably the start of the investigation - have already been scored. What is certain, however, is that the response to the massacres has potential to make significant contributions to both Israel and the cause of peace. i PRIME MINISTER! AMTAS 'ME A/ 'STERI ,° I PRIMEMINISTER/I d A I a \ , " } 0 SrEWAOW AF (,Z CARra:)j By DON Wool- MrHCGAN DAILY %e f f r, , , f' , ' /i Jj ; SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. - The first step has been taken toward a new legal definition for the practice of medicine in California. The action could lead ultimately to loosening the grip of physicians' organizations over medicallicensingeand a much wider public choice of alternative methods of health care. The action was taken when the state's medical regulatory agen- cy, the California Board of Medical Quality Assurance (CBMQA), -moved toward narrowing the areas over which physicians now have exclusive authority. The board also moved to adopt standards for registration of many other health-care providers who now work in the shadow of the Medical Practices Act. THE 1937 STATE law defines "medicine" and stipulates that only physicians can legally prac- tice it. The definition is so broad that, technially, someone telling a friend to eat more oranges to keep from catching colds is prac- ticing medicine. The board, which for three years has been studying various options for revising the law, voted to ask its staff to develop a position paper the would redefine medical practice as consisting only of three broad areas-surgery, ifnvasive diagnosis (those types of diagnosis requiring the use of in- struments or devices actually in- serted into the body), and treat- ment by prescription drugs and methods known to be hazardous. These include chemical agents with known serious side effects, radiation, and other forms of potentially hazardous therapy. If this redefinition-to be spelled out further at the board's next meeting this month-is adopted and translated into law Calif ornita red may rsdGsefine medicine' By Rasa Gustaitis many others including nurses, nutritionists, homeopaths, Chinese tradition doctors, and herbalists. , The American Medical Association is firmly opposed to a change in the definition of medicine. But the California Nurses Association and various alternative and holistic health advocates see a' revision as desirable. A legislative fight would be a certainty. Under current law a medical license is required of anyone who practices "any system or mode of treating the sick or afflicted in this state, or who diagnoses, treats, operates for, or prescribes for ;any ailment, blemish, defor- mity, disease, disfigurment, disorder, injury, or other physical or mental condition of any person." THOUGH MOTHERS who prescribe chicken soup and friends who advocate ocean cruises for health are exempted, the overly broad definition has stood in the way of citizens' rights supplement" to that approach. State regulation is necessary when there is a compelling in- terest to protect the public. However, under current law, regulations often serve primarily to protect the medical profession, he believes. The law requires physicians in charge of other practitioners, whose training is very different- from that of MDs, though it may be even more thorough and ex- pensive. Practitioners who work without direct physician super- vision, meanwhile, stand to run afoul of the law. IN 1976, for instance, Dana Ullman of Oakland became the first lay practitioner of homeopathy in this country to be arrested for practicing medicine without a license. Yet homeopathy has long been established in many parts of the world, including Europe and Asia. The British Royal Fmily has been under the care of homeopathic physicians since ALSO MAKING a change in the definition of medicine is the California Health Practitioners Association, which represents many diverse practitioners who work with vital energies rather. than illnesses. They include nutrition counselors, megavitamin therapists, and massage practitioners. Steven Markel, a member of the association and co-director of the+ Berkeley Holistic Health Center, argues that there is room for many forms of treatment in' American medicine. It is a matter of matching the approach and the need, he says. "If I'm in a car accident, take me to a physician in an emergency room. Don't take me to a' homeopath. But take me to a homeopath afterwards." Many people go to doctors when they. don't need to because they don't: know what else is available, he says. Among those opposing a change in the law is Dr. Arthur Rivin, director of medical education at Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center. In an article in the Western Journal of Medicine arguing against redefinition, he writes that "health care is too important for a let-the-buyer-beware attitude. It is too complex to expect even the most sophisticated and educated laymen, and especially one who is desperately ill, t select the proper care from a smorgasbord of practitioners." The gorwth of interest in alter- natives, however, is evidence that many people believe other- wise. If the proposals under study by the board become law, there is no doubt would be a period of con- fusion in which many systems would have to readjust. Insuran- ce companies, for instance,.A ,i