The Michigan Daily-Thursday, September 10, 1981-Page 15 Hospital construction continues amidst dissent (Continued from Page 7) *ervironment for its students." DALSTON REFERRED TO THE 'CHPC-SEM statement as "a convic- tion that has been held by many, but I'm confident that it doesn't apply to us." 'Dalston maintains that in order to continue producing high-quality health professionals, the University must keep .upI' with expensive, modern, technologies in its new facility. -"Our costs are higher than most other hospitals in the state of Michigan *and it's because of very expensive "t'aching programs," Dalston said. "We strive continuously to contain our costs, but this is a quality university." MEDICAL SCHOOL DEAN John Gronvall said he agreed with Dalston's assessment of the new hospital's priorities. "The only reason that the University has a hospital and runs one is that the University has teaching programs," Gronvall said. Asked about an agreement at the Regents meeting that ambulatory care. would be the top priority, Gronvall said, "I don't think that's an accurate statement; it may be it's been taken out of context. Its oversimplistic to say (between research, teaching, and am- bulatory care) that one is higher than the other.'' But, he added, "if there is a conflict between patient care and a teaching program, then the patient care has to come first." GEO vs. L In the 1979 CHPC-SEM position statement, planners projected high hospital care costs. The statement reads, "Even based on the hopes for very high bed occupancy rate, the average cost per patient day at the University Hospital will increase from the present figure of $371 to $1,069 in 1990 dollars." THE STATEMENT continues, "The University and the state stand in real danger of having to support a very ex- pensive half-empty facility, a veritable white elephant." But Dalton maintains that the plan- ning process has been smooth and productive. "Our planning in conjun- ction with CHPC-SEM and the Michigan Department of Public Health has resulted in a greater increase in tertiary care. That's the spearhead of what we're all about." As medical center planners begin preparing for the new Hospital complex with the demolition of North Outpatient Building and the possible razing of Main Hospital, public health workers have raised serious concerns over safety hazards. ACCORDING TO A former planning official at CHPC-SEM, unless University planners follow strict guidelines for the demolition of buildings and subsequent disposal of asbestos insulation materials, en- vironmental contamination and em- ployee good health will be in jeopardy. "During the demolition of the buildings, there will be a substantial risk to both employees and the surrounding community from friable asbestos insulation materials, used in the heating and cooling systems being demolished. Studies have demon- strated that people need not be directly exposed to asbestos materials before suffering the adverse health effects of exposure," the official wrote. "That's a screwy concern," respon- ded University Hospital planner Mar- sha Bremer. "It's off the wall. It's from out in left field," she said, adding that although she feels demolition of the Main Hospital Building (where most of the asbestos is) is inevitable, it's still "many, many years into the future." BREMER MAINTAINS that all precautions will be taken during the demolition process, adding that a stipulation will probably be included with the demolition contract. In contrast, Andrew Parker, a plant engineer at University Hospital, debunked the demolition precautions on North Outpatient Building by saying, "They'll just swing a big ball ... the asbestos will probably fall into a heap and then they'll just cart it away." Recent literature describes asbestos as a .fluffy, fibrous material produced from rock and well known for its ability to resist heat and acids. OF THE ALMOST 3000 asbestos products manufactured today, ap- proximately two-thirds are used for construction-including insulation, cement production, floor tiling, roofing and plastics. During the construction boom of the 1930s and 1940s, asbestos was com- monly used in building because of its reputation as in inexpensive, sturdy, fire-resistant heat insulator. In 1955, a definitive link between asbestos and asbestosis (a disease in which the lungs are irritated by inhaled asbestos dust) was established. ASBESTOS EXPOSURE has also been linked to three other diseases: cancer of the respiratory system, "asbestos corns" (small skin lesions resembling blisters), and mesothelioma-a rare cancer of the chest and abdominal lining which is usually fatal within one year of the first symptoms. Douglas Sarbach, director of plan- ning, research, and development for University Hospital, said that normal precautions will be taken and will be written into the specifications involving demolition of the North Outpatient Building, also built with asbestos materials. ACCORDING TO a former CH- PC-SEM health planner, it will be "the most expensive hospital per patient day of any non-profit institution." "I'm surprised the legislature voted that kind of money ($173 million), given the economic situation of this state," a government health planner said. According to University Regent Thomas Roach, student fees will serve as collateral for University Hospital revenue bonds which, along with private donations, will cover the remaining $110 million balance of the $285 million complex. MEANWHILE, LESS than a week af- ter announcing solid credit ratings on a proposed state building bond issue last July, Governor Milliken's ad- ministration postponed the transaction because of poor market conditions af- fecting the $121 million sale of State Building Authority revenue bonds. The bonds are designed to fund construction of college, prison, and psychiatric facilities. According to the federal health plan- ning official, many health planners are pessimistic about the timing of such a large expenditure based on the allegation that such an extensive health care complex is necessary. "I don't think that what they're (the University) building is needed," said the official, "and it is being done for prestige purposes." THE OFFICIAL pointed out that the University's contention that a new facility is needed because it is the predominant referral center for the state and also a major teaching hospital, is subject to criticism. "It is not true that the University Hospital is the predominant referral center for the state," said the official. "The University could do a lot more in terms of teaching their students in already existing facilities," the official added. Lamb responded to CHPC-SEM's role in reviewing the revised project, saying, "I think the committee will give them (the University) a fair hearing and make a fair judgment. I guess about 80 percent of the committee is about the same (as in the initial 1979 application)." ACCORDING TO Lamb, "anyone that has been through the facilities has no questions that the work has to be done," and that the funding will be used for a variety of hospital projects. According to the federal planning of- ficial, many health care professionals are skeptical about the necessity of such a large-scale facility-yet mosf feel "there is no point in fighting it anymore." "I think people are reluctant to spear (out against the new facility) because they don't see the point in doing it-but that doesn't mean they've changed their minds." [niversity: The struggle goes on Complete service at low rates for your European car. If your car is something special to you, have it serviced where it is treated accordingly. (Continued from Page 12) could be deducted from pay checks but the University refused to continue collecting," said Moran. In a 1976 Michigan Daily article Moran ex- plained, "If they put off long enough, agency shop fees won't be collected -which are necessary to finance the bargaining process." ANOTHER PROBLEM is that, unlike traditional labor unions, GEO's mem- bership and leadership change constan- tly with the waves of graduate students entering and leaving Ann Arbor. This makes it difficult to predict whether new member will continue the fights. "Most students are interested in ~'oing to school now," said University Attorney,"William Lemmer. "There is a lot of turnover. A group that was in- 0terested in this years ago may have Hi :een supplanted by a group who isn't," asaid. A ~ Union members say they feel they :hove lost a lot of strength during the in- m between court debates, and they harge that the University has used at- trition and attempts to bury student ac- tivism in the judicial system as strategies. "THE YEARS DRAGGING on have weakened our case," said Mark Pit- tenger, a TA in the department of American Studies. He said fears GEO is being misrepresented as "a vehicle for a court case." The dialogue between the adver- saries has grown stronger over the years, as they volley with charges of unfair labor practices and what one party calls "slimy maneuvers;" but although the' basic points of disagreement have been obscured, they, ' have changed little in six years. - "When you get into court, the real issues dissolve," said Moran. "We lost all the grievances. The working of the .,-anguage wasn't right enough. The management gets the benefit of the doubt in such cases," he claimed. THE SETTLEMENT now hinges on the MERC's arbitration decision' determining whether TAs are Univer- sity employees under the Public Em- ployment Relations Act. "That's what the whole thing would down to. We as employees had no rights. In November we said we had a contract and were going to take it to ratification, and the University said, 'No, this is a frivolous Suit because these are not employees, they have no right to unionize'," Moran said.- During the 1977 negotiations, Univer- sity attorney Robert Vercruysse argued the administration's stance by comparing the University to schools. "At Berkeley, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, and our other peer institutions, graduate student assistants are by law not considered employees," he said. VERCRUYSSE CITED the Leland vs. Stanford case of 1974 as legal precedent that GSAs are not em- ployees. In that case, graduate student staff and research assistants were declared to be students, not employees. Although TAs carry from I/ to 1/2 the teaching load and take on many responsibilities of faculty, the ad- ministration challenges the TA's right to bargain collectively, and the asser- tion that GEO members are professional workers whose interests are separate from those of the Univer- sity. The University has steadfastly held to the principle that all issues classified as "academic" by the ad- ministration are not labor contract material, and therefore are not negotiable. The union's concerns all fall into that category: affirmative action recruit- ment, non-discrimination in hiring, tuition, a joint voice in areas like class size, workload, salaries, TA training, and negotiating curriculum. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION was the major dividing point in the second con- tract-an issue the administration adamantly resisted and classified as "outside the union because we're talking about potential employees not actual employees." The matter was fought over in the 1975 strike-as well, resulting in an agreement that the University would establish certain "goals and timetables" to guide depar- tments in hiring women and other minorities. There is currently no University-wide special recruitment policy in awarding TA fellowships to minorities. GEO accused the University of not fully complying with a Memorandum of Understanding which outlined a com- prehensive hiring program. That memorandum was appended to the first contract, but GEO contends it had no. exniration date and therefore was still applicable to the second con- tract. GEO claimed the University reneged on its promise and union mem- bers said they wanted to strengthen the affirmative action commitment THE STATUS OF "TA, RA puts you into the community with the TAs say they hope an equilibrium will be established within the University that will pose a new relationship among the administration, GSAs, and faculty: one of shared authority, which hopefully will lead to a higher degree of professionalism. Fuel Injection and MultiCarb Specialists. Perfect Motion 906 N. Main, at Depot 2njr "Ct C Olion Al 995-1888 by appointment in your Yellow Pages profe were cludi were profe that were their Col educa mem comf denly wher both caref TH powe incre mini TAs, union Th also econ "Col ideal jobs, older recen Moni ssors," Moran said. "MinoritiesY getting fellowships that were ex- m inrn m rnrn - - m m m m m m m - - - m - m m m ng them from these offices, and n't given community or 1 ssional support and patronage 3 other students were getting that important to the advancement of 1 careers," he claimed. llective bargaining, in higher ation is relatively new, and, GEO bers claim the University is not, ortable with the thought of sud- being thrust into the public arena, e the principles and concepts of BUY TWO GET ONE ully and critically examined.I' E DESIRE FOR greater TA 3 r has grown in proportion with an B easingly negative view of the ad-UB 2Ltacosat u regular price, stration by large segments of the g your FREE h this coupnn RAs, and SAs, according to the getythird oneFwithc ,n. e GSAs' struggle to form a union is omic ealities,s okepersons snayw Located at: 414 W ILL AM CORNER OF THOMPSON, 2 BLKS. W. OF STATE ST. lege students of the late 70s are less istic and more oriented toward . careers, and income than were LIMIT ONE COUPON PER CUSTOMER siblings of the 60s," according to aLO nt story in the Christian Science- m m m - m OFFER EXPIRES OCTOBER 1, 1981 tor. -V ,h - -- --- - - --- -- --- -- --- - -- - - --- w i. r. 4 2 f .+ "i t bawvwiw.w" ...... t _nma CAA rm it mauimof nrrivr.i ! k S - -.-v- ,..-I I 'am NC\X XV., \ .I