100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

August 02, 1972 - Image 8

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Daily, 1972-08-02

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Page Eight

T HE MICHIGAN DAILY

Wednesday, August 2, 1972

CAUSES CONTROVERSY:

Farm report calls

By DAVID BREWSTER
Mr. Brewster is a Washington
based writer who contributes to
agricultural a n d historical
magazines.
WASHINGTON, D.C. - (DS-
NI)-A report now circulating
within the Department of Agri-
culture threatens to cause an
uproar on the farm front and
could have major consequences
for the nation's taxpayers and
rural poor.
The report, "New Directions
for U. S. Agricultural Policy,"
written by 15 young USDA ex-
ecutives, is one of the latest re-
sults of an intense - but little
publicized - debate in the De-
partment that will help deter-
mine the future of American
agriculture.

It calls for defining a new
program that would cut the to-
tal number of farms by almost
half, and proposes scrapping the
price support programs that
have been cornerstones of
federal farm policy for almost
40 years.
The Department, which offic-
ially has disavowed connection
with the 43-page report, is un-
likely even to discuss the re-
commendations publicly during
the election year.
Under the current definition,
a 'farm is an operation of 10
acres or more that sells at least
$50 worth of agricultural pro-
ducts a year. If a place is
smaller than 10 acres it must
sell $250 worth of goods to be
counted in census tabulations.
The report's authors argue

that this
ment give
of Americ
nomic po
public pol
optimum."
Instead,
farms to
that do n
worth of a
year.
In 1970,
than $500
to almost
2,824,000
counted f
cent of the
al sales a
of their i
sources.
Eliminat
time opera

for sweeping
standard of measure- riculture has) given the public
s a distorted picture the mistaken belief that the
an agriculture's eco- welfare of these people was be-
sition and leads to ing adequately cared for," the
icy that is "less than report says. "It is likely this
had tended to discourage the
they would redefine development of programs out-
eliminate all places side the scope of agriculture
ot sell at least $5000 . . . that were and are needed
gricultural goods each to assist low-income rural peo-
ple."
operations with less The report's recommendations
0 in sales amounted are based on the premise that
half of the nation's American agriculture should be
farms. But they ac- considered an industry, not a
or only about 5 per way of life, and that its well-
e country's agricultur- being should- be judged by the
nd actually got most returns it gives on resources
ncome from nonfarm rather than by the income it
provides to individual farmers:
ting poor and part- The study's authors maintain
tions from the census that poverty and rural welfare
t7 ionms fo tecensusA problems cannot be dealt with

change
cabinet - level official w h a
would be specifically charged
with solving them.
As for commercial agriculture,
the report says, "Income from
farming should be of concern
only to the extent that it af-
fects the industry's ability to
produce efficiently adequate
supplies rof food and fiber."
According to the report, cur-
rent farm programs - the
price support program and di-
rect payments to farmers -
keep the cost of food artifically
high by preventing the free
flow of commodities into the
marketplace. They also hinder
the movement of agricultural
operatiors into low cost areas.
Moreover, because payments
are made on the basis of a
farm's production potential,

OPEN
" e1:15
Shown atf
1:30
4 P.M.
6:30
DIAL 662-6164

count would automatically raise
the average annual farm income
from $5,833 to $10,617. The fi-
gure could be boosted even
higher - to $14,819 a year -
- by adding the income that
farmers earn from nonfarm
sources.
The report's authors also be-
lieve that a redefinition of
farms would focus attention on
the economic needs of low-in-
come rural residents.
"By identifying these people
as 'farmers' and having public
program, to upport farm in-
sine, (the Department of Ag-

"The report's recommendations are based
on the premise that American agriculture
should be considered an industry, not a way of
life, and that its well-being should be judged
by the returns it gives on resources rather than
by the income it provides to industrial farmers."

as a part -of .agricultural policy
but should, instead, be handled
under the direction of a new

This is Newsprint.

SS4
Harm less looking isn't it?

_ ,._ . ,

they do little to help the small
farmer, but go instead to large
producers who can thus earn
greater returns on their re-
sources than they could else-
where in the economy.
For these reasons, the report
recommends abolishing price
support and payment programs
over a five year period.
The authors say this would
save $6 billion that the public
now pays to support, the farm
sector through taxes and high
food prices. Farmers would suf-
fer a corresponding loss in in-
come.
According to the report, such
an income reduction would
cause an accelerated decline in
the number of farms and an in-
crease in contractual agree-
ments between producers and
processors.
The study maintains, how-
ever, that the family farm
would continue as the basic unit
of U.S. agricultural production
after the policy changes, al-
though it would be a larger,
more sophisticated enterprise
than at present.
SOLO-
MAN
" REFORM
ABORTION
democrat
state representative
Paid Political Advertisement
MCAT-DAT-GRE
LSAT-ATGSB
NATL. BDS.
® Preparation for tests required for
admission to graduate and pro-
fessonal schools
" Six and twelve sesson groups
* Small groups
* Voluminous materia for home
study prepared by experts in
each field
" Lesson schedule con be tailored
to meet individual needs
Summer Sssions
Special Compact Courses
Weekends-Intersessions
STANLEY H. KAPLAN
EDUCATIONAL CENTER
DETROIT BRANCH
21711 W. Ten Mile Rd., Suite 113
Southfield, Michigan 48075
(313) 354-0085
Success Through Education
Since 1938
Branches in principal cities in U.S.
The Tutoring School with the
Nationwide Reputation

All by itself, this innocuous square of paper hardly
seems important. But every week about 170,000
pounds of newsprint comes into Ann Arbor as news-
papers or to be made into newspapers. Well-packed,
that would make a square pile 20 feet on a side and
10 feet tall, solid newsprint. After the news is read,
the paper is buried and both are forgotten. But the
pile of old newsprint will grow until it no longer can
be ignored.

Fortunately, there is a solution. Old newsprint can
be recycled and made into paper products, thus
sparing the landscape and trees that would other-
wise have been cut. In Ann Arbor the Ecology
Center has a recycling station on South Industrial
Highway, off Stadium, just south of the Coca-Cola
bottlers. It's open from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Wednes-
day thru Saturday. For more information, you can
call the Ecology Center at 761-3186.

Advertising contributed by the Michigan Daily

, .
_~ , ,
; ., . < ~ .-m~ .,R.y .. . .. .:.r.v._, 4 0 . ,- L ._m .. R _ .. e: r- - F 2 _ x k, , -r , z-v, y. , .w .,.T . = ,,: . --r, R-, rn: .._Y .;. ,

Back to Top

© 2021 Regents of the University of Michigan