-7- -4- A I 4I U? 4 4 X 4. Page Ten THE MICHIGAN DAILY Wednesday, July 1, 1970 - Wednesday, July 1, 1970 THE MICHIGAN DAILY IT__- - ,.--~--. --- . ..--.--- ________ i 0 The University of Michigan INTERI RULES and Final By ROB BIER Final action is expected today in the Legislature on the higher education ap- propriations bill with the possibility of an additional tuition increase for the University hanging in the balance. Last Thursday the House approved a version which included $6 million more for state universities, with a $1.25 million increase for the University, over the ear- lier Senate version. The House also added a number of amendments aimed at curb- ing c a m p us disruptions and approved other measures of the same sort already passed by the Senate. "The outlook doesn't look very good as of this point in time," President Robben Fleming said yesterday, commenting on the outlook for the University's appro- priation. "We have already indicated that we will work very hard to avoid a tuition increase, but right now it's hard to say," he added. Sen. Charles Zollar (R-Benton Har- bor), chairman of the Senate Appropria- tions committee and a member of, the Joint Senate-House committee which has been meeting to work out a compromise vote set between the two versions, was equally pessimistic yesterday. "We have to have a balanced budget and if we give $6 million (the total in- crease in the bill approved by the House) to the universities we'll have to take it out of mental health or somewhere else," Zollar said. "The money just isn't there." Fleming agreed that Zollar might be right. "Apparently revenues are turning out to be less than was expected and the final figure may end up close to the one originally passed by the Senate," he said. At the time the Senate approved $73.3 million for the University, administra- tion officials said it might necessitate another tuition increase above the 15 per cent one approved by the ,Regents in April. But money is not the only issue which has been keeping administrators on the phones to Lansing. The House, also added a number of amendments to the bill, in- cluding: -A measure requiring state universi- ties to expel any student "who causes willful damage to public property on a on 'U' campus or, other facility of a college or university;" -An amendment, apparently aimed at the University's 10 per cent black ad- missions goal, which would prohibit state universities from establishing admissions criteria based on race, national origin or religion, and; -A vote to cut $93,000 from the ap- propriation for Wayne State University because of the administration's failure to curb publication of the university's stu- dent newspaper, the South End, which legislators have criticized for publishing articles allegedly emphasizing profanity- and sexual perversion. Those amendments join a provision which remained from the Senate version specifying a -minimum number of hours a faculty member must spend each week in classroom instruction and another re- quiring state universities to submit a written report to Lansing of any damage which occurs during a campus disruption. "I don't really know what the provision on admissions criteria will mean for our black admissions goal," Vice President for Academic Affairs Allan Smith said bu yesterday. deleted by to we're workin He also s hours provi dropped. "W one. Otherw written in fo Smith said. be 'changing structional h flexibility." Fleming sa might have two measure know. One us, but how fluence his said. Both the $ House for t million votec of Gov. Wil ommendatio: ernor had either the or its additic DISCIPLINARY PROCEDU RES Statement by the Board of Regents April 17, 1970 On March 31 we issued a statement containing the following passage : "Faculty and student groups have worked for some months on revision of rules and enforce- ment procedures. This the Regents welcome because they understand that a key element in rule enactment and enforcement is par- ticipation by those who will be governed there- by. Nevertheless, and until such procedures can be perfected, it is essential that there be more effective internal sanctions." To provide a temporary mechanism, we do now issue these Interim Rules and Disciplinary Proce- dures, to be applied to offenses occurring here- after. They may be superseded or supplemented by our adoption of rules drafted by the Univer- sity Council and our establishment of a more permanent judiciary. INTRODUCTION I. RULES A, The following forms of conduct, being in- compatible with the purposes of an aca- demic community; are prohibited: 1. Use of force or violence against any member or guest of the University com- munity; 2. Interference by force, threat or duress, with the freedom of movement of any member or guest of. the University; 3. Disruption or unauthorized interruption of a class; 4. Disruption or interruption of a duly authorized University activity, including (but not limited to) convocations, as- semblies, lectures, and recruiting inter- views; 5. Continued occupation of a University facility after being ordered to leave by the President or his agent; 6. Defacement, damage to or theft of Uni- versity property. B. Engaging in any of the forms of conduct set forth in preceding Paragraph A shall subject the violator to sanctions provided in Section II of this document. 11. SANCTIONS A. The following sanctions may be imposed on violators: 1. Warning: Notice, orally or in writing, that continuation or repetition of con- duct found wrongful may be cause for more severe disciplinary action. 2. Censure: A written reprimand, including the possibility of more severe disciplin- ary sanctions in the event of the finding of a subsequent violation of a University regulation within a stated period of time. 3. Probation: Exclusion from participation in .privileged or extra-curricular Univer- sity activities for a period not exceeding one year. 4. Restitution: Reimbursement for deface- ment, damage to or misappropriation of property. 5. Suspension: Exclusion from classes and other privileges or activities as set forth in the notice for a definite period of time. 6. Expulsion: Termination of student status. Readmission may not be sought before the expiration of one year from the date of expulsion. B. Sanction number four (restitution) may be imposed either alone or in addition to any other sanction. C. These sanctions for violation of the rules set forth in Section I may be imposed by the employment of the procedures set forth in Section III of this document. III. DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES A. Charges of violatons of these Interim Rules may be made by any member or guest of the University community or by any represen- tative of any department or agency of the University. B. Charges shall be in writing and shall be filed with the dean of the school or college in which the student charged is enrolled. C. Upon filing of the charges, the dean imme- diately shall forward them to the Office of the University Attorney. D. If the evidence is determined by the Uni- versity Attorney sufficient to warrant pro- ceeding further, the Office of the Univer- sity Attorney shall prepare and serve on the person charged a complaint setting forth the nature, time, and place of the violation charged. The complaint shall be served on the person charged promptly and within thirty days of the filing of charges. Service of the complaint shall be personal or by registered mail addressed to the per- son charged at his last University-recorded local address. The complaint shall be ac- companied with notification of the date, time, and place of the hearing, which date shall be not less than five nor more than fifteen days from the date of service. A copy of the complaint and certification of service shall be filed in the Office of the President and in the office of-the dean. E. The hearing shall be held before a hearing officer, not otherwise employed by the Uni- versity, appointed by the President. F. On written motion of the person charged, filed in the Office of the University At- torney any time before thehearing begins, the hearing shall be postponed until dis- position at the trial court level of any pending criminal proceedings arising out of the same conduct, provided, however. that a student who is convicted of a crim- inal offense arising out of the same con- duct and is charged with violation of a University rule shall be ineligible to register at the University in the semester following his conviction and thereafter unless and until the University charges against him have' been heard and decided. G. The hearing shall be governed by the fol lowing rules of procedure : 1. At the request of the person charged, the hearing shall be conducted in private. 2. The person charged shall have the right to have his defense conducted by an adviser of his choice, the right to hear and examine adverse witnesses, and the right to testify and present evidence and witnesses in his own behalf. 3. If the person charged shall, after due notice, fail to appear or if, having ap- peared, he shall make no response to the complaint, the hearing officer shall pro- ceed with the hearing. H. The hearing officer is authorized: 1. To limit the number in attendance at the hearing to assure decorum; 2. To limit the number of witnesses in order to avoid dilatory tactics; 3. If a party to the hearing or his adviser shall deliberately conduct himself in a manner disruptive of the hearing, to exclude him and proceed with the hear- ing as if he had not appeared. I. Within fifteen days of the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer shall file a re- port containing findings of fact, conclu- sions as to the validity of the charges. If the person charged is found guilty, the hearing officer shall impose any sanction or sanctions. The report shall be filed with the dean and served on the person charged in person or by registered mail: If the hearing was conducted in the absence of the individual charged, the report shall so indicate. J. Sanctions may be appealed to the Regents on the record by filing a notice of appeal in the Office of the President within five days of service of the hearing officer's re- port. The Regents' decision on the appeal shall be served on the appellant in person or by registered mail, and shall be final. K. Pending completion of the hearing and imposition of sanctions, the status within the University of the person charged shall not be altered unless his continued presence on campus shall be found by the President or his delegated representative to constitute a serious threat to the University com- munity or.to the property of the University. Such findings shall be preceded by an ap- propriate hearing unless extraoardinary cir- cumstances preclude a hearing. In any such case, the President or his delegated representative is authorized to suspend the person charged, the suspension to remain in effect pending completion of the hearing and final determination of the case. IV. APPLICABILITY These rules and procedures, are applicable to all students in the University for offenses occurring hereafter, and supersede any provi- sions of the by-laws, rules, and regulations in- consistent therewith. They shall remain in ef- fect until superseded by other rules and proce- dures established by the Board of Regents. April 17, 1970 Senate approves 19-year-olds face draft lottery today postal refor WASHINGTON (P) - Some two million men born in 1951 share an hour and a half of su- spense today as a national lot- tery assigns the mplaces in line for the 1971 military draft. Most of them probably will end up either deferred or ex- empt from the draft, or ready to enlist voluntarily; but for the others, available but not eager, the lottery drawing is crucial. By the drawing of red and green capsules from two rotat- ing drums, each man's birth- d a y is matched to a number from one to 365. Available men will be called for military service next year beginning with the lowest num- bers and progressing to higher ones. How high the number calls next year will go is anybody's guess, depending as it does on how m a n y men are actually available and how many t h e Pentagon decides to draft. Even for those deferred or ex- empt, the numbers in today's lottery are significant; for such men would have to f a c e the draft with those same numbers at any time in the future if they should lose their deferments or exemptions and become 1-A. A similar lottery last Decem- ber assigned place-in-line num- bers to all men then between the ages of 19 and 26. T h e y keep the numbers they got then' and are not affected by today's drawing. The n e w drawing, however, was prepared in a more complex and cautious way to avoid the charges of inadequate mixing which followed the December event. This time, birthdays and num- bers were scrambled separately according to computer-generat- ed random tables, then placed in separate plastic drums and locked away in a room at the Commerce Department on Mon- day. With both dates a n d num- bers scrambled, high, low and in-between numbers are likely to pop up unpredictably throughout the drawing, main- taining an element of suspense. at eai cal ~m. thi Sig on is ab( Hc C ~ en+ pal Se dei Co an po, err ma id% ma ie PO. -Associatcd Prs Se ice irec tor Curtis W. Tarr wt FOLLOWS HOUSE A- TI( Selective Serv Sussman to serve as lit school dean Informed administration and faculty sources reported yes- terday that Allan Sussman, associate literary college dean, will be named to take over as interim dean of the college until an acting dean can be found o replace Dean William Hays who is leaving today for a year at the University of California in Santa Barbara. It was also reported that Dean Fedele Fauri of the social work school was being considered for the position of vice presi- dent for state relations, the post left vacant by the suicide of Arthur Ross June 5. Contacted yesterday afternoon, President Robben Fleming responded to the possibility of Fauri's appointment with a sharp, "No comment." However, he did say that an announce- ment would be made "quite soon" on a temporary replacement for Hays, who will become associate vice president for academic development upon his return to the University. Earlier reports said that Sussman had turned down the post of acting dean in order to continue teaching and research. However, Vice President for Academic Affairs Allan Smith has reportedly encountered difficulty in finding someone to serve as acting dean and has now asked Sussman to take over the dean's duties until an acting dean can be found. It had been reported elsewhere that Fauri was "offered" the vice presidency. However, last night there was no confirmation of that rumor, only that his name was being discussed, along with others. Hospitald ove Pixi WASHINGTON UP) - The Senate rejected a presidential scolding about fiscal responsibility yesterday, and voted to override President Nixon's veto of a politically popular hospital construction bill. The vote to override was 76 to 19, or 12 more than the necessary two-thirds majority. The action, following by five days a similar move in the House, thus completed the first con- gressional override of a veto in 10 years and in- jected yet another issue into the raging election- year debate over the economy. The House voted 279 to 98 last Thursday to re-pass the $1.26 billion measure. The House vote, in which 67 Republicans joined 212 Democrats to override was 27 more than the required two-thirds majority. In the Senate, not one Democrat voted to support Nixon and eight of the nine Republicans seeking re-election this year went against the administration. The only exception was Sen. Roman Hrus- ka, (R-Neb.). Republican leader Hugh Scott of Pennsylvania also voted to override the veto. Nixon's only other veto since taking office in- volved a health-education appropriations bill last biill p ,on s December. He rejecte of fiscal irresponsibil House. The bill that.Con Nixon's opposition is Burton Act, a progr that has been popula servatives for a quar It has provided i lion for 9,780 hospits nation. Nixon wanted to 1 struction of new hosp guarantees to moder would require smalle put the money into need is greatest, Congress refused provision for $1.5 bil which the governme the interest as a subs But it authorized grants for hospital. three years-$350 mi and wrote in a reqv spend the money. The University of Michigan Board of Regents