OPINION a Page 4 0 Friday, October 16, 1981 The Michigan Daily I Edited and managed by students at The University of Michigan Vol. XCII, No. 32 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Weasel, YOURS BACAx I KNEW 'f'cup KUCK- T1NA[ 'SI*E V AB~IBT. SO, ARE Yov 3 t~ CLJA65Ec5PLCN -' JG~ f ASES . 4,..YA SUE..MYE tIo~=W YOU CANT FOOL. ME, FRED. IF I CAVEYGO AW MMEf, Youb c-o Flow oor Aru> &-od IT ALL ON 'SPACE rnVADF-As. AT wHkT T14AT "]> 6AMiE AAS voNE Tn '(Dv YboR6 AN EMGnorJ&L. v1RECK I YNow1, WEASEL. Nr s cAkl NEL' P1YSEt-F ANYMORE.. I- CANE STAY AWAY P"'SPACE J 1 Y LUCIiLY, FRE, Tl-eYHAVE OQ~AJ4IZA~tto&S ET IF TO I4F-LP PFPLe L. kY(6 'fou. rb.. CALA- T14t&A 'SPAC INVADER-S C- W(OU By Robert Lencl LATER SX N f WORtz. I', WW" TAKE GACCTt c.AFZE. bF Hl IA. 11 r 1 -- fL' . I Editorials represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial Board Fighting book censorship 11 1 1 m sue. l.w I- -. p ~ - - . __________________________ HE ONE PORTION of the Consti- tution stressed most often in elementary and secondary school social studies classes is the First Amendment. As American citizens, the students are repeatedly told, they are free to say, print, believe, or read anything they choose. But in- creasingly, school districts have been ignoring their own lesson. And now, they may get some added help from the Supreme Court. The high court announced this week it will decide how far school officials can go in banning books from school libraries. The case that will be decided involved a New York school district, where school officials removed nine "objectionable" books from the high school library. The books included "Slaughterhouse Five," by Kurt Von- negut; "Soul on Ice," by Eldridge Cleaver; "Black Boy," by Richard Wright; and "Best Short Stories by Negro Wriers," edited by Langston Hughes. If the Supreme Court does decide to allow the local communities to censor books on school library shelves, they will be dehying school children a fun- damental First Amendment right. It is ironic that schools could be allowed to infringe on the very freedoms they so often tout in their classrooms. The problem of censorship in schools is further compounded when local stereotypes enter the picture. For in- stance, more than half of the books removed from the shelves of the New York school district were written by blacks or dealt with minority issues. Community allegations that various works are pornographic or contain ob- scene language are often covers for racism. The Supreme Court has the oppor- tunity to finally settle this issue, thereby reaffirming students' First Amendment rights. The high court must not allow local communities the right to censor books from school libraries. This will only deny school children their right to be exposed to all levels and realms of literature. I New dilemmas in France 's Central American pa Rationalizing selfishness THE PRESIDENT has made it all too clear what his priorities are regarding U.S. aid to developing coun- tries. Last night, in a speech before the World Affairs Council, President Reagan reaffirmed what top ad- ministration officials have been saying for weeks: The United States is going to emphasize private invest- ment-rather than direct U.S. gover- nment financial assistance-as a method for aiding the development of Third World nations. The speech was rather revealing. In practically the same breath, Reagan praised free enterprise capitalism for the freedoms it provides and praised a system of foreign investment that all too often robs individuals in poor coun- tries of those freedoms. The president's position seems aimed more at ensuring the continued domination of poor countries by U.S.. based multinationals rather than at helping the unfortunate countries im- prove their lot. By emphasizing foreign investment by U.S. firms as the primary source of, economic development, the president is actually working against the freedoms of the people of less developed nations. What the less developed nations really need is genuine indigenous development, not exploitation by multinational cor- porations. Indeed, the speech came perilously close to being a mere justification of a reduced U.S. commitment to foreign aid, rather than a design for easing world poverty. Instead of searching for ways to rationalize his administration's selfish inclinations to resist sacrificing for the development of other nations, the ad- ministration should look for ways to encourage their growth with more financial assistance-not less. By William Orme French foreign. ministers are not often personally dispatched to cities as geopolitically obscure as Tegucigalpa. Yet one of the first overseas assignments President Francois Mitterrand handed Foreign Minister Claude Cheysson included a brief visit to the isolated, villagelike capital of Honduras, as well as stops in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Poin- tedly omitting Guatemala and El Salvador from his itinerary, Cheysson declared to local newsmen that France inten- ds to back local social reform ef- forts in Central America and no longer will supply arms to gover- nments which use them "to repress their people." Cheysson concluded his trip in Mexico City where he and his Mexican counterpart, Jose Castaneda, prepared an official statement recognizing El Salvador leftist opposition movement as "a representative political force" meriting a role in "the negotiations needed for a political solution to the crisis." Although U.S. State Depar- tment reaction was carefully muted, the joint Mexican-French declaration represented the strongest complaint yet lodged by American allies against the Reagan policy of unswerving support for El Salvador's military-civilian junta. CENTRAL AMERICA might seem an improbable venue for a paris-Washington foreign policy clash. France has few historical ties to the region, its trade relations traditionally have been minimal, and Central America's internal disputes are not of critical concern to the French electorate. Yet President Mitterrand ap- pears to see U.S. Central American involvement as an ideal opportunity for France to reassert its traditional diplomatic independence, in an ideological direction clearly con- trasting with that of his predecessor. The legacy of Valery Giscard d'Estaing may prove hard to shake, however. France's own involvement in Central America during the former president's seven-year term has received lit- tle attention but it included ship- ments of aircraft and other ar- maments, ethically questionable bids for lucrative public works contracts, and-perhaps most importantly-the emergence of its state-controlled oil company, Els-Aquitaine, as the sole operator and part owner of Cen- tral America's only commercial oil field. ALTHOUGH THE GISCARD d'Estaing administration was French President Francois Mitterrani' notably friendly with El Salvador, selling its air force Allouette and Lama helicopters and building a small government- run tuna fishing port, its most in- timate local relationship was with Guatemala. The French fir- st began courting Guatemala's military rulers during the Ford administration when U.S. policymakers opposed heavy arms sales to the region. France, however, in aggressive pursuit of arms contracts with Third World countries of all philosophical colors sold Guatemala eight of its AMX-13 tanks, replete with 75mm cannon, and concessionary credit arrangements. In 1979, two years after Jimmy Carter's human rights stance had led Guatemala to announce it would "refuse" any U.S. military assistance, the French also sold the Guatemalan air force three Fouga Magister trainer jets. The Guatemalans again were grateful: With officially san- ctioned political killings claiming more than 2,000 victims a year, Guatemala was becoming something of an international. pariah, rejected by both its staunchest ally-the United States-and by European and Latin AmericanChristian and Social Democrats, whose Guatemalan colleagues were among the principle targets of this persecution. FRANCE WAS only returning a favor, however. The Guatemalan government had long been plan- ning several major projects, in- cluding hydroelectric dams and the replacement of its century- old Pacific port facility, which ordinarily would have been largely financed with low- interest, long-tenured credits from multilateral lending agen- cies, particularly the Inter- American Development Bank. But Guatemalan leaders resen- ted Carter's diplomatic clout in the IADB, where the United States exercises effective veto power. They also disliked the IADB's strict requirement for competitive public bid- ding-which severely con- strained opportunities for graft and political favoritism. Enter the French. The contract for a $150 million Pacific port complex, the largest public works undertaking initiated by the Lucas government,was declared a "national emergen- cy," and quietly awarded without prior announcements or bidding to France's huge Dragages et Travaux Publics. Financing, at commercial rates of 13 percent and upward, was provided by a consortium of Parisian banks with French government guaran- tees. The Guatemalans then began informal negotiations for similar French commercial financing of a $900 million hydroelectric plant, the costliest public investment ever contem- plated in Central America. BUT THE MOST intriguing aspect of the Franco-Guatemalan relationship under Giscard d'Estaing concerns neither arms sales nor pork-barrel port schemes. Several years ago, a small Luxembourg-based firm, Basic Resources International (BRISA), discovered oil in Guatemala's undeveloped north. BRISA, too undercapitalized to exploit its reserves, was then' taken over by billionaire publisher and chain store oWre Sir James Goldsmith. A personal friend of President Giscard d'Estaing and a major force in Parisian financial bir- cles. Goldsmith used his banking connections to persuade Els Aquitaine, the world's ninth- largest oil company-two-thirds owned by the French gqOer- nment-to buy 20 percenChr~ BRISA's concession. Els'tAGO became the operator of BRISA's production and exploration ven- ture. At the time of the Freiii. presidential election, ELS had further agreed in principle t in- crease its share of the B 04A operation to 50 percent. Itut Guatemalan authorities quashed the plan when Mitterrand vas elected, loathe to cement 'a business partnership with 'a government whose new lead4 had just announced the appon- ' tment of one-time he Guevera companion Regis Debray as a foreign policy adviser. ELS sTILL retains its 20 Der- cent interest, as well as a sharebf two other nearby concessio§s.'As Guatemala receives a minikniim of 55 percent of the oil produced, President Mitterrand is in: t awkward position of helping O bankroll a government whose policies he officially deplores.t The Debray appointment, the Cheyson junket, and' tihe declaration with Mexico of' up- port for the Salvadoran leftdll have dramatized Mitterran'd's oppostition to the policies"of Reagan and Giscard dEstaing But these symbolic steps wiltiiot suffice as long as France niai- tains its own investments in Guatemala's oil fields. Moreover, under the leadership of Giscard d'Estaing, Frane became the non-communist world's second-largest arms sp- plier. The Socialists inherited'in economy where armaments ac- count for 8 percent of total expor- ts-the highest percentage of any major industrialized i * try-along with an arms in ry now 60 percent state-owned ow Francois Mitterrand choos t to resolve the conflicts bet.gen Socialist idealism and French domestic economic demands4ill set the true tone of his plhies toward Central America and'he rest of the developing world. Orme is a staff writer fr Central American ReportJ wrote this article for P".ic News Service. i 600D ;"DEA. I SEE WHERE THE PRESIDENT WANTS PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND VOLUNTEER GROUPS To DO MORE FOR THE POOR, SINCE THE 6oVERNMENT IS DOING LESS. f k. THEY "< LD BUILD PRE FABRICATED 'REAGANVI LPLES' AND CALL 'EM PRIVATE HOUSING. p f.- i&' r _' Feiffer., IJtE2esr RATE~S Ai21 HI. AAl TA1X R6VENt5 0 a w 2uk. I 1-AT1OIk) 15 OP - b - p r .4 k - ii _____---- rFr r.W ksL Au in wa f l2aa6 seIM ')TI;N.'6LZe [2iG11\GLL IG z-lr= i. %A i Ie-MCC?" 14:Z -j I D510 I 15, i C L-tF. WA.L Sicc iW' lL IIt5 1 V~W y I A ! w t --. V i 1 VVIK r