~1ie Sfrftan Dait Eighty-Six Years of Editorial Freedom 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, M( 48104 The war 's last Thursday, April 8, 1976 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Close call calls for HHH? REPRESENTATIVE MOR- RIS UDALL'S near miss to Jim- my Carter in Tuesday's Wisconsin presidential primary is disheartening, for the most progressive voice at the Democratic National Convention in July is probably on his way out. But, in the larger context of matters, the loss indicates that Carter--a conser- vative with a forked tongue - will have to wage a battle against Hu- bert Humphrey for the nomination. Also on Tuesday, Senator Henry Jackson scored a victory in New York's primary, although Udall, Car- ter and Humphrey fortunately kept him from garnering the majority of delegates. Jackson - whose foreign policy hearkens back to the fifties - has strong support from organized labor. He won in New York with labor's support and that of the state's Jew- ish population, attracted by his stand on Israel. But Jackson's appeal is not broad. The prospect of a Jackson-Ford race is frightening, but not very like- ly. The prospect of a Carter-Ford or a Humphrey - Ford race is disap- pointing. And if Udall doesn't win big somewhere relatively soon, he will probably follow in the footsteps Udall By RASA GUSTAITIS SAN FRANCISCO (PNS)-Hao Thi Vo searched for months through bureaucratic mazes be- fore she learned that her three- year-old son was in the care of one of the "orphan Baby- lift" agencies. But when at last she found him, she was told she could not have him: He might be better off with his new American "parents." Vo is one of more than a dozen refugees in this country known to be seeking return of children shipped here in the panic of the last days of the war. She is one of several who must face court action if she expects to be permitted a re- union. Like many other Vietnamese mothers with half - American children, Vo feared for the lives of her three sons when the Sai- gon regime was collapsing and sent them to the U.S. for their safety. Through a friend, she said, she met an American named Dick who agreed to take her oldest sons, Vo Huy Khanh, 7, and Vo Anh Tuan, 5, if she signed a release for them. She did. A neighbor bound for the U.S. agreed to take Vo Huy Tung, then 2, as her own son, under an assumed name. For him Vo signed nothing, she said. VO HERSELF MANAGED to fly out shortly thereafter. From Travis Air Force Base she called Bill Popp, a Flying Tiger pilot she'd met in Saigon. He had offered to help if she man- aged to get to this country. Popp decided to sponsor Vo, her 20-year-old sister, a cousin and the cousin's six-year-old boy. All came to live in his home near Los Angeles, found jobs and, together, put a down pay- mnent on a house. (In Saigon, Popp said, Vo had beenahead of household for an extended family of 13.) With Popp's help, Vo sought her sons. After many expensive long distance phone calls, Popp said, they learned through the International Red Cross where the two oldest boys were and discovered that the youngest was with Friends of Children of Vietnam. The neighbor who had brought him, Vo said, had given him to the agency, ex- pecting that he'd be cared for until his mother could claim him. But the agency, armed with a release paper Vo never signed, had placed the young- ster in a home for adoption. Through FCVN, a letter ar- rived for Vo from "Bob and Joan," who had had her child for 10 months. It told Vo that her son was not Vo Huy Tung now but Bruce Donovan, that he loved going fishing with his "daddy," that his good behavior "still gives us great pride," that "he can count to nine, he knows all the basic colors." 'To is one of more than a dozen refugees in this country known to be seeking return of children shipped here in the panic of the last days of the war. She is one of several who must face court action if she expects to be permitted a reunion.' "WE THINK YOU should see Bruce," the couple wrote. "That way we both could see his feel- ings. If by chance he does not remember you, we think it would do him great harm to leave us. We can't help but feel that he would think we had re- jected him. Then, on the other hand, if he did remember you, we feel it would be wrong for us to keep him from you even though it would hurt greatly." Vo flew to Denver and was taken to a room where five strasgetadults faced her, with her child. After a few minutes in a highly tense situation, the authorities now in charge of the boy decided he did not recog- nize his mother. "They don't give him to me," Vo said in an interview. "I ask, give me a chance to see the boy. A few minutes. To play with him. They say, maybe the kid get hurt. I say, I don't hurt the boy." She was not permitted to hold him, she said. "They say, he has good home now, good moth- er, good father. I have good home, good mother. Not father. battle That I don't have," Vo said. "They say, birthmother mean nothing." "I ASK, 'WHEN they tell the boy that he has a mother?' They didn't answer." Vo said she was shown a pa- per saying the boy was declared an orphan April 16. She said she then showed the FCVN officials a photograph of her holding her son April 19. Vo left alone, with the advice that she seek a lawyer if she wanted to fight for her son. FCVN officials refused to com- ment on Vo's case. In explain- ing the agency's general policy, case work supervisorMarcia Schocket quoted from a book she goes by, in which the au- thors maintain that "It's the psychological parent, not the biological parent" who is im- portant to the child. "If there's no recollection," she said, "there can't be a con- tinuance of the same relation- ship. There could only be a new relationship. It was obviousaft- er 15 minutes to half an hour in two cases that the biological parent was just another person in the room to the child." Agency procedure requires, she said, that when a biological mother seeks a child's return, a social worker be sent to "as- sess her financial situation, liv- ing situation." This information is given to the adoptive family who may then opt to return the child. If not, a court may have to settle the issue. "WE FEEL CONFIDENT we're observing sound social work practice," Schocket said. Asked if the authors of the book she goes by considered cross-cul- tural adoption, she said "not really," but indicated that was not a currently relevant factor. "There aren't many villains in this story," commented Popp, who was echoed by others rep- resenting conflicting points of view. It comes down to a choice based on a value judgment: Who is entitled to judge the children's best interests? As long as that question goes unsettled, these children and their families will remain vic- tims in theslast battle of the war that everyone wants to for- get. Rasa Gustaitus is a free- lance writer in San Francisco. HEALTH SERVICE HANDBOOK: Homosexual health By SYLVIA HACKER and NANCY PALCHIK GARWOOD QUESTION: When my room- mates found out that I'm gay, they freaked out. For awhile I was afraid they were going to beat me up. They said that they didn't want me around and that I should get another room in the dorm, or get out of the dorm altogether. Does their an- ger mean that they are worried about their own sexuality? Wher'e can they can get some help? Where can I get some help? ANSWER: You're right - your roommates might be wor- ried about their own sexual or- ientation. Their angry reaction is characteristic of a Western societal disorder termed "hom- ophobia", a word coined by Dr. George Weinberg and used in his book Society and the Heal- thy Homosexual. "Homophobia" means the panic fear that many people have of being near hom- osexuals. It also refers to the self-hate that many homosex- ual persons feel because our society has always told gay people that they are sick, sinful and criminal. Homophobia is a part of our anti-homosexual (one might even say anti-erotic) Judaeo - Christian heritage. In Western society homosexuals have been persecuted for thou- sands of years. Until recently, homosexuality was little men- tioned in "polite society" and in courts of law ,for example, homosexual matters were re- ferred to in Latin. Homophobia is expressed in our present leg- al codes which define criminal sexual behavior and the penal- ties for it in terms that come directly from European eccles- iastical law. PEOPLE WHO HAVE pho- bias suffer from them. Often their negative feelings spread to a whole circle of ideas and acts that are not really the thing they fear, but which re- late to the feared-thing or ac- tivity only symbolically. For ex- ample, homonhobic peonle fear and shun behavior that they imagine to be conducive to homosexual acts, or behavior that might merelv elicit an awareness of homosexual feel- ings. In this country, men fear gayness more than women do. Men often refrain from embrac- ing or kissing each other; men are even reluctant to express fondness or close feelings for other males; men often will not permit themselves to see or enjoy beauty in the physi- cal forms of other men. Look at the parent-child relationships - millions of fathers feel it would not be "masculine" to kiss their sons or embrace them in any way, especially after they reach uberty. It may interest you to know that many other cultures ac- cept homosexual behavior as one of the biological varieties of sexual behavior. As a matter of fact, a number of societies give homosexual people a place of honor. AFTER WRITING THIS long response to your first question, we'll try to answer the others. It sounds as though your room- mates need some education about homosexuality to help them work through their nega- tive feelings about it. And you yourself can get help from the same people who can help your roommates - the "Gay Advo- cates" (Human Sexuality Ad- vocates) and the people who work with them at U-M. The Ad- vocates (763-4186) help gay students and other people who are concerned about their sex- ual. orientation or problems that arise because of it. They do peer counseling and refer- ral, help people find support groups, organize educational presentations for University classes and seminars, and aid persons who are hassled by practical problems about any aspects of their sexual orienta- tion. They will bring people to rap in your room if you invite them - so think about it. They work closely with us at the Dept. of Health Education (they collaborated with us in the pre- paration of this column for ex- ample) and with people at Counseling Services and the Of- fice of Ethics and Religion, so there really are some sources of helo to go to. Good luck and feel free! SEND ANY HEALTH CON- CERNS TO: Health Educators U-M Health Service 207 Fletcher Ann Arbor, Mich. of candidate Fred Harris, expected to drop from the presidential race to- day. The situation gets increasingly dis- mal by the week. Our state's voters should begin to think seriously about what levers they will pull on May 18, in the Michigan primary. How will Callaghan do? IN THE AFTERMATH of British Prime Minister Harold Wilson's surprise resignation from office, members of the country's Labour Party have selected ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer James Callaghan to assume the reigns of government. Callaghan promises to pursue the progressive policies of his predeces- sor faithfully, while attempting to keep the ideologically divided Labour Party from splintering into a num- ber of diverse, uncompromising fac- tions. Hopefully, Callaghan will remain true to Wilson's visions of social re- form, especially his commitment to nationalization of industry. Wilson pleased leftist members of the Labour Party in 1974 when he took a hard line in favor of nation- alization, recognizing that the eco- nomic power inherent in large indus- try belongs in public, not private hands. WILSON WAS ALSO responsible for eliminating much of the bureau- cracy that normally accompanies na- the competitive edge on market that will accrue sorely needed relief to economic malaise. the world may bring England's Of course, it remains to be seen that Callaghan will capably dis- charge his new responsibilities. But the signs are encouraging. As the on- ly Cabinet member to hold three key posts, Callaghan certainly has broad experience. Although critics dispar- age of his lack of imagination, no one denies that Callaghan hat innate common sense. And Callaghan is de- scribed as a leader who, while not exciting his supporters, should man- age to keep the Labour Party united by treading in the footsteps of Har- old Wilson. Editorial Staff ROB MEACHUM BILL TURQUE Co-Editors-in-Chief &$AT Myhi OF A60 MW~L~2~ IO TO 6 ol C~up .2 A O4VW AHERICA. AHUICA. A A _'' r.ft' ~ NMVAL A T Fa" AAEOftoc F~rAfflrf- , Uk5(TLZ6PAME{R (CA " UIjC AMI6CA - .., awa,,wvvaa~iwaa{,1 GL JEFF RISTINE .......Managing Editor tionalization. If Callaghan follows SCHCK .......e dr the same path, centralizing decision STEPHEN HERSH.............Editorial Director making power and cutting away the JEFF SORENSEN..................Arts Editor red tape in nationalized businesses, CHERYL PILATE..............Magazine Editor STAFF wRITERS: Susan Ades, Tom Allen, Glen Anlerhand, Marc Basson, Dana Bauman, David Blomquist, James Burns, Kevin Counihan, TODAY'S STAFF: Tom Godell, Kurt Harju, Charlotte Heeg, Jodi Dimick. Mitch Dunitz, Elaine Fletcher, News Ane Maie ipinkiStu c- Phil Foley, Mark Friedlander. David GarfInkel, News: Anne Marie Lipinski, Stu Mc- Richard James. Lois Josimovich, Tom Kettier, Connell, Rob Meachum, Mike Nor- Chris Kochmanski, Jay Levin, Andy Lilly, Ann ton, Ken Parsigion Bill Tur ue Marie Lipinski, George Lobsenz, Pauline Lu- grquebens, Teri Maneau, Angelique Matney, Jim Editorial Page: Stephen Hersh, R o b Nicoll, Maureen Nolan, Mike Norton, Ken Par- Meachum, Maureen Nolan, J o n sigian, Km Protter, Cathy Reutter, Anne Marie Schiavi, Karen Schulkina, Jeff Selbet, Pansius, Rick Sobel, Tom Stevens Rick Sobel, Tom Stevens, Steve Stojic, Cathl Arts Page: Jeff Sorensen Suyak, Jim Tobin, Jim Valk, Margaret Tao, Andrew Zerman, David Whiting, Michael Beck- Photo Technician: Pauline Lubens man, Jon Pansiusvand Stephen Kuriman. OSTAL SERVICE (0 USA 4r.. t N. At) 6QUA(TARIR AA-ER(CA - A CLAS'S Ff & AMERICA- TV A R'U2OF RLF(C6 At-1OCA? Letters to The Daily recruiting To The Daily: IN THE STUDENT elections which end today we have the opportunity to vote on whether or not the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Securi- ty Agency should be allowed to recruit on campus. Many indi- viduals may interpret this as a referendum on the philoso- phies and policies of these two agencies, but it is not that sim- ple. If the question on the bal- lot this week were one of ap- proval or disapproval of CIA/ NSA philosophies and policies I, for one, would vote disap- proval. Unfortunately, on the ballot this question is inextric- ably interwoven with a much more fundamental issue: wheth- er we, as a collective student body, have the right to infringe upon the rights of any individual student by foreclosing certain employment opportunities. The importance of preserving indi- vidual rights, I think, far out- infringement on individual rights would be small; it would affect only a small segment of the student population and any stu- dents who were really interested in working for the CIA or NSA could contact these agencies off campus on their own initiative. This argument does not address the basic issue; it is merely a statement of the degree of in- fringement involved. And if this degree of infringement on indi- vidual rights is, by some stand- ards, acceptable, then the argu- ment could be applied equally well to the barring of any or- ganization which recruits from only a small segment of the student population; interested students could always contact such organizations on their own initiative. Clearly, we would not wish to go this far. But where do we draw the line? Nearly all organizations which recruit on this campus have some phil- osophies or policies which would offend some segment of the stu- dent body. How large an offend- to be told by other students, individually or collectively, which organizations I would be prohibited from interviewing on campus - even if I would have chosen, of my own free will, not to interview those very or- ganizations. Similarly, I would consider the imposition of my values on another student, by barring from campus those or- ganizations which I find offen- sive, an unacceptable infringe- ment on the individual rights of that student. If we really beieve that all students here are equal, that each is capable of making his or her own de- cisions and has certain inviol- able individual rights, and that no one group of students has the right to violate the indi- vidual rights of any other group, then this fundamental issue must take precedence over our approval or disapproval of the CIA and NSA in the cur- rent elections. It should be noted that there is also a very pragmatic rea- these organizations? It seems relatively safe to assume that the most likely type of student to make that extra effort and thus be hired and perpetuate these agencies would be those who already identify with the philosophies and polices of the CIA and NSA. Is that what we want? At least if they are on campus they are more likely to interview, and therefore hire, people who may initiate chang- es, however small, and who are less apt to perpetuate the cur- rent philosophies and policies of the CIA and NSA. J. S. Stevenson April 2, 1976 housing To The Daily: YOUR "YES" VOTE ON PROPOSITION I in today's stu- dent election will help insure that you have someone to com- plain to about an unfair grade, and that your landlord's lease is without oppressive clauses. Tuahv night the Michiaan per year for housing law re- form and $7,000 for an attorney to work solely for student griev- ance procedures, a student union, and litigation directly in- volving M.S.A. The contract is a bargain be. cause of the low pay of the three lawyers who still do the work. It is the result of sev- eral months of negotiation with the housing law reform project which, already has a proven track record in work with Stu- dent Legal Aid. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN consultant to the Tenants Union and has served on legislative committees to prevent unauthor- ized landlord entry in tenants' homes, for example. Passage of the continued auto- matic funding is essential to continuation of these projects and an important step in im- proving students control over matters affecting your lives. Jonathan I. Rose Attorney at Law