4 OPINION Wednesday, January 7, 1980 The Michigan Daily 6 A dire mess The following remarks are excerpted from a speech given by Detroit Mayor Coleman Young at Winter Commen- cement on December 21, 1980. Commencement is a beginni1, You are about to join what a lot of you jokingly call the "real" world. I've been a part of that world for a long time. I wish I could tell you it's going to be a bed of roses. It's not, and I think you know that. This country is in trouble. We face an economic and social crisis as severe in some aspects as the Great Depression. This severity is not generally recognized because it does not impact with uniformity across the nation. ECONOMIC STORM warnings are up throughout the country's industrial hear- tland-the frostbelt areas of the east and midwest. That's part of the problem, since all of us are not aware that a problem exists, or feel that since it affects somewhere alse, it is of only academic concern. The economic concerns we face today in the cities and in the north immediately threaten the overall national economy and there is no easy way out. There are no painless solutions. As Felix Rohatyn has said in seeking a solution, "our national choice might well be between extreme pain and agony." We can, and I believe we will, survive and prosper, and build a better tomorrow. America's industrial complex is in trouble. Take automobiles: We used to make more cars than all the rest of the world put together. Now, we barely hold our own again- st the Japanese. This unprecendented foreign challenge to the country's auto industry means fear at best and misery at worst for the one in five Americans who depend on autos for their daily bread. THE SAME IS true for just about every basic industry in this country. Autos, steel, glass, and chemicals are all teetering on the razor's edge. The country will have a national tragedy on its hands if these basic industries go under. Hundreds of thousands of families will be caught up in a disastrous depression that will teach every one of you what your folks meant when they talked about the terrible times of the 1930s. Today America is a land divided. Recent gains by minorities toward equality and im- proved racial relations are now threatened by the resurgence of the political right and the self-styled moral majority. But our divisions in America run deeper than that-we see frostbelt vs. sunbelt, city vs. suburb, the emergence of a new under- class of permanently unemployed (the "structurally unemployed" as they are known in Washington bureaucracies.) Our central cities have increasingly become the exclusive domain of the poor, the black, the brown, and the aged. As the life span grows, many older Americans on static and inadequate incomes face this winter with a choice of buying enough food or fuel. There is not enough money for both, a literal choice of starving or freezing to death. We are headed. full tilt for deep trouble. WE MUST TURN things around fast. We have to change the way America does business. It is too late to turn back the clock. The price for recovery cannot be bought with the misery of those at the bottom of the lad- der. Such an effort would provoke the dam- nedest social and economic explosions wit- nessed in recent history. I am talking about change unmatched since the Great Depression and the New Deal. We need a national effort if we are to cope with that change. The federal government has to be involved. We cannot fold our hands while the rule of the market place wrecks the lives of millions of people. Despair is not our style. We can't afford it now. We'll need fresh new ideas if we're to handle the challenge of rein- dustrialization. People like you will have to help provide these new ideas. Government at all levels will have to play a major role if we are to succeed. In addition, cities, local governments, and som e states-like M ichigan- face an un-A T o Y O A P c o oA A ib F of Tie 1AMA keGit~e r11A~AJS age for precedented fiscal crisis. I know that's strong language. After all, during the 30s, when a quarter of the country was out of work, com- munities everywhere couldn't meet a payroll, and hundreds defaulted or went bankrupt. Still, I think today's problems are every bit as severe, with even greater potential risks for the country as a whole in relation to the rest of the world. TODAY'S CRISIS is centered on the great cities of the industrial heartland. In Detroit, for example, unemployment is "officially" 18 percent. For blacks, it is at least double that. Cities all across the frostbelt areas are in the same boat. And they need federal help. The bootstraps have been pulled as far as they can go. In Detroit, during the past 18 months we have cut City Hall employment from 24,560 to 20,000, the lowest level in decades. Yet we face a $100 million shortfall on a budget of $1.5 billion for the coming fiscal year. Other major cities face similar fiscal crises. The fiscal collapse of Detroit or other major cities is not just a problem for the people of those cities. The effects of such collapses would sweep across the land. Collapse could cripple efforts to revive basic industry. Collapse could turn once proud metropolises into sink holes of violence and despair. This is a national problem requiring a national solution. FINALLY, LET'S LOOK at the issue of equal rights. Black or white, rich or poor, we want certain things. We all want equal oppor- tunity, safe streets, a good education for our children, and respect. The drive for equal rights for blacks and others is part of that dream. Our country has been moving in the right direction. But we shouldn't kid our- selves. We still have a long way to go. Too many blacks, too many Spanish-speaking Americans, and too many women are stuck at the bottom of the totem pole. Many people don't understand why Miami exploded in flames this year. I say "ex- plosion" as opposed to riot because the word "riot" in American too often connotes conflict of race against race. Such riots have not oc- 1981 , , curred in the United States for some time. The more recent explosions, as in Watts, Newark, Detroit '67, etc., have been marked by mortal conflict between members of the black community and largely white police forces. These explosions have represented blacks striking out in anger and agony at social oppression, and almost always were triggered by police abuse. Some thought all' this was a thing of the past-that's because the picture is a lie. It is not commonly recognized that most of these conditions still exist, sometimes in exacerbated form. PEOPLE RIOT WHEN circumstances leave them no other choice. Too many blacks and minorities find themselves trapped in an unending cycle of poverty and despair. Disin- tegrating tax bases, poor services, and inferior education seem to deny hope of escape. If these circumstances continue, people will, take to the streets the way the people of Liber- ty City in Miami did. We face a national calamity unless we act now. Americans voted the way they did this year because they were angry, frustrated, and a' little bit scared. When Mr. Reagan asked whether or not they felt better off today than': four years before, they said no. They turned, Jimmy Carter and some liberal Democratic *6 senators out of office because they decided to give Reagan and the Republicans a chance to show they could do better. To me, the election does not mean the end or the rejection of the "hard-won" liberal principles and values like compassion; decency, caring, and equity contained in the fair housing, civil rights, and equal rights' initiatives of the past. What it does suggest is that the public wants us to look at how we can' improve upon the delivery of these services to the American people. There issues can't be dealt with by preten- ding the great crash never happened, civil' rights laws were a mistake, that Vietnam was a "noble cause," or that the New Deal is not a reality. It is our challenge, yours as well as mine, to build upon our nation's tradition of the past fifty years to accomplish this goal. l e Mt4,cbtgan+ tttl -ri+k wuA Awr) o%4 Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan \ ,; a , _,, t ; ,.t t Vol. XCTINo. 83' 420AnaynaordSt, Ann Arbor, Ml 48109 Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board NOT Reagan and registration O NCE AGAIN, the Selective Service has kicked off a week of registration of young men for a possible draft. A new set of young men must now wrestle with their conscien- ces and decide whether they will com- ply with the registration requirement, thus helping to make the misguided ef- fort a success, or will defy the order and risk both fine and imprisonment. It is not an easy decision, but it is one that every 18-year-old American man must grapple with. The dilemma might be rendered academic if President-elect Ronald Reagan were more vocal during this transition period about any plans to discontinue the program. It is a bit un- settling that Reagan has remained as passive as he has on the issue since his election. His steadfast opposition to registration in campaign speeches has faded since his November victory. In- stead of offering a specific outline for a plan to disband the registration program, Reagan has offered no elaboration on his plans, leaving his true intentions shrouded in vagueness. Alarmingly, it is not entirely far- fetched to imagine Reagan announcing a change of heart about registration following his inauguration. It is unfor- tunately conceivable that Reagan might allow the program to continue operating, or, worse yet, in keeping with his vow to achieve military superiority over the Soviet Union, he might push for escalation of the registration into a peacetime military - draft. If Reagan is truly committed to ef- fecting an end to draft registration, he would do well to vocally oppose the program now while it is in full swing. By remaining silent on the issue, he passively condones the government's efforts to gear up for some future military adventure abroad. Also, if Reagan intends to end registration once he takes office, the millions of dollars the Selective Ser- vice spends in these next few weeks registering all American 18-year-old men will be for naught. With Reagan's repeatedly avowed contempt for government waste, it would seem that he might wish to help prevent the useless spending on registration. But, Reagan has made no effort to convince the present administration of the futility of continuing the registration program. We only hope that Reagan reaffirms his opposition to registration after he settles into the Oval Office, since it is apparent the issue has been placed on the back burner for the transition period. Hu- / ti Q r ~' a ) 0 l ' l i _. , ,,, r. l yi ;; ,, 6 0 1 L rAlnmrmu rv , r F - LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Let's help out those poor regents To the Daily: $77,000 for the regents to go to the Rose Bowl! How paltry! How miserly! These are, after all, the leading officers of a university with a proud tradition. What kind of example do you think was set when the proud officials of our university were allotted a measly $77,000? Don't you know regents have to eat, too! How tight can you get! The football team and the marching band ought to be ashamed of themselves! If they had paid their own way and had paid their own bills, there would have been much more money for the impoverished officials of the University-those small-"r'' regents. You can't help but wonder what state higher education is in when athletic funds must be taken away from allotments that would maintain the dignity and gran- deur of the regency, and used-can you imagine this-to How can I explain to these detractors of the .Univer- sity-these Ohioans eager for gossip about the Maize and Blue-how we could afford $77,000 for the regents of our university? How? You'll be happy to know, though, that the alumni here have started a fund to help the regents out next year. I should be able to forward the Daily some funds soon. My fundraising efforts have been hampered somewhat-in- flation is still raging, you know, and the closing of the steel mills has hit this town hard-but we set the standard contribution low enough so that almost everyone could contribute. And yes-more than eighty per- cent of the alumni have already sent in their two-cent con- tribution. -Jack Reisman Chief Fundraiser, Regents Emergency Relief Fund Youngstown, Ohio January 1 A Winning without sacrificing integrity To the Daily: An open letter to Don Canham: I have noted with dismay the scandals in athletic departments here on the west coast, par- ticularly in the Pacific 10 con- ference. Cheating is not new in college athletics, but the latest scandals are different in both kind and degree. -At USC, probably the most "high profile" among the offending schools, at least 330 academically deficient The University of Michigan is one of the great universities of the world. Michigan's traditions of excellence in academics and athletics need no elaboration. As the architect of Michigan's athletic excellence over the past two decades, you deserve the respect and admiration of all who love Michigan. I sincerely hope that, in the pursuit of fur- ther victories, you do not allow Michigan's hard-won reputation compromised. I have personally witnessed three painful defeats in the Rose, Bowl. As a west coast resident, .I- am constantly reminded of these defeats. I want Michigan to win as much as anyone, but not by sacrificing the integrity of a great university. Such victory would be Pyrrhic indeed. -Glenn A. Myers Class of 1974 Berkeley. CA jr 4K