Page 4-Wednesday, February 13, 1980--The Michigan Daily UrSdpigan :3axIQ Ninety Years of Editorial Freedom Of radicals and sugar twisties Vol. XC, No. 110 News Phone: 764-0552 01 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Studentsand the campaign y ESTERDAY'S newspapers carried a report that students may have had considerable impact on the outcome of the Democratic caucuses in Maine,. If the report is true, or even if politicians are simply made to believe that it is,. the current cam- paigners might just find themselves with no choice but to add the student constituency to the list of groups whose needs and desires they must consider. Students have more than sheer num- bers to offer: They are one of the few interest groups that candidates can count on for active canvassing, phone calling, door-to-door hustling, and propagandizing in general. But Ken- nedy and Carter are not simply going to take for granted that grappling for the student vote is a worthwhile pur- suit; ' they have to be shown that students are ready and willing to do the tedious work requisite for garnering support. In exchange for a promise of-, inexpensive student labor, even - the president's ruffled war feathers might be seen to relax into a more tidyI arrangement. The political system, faults and all, can be made to work for student interests, notably on such issues as plans for registration and the " draft and nuclear energy. We might as well play the game-it's the only way we'll win any of the prizes. It's been twelve years since student activism was generally recognized as having had strong impact on a presidential race, and it took candidate Eugene McCarthy to attract it. Though perhaps none of the candidates possesses the charisma that McCarthy displayed, there are certainly more than enough issues on which clear and relatively solid student opinions will emerge. Once the candidates are through jumping from right to left and back again, and have settled into more or less consistent stances on the issues important to students, the combined strength of youth can be thrown behind the gentleman closest to the ideal. As I entered the Fishbowl, the sounds I heard were familiar. "Hate capitalist ;imperialism!" cried a spokesman for the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade. "Help destroy American puppeteering of capitalist czarist activities! Support the overthrow of U.S. totalitarism! Buy a donut! Get your coffee right here!" Being a sucker for sugar-glazed twisties, I purchased two donuts and some Sanka, alone with my secretthat I could be of no assistance to overthrowing U.S. totalitarianism, at least not until I finish graduate school. HAVING AN HOUR to exercise my free time, I took an inconspicuous seat against the glassed-in bulletin boards, facing the doors to the fishbowl. It was 10:01 a.m. I watched with interest people greeting each other, bodies squeezing through the crowded area, and the frantic attempts to get coffee before class started. I opened up my magazine and prepared for a relaxing hour. I quickly became aware of more cries from the crowded fishbowl. "But the Workers Vanguard!" went the chant offered by a couple of radicals. "Crush oil companies! Stop corporate profiteering!" 1 took a huge bite of my donut, a true sensory pleasure with the daily minimum requirement of calories. Suddenly, a young bearded man with a faded lumberjack shirt and Tito sunglasses approached me. I hid myself quickly in my magazine. Maybe he won't see me, I thought to myself. "EXCUSE ME," he said. I pretended not to hear. "Hello?" he persisted. Slowly I looked up. "Buy a copy of Workers Vanguard!" he suggested. "Read how oil companies are raping the land and the people. Stop corporate profiteering!" "But I already have some reading material," I replied, lifting my Fortune magazine so he could see it. "And besides," I argued, "if I buy a Workers Vanguard, will corporate profiteering really stop?" Probably not, he said impatiently, and before he could continue I expressed my sin- cere desire to be left alone with my glazed twistie and rapidly-cooling Sanka. As he left, I shook my head with disgust, and resumed ".. By Nick Katsarelas reading about Exxon's quarterly sales. WITH ONE MORE bite, I devoured my first donut and moved on to the second. As I flicked some sugar specks off of the alligator on my shirt, I noticed some more commotion near me. "Join the Young Socialist Alliance!" went the cry. "Kill capitalist yelling dogs! Nuke the bourgeois!" I stared at the bespectacled malcontent wearing a faded lumberjack shirt who was doing most of the yelling. He saw me and began walking over. I spun around, preten- ding to read the flyers taped on the bulletin board behind me. After a couple of minutes, I slowly turned, only to find the bespectacled malcontent standing over me. My eyes pleaded with him for mercy. "CRUSH THE RACIST Carter regime!" be demanded. "No thanks," I replied, cowering. "Down with Carter's racist policies," he continued. My conscience struggled with me to fight back. I fought back. "Anyone who doesn't know the difference between racism and ethnocentricism is no partner of mine in the class struggle," I said. "Comrade, I beg your absence." He paused, bewildered, and then walked away dazed.. My hands trembled. Per- spiration beaded on my forehead. My Sanka was cold. I COULD TAKE no more. I rose and began gathering my things. Out of the corner of my eye, I saw another merchant selling her wares. She firmly grasped a Daily Worker in -one hand, and thrusted a clenched fist into the air with the other. "Protest the draft! Kill war mongers! Sup- port Soviet intervention! Hate U.S. attempts to intervene in Soviet internal affairs!" Suddenly, the Daily Worker saleswoman was next to me. "May I talk to you about the workers' struggle, comrade?" she asked. I gave in. "Lay it on me, sister," I answered, and made room for her next to me. She was a grim-faced brunette wearing a faded lumber- jack shirt. SHE ASKED ME if I were aware that thousands of union organizers have been secretly executed by the U.S. government. But before she could finish, I broke in. W "Hey, didn't I meet you at a mixer at Brown a couple of years ago?" I asked. "Don't you remember, our fraternity kept chanting, 'Delta Chis, on the rise,' and then you girls from Wellesley left when we shouted, 'Alpha Phis, just can't please'?" "Oh, my gawd," she said, blushing in true Wellesleyian form. "I thought I recognized you!" She looked around nervously, then caught herself. "Yes, but the workers' struggle .. ," she stammered. "YOU'RE LINDA SUE Pemberton, aren't you?" I pressed. "Sure, your dad gave our lacrosse team a party on your yacht." She laughed, tossing her long brown hair seductively across her softly-sloping shoulders. "Daddy used to play on Brown's lacrosse team," she gave in. We made small talk. "I'll trade you the rest of this donut for a free copy of the Daily Worker," I said. "It's deal," she answered, shaking my hand. We both. threw up our heads and laughed, savoring the spirit of the moment. Radicals, too, I thought to myself, are suckers for glazed twisties. Nick Katsarelas got three D's in four chemistry classes and is no longer pre- med. His column appears on this page every Wednesday. Four freedoms fade as China moves backwards W HO KNOWS what evil lurks in hehearts of totalitarian rulers? Who can tell what rationale governs the on-again-off-again freedoms gran- ted by.the government of the Peoples' Republic of China to its citizens? Chinese dissidents must have been mightily confused by the reversal in the recent trend toward freedom of speech. It seems only yesterday that China's "four freedoms" were first unveiled. They permitted nationals who would quarrel with governmental policy to usi several avenues of ex- pression, ostensibly without fear of reprisal. The four rights granted were those to put up wall posters, speak out freely, air views fully, and hold great debates. Maybe the problem lay in the Chinese government's expectations of what sort of views would be aired upon theannouncement of the new "four freedoms." -Perhaps the government expected all the debate and discussion to focus on the positive side of the Cultural Revolution and the advent of Marxist doctrine in the land. And in- deed - from the communist's point of view - the recent revocation of speech "privileges" is understandable. How dare the dissidents question the valor and efficacy of the progress toward Communist goals? And in a forum R" provided by the leaders themselves, at that. So gradually, the freedoms have been slipping away, occasionally pushed along by harsh state action. It started with the imprisonment of Wei Jingsheng, a well-known activist, for counter-revolutionary activity. Then the "Democracy Wall," where signs and leaflets espousing diverse points of view had been posted, was put out of commission. Next the authorities began coming up with assorted methods of making life difficult for the editors of the opposition periodicals. that had been springing up. And this week, a Communist Party get-together is slated which may produce even more clever techniques for repressing democratic activity. Ah, well. There's always the Party's People's Daily. It's a fine publication, really. And it manages to steer clear of those awful negativistic ideas. Editorial policies LETTERS TO THE DAILY: Why SYL backs Soviet Afghan moves r r s I + , " 7 Unsigned editorials ap- pearing on the left side of this page represent a majority opinion of the Daily's Editorial '* ~ Board. Letters and columns represent the opinions of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the attitudes or beliefs of the Daily.- To the Daily: In a factually distorted, anti- communist letter in the January 31 Daily, Seth Moldoff challenged the Spartacus Youth League (SYL) to explain why we support the Soviet Army in Afghanistan and what we mean by calling for extending the gains of the Russian revolution to the Afghan peoples. We gladly take the op- portunity to do so. In Afghanistan, the Kremlin bureaucracy has been forced for purely defensive reasons to take up a genuinely Red cause, for on- ce. We rejoice as Russian tanks roll over the rag-tag mullah-led army. The insurgents are backed by the CIA, Khomeini, and Pakistan. The rabidly anti-Soviet but equally, Stalinist Chinese bureaucracy also supports the mullahs who are fighting to defend the bride price, the veil, usury, serfdom, and perpetual misery. The victory of the Islamic in- surgents would mean the per- petuation of- feudal and pre- feudal enslavement well into the last quarter of the twentieth cen- tury. The Spartacus Youth League is against fathers selling their daughters to prospective grooms like chattel slaves, against shooting teachers who at- tempt to bring literacy programs to women, and against poor peasants being tied to the land of rich farmlords. We are for spreading to the Afghan masses the social and economic gains that were won not only in Russia in 1917, -but in the French Revolution two centuries ago. For that reason we called for the military victory of the Kabul regime when the mullahs took up arms last spring. The deployment of Soviet troops and the confirming of the insurgents' imperialist ties alters both the terms of the co flict and the possibilities of the outcome. The Russian army will have little trouble in routing the mullah in- surgency. But what happens af- ter that? In the absence of any but the most rudimentary proletariat the essential ingredients for the liberation of the Afghan peoples must come from outside this over- whelmingly tribalist region. If the country is effectively incor- porated into the Soviet bloc this can today be only as a bureaucratically deformed workers state. Compared to the present conditions in Afghanistan this would represent a giant step forward.. . the gains that women have made in, the- Soviet East to see what proletarian liberation of these pre-capitalist areas has meant. The October revolution proclaimed the full equality of women. Bolshevik cadres in the Asian regions where the mullahs held sway struggled, often at the cost of their liveito draw women: out of their enforced seclusion. In the 1920. , the combined ef- fects of an economically back- ward Russia beseiged by hostile imperialist powers, the predominance of the peasantry, and the failure of proletarian revolutions in Western Europe took its toll. Although fought to the end by Trotsky's Left Op- position, a privileged bureaucracy with Stalin at its head usurped the political power of the working class, destroyed workers democracy, and sought appeasement with imperialism.- rather than its overthrow. Yet the fundamental economic and social gains of the October revolution remain. Trotskyists to this day unconditionally defend the, Russian degenerated workers state against all attempts of capitalist restoration while calling for a proletarian political revolution to oust the bureaucracy, and a return to democratically-elected soviets and the revolutionary road of Lenin and Trotsky. The work of the Bolsheviks among the peoples of the east suf- fered tremendously with-the Stalinist political coun- terrevolution in the twenties, but women in the Muslim areas of the USSR have vastly more social gains and real equality than in any Islamic country. For this reason, the soldiers of the Soviet units in Afghanistan are recruited from the Uzbecks and Tajiks. If "fiercely independent Afghanistan" is about to suffer horrendous national oppression at the hands of the Soviets, why can Moscow use Muslin-derived troops without fear? Obviously because the soldiers know they are better 'Off than they would be under the Afghan mullahs or Khomeini. We do not have a knee-jerk reaction to support Soviet troops wherever they are deployed, for all too often they are used by the Stalinist bureaucracy for coun- terrevolutionary ends. In Hungary in 1956 the Kremlin sup- pressed a working class political revolution in which workers were demanding workers democracy within the confines of a workers state. In Czechoslavakia in 196k the Kremlin sent in the troops ti clamp on a bureaucratic stranglehold and cut short poten- tially revolutionary ferment. Both of these invasions were neither in the interests of the in- ternational working class nor of the defense of' the October revolution. The point about Afghanistan is that the Soviet Union is fighting a just war and we take a side. The road to a socialist future * economic plenty and inter- nationalist equality lies in a proletarian political revolution to oust the parasitic Stalinist bureaucracy which must be linked to international socialist revolutions from South Asia to the imperialist centers. But in this war, in the face of the im- perialist uproar over Soviet military intervention against t mullah-led reactionaries 1 Afghanistan, Trotskyists do in- deed proclaim, "Hail Red Ar- my!" -Irene Rhinesmith Spartacus Youth League Feb.9 ABA affirmative action stance assailed ,. A ^v A e4 ^* .. ° ^..t ., A"ti l." i n . ry ; 0 ^ ,. ./ 1. f j '"'' 1 , W . ; 1i ,. To the Daily: I am appalled and outraged at the attitude you took in your Sun- day, February 10 editorial in which you stated that affirmative action need not be one of the criteria for ABA accreditation of law schools around the country. I mean, what is an education for-to, give a person the necessary credentials so that New Agenda To the Daily: The anonymous attack on the Ann Arbor Committee for a New' Jewish Agenda in your letters column (Daily, Feb. 9) com- paring them to the Spartacus 'League and the Revolutionary Communist Party was com- pletely inaccurate and deliberately misleading. A non-Jew, I attended a recent film and discussion introducing the committee to the Ann Arbor community. A very wide range of political views were expressed during the discussion, and the moderators emphasized that committee people were in disagreement on many fun- damental issues. dnvn_ lnntvna isnoh o ni s/he can step out into the world the way it is and make lotsa bucks and maybe a big name, or- is it to open minds to ways we can live better together and keep the planet fit for human habitation for generations more and even beautify it in the process? And what's this about ". . social and political gains-however worthy-that the ABA accreditation guidelines were never designed to promote"? What is the whole gamut of law-law school ac- creditation guidelines, laws themselves, the practice of law-for, then, except to keep those with power in and those without power out? And while I'm writing, I must say I didn't care much for yo* small news article in the "Today" column on how to register for the draft. How can you take such a happy-go-lucky attitude towards the first step in killing and mutilating our fellow humans and our planet? (At least that is what has always happened in wars in the past, but perhaps this one will be different.) Well, lest you think I'm takin a negative attitude towards the Daily, let me close by saying that I generally find the Daily quite acceptable. -Rose Siri Feb. 10 Greene camp responds To the Daily: Marc Abrams' letter to the Daily on Feb. 9 grossly distorts the nature of the Earl Greene campaign. I told Daily reporter John Goyer early last week that he could meet with me and examine our list of volunteers and call them if he wished. Mr. Goyer said he felt it would not be necessary to examine them and he said he would use this -fact in his story on the Second Ward to draw attention away from Stacy's- total lack of th qualifications necessary to be member of the City Council. We need to limit ourselves in this campaign to the issues'and not to the internal workings of campaign organizations. Doing so would serve the primary purpose of an election camy paign-educating the voters. -Phil Bokovoy Campaign Manager,