Energy America vs. the world By DR. ALT A. MAZRUI If Jimmy Carter's energy cru- sade is a drive for American self-sufficiency, that is had news for the rest of the world. An America which is needed by other nations, but could it- self find others "expendable," is an America still not ready for genuine internai>nal inter- dependence and a more bal- anced and egalitarian global system. Thus parts of the Third World today see a direct clash between resource conservation by the in- dustrialized nations and pros- pects for social justice in the underdeveloped nations of Af- rica, Asia and Latin America. A sustained attempt by the Northern Hemisphere (especial- ly North America, Western Eu- rope and Japan) to reduce its consumption of oil and other re- sources is bound to mean re- duced leverage and influence The Michigan Daily Edited and managed by Students at the University of Michigan Friday, May 6, 1977 News Phone: 764-0552 Tricky Dick-tricks on JICHARD M. NIXON has made one thing perfectly clear: he will never fully confess to his part in Watergate-related crimes. One thousand and one days since his resignation from the presidency, he continues to shield the truth. In the first of a four-part series of interviews with David Frost, Nixon only went so far as to confirm knowledge the public already has. Such knowledge, including the times Nixon "learned about" different facets of Watergate, was brought to light through the establishment, cross-examination and corroboration of various testimonies by reporters, Con- gressional commit tees and courts. Nixon offered nothing new. In fact, he only evasive- ly re-established the old. Despite 1,001 days in virtual seclusion, time has obviously not rehabilitated the old Nixon. He still evades any and all questions possible. He still twists and shades the truth. And, he still relies on the old "Trust Me" emotional appeal first seen in his "Checkers" speech in the early 50's. In fact, it is just that emotional appeal which may fog viewer's minds, and induce them to forget several unanswered questions. For instance, if Nixon's claim he had no part in Watergate wrongdoing is true, whey then, did he not put a total end to it was soon as he learned of the problems? Or, why were the Presidential tapes ever made? Who did the erasing? What is the story behind the Nixon pardon? As it stands now, we are only left to speculation based on the testimonies of people close to the Nixon Administration. After 1,001 days, Dick Nixon has shown us one thing: he still has the American public to kick around. U.S. to OK Viet Nam for U.N.--it's about time WE NOTE WITH SOME SMALL sense of satisfaction and a larger sense of relief the announcement from Paris that the U.S. government will no longer veto the admission of Vietnam to the United Nations. We hope this is part of the process called "normalization," and that diplomatic relations will be initiated and the trade embargo lifted in the very near future. The American government's decision not to oppose Vietnam's entry into the U.N. is neither especially in- novative nor visionary, but at least it demonstrates (along with much of the rest of the Carter administration's foreign policy) a firm grasp on the obvious. It is encouraging that the decision not to veto was made for the right reasons: a token demonstration of cooperation, and a touching belief In the universality of the United Nations, Apparently this administration has discovered the rest of the planet is not simply a sideshow to be man- ipulated for its effect on the circus of domestic politics.- for the resource producers over the resource consumers. While this prospect may ap- peal to consumer nations, it has already resulted in tough revi- sions in Iran's ambitious de- velopmental plans. The tone of decision-making within OPEC has become more circumspect, a little more cautious. The OPEC nations realize they have little more than a decade to exert leverage on the indus- trialized countries. Further re- straint in consumption by the Northern Hemisphere would weaken OPEC leverage even further. Yet the need for the oil pro- ducers to use their power not only for themselves, but to en- courage an entirely new world economic system, remains as great as ever. The late British philosopher Bertrand Russell reminded us civilization was born out of the pursuit of luxury. As man got beyond the struggle to satisfy basic needs and started to as- pire to additional comforts, civ- ilization began to emerge out of the womb of that extravagance. But while it is true the pur- suit of luxury helps give birth to civilization as we know it, it is equally true the excessive pursuit of luxury could destroy civilization. In this sense, some may view Jimmy Carter as a kind of re- incarnation of the prophet John Calvin. A reintroduction of Cal- vinistic austerity in the West, and restraint to conserve re- sources and curtail consumption, would help to arrest the decay of Western civilization. Such a turn of policy is clear- ly not in the best interests of the Southern Hemisphere na- tions. On the contrary, it is im- portant to them that for at least another generation the Northern Hemisphere's appetite for ener- gy and raw materials should remain relatively unabated. On- ly in this way will the North increase its dependence on the countries that produce those re- sources. Petrodollars in the hands of the Arabs on one side, and gold in the hands of the majority of South Africans on the other, could jointly constitute an enor- mous threat against monetary stability and rates of exchange in Western centers. The West's response to Third World arguments is often in di- rect proportion to its own sense of vulnerability. Increased re- source importation by the West should increase its responsive- ness to Third World pressures. If the Third World perfects techniques of negotiation and international lobbying for change before the West's en- ergy appetite abates, the old pattern of relationships between the dominant North and the un- derdeveloped South might at last be transformed. Western pursuit of luxury, which had been such a major force in the rise of the West to global pre-eminence, would at last also be an instrument for cutting down to size West- ern power over the rest of man- kind. Dr. Mazrsri, profe sor of fio- li/ial irience at the University of Michigan, and a member of its ri/er for Afro-American Studies, has au/hored numerous books and articles on Africa and the Third World, some for the Pacific Ne-s Service. aMY' kN46 5 .11r IM'( AR ,\ I Letters to sulsexual To The Daily: A few scattered thoughts prompted by Gregory Hill's letter printed on April 15. I become angry when "Biblical Christian prin- ciples" are the basis of a persecution so intense that it's out to destroy a rather large slice of an individual's identity - his sexuality. You for- get, brother Hill, God loves us all. Hill attributes the graffiti in men's restrooms to gays. Being female, I've never seen the "de- cor" contributed by these "immoral/disturbed individuals." I suggest if Hill believes the vul- gar words and graphics come from gays only, and if that is all he knows of gays in this or any other community, it's no wonder he's sick- ened (though it's a gross reaction) by homosexu- ality. The issue of gay teachers, policemen, soldiers, etc. is thorny only because of the child molester label given any homosexual and the fear gays are out to convert the world to their way of having sex. Speaking of conversion, the best sex I've had (if defined in terms of climax intensity and/or duration) has been the result of masturbation., I'm almost certain Hill views self-manipulation and other methods which are not the front-to- front, woman-man, let's-have-a-baby variety as perverse, so here I am - baddest of the bad. Social pressures aside, I've had the opportuni- ty to learn the best way of satisfying my sex urge - intimate loves and lovers available or not. If I were realistic l'd admit that social pressure can never be aside and that it did/does have an effect on my sexual evolution. Some- where along the line I found masturbation the only comfortable option I had. SUISEXUALS UNITE! Joanna Soukup TeDailyI no waste To The Daily: I am a junior doing a double major in Ger- man and history. Although your recent series of articles on the language requirement here was not blatantly critical of the program, the impli- cations were obvious. It seems that students are forced to spend time studying languages when they would rather be pursuing other academic goals, and the people dedicated enough to go to the language lab are really just wasting their time (although generously a few opposing opinions were quoted). There is value in studying foreign languages. The more you study a language the more you realize that it is not the words, but the ideas behind them, that are important. The same thoughts can be expressed in many ways. I do not think that going to the language lab is a waste of time. I found it very helpful, es- pecially in the lower level classes. True, it does seem a bit silly to be talking into a machine, But the repetition does help the student to learn words and their pronounciation; it also helps you get used to common sentence structures and to responding to German with German - the first step towards being able to hold a con- versation in German. I can't help thinking that Americans really are too egotistical. We demand that all the na- tions of the world come to us on our terms, and communicate with us in our language. It is too soon for us to forget the mistake we make when we assume that our culture is superior to all others, and that a few English speaking people can solve any problem. As the world grows smaller through speedier forms of communica- tion, we need now more than ever to be aware that most other countries have a far richer heritage than we do. Helena Jo Goldstein