Page Four THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, January 18, 19-1 BOQ KS Picked By JAMES GINDIN PICKED UP PIECES, by John Up dik e. Knopf, New York. 519 pp. $12.95. A LTHOUGH HE worked regu- larly on the staff of The New Yorker for only two years in the mid-fifties, John Updike, in this collection of his occa- sional prose, essays, and book reviews written over the past ten years, represents much of the best of that magazine, its thoughtfulness, independence, range, and concern with good writing. One of his longest pieces, an account of the Carib- bean island of Anguilla, is in the tradition of New Yorker "fact pieces," combining person- al visits and observations with a sound reporter's research on the history and politics of the island. In this essay, as in his accounts of travels to Russia and Eastern Europe, Updike achieves a dens- ity of fact and knowledge that Up Pie ces: The best of John Updike renders the easy governmental or political slogan shallow. The reviews, most of them written for The New Yorker, show the range of Updike's interests, European, South American, and African literature, psychiatry and social issues, graphic and pictorial art from the erotica of the, Far East to a book reprint- ing David Levine's caricatures for The New York Review of Books (before publishing any fiction, Updike won a fellowship to the Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Art at Oxford, and he remains °xtremely skillful in describin visual compositions and effects t As a reviewer, Up- dike is balanced, more lauda- tory than not, eager to discover the particular distinctions of well-known writers such as Hemingway, Proust, Borges (he was, in early 1965, one of the first Americans to appreciate Borges in print), Auden, Eliot, and Robbe-Grillet (he is particu- larly acute on the differences between theory and practice in Robbe-Grillet's work, on "a forced naivete in his vision"). Updike's reviews, like many of the longer ones in The New Yorker, are apt to be biograph- ical, to summarize a career (despite the caution against this in his preface) or draw out the implications of a particular "experiment." In a sense, many of the reviews celebrate the lit- erary life, avoid pre-established standards to uncover what is uniquely valuable about Joyce or Proust or Sylvia Townsend Warner. They are very much New Yorker reviews, just as, in a few peripheral pages, Up- dike gives a richer sense of what it was like to work at The New, Yorker (at least in the fifties) than does Brendan Gill's long book of gossip and power ploys. j TPDIKE C A N sometimes,' however, be astringent, as in his blast at the slickness and condescension of T.S. Matthews' book on T.S. Eliot or in his demolition of the inflated repu- tations of Francoise . Sagan, J a m e s Gould Cozzens, and Jerzy Kosinski. Able to see lim- itations even in his generally reverent reviews of Nabokov (ADA is called "cotton-candy spun to the size of sunset cumu- lus"), Updike can be gossipy and witty about Bellow and Sal- inger, acerbic about critics who demand messages or patronize writers or sound like humane old "aunties," and is himself superficially snide only once or twice when talking about Nor- man Mailer. Far more frequent- ly, Updike can find a book that is little known, like the late' Erich Kahler's The Inward Turn' of Narrative, show its distinc- tion, its limitations as well, and then shape it to ask questions with understated profundity, in this instance a speculation about whether art, which tames the barbarian in all of us, is a "progressive" or a "reaction- ary" force, "advances con- sciousness" or "lulls and muf- fles it." THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC FACULTY CHAMBER CONCERTS EVA LIKOVA, Soprano LEONARD JOHNSON, Tenor' RALPH HERVBERT, Baritone GUSTAVE ROSSEELS, Violin JOHN MOHLER, Clarinet CARL DAELER, Horn' LYNNE LYNCH, Piano NANCY HODGE, Piano DEANNA BOYLAN (Guest), Piano Associates: RICO McNEELA, MARIANNE TOTH, Violin MAXWELL RAIMI, Viola; YOUNG-SOOK TUN, Cello JAMES WILHELMSON, Piano' TODAY, Sunday, January 18-4 p.m. f RACKHAM AUDITORIUM MILHAUD, BRITTEN, AULENC, CHAUSSON ADMISSION COMPLIMENTARY ..+ PnU ON YOUR DOORSTEP! I , A S A SOCIAL commentator, in both essays and reviews, Updike is often intelligent and iconoclastic about the easily accepted. He is superb ,in a long account of the importance of the Grove Press and the avant-garde, brilliantly uncon- ventional about the social im- plications of satire, and shrewd- ly knowledgeable and accurate about the lack of "complacency" A A sbe - 0 thr* TKE UNIVRSITY OfMICMIGAip PROFESSIONAL IHEATRE PROGRAM THIS, AN ACTOR'S TRUNK has gone in and out of 92 cities across the U.S. Now, it returns to Ann Arbor! 'in the young during the fifties. remains the writer, the person He also, against the grain of his who transmits and discovers generation, b e g a n reviewing experience through language, theological books about 1960, who resists talking.of fiction in and has included long, search- terms of messages or slogans, ing, thorough psycho-biographi- and who defends other writers cal and critical accounts of as "members of a conspiracy Kierkegaard, Tillich, Dostoyevs-i to preserve the secret that peo- sky, and others. The Kierke- ple feel." Occasionally, Updike's gaard review tries to show how imagery can elaborate sense- the Danish thinker, "holding lessly ("he spelunked past slip- out for existential d u a lit y pery stalagmites of compacted against the tide of all mon- Common Books into unthinkable isms," made Christianity "in- caves of ancient correspond- tellectually possible" for 20th ence") or d e g e n e r a t e into century man. Updike, too, writes whimsy (and Updike admits it), well about his own roots in the but, far more often, the imagery farm country of eastern Penn- expands, discovers, and cele- sylvania (details and an attitude brates. Often, Updike's - prose most visible in The Centaur, combines the incisive and the still his favorite among his reverent, the sharp mind used novels, and in his more recent to appreciate and to love what play, "Buchanan Dying"). The had not 'been seen before. In combination of i n t e r e s t ims e v e r a l different ways, he "roots," in religion, and social makes the point. that "the bour- iconoclasm has led to others: geois novel is inherently erotic," characterizing Updike as a Con- both in its social dimension and servative. I, like Updike, am in its concentration on the issue not altogether sure what a Con- of pprevral salvation. He talks servative is, but there is a note of s- " s the emergent reli- of ethnicity in his work, of 1968- gion," oth "the only thing 71, visible in Couples and par- left" and the communication to ticularly in the excessively sim- I be treated reverently because plified alter-ego personna of all of the individual is involved. Henry Bech (Bech: A Book, and The prose often expands to this a few later defenses), a kind of point of intersection, the point only half humorous willingness at which love, religion, and the to reside within the standard individual meet; no wonder it is stereotypes of ethnic identity, vulnerable, sometimes exces- which I find limiting anoi unat- sive, sometimes flat. Updike's tractive. Perhaps coincidentally, acute images often combine un- the few pieces that I think lack expected categories or seeming- Updike's usual insight were ly inappropriate language in written during the same period: idea or in scale to achieve a a rather stale essay on living startling force: some of the in London for nine months in "comic-book" attitudes in con- 1969 that seems to owe as much temporary politics are sure that to Hollywood's idea of the Eng- "Che and Mao will deliver us lish in the thirties as to any from toilet training:" Ivy Comp- observation; a reductive and ton-Burnett has won her "iron imperceptive parody of an Iris niche - in English literature;" Murdoch novel; a rather labor- Dostoyevsky, in the self-promot- ed and pretentious fantasy of a ing diary of one -of his mis- golf match on the moon. Updike tresses, is the "repulsive, re- is not at his best with what he pelled lover, whose immortal does not know densely, the Eng- genius is never for an instant h jpermitted to wink through the lash, just as I, as reader, am vapors of her narcissism." Up- not at my most appreciative dike's skill in turning Imagery with what I don't know at all; sometimes reveals illuminating (both golf and the moon). literary criticism: Nabokov's American novels are regarded f.. INEVITABLY, any reader will as his best, containing "a fierc- reject some of the attitudes er frivolity and a cruelty more and opinions within a book as humane" than does the fiction vast and varied as this. Yet, written in Europe, and his best work is "inspired by. an athe- consistently throughout, Updike ist's faith in the magic of simile and the sacredness of lost time;" Hemingway's later fic- tion, with its postures of brav- O rd erIery, "is not grace under pres- sure but pressure forced in the I -'hope of inducing Grace," al- 4 i r though, for Updike, the result- If you live on campus, why wait , until the atfernoon to find out what's happening when THE DAILY can be on your doorstep in time for breakfast-? Read THE DAILY and keep up on world, local and campus news, and sports. ONLY $6.5O NOW THROUGH APRIL Order your subscription now- don't miss a single issue! Call 764-0558 between 10 a.m.-4 p.m. or stop by 420 MAYNARD " f '"- : ~ ._< _ John Updike Niven's latest: 4 4 G { 3 I E The Act in Subscription Today 764-0558 ing reader's, "pity feeling im- pudent" allows one to love Hemingway still. Often, Up- dike's prose expands in sheer delight with words. Always, he is the writer, the creator, the person who celebrates what is, and, at his best, finds additional dimensions of experience in his celebration. 3 James Gindin is a professor in the English Department. 1, E i rum. aw. WILL BE AT CENTICORE MONDAY, JAN. 19G1-3 P.M. AUORAHPAT wo WO1MVWO/ JANUARY 6-31 UNION GALLERY WEEKD4YS 10-6 WEEKENDS 12 -6 MCHIGAN UNON, FIRST FLOOR 530 S. STATE ST ANN ARBOR MICHIGAN 764-3234 sponsors UM-iWY UNION GALLERY & RESIDENTIAL COLLEGE They shoot empy horses dcn't they? By RANDI HACKER apparently referring to the ex- otic world of Hollywood. Stein HRI O THE EM Y replied, "There is no there out HORSES by David Niven. G.P. there." At this point Niven goes Putnam's Sons, New York, directly into his own philoso- 374 pp. $ ohies about Hollywood including T IS UNFORTUNATE that s-ich gems as the hummingbirds that fame deludes prominent ". . . whizzing about with their people into believing they ca tiny waist coats of turquoise, write. David Niven, for example vermililon and gold flashing in has written yet another book the sunlight," and little stabs at about the wonderful, madcap, equality l i k e "oneupwoman- oh-so-romantic days of Holly- 'ship."But what he fails to point wood-the time of big powerful 'tot is the meaning or intepre- movie moguls and big popular tation of Stein's response. movie stars: Niven begins hisbook by say- ;Niven's Bring On the EmptyE ing "this is not a book about Horses is mostly a series of David Niven . . . but if, despite questionably funny anecdotes 'valiant efforts to remain in the and quotes once mouthed by wings I have, on occasion, Hollywood notables. Niven never eased myself forward, I apolo- succeeds in connectng them to gize." The reader can only be anything at all. The importance consoled by this apology, for of the book seems to lie in the w i t h remarkable frequency number of names dropped on iien "eases" himself into the any given page. For example, ? book. Niven makes certain that the first chapter begins with a all the quaint and amusing re- little s t o r y about Gertrude marks are obviously first hand Stein's answer to the question knowledge. )"What is it like-out there?"- A NOTTRRh t Adnb Pn-L 71 ELSA ts. The College of LSA does not provide for adeqaute student participa- tion in college decision-making. That is why the LSA Student Govern- ment is continually working for meaningful student representation on College committees. It also meanh that those student seats that do exist on College committees are even more critical to students. The LSA Student Government is now interviewing for openings on the following committees: iN ri Kcnapier aeais en- *t 1 tirely with Clark Gable's - anod fortune in meeting David Niven, who then was just an extra with an impeccable and enchanting English accent. And are vou aware that without David Niven, Gable would have never made it through all his crises? All of Hollywood, he hints, was seeking Niven's ad- vi-e. C1-e'~nter Three - "Our Little (~rl"--is purely an unsuccess- F allegorv. This is the inevit- ahle morality section containing a deen message for those who have fantasies about the glit- t-ring life of a movie star. Here Ni-en relates a heart-rending *-le of a not-so-young starlet on the downhill road of drugs, fil t~rad le-s close tn shots and a 'hnd, symbolically referred to as "'im." who is. of course, I in--ithf'il. It fails as an ale- nr~r, brit does st fine as an n-W1-e for an Jaqueline Susanne I COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE I LSA ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD ii