Page 14-Saturday, June 17, 1978-The Michigan Daily (Conti of the Bald funds were because, ac funds had be tain cases im administrati SINCE TI elderly hour disaster with money toi residents, the an understan mingham wa there was mo It was abi were finally in 1976, that statements receive mone projects if the their city of income hous mingham, b taken by MSI the assessed low-income elderly peopl project was dwellers, tha ingham woul units of low-i which was la frontations1 missioners a "We went for more," said MSHDA. IN APRILc st time firml project was k up with low-i Dorothy Car Birmingham locks nued from Page 9) mayor by the commission in 1977, seen the disastrou win House project, HUD called a public meeting to discuss with gloomy firetraps th held up for long months the community what the ramifications ted, and the crime a; cording to Conrad, HUD of the MSHDA demands were. "I went borhoods that camei en mismanaged and in cer- to Lansing, and then the MSHDA people There were the poorl pounded during the Nixon came down here and looked around. I infested homes built1 on. showed them we didn't have any large housing program ths tracts of land where we could put 1 attention to Detroit HE construction of the anything," explained Conrad. there were the con sing could have been a "They were thinking of one project dope dens known as t out the guarantee of HUD which we rejected right away - even if built in Taylor in the' bring in lower-income we had a parcel of land," she added. congestion and the e project was shelved with The commission instead opted to borhood schools that ding from HUD that Bir- renovate dilapidated houses scattered and there was the f s on the top of the list when throughout the city to use as low- that property rates ney to be released, income housing. "I would say that those because the people in out the time HUD funds commissioners who supported family too busy bending o released to Birmingham, housing at all felt that a project was not help somebody else. MSHDA began making in the best interest of anybody - AND, MAYBE the that cities would only primarily not the tenants. American racism. y for their elderly housing "You house them all together, and speech in front of al y kept up some set ratio in then you drive people through town and Voters group, one of t elderly housing to low- say 'that's our low-income housing' - ran against the three ing for families. In Bir- lots of communities do that," Conrad the voting block in P ased on housing surveys explained. favored housing) sai HDA of the whole county, ALL OF A sudden, water began tion of this entire pl ratio was to be one unit of cascading over the dam. The voters of generate a total soc housing financed for the sleepy community were being mix within the same1 e. And since the downtown called to order, and the bell was ringing within the same livi blueprinted to house 152 ever louder as the days went on. It was mix never existedi 1 meant the city of Birm- time to fight, for the very meaning of mankind, and is biolo d have to come up with 76 Birmingham - the undeniably plain The campaigningp ncome housing - a figure and simple fact that Birmingham was that, William York ter whittled down in con- not for everyone - had been dragged biggest vote-getter in between the city com- into doubt, by a group of "bastards York later was to sta nd MSHDA to 50 units. from Washington" and "people here flustered by his fir 50, but we could have used with a guilty conscience," as the mayor paign, and had meal a representative from expressed. was "sociologically w Indeed, they were terrified. A com- Things moved ve of 1977, MSHDA for the fir- munity had been constructed, over that. About four or y stated that the Baldwin many years, and they were not about to formed to combat the illed, until the city came let it fall apart now. They had seen what the pro-housing con income housing. In May, happened when the government forced groups, which accor nrad, who was elected subsidized housing on people, they had missioner had been m the door s results - the at were construc- nd decaying neigh- in with the tenants. y-constructed, rat- under the old HUD at brought national in the 60's, and istantly vandalized the Dover complex 70's. There was the decay of neigh- was sure to follow, frustrating feeling would drop, all n Washington were ver backwards to re was a touch of In a campaign League of Women he candidates who commissioners on May (all of whom d "The overall ac- an is to create or cial and economic housing structure, ing space. Such a in the history of gically wrong." politician who said was to be the i the May election. te that he had bee st political cam- int to say the mix wrong." - ry quickly after five groups were housing plans and mmissioners. The ding to one com- bade of roughly the newspaper & The Advertising Council We're counting Red Cross. The Good Neighbor. same people and were even listed as being a mere handful of people on man- datory records filed with the county, handed over a mimeographed group of petitions at a November 28 commission meeting and demanded a recall vote of- Mayor Conrad and commissioners Ann Dropiewski and Patricia Watt. In a May election, they were recalled. AFTER THE October notification by MSHDA that the project was on again, the public response forced the city to put the issue of the purchase of the 55 units on the April ballot with city elec- tions. The issue of the purchase of low- income housing was split into two ballot proposals. The first proposal asked whether or not the city should purchase the Baldwin project themselves, thus taking out the MSHDA stipulation that lower-income housing be provided. This proposal would cost the city a sum of not more than $6,000,000. The second proposal asked Birmingham voters if they wished to let the state pay for Baldwin and also bring in the sub- sidized lower-income housing. In the A- pril election, proposal two was defeated 4,564 to 1,772, and the first proposal was voted down by an even larger margin, 5,900 to 615. Also in that election, incumbent city commissioners Herbert Ring, Samuel Staples and Arthur Underwood lost their bids for re-election because of their pro-housing stance. MAYOR KELLEY is still elated with the victory. "I say this is the best way to choose to live - by the majority of the people. You may not have everybody an expert, but that's the system. You go to the ballot and you vote what you honestly and sincerely feel. If you've been misinformed, or if you're uninformed, that's still im- material,.That's the system of majority rule. That's democracy," he said. "saylet's take care of the need," explained the mayor. "And no need other than senior housing exists in Bir mingham. That's not being rich-bitch, that's not being smart-ass, those are absolute facts. They just do not exist in Birmingham ... why can't we rebuild our country, why can't we put houses back where they belong?" "They (the city of Pontiac) have got crime-ridden streets, they've got homeless people, they've got hungry people. You can't walk down the streets of the city of Pontiac at 11:00 at night without getting mugged, but you can do it here. And we don't owe any money. So the sons of bitches want us to get in the same position they're in. It just doesn't make sense," Kelley explained. "They say I'm trying to keep people out - but we're not an expanding city . . . We're totally encircled. We're not a Troy or a Westland or a Novi with acres and acres of land to be developed." Statistics, however, prove the mayor wrong. The 1970 census, for instance, show there to be 1144 families in Bir- mingham with incomes of less than $10,000 annually, many of whom would qualify for rent subsidies and low- income housing. According to a housing survey con- ducted by MSHDA, there are roughly 75-80 families who would qualify as low-income families in the city. IN 1967, the year when riots in Detroit, Newark and Cleveland displayed a nation seething with racial unrest, a special commission was ap- pointed by President Johnson to probe the roots of the rising militancy, and explore the vacuum of race relations. Headed up by former Illinois Governor Otto Kerner, the report warned that if the present social trends continue, there would be "the permanent establishment of two societies: one predominantly white and located in the suburbs, in smaller cities, and in outlying areas, and one largely Negro located in central cities." The Kerner commission pointed out the need for low-income housing scat- tered throughout the community, and not dumped in one spot of town. They stressed the need for non-Negro areas to accept low-income housing, and rent supplement payments. "What white Americans have never fully under- stood," the commission wrote, "but what the Negro can never fully forget is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. "The Kerner report stated that in 1968, the same year open-housing was greeted in Bir- mingham. What is happening in Birmingham is not an isolated case. In Southfield and Livonia, low-income housing has received a cold shoulder from the community. There is an endless, win- ner-less conflict being acted out: the proud, seective suburbanite against the person with the lower hand, the disadvantaged person. Perhaps the issue comes down to money, and suburbs who are able to refuse state and federal money doing so and thus effectively capping low- income housing efforts. If this is the case, then Birmingham has perhaps an enviable position - they have a mayor who boasts that the city could build five projects like Baldwin House whenever they want to, without federal funds and restrictions, and who laughs at the thought of losing federal block grants.