The Michigan Daily Edited and managed by Students at the University of Michigan Wednesday, May 21, 1975 News Phone: 764-0552 o r SiN - i e v~etobdoen PRESIDENT FORD'S DECISION to veto strip-mining control bill recently pushed through Congress has re- inforced the worst fears of those who feel the present crop of administrative energy policy architects are lead- ing this country down the road to disaster. The bill would have put a stop to the coal industry's traditional practice of raping the countryside of its fer- tile top layers in order to get at the coal seams below. Environmental groups and residents of mining areas have, massed a vigorous campaign to outlaw stripmining and the unredeemed devastation of the land it inevitably leaves behind. By choosing to veto the bill, President Ford has served notice on the American people that he is willing to put the short-term convenience and advantage of the energy industry ahead of the nation's long-term energy and environmental needs. IT'S A WIDELY accepted fact that the days of oil-and coal-generated power are severely numbered. A rea- soned and resnonsible approach to the nation's future energy needs would have to include provisions for re- strictins- conventional energy consumption until efficient and safe alternative energy sources can be implemented. It seems that President Ford doesn't quite grasp the fact that the price of gratuities he extends to the Exxons and Peabodys of today may well be unbearable when it takes its toll on energy consumers twenty or thirty years hence. Kindne No rooi By GORDON ATCHESON WASHINGTON - On a balmy Saturday afternoon about a week ago, over 125,00 people flocked to the Washington Monu- ment and the surrounding mall to celebrate "Human Kindness Day" which included a free Stevie Wonder concert. At least 600, perhaps many more, of the people left the event much poorer than when they came. They were robbed and besten by roving gangs of youths, as others in she audience tooked on helplessly. Although the incidans were not co-ordinated, they w e r e certainly too numerous t. be dismissed as sporadic or isolat- ed, and caused a major out- burst of anger from civic lead- ers. Perhaps the reaction was due in part to the heavy racial over- tones; nearly all the victims were white and the gangs black. But even more compelling was the brutality and caliousness evident in the attacks. One Agriculture Dapartment executive cut across the mall on his way home from the of- fice. He had been working on Saturday to catch up on the bureaucratic red tape. As he approached the tower- ing marble spike of the Wash- ington monument, a hoard of teenagers enveloped, him and began savagely pum-melling him with fists and make-shift clubs. In the fracas, the man was stab- bed in the eye. He stood there, clutchimg at ass Day crowd: m for humanity the bleeding wvound. But nobody dared assist him for fear the gang might attack them next. Lying in a hospital bed a day later, doctors told the man lie had lost the sight in one eye. That was a single part of what happened - at Hunan Kindness Day. But it really :sn't particularly surprising that vio- lence erupted. What is surprising is t h a t Washington hasn't alreayiv ex- ploded.Y Unlike probably every other major metropolitan area in the country, Washington has no mid- die class. In essence there exists no buffer zone between t h e abject poor, of which' there are many, and the powerful a n d rich, who are among the most powerful and rich in the woarld. WHEN THESE two aides of the city rub together, tremerd- ous friction develops. A n d sometimes it ignites as it did at the Human Kindness Day celebration. The disparity of the social classes in Washington is further reflected in the high crime rate. But for some reason the crime tends to be less violent than in Detroit or Atlanta, where murder at times seems ram- pant. The stately, almost regal buildings of government and the quiet shaded streets that cradle quarter-million dollar 5 o m e s clash with the stifling, crowded inner city. The tourists and visiting heads of state never see the poverty and pent-up hostility, yet it thrives, growing as the economy continues downward and the un- employment offices pull more people than the best movie n town. RIGHT NOW the poor leed lives of quiet despervion. But the splendidly dressed couples strolling .own Wiscon- sin Ave. talk about a long hot summer, as they gaze at costly baubles in the Georgetovn b'su- tiques. Of course, they may mertly mean that the weather will be sunny and humid - just like every other summer in Wash- ington. But probably not. For some reason people have .a hunch, a suspicion, a premonition -- call it what you will - that there is going to be more trouble in this town in the next couple of months than there bas been for quite a while. They don't have any answers. They would probably lust as soon forget about that other side of Washington, except. that it just won't go away. The city has moved to b a n large free rock concerts such as the one held on Human Kind- ness Day. But it seems like there is more to solvi'g the problem than that. Gordon Atcheson is co- editor-in-chief of The Daily presentlv working with the Knight Newspapers Wash- ington Bureau as a summer intern. Letters: Sex bias claim unfounded To The Editor: RACISM and sexism come in many costumes; and t h e s e days the fashionable racist or sexist can be seen making his appearance in an outfit of self- serving humanism. It seems that the accusation of reverse discrimination (against whites or males as the case may be) is rapidly becoming the rallying flag of those who would like +o slow down the erosion of white, male hegemony in this society. The editorial of May 14, "The Flip Side of Sex Bias", is one more manifestation of this men- tality, by which a cry of "equal treatment for all at all times and in all places" becomes a disguise for perpetuating in- equality in as many places as possible. The editorial in ques- tion expressed considerable out- rage about an incident in which a male was apparently asked to remove himself from a Wamen's Studies course. I WOULD LIKE to address the general issue of all-women groups, rather than the specifics of the incident which inspired the May 14 editorial. If there is ever to be rcal ex- ual equality, women and men must meet on equal ground, with equal control over reaources. Among the resources which per- petuate male dominance are the habits which we all acquire in the process of socialization. The pattern by which women defer to men, and by which men ex- pect deference from women, is. one of the more deeply engraved of our sexually dimorphic ac- quired reflexes. This reflex im- pels women to respond to male needs and desires-in preference to their own, and it enables nten to obtain the attention, energy, and service of the women around them. This deference pattern, whn combined with the trainina te- ceived by women to fear male disapproval, can, resuit in d's- cession groups in wich ewomut are inhibited and men dominate conversation. One a 4tht a ic- tions of women-only discussion groups is to break some of these habits for both sexes. Womnen in such groups do it fact feel more free to think and speak. Moreover, the act of insis ing on such a woman-only group is a lesson in valuing our own needs and desires, instead of deferring to those of men. THE ISSUE of seoaratism is of course a complex one, and there are good and' ra-ional ar- guments on all sides of the ques- tion. But the argument is more often tactical than rational. It is revealing to look at when, how, and by whom the argument against separatism is deployed. Men, who never thought twice about their exclusive access to corporation boards, social clubs, locker rooms, departmental fa- culties, athletic teams, and po- litical leadership, suddenly see the outrage of sexual exclusion. Men, who were perfectly ccn- tent to have women serarated in kitchens and kindergartens, suddenly discover that separat- ism is anti-humanist waea wo- men engage in single sex politi- cal and intellectual acivty. If male "humanis-s ' had been more vociferous in de- nouncing male and female sep- aratism (in councils of state and nurseries, respectively) be- fore the advent of the feminist movement, I would be less skep- tical about their current insist- ence on "equal" treatment. The "equality" argument against separatism is used to undercut attempts by women to organize in opposition o male power and privilege. It is used to prevent women from obta-n- ing precisely those reasurces necessary for true equality. If the "equality" argument did not so often function t) perpetuate sexual inequality, I would find it more reasonable to insist upon what is ultimately a reasonable ideal. But when men basically control the institutions, univer- sities, classrooms, ideologies, and women in this society, while women attempt to control a meager few. discussion groups, the humanist argument for equal male access to women's rather limited resaurces is ar- rogant. I MYSELF have been in the woments movement for many years, and have undergone var- ious incarnations as marxist fe- minist,. separatist feminist, and humanist feminist, among oth- ers. . I currently hold that it is a task of the feminist movement to articulate a vision of a utopia of gender equality, in which any form of sexual hierarchy 'vill be an artifact. But is s dif'icut for feminists to develop a dis- course on sexual equality when the discussion is expr-priate: by men squawking about the dis- integration of their cherished prerogatives. -Gayle Rubin May 19 WHAT15 THE PURPOSE YES! I'M A OF YOUR EXISTENCE? THAT'S SPECIALST. I KILL. I' PEOPLE! - t . .,. a s TREN HOW IN THE WORLDPa I KILL YOU JUSTIFY YOUR EXI5TENCE2 REGARPLES OF RACE ,#COLOR IM A 6PORT OR CREEP! M\~i