420 Maynard Street, Ann Arbor, Mich. Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Editorials printed in The Michigen Daily expres the indiidual opinions of the author. T[is must be noted in all reprints. Saturday, May 22, 1971 News Phone: 764-0552 NIGHT EDITOR: GERI SPRUNG SST aftermath THE CONTROVERSIAL supersonic transport program once again met defeat Wednesday as the Senate killed a bill passed by the House to resume funding for the SST which Congress had voted in March to dis- continue. Though the Senate acted wisely in voting not to revive the program, the chief reasons which prompted the House move to restart the SST - laid-off workers and feared decline of the aerospace industry - should not be ignored. The government does have a responsibility to help the workers hurt by the cancellation of the SST pro- gram. They had no reason to anticipate the Con- gressional decision and are having several difficulties in coping with the consequences. There is a wide variety of talent and hardware available to the aerospace industry, and cancellation of the SST need not force it into a decline. The government ought to subsidize the companies to deal with problems such as efficient mass transportation and air pollution control. Assistant Secretary of the Housing and Urban De- velopment Department Harold Finger has said, "The aerospace industry's capability in hardware, software, management, planning, evaluation, analysis and pro- gramming - all can be applied to the national problems of housing, pollution, and waste management." The industry is already handling some $2.5 billion worth of non-aerosnace business annually in such fields as urban studies, pollution control and housing, accord- ing to Aerospace Association president Karl Harr, Jr. Also, there are ways to help the American aerospace industry face competition from foreign aerospace enter- prises that will be marketing SST's. If SST's were banned from landing in or flying over the United States, as they should be until it has been shown that they are not ecologically harmful, the market for any foreign SST's would be severely limited and the American aerospace industry relatively unharmed. Bills that would ban the SST are already pending in most state legislatures, including Michigan's. The U.S. government ought to make it clear to foreign builders of the plane that it regards the noise and air pollution of supersonic flight as intolerable and does not welcome SST's in its airports. The Nixon administration, in its dealings abroad, has not heeded Congress' decision. American Ambassa- dors to France and England have assured those govern- ments that the supersonic Concorde will. be allowed to land in New York and have encouraged them to go ahead with their program. ENVIRONMENTAL ARGUMENTS against the American SST weigh as heavily against the Concorde and the Russian supersonic transport. Many scientists have pointed out the hazardous ef- fects the SST would be likely to have in terms of noise and atmospheric pollution. A University of California scientist has said that the upper atmosphere's ozone shield protecting the Earth from the sun's ultraviolet rays would be cut in half in two years by a fleet of SSTs. Though the extent of such effects may not yet be known conclusively, the scientific prediction of these hazards is reason enough not to produce the plane until adequate solutions can be worked out. The SST is not worth building to discover its dangers only after they have already had their disastrous effects. In the last few years, environmentalists have made us increasingly aware of the dangers that accompany technological progress that is allowed to pursue a random course without regards for. its consequences to life on this planet. Technological advancement must be seen in terms of achieving a level of human activity where all components of population, economics, ecology, technol- ogy, and natural resources are balanced and consistent. This applies clearly to the SST. This nation has needs far more vital than helping a relatively small number of wealthy passengers reach London or Paris a few hours earlier. Our cities are de- caying; welfare costs are soaring; the environment is in serious trouble. THE SST should not be built u n t iil we can afford it and it is proven to.be safe to the environ- ment. In the meantime, the talent and resources of the aerospace industry ought to be put to work on projects Home in good old Detroit By PAt . TRAVIS DE~TROIT. HE DARK BLUE Firebird eas;d up to the red 'ighl Tine driver gunned his engine a few times to get the attention of the silver Mustang already waiting at. the light. The Mustangs driver glanced at the Firebird for a few seconds, nodded and re- sumed staring at the light. As the whine of the engines grew so did the eyes of the three little kids standing on the corner. The light turned green aud with smoking exhausts, screaming tires, and a hearty hi-o silver the two cars disappeared down the road. I had come home to Detroit for the sumnmer. At first glance. Detroit had not changed much during the time I was away getting my higher edu- cation. The "hot wheels" were still roaring down the streets. Detroit was in the middle of another one of its gasoline price wars. Mammoth trailers filled with new cars on their way to somewhere were still parked at the corner restaurant while their drivers got a cup of coffee. There were noticeably fewer trailers than in past years but it was reassur- ing to see at least a few. The shopping centers were still packed on week- ends with teenagers who had no money but plenty of time to spend. The hair was longer, the bras fewer. At first glance, Detroit had not changed much. But as I drove my parents' car around the city, doing errands or just cruising I began to notice a few un- settling things. For the first time I noticed the smell of the air. It may sound funny but it was the first time the smell ever made an impression on me. It smelled bad, really bad. I BEGAN TO notice other things. Things like the division between what was called the "bad" area of town and the "good" area had moved further out. There were more "For Sale" signs-everywhere. The dreaded creeping "urban blight" which is talked about so often but is not readily visible when you're part of it became obvious to me. Areas of Detroit are so bad that the U.S. De- partment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) tried to bar FHA mortgage insurance for parts of the city. HUD felt that certain areas had deterio- rated too far to risk issuing insurance. When the ensuing publicity grew out of hand, they recinded the order. I guess Detroit really is changing. Some things still remain the same. They still make the best pizza a few blocks away. They still make the best potato -Dniy-uary aViani chips a mile or two away. Thinsgs like that haven't changed yet. But pizza and potato chips don't make up for the rising crime rate, the absurd murder rate, and the ever-spreading slums. Which is why I've noticed more talk by people of moving, to the suburbs, to the country, anywhere, just as long as it's out of the city. AND I CAN'T really blame them. I felt cheated by the city also. One incident brought it all home for me. I was driving down the street towards the show that the whole neighborhood gang used to walk to every Sunday afternoon. Memories of King Kong, of Tarzan, of Godzilla, flooded my mind. But, like the city, the show had changed - changed into one of the many porno-shows that now probably outnumber the "family" shows. It's sort of sad that my little brother will never walk to that show on Sunday as he grows up. Letters to The Daily I Student employes To the Daily: THE FOLLOWING letter has been sent to HEW Secretary Eliot Richardson: We are writing with regard to the crucial issue now before you: to decide whether or not HEW has jurisdiction under Executive Order 11246 over admissions to graduate programs at the University of Michigan (and, by implication, at many other universities). We, the elected government of the Rackham School of Graduate, Studies (which includes all pre- doctoral students) at the Univer- sity of Michigan believe that the University Administration is try- ing to deny jurisdiction in this area to HEW because it does not want to recognize the fact that graduate student' workers are em- ployes. It seems obvious to us that teaching fellows, research assistants, and staff assistants are employes. They perform impor- tantacademic services for the University and receive salaries in compensation. Although many de- gree programs demand research or teaching experience as part of one's training for the degree, most graduate employes work at these jobs in order to support themselves while going to graduate school; they often work longer at them than is required to satisfy the pre- i-if/ Off :; .. .';.t fr b requisites for their particular de- grees, and they pay taxes on their salaries after the requirements are completed. Moreover, t he University Ad- ministration has implicitly con- ceded that teaching fellows, re- search assistants, and staff assist- ants are employes, since they are eligible for Blue Cross-Blue Shield Health Insurance and for Life In- surance benefits which are not available to graduate students re- ceving grants or stipends. The University Administration's claim that monies received by teaching fellows, research assistants, and s t a f f assistants are stipends is thus inconsistent with its own practice. We also believe that the Uni- versity Administration is taking this position even though it knows very well that there is discrimina- tion against women in graduate °admissions, because it does not want HEW to interfere. That such discrimination exists is known to every undergraduate woman who has even thought of applying to graduate school, and to every graduate woman who has man- aged to gain admission in spite of it. Efforts to eliminate discrimina- tion against women in occupations which require a graduate degree will be to no avail as longs s women can be denied equal access to these jobs indirectly, by the simple expedient of denying their. equal opportunity to achieve that degree. WE URGE YOU to bring the power of the United States Federal Government to bear in eliminating these inequities. Rackhaw Student r 4 /. Sr