4 OPINION 1 Page 4 Wednesday, November 19, 1980 The Michigan Daily, . Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan In Defense of Don Canham Vol. XCI, No. 66 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board The Free Press eats crow I T STARTED out just like the per- fect "old person bilked of life savings" story-the same human inter- est feature countless editors have put on countless Page Ones because it sells countless papers. The despairing, weeping face of Peter Muzyka, a partially deaf 91- year-old Polish immigrant who was robbed last week of $16,000 by two con artists, stared out forlornly from the front page of Friday's Detroit Free Press. Now I have only my $300 monthly pension to live on, the old man cried. The Free Press and the local television media milked the story for all it was worth. Following faithfully the journalistic formula for these types of stories, the newspaper set up a fund for donations to the old man and prin- ted the address. Lo and behold, the "ruined old an" angle quickly shifted to the "ge erous citizens pour out money" angle. And speaking of milk, one donor sent in $1 and wrote, "I was going to buy milk with this dollar; instead, I will drink water all week." Nearly $10,000 was collected within a few days. "As soon as I get it (the donations) ... put in the bank. No mod-e leave home. I scared now," the old man affirmed. The beneficent citizens felt good. The Detroit Free Press felt good. And oh, did Peter Muzyka feel good. You see, this poor man who lost his life savings (according to the Free Press) isn't really poor and didn't really lose his life savings. He has $22,686.14 safely stashed in a savings account. That small detail was revealed in another front page story in yesterday's Free Press-a story that didn't quite follow the standard formula. The old man "neglected to mention his savings account," according to the newspaper's story. Well, that's not quite right. He did say he would put the donations in the bank. He just failed to point out that he would add the funds to his savings account. So a shrewd old man weeping in broken English to an overeager repor- ter has shattered the sacred jour- nalistic tradition of "poor old person" heart-tuggers. . Donations to the "Help the Free Press Save Face Fund" can be made in care of the Daily, 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. One mile from the heart of the Michigan Tech campus in Houghton, on a bluff overlooking the channel to Lake Superior, stands a sprawling modern brick complex: Michigan Tech's brand new Student Development Center. The Student Development Center is afocus for Houghton's renaissance; it casts a light on the town of 3,000 that brings life to the area. Once a copper mining village, Houghton now thrives on its tourism businesss and on the university. The rows of aged houses are especially striking in contrast to the Center's modernistic look. The complex is a focal point, a beginning of what may be yet to come. The SDC-all $21 million of it-is awesome. The basketball arena inside holds 3,500 spec- tators; there is none larger in the, Upper Peninsula. The multi-purpose room contains six basketball courts, which can be arranged so a running track around the perimeter can be used. A separate gymnasium is strictly for gymnastics. And an Olympic-size pool tops it off. THE CENTER is scheduled to close in January because of lack of funds. The athletic department simply failed to prepare for management and maintenance costs. The estimated annual expenses are nearly $1 million, and the school can't meet this budget. Somebody made a terrible mistake. A blunder of this magnitude could not hap- pen here at Michigan; we've got Athletic Director Don Canham. Canham foresees the trends and prepares for the future. He can move mountains in this town. He has earned our trust. He is a proven provider for The University of Michigan. Granted, Canhanvhandles the press poorly. By Dan Conlin He doesn't reveal any news which could hurt his department. He makes the press fight for everything it gets. He doesn't soften his ways for anyone and he also alienates many students. But the man knows his role here at Michigan. CANHAM GENERATES enough revenue to allow all the other sports here to operate without draining the University's general fund. Though he has increased the price 'of football tickets regularly, no student is charged an exorbitant rate. And due tothe quality of our program, some students can turn a profit by selling just one ticket. Students benefit more than anyone from Canham's revenues.'The number and quality of our intramural facilities is surpassed by none. Swimming at the North Campus Recreation Building, basketball at the Cen- tral Campus Recreation Building, and pad- dleball at the Old IM building. . . we have no basis for complaint. Students should and will be aware of the athletic tradition which is now being established through our athletic prominence. One day we'll take even more pride in our teams and the athletic administration as Michigan alumni. We are recognized on the national sports map in a big way and con- tinuous athletic exposure over the last ten years has brought great exposure to our academic programs. Michigan sports are a lifeline to our growing respectaas an academic institution. Every time a University team ap- pears on television, Michigan is awarded free, favorable publicity. , CANHAM'S POLICIES toward the student body and minor sports teams are not perfect, but they do not overshadow the memories of 1969 through 1972. Student football tickets cost three dollars back then, and demand was not nearly as high. Groups of us would go to the games and have the end zone seats so much to ourselves that when Michigan would take a solid lead, we could concentrate on throwing a miniature football through the stands. There were so many empty seats we could run pass patterns up and down the endless rows. Out of that, Canham has created a dynasty. He brought Coach Bo Schembechler to Ann Arbor. For 35 straight games, Canham and Schembechler-who should share the credit-have brought 100,000-plus fans into Michigan Stadium. By the end of this year, the football team will have made four television appearances (including a bowl ap- pearance). GREAT FOOTBALL teams draw people to the stadium, and large crowds and en- thusiasm draw big time recruits from all over the country. A program like the one Canham has operated here will rejuvenate itself every year. The University will continue to reap the revenues of this program and students will be treated to fabulous athletic facilities for generations. Nothing that Canham has produced for this university should stand alone. Any one part of his system judged by itself cannot outweigh the accusations held close to the hearts of many students. But the entire system of intramural buildings, intramural leagues, athletic facilities, athletic tradition, and the fame the University has achieved shows the great things this man has done for the students of the University. All this makes him worthy of a pat on the back. Dan Conlin is a Daily sports writer. LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Henry tenure denial suggests witch hunt Thou shalt remain secular SOME LEGISLATOR in Kentucky had a brilliant idea a couple of years ago: He recommended that his fellow legislators require the state's public schools to post a copy of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every classroom in the state. The idea went over big in Frankfort, the state capital-the good old boys in the state house clearly wanted none of the so- called New South enlightenment. Not in the land of mint juleps, high-stakes horse races, and fundamentalism. Then some killjoys came along and discovered a' clause in a certain well- known document that raised questions about the display of the Biblical injun- ctions in a secular setting. It said something about separation of church and state, evidently an unpopular notion in Frankfort. The heathens (a rabbi, a Quaker, and a nonbeliever, actually) brought a court suit that challenged the con- stitutionality of the state law. The suit came to a final resolution Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the law, noting that, while adherence to the Ten Commandments' might be "desirable," Kentucky's legislation was indeed unconstitutional. Though the court's decision was a wise one, ,there is plenty of cause for pessimism in connection with the case. First, there is ample evidence that many Americans-not just Ken- tuckians-want their religious beliefs to be made the law of the land. Laws against homosexuality, pornography, and prostitution are all fundamentally religious in nature, and as such ought to be deemed unconstitutional. Yet they probably never will be, and that brings up the second area of concern. Monday's court decision was made by a slim one-vote margin. Two of the justices who voted for strict ap- plication of the First Amendment are considered likely to retire some time during the next four years. It falls to President Reagan, of course, to replace them, and that could mean dozens of decisions sympathetic to religion (read Christianity) that could do civil liberties infinite harm. Lovers of freedom, beware. And prepare. To the Daily: An article published in the Sep- tember 26 issue of The Michigan Daily dealing with the refusal of tenure to Professor Clement Henry has come to my attention. In that I have the highest regard for Professor Henry as a teacher and a scholar, and in that I have had some correspondence with former LSA Dean Billy Frye (now University vice president for academic affairs) on this matter, I feel compelled to com- ment. In the spring of 1979, along with numerous other American and European specialists on Middle East and North African politics, I wrote Dean Frye expressing sup- port for Professor Henry in the strongest possible terms. A year later, following his final rejection for tenure, I wrote another letter. I explained to Dean Frye that I could no longer recommend to Penn undergraduates The University of Michigan as a, desirable institution in which to* pursue graduate studies. My reasoning then, as now, is that any university which denied tenure to one of the most outstan- ding scholars in the field of Mid- dle East and North American politics is either too lacking in talent, too poorly organized, or, as I most fear and suspect, too politicized, to qualify as a first rate university. Dean Frye's assistant responded to this letter, defending the University's decision entirely on procedural grounds, saying nothing of the merits of the case. Since it was the substance of the issue and not CIA is n To the Daily: As I sit reading the articles op- posing the recent Central In- telligence Agency recruitment sessions held here at the Univer- sity, I find myself having to play the role of the Devil's Advocate. Many of the persons who seem to want the CIA recruiters off cam- pus can see no good or useful role for the agency. This is where I must disagree. The United States can and does exert great influence in world af- fairs. Whether this influence is for things we consider good (the defeat of Nazi Germany comes to mind for me) or things we con- sider had (I am nersonally the procedure that I was objec- ting to, I felt the response to be inappropriate and inadequate. There is, however, one procedurally-related matter that requires comment. Namely, that Professors Edna Coffin and Albert Feuerwerker, who are completely without qualifications and expertise in modern Middle East and North African politics, should justify their votes against Professor Henry on the grounds of the quality of his work. They are specifically cited in the Michigan Daily article as saying that his most recent book, Images of Development: Egyptian Engineers in Search of In- dustry, "did not measure up to the committee's (ie., their) standards." This is nonsense. This work is the most carefully and exten- sively researched and most skillfully argued book yet to ap- pear on Egypt since the rise of Nasser. It will establish Professor Henry as the pre- eminent authority on the process of political and economic moder- nization in Egypt. His previous work, Politics in North Africa, is already widely recognized as the leading comparative study of Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia. Such positive evaluations could and would have been offered by virtually any qualified expert in the appropriate field had he or she been asked. Alas, two unqualified and possibly prejudiced members of the Michigan faculty-Coffin and Feuerwerker-arrogated to themselves the right to adjudge ecessary petent foreign policy, no matter what goals that policy may en- tail. It is equally as impossible to run a "good" foreign policy without accurate information as it is to run a "bad" foreign policy without it (however one may take those terms). As an example, I would simply cite the effect that incomplete, inaccurate information on China had on U.S. foreign policy after a number of our finest China exper- ts were "purged" in the McCar- thy years. So, in closing, I believe it is very important to separate in our minds the repulsive role that the Aci ann a nnyt i h a -t ac Doily Photo by USA KLAUSNRi Clement Henry work for which they have no ap- propriate standards or knowledge. That such procedures are per- mitted suggests at the minimum grave defects in the tenure process at The University of Michigan. More seriously, it might point to tacit, or active but covert support at higher levels for faculty witch-hunting fired by prejudicial and ideological motives. In either case it demon- strates that The University of Michigan would best be avoidedt by serious students of the moderri Middle East and North Africa. : -Robert Springborg Assistant Professor " Department-of Political Science and Middle t East Center The University of Pennsylvania November 10 dMlhl Im gmo-.A Also Speaker claims misquotes 14 ~ .7/ )fu.~ 7. -,N'J '4 ~ ~ 'N 4 4 4 4 4' 4' 4 ~ 4- . Nei To the Daily: I am both astounded and incen- sed by the Daily's coverage of remarks that I made at the Women's Safety Awareness Rally on Friday, November 14. Only two quotes attributed to me in your article in November 15's Daily bear any resemblance to what I actually said at the rally. The accurate quotes con- cern my opinion that all men benefit from the existence of rape, insofar as rapists function as a "goon squad" who enforce female submission to our society's male-dominant struc- ture, and my main point that rape will continue to exist as long as there are men who want to rape. All other quotations attributed to me in your article are at best gross distortions of my speech, and at worst include some en- tirely false attributions-i.e., rallies? .I know of no similar rallies that have taken place in our city in the five years I have resided here. Your reporting bias is also evident in the article's focus upon my remarks, even though your article alleges that I was the least well-received of the six speakers at the rally. If I was the least valuable of the speakers, why not pay more at- tention to my five co-speakers, four of whom were not even men- tioned in the article that you ran? And by the way, in my opinion your assertion that "shouts of protest erupted from the audien- ce" as I spoke isfalse. Only two shouts were audible to me as I spoke, and one was clearly a shout of agreement with me and expansion of a point that I had made. This leaves one shout of dissent actually occurring, which should not be recounted in the 'Mik