_ARTS Thursday, February 19, 1981 The Michigan Daily Page 5 would be a great album. The lyrical power is awesome, and cleaned of the electronic flash, the songs would be too. The album's problem is best summed up in "Kingston Advice," one of its best songs; In these days I don't know what to do The more I see the imoe I'm destitute In these days I don't know what to sing The more I know the less mIy tune can swing... As Joe Strummer shouts these lines over a crashing guitar line, his desperation is obvious. He wants the freedom of the music, but the truth must come first. And the truth keeps dragging him down. L tarid Seldin the Clash The Clash - Sandinista! (Epic) - About a year ago, the Clash released London Calling, their third album. It was an amazing work: 19 songs encom- passing the muscial and social history of rock 'n roll. From the blues of "Jim- my Jazz" to the post-punk energy of "London Calling,"' from the age-old story of Stagger Lee to Margaret That- lher's clampdown on England's "un- desirable" aliens, the Clash took the music and the issues and made it all their own. Now we have Sandinista! Having waited a year for the Clash's next move, this album is both a pleasure and a disappointment. This six-sided, two- hour-long album provides room enough for both. Sandinista! is plagued by the world's problems. The songs range from set- ,tings on one end of the earth to the other; from the Nicaraguan revolution, to blue-collar America, from a Jamaican Carnival to the Vietnamese War. Everywhere the Clash turn, they find oppression, stupidity, hatred and poverty. Their grasp of the world's plight is brilliant - it shows through every song, every word they sing. Merely reading the lyric sheet is an ad- venture into a sick, unjust world, one fat desperately needs to be rebuilt. Sandinista! is a call to get to work. Lyrically, almost every song on this album is superb. Each song manages, in a few short lines, to describe a unique slice of the Clash's exhilarating and scary vision. As Mick Jones sings in "Somebody Got Murdered," Minding your own business/Carrying spare change You wouldn't cosh a >arbter/But you're hungry all the same I're been rerv tempted/To grab it from the till I're been reriv hungr /IBut not enough to kill Jones summons up the terror and desperation of murder with an unner- ving power. Simple and beautiful, com- passionate and frightening, the lyrics manage to drive the brutal reality home. THE PROBLEM, then, is with the music. The Clash have always refused to tie themselves to any one style. This diversity worked to their advantage on London Calling, where they were able to maintain focus - the music was always in their control. Here, the focus is lost. Over six sides, they can't hold it together. The cornucopia of musical styles represented on this album sounds more like a compilation than the work of one band. Where London Calling leaps forward, Sandinista! meanders. The songs themselves are flawed by pointless experimentation. The elec- tronic doodling that spots the album adds nothing and actually ruins several songs. Four have false endings (a la Helter Skelter), and in all but "Charley Don't Surf," they are pointless and boring. The biggest disappointment, however, is the inclusion of several truly sub-standard songs ("One More Dub," "The Equaliser," and most of side six). Trimmed to four sides, Sandinista! UNFORTUNATELY, this only results in him biting off more than he can chew (to coin a phrase). On some songs, Scott tries to introduce greater seriousness into his lyrical content, a strategy that ultimately works against him by robbing his songs of their essen- tial energy. It is sad, but not surprising, that songs like "Working for the Cor- poration" and "Your Country Needs You" on Official Secrets fall far short of the bouncy exuberance of "That's the Way the Money Goes" and "Cowboys and Indians" from M's first release, New York-London-Paris-Munich. On the other half, Scott goes "arty" with the same mixed results. Too often he ends up sounding obviously derivative of other artists. "Tran- smission" is a nice tune composed of found references from international propaganda services set to synthetic, tropical mood music, but "Maniac" is an almost note-for-note ripoff of Kevin Godley and Lol Creme's 'Foreign Ac- cents." In short, this album suffers from taking itself too seriously before it has anything substantial to say. However, I believe Official Secrets could possibly be a positive step on Robin Scott's way to better things; he certainly could have hurt himself continuing to sing with his tongue in his cheek for much longer. --Mark Dighton SLF HanX! Stiff Little Fingers-Hanx! (Chrysalis) -Granted, Stiff Little Fingers may not want to be anybody's heroes. . . but then why do they deliver rock and roll with such passionate desperation, as if each tune was their biggest hit? The tension between SLF inviting adolation from their frenzied fans while rejecting it is what makes them so interesting. With their first album, Inflammable Material, Stiff Little Fingers broke into the album-rock scene by means of a mathematical attack of drums, neo- heavy metal guitar work, and a quick bass line. The instruments alternately complemented and clashed against the searing vocals of Jake Burns to produce a sound that demanded unrelenting at- tention. THEIR NEXT album release, Nobody's Heroes, proved that SLF was aiming for the top. Crisp production, a more definitive instrumental separation, and tunes that were not only hard-hitting but infectious established these guys as THE band of teenage escape. SLF's new release Hanx!, suffers from being live although it includes some of their best tunes. Much of the in- tensity of the studio recordings is lost on vinyl when directed towards a live audience. Hearing this record, you despearately want to see this group to check out what you're missing. Still, the pent-up anger comes through on "Alternative Ulster," the mock- patriotism of "Fly the Flag" is not completely surrendered, and the defiant stance of "Tin Soldiers" is not totally compromised. But if you're af- ter your heroes at their best, stick with Stiff Little Fingers' previous releases. -Jeff Yenchek Help Prevent Birth Defects - The Nation's Number One Child Health Problem. Spport the Vlarch of BIRTH DEFECTS -r FOUNDATION This space contributed by the publisher. Begin your day with 764-0558 i II 1 I 14 7 INDIVIDtUAL THEATRES r M's serets M-'The Official Secrets Act' (Sire)-The Official Secrets Act is the work of an artist who knows that his style is not substantial enough to sustain any real career, and is also at a loss as to where to turn next. This album is torn in half. On one half, M (aka Robin Scott) tries to capitalize and expand on the ludicrous little syntheditties (like "Pop Muzik") that first won him public acclaim. "Relax" and "Join the Party" are relatively unadulterated and still relatively successful illustrations of the M formula. But Scott recognizes that an album composed exclusively of tunes like these would be nothing short of an- noying, so he wisely.. . but largely un- successfully . . . attempts to develop this limited format. The incredible stinking movie By DENNIS HARVEY There were high hopes in this depar- tment for The Incredible Shrinking Woman, but alas, it's turned out to be just; another film worth ignoring. After the first or second scene (if you haven't given up the ship already during the badly designed opening credits), one is likely to mumble that particular "Ahem" of diminished expectations; laighty minutes of disappointment later, you- trudge home, sobered, another degree less willing to check out new films that sounded pretty good. The 1957 original Shrinking Man was one of the best, most thoughtful and terrifying (remember the fight with the spider?) of the 1950s science-fiction films, full of edgy wonder at the world its hero suddenly had to face as an increasingly miniscule creature. Modern technology was useless in aving him (victim of a freak radioac- tive cloud), and it often turned against him frighteningly. THE REMAKE IS conceived as a consumer satire-a logical extension, perhaps, of Richard Matheson's original screenplay, but realized in the most infantile terms here. Shot in a par- ticularly insidious sort-focus color process that renders everything a gaudy blur, Shrinking Woman opens with Lily Tomlin as a good-natured housewife (that's as far as the charac- ter ever develops) emerging from a supermarket, screaming kids in tow, and faced with a slimy announcer taste- testing brand new, canned Cheese Tease. As she drives back home through suburbia, her neighbors call out advertising slogans to her in cheer- ful advice. And so it goes-Everything is Product. This might have been a devastating thesis in 1957 (though the original film had more inventive points to make), but in 1981 it's a cliche, and the sophistry of the satire here makes is all much, much worse than you might fear. Tomlin's diminishment - apparently due to a simple consumer's overload of Product, though we never really find out -= makes her, of course, an inter- national celebrity, and she's finally kidnapped by an international band of corporate creeps who want to test her blood and shrink the world - for reasons also never quite made clear. While incarcerated in a hamster cage, Lily schemes to bust out of the joint with the help of a lab gorilla, and . . oh, who cares? The silliness here is just Disney slapstick - loud, harmless, sentimental and dumb. THE SPECIAL effects are okay, though hardly worth the ticket alone - especially not as seen through this shoddy photography. As Lily's bright- young-exec husband, Charles Grodin continues his wasted career as a walking luxury item, someone counted on to be good (but not very good - that would be distracting) while the heroine gets what little material there is, in an endless stream of glossy, de-energized farces. Lily Tomlin's television'comedy has always been a source of amazement - those characters so minutely observed, outrageous yet dead on target - so one keeps rooting for her big-screen career, persevering through fizzle after fizzle in the hope that she'll suddenly break through in full glory. Her dramatic per- formances, in Nashville, The Late Show and the glum Moment by Moment, have been careful, studied work, with flashed of quicksilver insight, but they seem to hold her in check. Shrinking Woman should have been her liberation - a comedy, at last, and one with a fun premise. Unfortunately, it's pretty bad, and by this time it's impossible to con- tinue placing the blame on her directors or writer-collaborator, Jane Wagner. Tomlin has said that she's not much a at writing anything beyond a sketch, and it's apparent now that, even in comedy, her judgment stops at a cer- tain point - which occurs, unfor- tunately, the moment Shrinking Woman hits the screen. Her perfor- mance is just genial - perhaps, like Richard Pryor, she needs to slip into one of her characters in order to reveal something of herself and expose all of our foibles. We've all endured a lot of mediocrity in the wait to see what Lily Tomlin can really do - but we're so used to auteurs by now that the idea of a brilliant per- former not being particularly gifted in other directions doesn't occur. Perhaps it's time to stop waiting for Tomlin to make her own epic comedy and hope that someone will know how to use her in theirs. L SOUNDSTAG E I N COFFEEHOUSE o Presents, F POETRY READING with Emery George, John Glowney and Beatrice Lincoln READING FROM THEIR WORKS 7:30 p.m. Thurs., February 19 Admission: FREE NOON LUNCHEON Home-made Soup and Sandwich 75C "Sexual Harrassment in the University," A discussion by Tapestry, a Feminist Counseling Collective FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20 GUILD HOUSE, 802 MONROE (662-5189) * . Ua U -a U"