Page 10-Thursday, September 9, 1982-The Michigan Daily Regents approve By KRISTIN STAPLETON Almost two years after the dangerous hazing of a hockey team member opened the issue of initiation rituals on campus, the University now has an of- ficial policy against hazing. The policy, approved by the Regents in June, condemns hazing practices as requirements for membership in any organization. The policy further states that the University community "could not support the continued operation of any group which allows such practices" and calls for appropriate legal san- ctions against violators. The policy defines hazing as "willful acts, with or without the consent of the individual involved," including physical injury, kidnapping, humiliation, mandatory servitude, for- ced consumption of liquids or solids, abandonment, and intentionally placing a person at risk of severe men- tal or emotional harm. HAZING BECAME a campus issue in the fall of 1980 when an incident in- volving five first-year hockey players received wide publicity in both Ann Ar- bor and Detroit. One of those hockey players became violently ill after his teammates forced him to consume alcohol, shaved parts of his body, and left him naked and shivering at his dormitory after an initiation party. Spurred by the incident and an angry community reaction to the way in which administrators addressed the problem, a committee examining hazing on campus completed a draft of policy suggestions in the spring of 1981, said Chris Carlsen of the Student Organizations, Activities, and Programs office. The Michigan Student Assembly ap- proved the policy, although some of the assembly's members felt specific san- ctions should be included as a part of the document. hazing THAT SUGGESTION eventually was rejected by both the faculty Senate Assembly and the Regents. Carlsen said that the new policy is an important first step in dealing with hazir violations. She said it sets forth in clear terms the University's disap- proval of hazing, although "just doing that won't solve many problems." According to Carlsen, responsibility for creating and enforcing sanctions against hazing rests with the super- visory organization of the group which violates the hazing policy. In the case of student groups recognized by MSA, the responsibility for appropriate punish- ment lies with the student government. Fraternity and sorority violations will be dealt with by their coordinating councils, and violations by athletic groups will be the responsibility of the athletic department. "THERE STILL needs to be some work done in terms of specific san- policy ctions," Carlsen said. For that reason* she. said, "each coordinating body is coming up with their own sanctions td deal with hazing." Carlsen said she is working with members of MSA to ensure that the sanctions of the various groups are ap, propriate and forceful. Kathy HarI twick, the MSA member working on the hazing policy, said the role of MSA is to "make sure each individual group has defined sanctions and knows about them." A central University council will handle appeals from any group dissatisfied with sanctions imposed on them, according to Carlsen. Regent Sarah Power (D-Ann Arbor) said the new policy will be helpful in ' curbing incidents of hazink. "The first thing to do is to articulate your policy well," Power said, and ad= ded that o clear policy may deter any would-be violators from participating in hazing. University investments back nuclear weapons (Continued from Page 1) none of Brinkerhoff's staff feel the obligation to bring these issues to the attention of the Regents. Norman Her- bert, the University's investment of- ficer who casts the votes, said "It's not our role to introduce those issues other than to the extent that its financial." CHANDLER Matthews, the Univer- sity's controller, who also receives the IRRC reports, said, "As a private citizen, I suppose we're all responsible for bringing these issues to discussion." Asked why none of the administrators have ever done so, Matthews said, "I just don't have the answer for that." "It's not up to me to bring that issue to the Regents," said William Sturgis, an assistant to the vice president. And the vice president, Brinkerhoff, said, "The Regents specifically have asked us not to bring these issues up." But Regent Sarah Power (D-Ann Ar- bor) differed with Brinkerhoff on the issue. "If (the administration) thought there were issues we should see, they 'Total denial of supplies to the police and military forces of a host country is hardly consistent with an image of re- sponsible citizenship. The great bulk of the work of both the police and military forces in South Africa is for the benefit of all its inhabitants.' -Statement by Mobil Corp. to its shareholders Ulrich's now stocks medical texts. would bring them to our attention," she said. The faculty committee that watches over University investments addresses strictly financial issues (except for an annual discussion on South Africa). Meanwhile, the University continues to vote without regard to social questions. AT GE, A second shareholder resolution asked the company to halt all its weapons work, not just the operation of a single plant. "How can General Electric base its corporate advertising campaign on the slogan 'We bring good things to life,' when at the same time a substantial part of its business is based on the production and promotion of nuclear weapons which could kill everything?" argued the resolution's proponent. GE's response read like that of many other manufacturers who were asked to stop their weapons work: "The U.S. government relies upon the technological and management capability of the private sector to produce the equipment needed to achieve a sound defense posture and to support the nation's foreign policy ob- jectives. Where the government has determined it needs to get defense work J4 J J44.4l J J.J J 4 4 - Recommended Treatment: courteous assistance in obtaining required texts at reasonable prices; Prognosis: one less frazzled nerve. -.-'4' Stop in and make your own examination. r , t MORE THAN A BOOKSTORE 549 E. University at the corner of East U: and South U. 662-3201 done, and we've been chosen to do it, the company plans to continue its par- ticipation in the nation's defense ac- tivities, both to serve our shareowners and our government." A resolution to American Telephone & Telegraph Co. asked the company to establish a committee to evaluate the implications of its nuclear weapons research and development laboratory. The University voted its $1 million of shares against the resolution. LIKEWISE, the University voted its $1.5 million of Du Pont stock and $1.5 million of General Telephone & Elec- tronics Co. stock against anti-nuclear weapons resolutions. On other issues: * The University voted its $750,000 of J.P. Morgan and Co. stock against a resolution calling on the bank to disclose its lending activities to the reportedly repressive regime in Chile. Morgan executives said that to do so would violate customer confidentiality and argued that its loans contribute to economic progress in the country and long-term enhancement of the quality of life; " The University also voted against a resolution that asked Morgan to disclose its affirmative action prac- tices, including statistics on the status of women and minorities in the firm. * The small number of shares that the University holds in Carolina Power & Light Co. supported the utility's desire to continue the use and construc- tion of nuclear power plants. e The University voted its $1.7 million of Bristol-Myers Co. stock against a resolution calling for the company to endorse and implement the World Health Organization's code restricting the marketing of infant foods as breastmilk substitutes in developing nations. The code which Bristol-Myers is resisting has received widespread international and corporate support. THE UNIVERSITY remains politically indiscriminate in its social apathy; it opposes not only left-wing proposals, but also resolutions from the right. One resolution asked Hewlett- Packard Co. to stop selling technology to the Soviet Union. Hewlett-Packard's management argued that the company is in full compliance with the gover- nment's export control laws, and the University, by virtue of its vote for management, agreed. It is only for resolutions relating to a company's South African operations that the investment office can consider voting against management. The Regents' policy states that the Univer- sity will vote its proxies in favor of resolutions supporting the enhan- cement of political, social, and economic rights for a company's em- ployees in South Africa. The policy, however, does not make reference to selling products to the South African government or expan- ding operations in the country. Thus, the University voted $1.9 million of Xerox stock against a shareholder resolution-which asked the company to stop its expansion in South Africa- because the University's "policy does not address the issue of expansion," ac cording to investment office files. IN 1981, the University voted its $2. million worth of Mobil shares against a resolution calling on the company to stop selling oil from its European sub sidiaries to the South African military and police, which have long been ac- cused of repressive practices. Although U.S. export rules restrit such sales,~'there are no controls on sales from foreign subsidiaries. Mobil argued that the corporation should not restrict itself beyond specific U.S. ex- port rules. The company's statemelt also said: "Total denial of supplies to the police and military forces of a host country is hardly consistent with an image of responsible citizenship in that country. The great bulk of the work of both the police and military forces in every country, including South Africa, is for the benefit of all its inhabitants." The University, in effect, accepted this statement through its vote. Many observers of the South African situation sharply disagree with Mobil's analysis. MOST universities. with substantial investments have some sort of standing committee to advise their governing boards on questions of socially respon- sible practices. Such a committee was suggested here in the late ,1970s, but the idea died before coming up for formal discussion, Brinkerhoff said. "The inference was we have a process that we're happy with," he said. The University now stands as the only school with a large investment fund in the country that does not use any form of committee structure, said University President Harold Shapiro. HARVARD University, with the largest investment portfolio of any school in the country, set up an Ad- visory Committee on Social Respon- sibility (ACSR) 10 years ago to make recommendations to Harvard's gover- ning board on proxy issues. The Harvard Corporation accepts ACSR's recommendations almost 80 percent of the time, said ACSR Secretary Candace Corvey. In 1981, although ACSR advised the Harvard Corporation to vote its shares in favor of several anti-nuclear weapons resolutions, the corporation voted with management. THIS YEAR, however, in light of the attention recently given to the nuclear arms race, the corporation switched to a neutral position until it could study the issue further. Harvard abstained on resolutions to Du Pont, GE, and AT&T, among others, this year. Harvard abstained on the infant for- mula question to Bristol-Myers last spring only because it did not receive the proxy materials in time to consider the question. Harvard later sent a letter to the company saying it would have voted in favor of the resolution (against management) and would do so in future years, Corvey said. Shareholder resolutions such as those named above rarely receive much sup- port from corporate voters. This year the only anti-nuclear weapons resolution to receive more than 5 pet- cent of the voting shares was the AT&T proposal. The Bristol-Myers resoluti on infant formula did fairly well, receiving 6.2 percent support. The Xerox resolution received slightly mor than 10 percent of the vote. Nevertheless, church groups ani others continue to put the resolutiois before the shareholders each year-4i part to gain concessions from the con- panies and in part to relieve their con- sciences of investing in "immoral ' causes. Now That You're Here, It's Time to) Plan to Leave!I With Fall Term just starting, Thanksgiving and Christmas seem a long way off. But now is the perfect time to make your airline reservations home for the holidays. It's simple. If you book now, you'll get the best schedule and the best price. If you wait, well .. . no one wants to have Thanksgiving dinner at the. Metro Airport. So stop by or call Conlin Travel's convenient location on South University. We'll book your flights and issue your ticket using our computerized reservation system. We can help you with any kind of vacation plans. Whether you're traveling abroad, going out west for a ski trip, or just heading home, call Conlin Travel for your holiday reservations today. It's a smart way to start off the school-year. . CENTRAL TELEPHONE 769-9680 South University (Central Campus) " Plymouth Road Mall (North Campus) * Wolverine Tower (Briarwood) Conlin Travel