420 Maynard Street, Ann Arbor, Mich. Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of the author. This must be noted in all reprints. Saturday, May 8, 1971 News Phone: 764-0552 NIGHT EDITOR: GERI SPRUNG- Bird Hills dilemma ITY COUNCIL has moved to permit the development of 240 luxury condominiums on 60 acres of natural land adjacent to Bird Hills Park. For four months, a large number of Ann Arbor residents have attempted to prevent the rezoning which will make the construction possible. Many view the action as a mockery of the principle of citizen participation in government so often emphasized by Mayor Harris and Council members. Local environmentalists and other concerned citizens have argued that the 60-acre parcel is an integral part of the ecology of adjacent Bird Hills Park, widely considered the city's most beautiful natural area. Their protest was an effort to avert "irreparable damage" to Bird Hills they felt the development would cause. When council on March 15 challenged area residents to raise $90,000 in three weeks toward purchase of the land for a park, it was felt, that to raise such a huge sum in so short a period of time would be an impossible task. Yet, phenomenally, within that three weeks, a fund- rasing group found enough spirit in the community to raise over 1,600 pledges amounting to more than $90,000. Council had indicated it would seriously consider matching that sum and using federal funds to supply the remaining half of the estimated $360,000 purchase price to buy the land and add it to Bird Hills Park. Overruling the pleas of many individuals, young and old, and the sincere, demonstrated support of those pledges, council decided to rezone. COUNCIL'S DECISION included a "compromise" - an informal agreement with the condominium develop- ers not to build on five of the sixty acres in exchange for the city's reducing by $60,000 payments the developers would be required to make for road improvements. This comoromise by council was supposed to reduce the danger of ecological damage to Bird Hills Park. The five acres includes a valley and stream flowing into the park. Environmentalists had charged that erosion from the development would produce sedimentation in the stream ultimately damaging the park. Council's primary motive for this compromise appear- ed to be to weaken the case for a lawsuit threatened by residents, rather than to avoid damaging the park. Mayor Harris appeared to be primarily concerned with meeting his committment to build at least 2,200 housing units per year in Ann Arbor. In allowing residents only three weeks to raise the $90,000, he set before them what was considered a practically impossible goal. In addition, residents trying to save the park reported he very often deal with them with a "brush-off" attitude. Though saving those five acres will certainly con- tribute to preservation of the land, it remains highly questionable how much damage the remainder of the construction would cause. Council decided to rezone with- out ever investigating the claims of ecological damage thoroughly. Some experts have pointed out that the soil on the 60 acres is very fragile and that removing the trees and terraces which prevent erosion as well as building on any part of the land would inevitably cause runoff disturb- ing Bird Hills. The large number of vneople moving into the area (many more than if it were a park) would eventually cause the wildlife to move out. Bird Hills now supports an abundance of interesting birds that is not found else- where in the Ann Arbor area. Many have argued that the city's funds ought not be spent on the 60 acres since others areas of the city are in more urce ntned of parks. Bird Hills, however, is in urgent need of being saved from permanent ecological damage. The imminent dang- er to this unique land ought to give it a higher priority than other lands which do not face that danger and could be purchased later. The quiet By CHRIS PARKS TBHE church social, The Lions' club picnic, the PTA carnival are all familiar sights to anyone who has lived in a small town in the Midwest. Handclapping and singing to religious songs fills the air. Booths are set up dispensing homemade baked goods, balloons and other items, with proceeds going to the fund for a new altar cloth, a memorial placque, or new uni- forms for the high school band. The older people stand around, while the youngsters race in and out through the crowd, getting a pleasure out of it as hard for the adults to understand the older peoples leisurely conversations over the weather or Mrs. Jones' new dress or how Cassius Clay could never have lasted two rounds with Joe Louis, is to the children. Those from small towns, steeped in the . tradition of the ox roast, the church picnic, or the PTA carnival would have been strongly tempted not to believe protesters for peace" "balloons for peace",and one displaying cookies and baked goods were, aside from references to peace, indistinguishable from concessions at the cub scout carnivals of my childhood. If you closed your eyes, even for a moment you were transported; the good, warm, kitchen smell of fresh cookies mingling with the exciting carnival odor of peanuts, the sounds of the hawkers urging people to "get your this or don't miss your that", and the sound of tired parents calling to their children and untired children blissfully ignoring them, filled your head. After all, this wasn't really a peace demonstration. Look a little closer, scratch off the surface paint and you see the basic structure is very old and familiar. This was the peace demonstration for middle-aged men and women and small children. It was an event permeated with an incredible naivete unequaled by anything since the early peace demonstrations of my generation. THERE WAS something that bothered you about it all. Something naively pretentious in a sign for baked goods reading "eat away at the war", something rather pitiful about an eight year old boy carrying around a United Nations flag (the flag itself, sym- bolically enough, was faded almost beyond recogni- tion) and something reminiscent of the indignation of a man waking out of a long sleep to find his house has burned down, in a sign which, after over 15 years of American involvement in Vietnam, read "Before God and the world, our hands are bloody". To a veteran of several years of anti-war protests it was all somehow too simplistic, too belated, and too much like a coun- try carnival. Adding insult to injury it was perhaps just the sort of thing President Nixon might have enjoyed. Therein lies the point, however, for this was a prot'st against Nixon. For a protest to have come in this scenario with this cast of characters would have cut the Prsi- dent to the quick had he been there. Middle America may be rising from a long sleep and if the slogan of the silent majority is to become "out of the hvnng count and into the streets" it imay be the fitr t seed chance in years for an end to American involvetent in South East Asia. -An older, foreign-looking woman in the crowd was overheard to say "I lived as a German with my con- science, I don't want to have to go through that again because I didn't speak out". This largely seemed to reflect the mood of the crowd. They didn't want to be judged responsible by history for this war and i's atrocities. NO ONE COULD deny that most of the nearly three hundred who gathered at city hall Wednesday night were, in the main, middle-aged adults, protesting in a format that any small town American would have recognized and felt comfortable in. If the small town picnic is to be the Trojan horse from which Nixon is to be defeated then so be it, for Wednesday night's rally while being from an older day, may portend a new dawn. A $ that Wednesday night's peace rally at City Hall was anything but one more in a long string of small town get-togethers that date back past the turn of the cen- ury. THE SIGNS could as well have read "Lions Cub Auxiliary" as "Women United for Peace". Even the music didn't destroy the mood. Such songs as "We Shall Not Be Moved" had a certain universal "come to meeting" feeling to them strongly familiar to vet- erans of small town Methodists sing-longs. The words were different, but the handelapping, the intensely sincere quality of the music was the same. The booths also were a familiar sight. Such booths as "peanuts New LSA Dean interviewed ED~ITOR'S NOTiE: Th'e tiillowiag i exceriipitefromthate secand 'sit at an ineriew wathS LSA ODean-de'sigater Franti ithodes, tie tirstpart oiich~i as apubished Wedanesday. DAILY: What role do you en- vision students having in the gov- ernance of the literary college? RHODES: I think you've got to have a representative body that's small enough to debate the fuse -points. I think the committee we know have set up (The Faculty- Student Policy Committee) is a powerful instrument for change. I hope it'll be inventive, I hope it'll be innovative - and in bold terms, and I certainly don't think it's powerless. I don't think you've got to give the impression that you're drag- ging the faculty screaming into the twentieth century. I don't really see this as a conflict be- tween who has power. There are many of us who feel very much the way many of the students do about the need for educational re- form., I think we've moved into a new kind of era where students still have a voice - a major voice. Our' best hope now is to give these new structures a chance to work. Then, if we don't like t h e m, let's be flexible and produce new ones that are more responsive.' I do think there is a 'long-term continuing question of implemmen- tation which is really a difficult one - in which a student who's only on a committee for one year is going to find it difficult to play much of a part - and on' ques- tions of things like tenure, or pro- motions, which involve very dif- ficult judgments about scholarly standing, are probably best left to a committee of fellow faculty who've gotten all the input they can get from the students. DAILY: How do things look fi- nancially for LSA considering the University's current budget c-isa:? RHODES: Yes, the budget's a very serious problem. I'm as much aware of it, I think,.as most peo- ple. I'm coming in at a terribly bad time - it couldn't be worse. But I'm really impressed by the kinds of committments that the President (Robben Fleming) and Vice President (Allan Smith) have made. I'm especially impressed by their willingness to be so helpful in a period of very tight budgetary conditions. DAILY: Would you support changing distribution r e qu i r e- ments? RHODES: What I really want to do is look critically at all the insights we can get into the re- quirements we do have and then to experiment boldly with is e w ones . If a student could do this on an individual basis, making his own program out of it - if we could say to him, it aeems to us it sould be worthwhile on your w a y through life, at least you should have some familiarity with 1: e way these chaps think - if that's what we mean by distribution re- quirements, I think we have a lot of student support. Liberal education is supposed to make men free. What we've got to do is do it in such a way that really sets people free. My worry now is that much of what we offer really makes 'hen slaves. The great advantage of 'xpei- mentation in a place as b i g as Michigan is that you can txperi- ment and still preserve our flex- ibility to change if it's not a suc- Here we can experiment, and if these pilot programs work, if stu- dents find them meaningful, and the faculty find they're able to teach in this situation, then we can say, fine, let's bring that "ut and expand it. DAILY: What would you think of raising t he standard faculty course load? RHODES: One of the things I want to do is work very closely with the faculty in examining the whole question of use of faculty time, but I'm in no sense the boss of the faculty. I'm looking, and I won't disguise this for a commit- ment that everybody has got to be involved in undergraduate teach- ing, in some shape or form. I think what you've got to do is instead of counting contact hours, is see what a pgrticular course really involves. If you're teaching a graduate course with two stu- dents in it, and you're teaching six hours a week, you don't have too much work. You're teachi., your specialty, you don't have to do a tremendous amount of read- ing. If you're teaching a course with 300 people, as some of us do, and you've got 20 teaching fellows to train and supervise, and you say to students you can reach me any time any day, it's a different thing. ti 4 THERE APPEARS that money is actual purchase the crucial 60 acres adjacen Park. The recently nassed park bond issue $600,000 for the park's development. Part could easily go to purchase the 60-acre1 Siiinri' Fli/orial S/aff STavE iNKnPMAN LARRY Co-Edita Cos-] ROBERT CONROw .. .. .... ..... .... ... . ,........ . JIM JUDKIS. . .. ... .... ... NIGHT EDITORS: Rose Sue Berstein, Mark Diller. Jooa Schsreiner.GOral Sprung ASSISTANT NIGHT EITOHS: Juanita Anderson, Anite Alan Lenhoff, Chris Parks ly available to. t to Bird Hills even included of this money parcel. -JIM IRWIN LEMPERT Editter Books Editor Photography Editor than Miller, Robert a Crone, Jim Irwin,