Arts & Entertainment eTHEMCGn da LMay 1,1976 'MM An orgy of Pan-lana MM's Peter Pan By TIM PRENTISS Dinner theatre at its best is delicious, and at its worst is good for either an after-dinner nap or indigestion. Mardy Medder's production of Peter Pan, at the University Club this weekend, gives nobody a chance to sleep, yet gives enough time for the stomach to settle. The food leaves no possibility for heartburn. Energized and driven by Captain Hook's Pirates and Peter's Lost Boys, the show is exciting, colorful and tlots of fun. It had its weak and slow moment, but these were quickly forgotten by an audience who "believed." Set sparsely in-the-rotnd, this production moves smoothly from scene to scene, enrapturing the kids in the crowd while entertaining the parents. The production itself was filled with movement, not all of which made sense. Often, the company failed to take advantage of the stage in the center of things, close to the audience. Occasionally, though, this possibility was realized in genuine contact and communiiration with the happy spectators. The mood was spirited, for the most part, and some of the entrances and exits through the crOwil were strong and surprising. Unfortunately, Peter Pan and the kids did not actually fly through the Ander- son Room of the Union, but their usage of small, strategi-ally placed trampolines gave enough of an impression to satisfy. As fir as the actin went, some of the characters left a bit to be desired Prime among them was Peter himself, in the [ 9 gliS'e of Sa111y Iublit. Tlopped in an alarning latinsmn blond wig, she ware the expresions of a comedienne with bad timng. Many of I cir's maninerisnm and mu gings were notsense and cuntra to the lovable and free Ereryboy of Never- never Land. It is rare that Slightly Soiled of the Iost Bofy gang tops Peter Pan in populnrit ', but Iirel Janiszewski did just that The oy- were spontaneous and gen- erally fun, with Ibhby Stitber and Bruce Judge coming off spec-tcuarly as the runaway-proise ruffians just down the street. Thir wit and energy were much needed. The group that pulled the production through was the Pirate mob. Too numer- ons to mention, they have to be experi- enced to be appreciated. Together they are the Kekstone Kos of the sea, and I found myself waiting for their every inurderous apperaice. Chief aoing lbthem, of course, was Paul Silvertsen as ('aptai Hook. Coming on like a storm-tossed Doatiild Sutherland, this cultured anti-Villain struck glee into the hearts of all. Father's wife, Roberta Owen, came off as the pereculy Victorian mother who would have raised the properly restrain- ed Darling children. Most fetching of the flying kids was Michael (Nick Cha- pekis, Jr.) as the confused and some- what awe-struck youngster Tiger Lilys Indians were all there, and they whooped around, but generallyx served as foils for the hilarious pirates and the smart-alecky Lost Boys. Al- Peter Pan (Mary Martin) and Captain See PETER, Page 7 of Martin's most famous plays, the rol Inside Mary Martin My Heart Belongs. By Mary Martin, William Morrow and Co. N. Y., 1976, 320 pp. $8.95. By JEFFREY SELBST Mary Martin, grande dame of the theatre, has chosen to regale us with the stories of her life. Not just the story, mind you, for she has been many actresses in her time. One wonders somehow why they all look so similar. Martin, you may remember, was not just Nellie Forbush in South Pacific, not merely Maria von Trapp in the intensely forgettable Sound of Music, bue she was also the child who never grew up, Peter Pan. She writes like a child who never grew up. Consider this diadem of the literary art from her very first chapter (one can almost picture her saying, "Golly! My very first chapter ever!"): "I think . . . Never Land is the way I would like real life to be: timeless, free mischevous, filled with gaiety, tenderness and magic." Had enough yet? That's how the whole book goes. To say that My Heart Belongs is one of the most vapid showbiz bios ever put to pa- per is somewhere near stating that the distance from here to Mars is "quite a little trot." I don't believe this book was ghost-written, and that's a shame. A good ghostwriter would have said, "Mary, don't you think your readers are going to get just a teensy bit ill of your frogbrained simplicities?" Mary would then respond, "Golly, maybe you're right" - and then the book would have been inproved. Because she does come off at least af- fable. Well, not completely. After all, she thought Ethel Merman was a swell = - gal and she does recount, ruefully, how Y V -she almost killed someone with a jar of Iond's Cold Cream. ("Wasn't I a silly?" she must have been chuckling as she put those immortal words to parch- pac-ment.) Still, she is full of love for her hus- band, who must have been a man of endless patience; she is loyal to a fault -to the point of inserting the name of one of her childhood friends ito every show she ever did (with the exception of one or two) - the friend's name was Bessie Mae Sue Ella Yaeger. Isn't that adorable? Don't you just want to cry? Books with lots of backstage gossip usually delight me. This one left me wondering "Why?" and "flow did we deserve this?" There is a minimum of backstage gossip in this book, and a maximum of cloying stupidity. Consider the caption of one set of pictures in the tome - she shows us a variety of Holly- wood stills taken of her - "me as Jean Arthur, me as Claudette Colbert" etc. and then, a picture or her without makeup - "but mostly I just looked sick." Now isn't that modest? Isn't she a model for future generations? Mary Martin and her husband used took (Cyril Ritchard) stand off, in one to buy presents for all the stage crews that made her known the world over. See MARTIN, Page 7 H+ ie 1 'Breaks': Riding high and violent By DAVID KEEPS Brando and Nicholson, two contemporary screen heavyweights grapple valiantly with a terse, languorous- ly violent Western, Missouri Breaks, newly opened at the Briarwood Movies. It is hard to determine the ultimate victor in Arthur Penn's latest venture, for both the performances and the intensely psychotic story are joined together so deftly. Usually the star tends to dominate the production,. and the combination of Brando, the legend, and Nichol- son, the near legend, threatened to be an explosive concurrence of superstar chemistry. Fortunately, the combination never really gels, but only because of plot mechanics. The two have few scenes together, wiich strengthens the picture immeasurably; each being left to his own characterization, instead of the dalliance between two screen personalities. As a result, the acting is remarkably strong: Nicholson honing off the punky edge of his previous roles, and Brando un- deniably subtle and purely strange in his portrayal of the eccentric manhunter, Robert E. Lee Clayton. The story is terse; at times excruciatingly slow. Basically it is the romance of a horse thief, Tom Logan (Nicholson) and the daughter of a wealthy hanging- judge, Jane Braxton, played by an interesting and attractive newcomer, Kathleen Lloyd. Logan is seeking revenge for the hanging of one of his mob, and also planning a horse heist from the Canadian Mounties, Shortly after murdering Judge -Braxton's right-hand- man, Logan and his gang take residence at the ranch adjacent to Judge Braxton and his daughter. Mean- while, Braxton has engaged the services of Mr. Clayton (Brando) to avenge the murder. The film opens slowly, flooding the screen with expnsive and colorful cinematography, until Penn explodes with the sudden and unexpected jerking of a contorted body at the end of the rope. The action then degenerates into a bloodlusty adventure with a good deal of suspense and some wrenchingly bizzare action, Violence, elegant and brilliantly gory, is a trademark of Arthur Penn, as can be easily seen in Bonnie and Clyde, and now his latest. But the violence is never cheap or exploitative, it is real, human violence with extraordinary emotional interest and impact. There are no trappings of the trendy violent films so common today, rather the violence, like the entire film is carefully and brilliantly wrought.