Vol. LXXXVIII, No. 42S (rfII~hIThursday, July 13, 1978 [o..ichigan DAILY 12 Pages Ann Arbor, Michigan Ten Cents Fired By RENE BECKER Marc Levin, former city accountant who was fired as a result of an invest- ment scandal last fall, is suing the city for $1 million plus lawyers' fees. In the lawsuit filed Monday, Levin charges he was denied due process in the personnel review which led to his dismissal. He also charges the city with breach of contract, in part alleging the city did not follow its own rules and regulations in the review of his dismissal. The third count of the suit claims defamation. LEVIN WAS fired on October 5 by city administrator Sylvester Murray shortly after it was announced that the city had been involved in an investment deal similar to arbitrage. If an individual borrowed money from a bank at five per cent interest then invested that money in something which offered 10 per cent interest, that would be arbitrage. It is not generally considered a risk, but there are federal laws which prohibit cities from using the technique. Carter: Dissidents rights violated GENEVA, Switzerland (AP) - President Carter accused the Soviet Union yesterday of violating the 1975 Helsinki human rights accords in the trials of Anatoly Shcharansky, Alexan- der Ginzburg and other prominent Soviet dissidents. Carter made the accusation in a message to Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev that Secretary of State Cyrus Vance delivered to Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko in a private meeting following day-long arms con- trol negotiations. CARTER'S MESSAGE charged Soviet authorities with "disregard for due process" in the conduct of the trials of Shcharansky and Ginzburg. U.S. spokesman Hodding Carter said the administration was still "not linking" its displeasure over the trials to an effort to complete a treaty limiting strategic nuclear weapons - the purpose of the Vance-Gromyko talks. He added, however, that "We are reviewing other aspects of our relation- ship." One possible course of action known to be under consideration is blocking shipment of oil drilling equipment from American firms to the Soviet Union. U.S. officials privately question whether economic sanctions of this sort could have a major impact on Soviet behavior.. - SPOKESMAN CARTER said the See TRIALS, Page 10 employee sues city The city had paper losses of more manner in which the hearing in (Levin) be given an increase in pay." than $1 million in the investment deal in December was conducted." Russell said he asked at the hearing which Levin was implicated. The deal Russell said Levin alleges that Garret not be allowed to chair the involved borrowing millions of dollars specifically that the review board board. He said the city attorney also of securities from the Merril, Lynch, would not allow all defense witnesses requested Garret be excused. Russell Pierce, Fenner and Smith brokerage requested to testify. said the request "was basically firm. The city came out of the deal un- ignored." scathed because the firm absorbed the RUSSELL SAID the board did not loss. reveal some documents to him concer- IN RESPONSE to suggestions that LEVIN DOES not deny his involve ment in the deal but charges that his supervisors knew of the operation and had given consent. Levin's supervisors suffered disciplinary action but were not fired. . According to Levin's Detroit attor- ney, Lyle Russell, the lack of due process charge "centers around the ning Levin until the day of the hearing. In this and other respects Russell called the board "biased." The personnel board and the chair- man, William Garret, had been chosen by Murray, Russell said. He said Garret had reviewed Levin's invest- ment activities only a few months before the "whole thing blew up and he had signed a recommendation that Levin might have been the victim of a conspiracy in the city hall, Russell said he "stopped short of that accusation" because it would be too difficult to prove. While discounting the certainty of a conspiracy, Russell attributed Levin's plight to administrative "ineptness." See FIRED, Page 10 Daily Photo by JOHN KNOX A SON OF a postal worker shows a sign claiming a family of four cannot live comfortably on $5.50 an hour. Workers picketed yesterday for higher wages and better working conditions and complained about the slow progress in contract negotiations. Postal workers criticize talks By MICHAEL ARKUSH Unhappy with the pace of negotiations for a new contract, ten postal service employees picketed yesterday in front of the Liberty St. postal station. The picketers complained the U.S. Postal Service was un- willing to propose improvements in the employees' working conditions and wages. YESTERDAY'S "informational picket" was one of many nationwide protests against the postal service management. Nearly 6,000 emplyees demonstrated in Washington, D.C., where the negotiations are in progress. "This isn't a strike, We are just trying to tell the public and Congress that the current contract expires on July 20, and negotiations are going so slowly that we're worried that a new contract won't be done in time," said Louis Brough, former president of the Michigan Association of Letter Carriers. Brough said he would not completely rule out the possibility of a strike if a new contract is not signed by July 20. THE EMPLOYEES carried placards reading, "Postal people are united", and "U.S. postal workers are the most ef- ficient in the world." A spokesman for the National Association of Letter Carriers in Washington said the organization is seeking to insure that supervisors are not assigned jobs that are normally relegated to clerks. "Our basic demands are a 14 per cent wage increase, better working conditions especially concerning sick leave benefits and better working rules," he said. BUT THE MAIN thrust of the picket was to protest against alleged secrecy and-lack of speed in the negotiations. Brough said he learned from a postal official in Washington that the Postal Service wants to take away over 100,000 jobs. Brough charged the Carter administration has become too active in the negotiating process. "The administration is trying to use us as the scapegoat of the economy's problems," he said. He also said he believed the Postal Service would have to negotiate a fair contract or the national interest would be significantly harmed. See POSTAL, Page 12