Page Four THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, February 29, 1976 Page Four THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, February 29, 1976 BOOI KS The Dead Father: Provoking us to confront our old myths Vidal's 1876 offers engrossing glimpse into scandals of Grant and Boss Tweed THE DEAD FATHER by Donald Barthelme, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, N.Y., 177 pp. $7.95. By BRUCE WEBER RE ARE things that are bigger than we are: Re- ligions, myths, philosophies, eth- ics, and governments. We, in- dividually, are troubled by them. They command so much of our attention, creating problems that require commitments for an- swers. But thinking about them is like kow-towing to a figure- head -- satisfactory rewards are never f orthcoming. On the other hand, we, collectively, are the supporters of their existence, we being those who need to be governed, who need a guiding light or a straight and narrow path. We are, after all, the de- terminants of human nature. The Dead Father, an allegor- ically-tinted new novel by Don- ald Barthelme provokes t h i s conflict between ! man and the body of commandeering, man- made overseers, by reducing the creations of our grandiose dreams to the size of a single personality. The title character is big all right (3,200 cubits, or approxi- mately 5,000 feet from head to foot), but assumes proportions - a human voice, and annoying human idiosyncrasies. Imagine conversing with St. Peter's Ca- thedral, and having it speak with a lisp. The armor of the Dead Father is similarly flaw- ed. Nineteen laborers and a sup- ervising party of two women and a man are dragging the half- living, half-artificial Dead Fath- er, by means of a cable, through an indeterminate land toward an indeterminate destination. The trip will supposed conclude with his rejuvenation. The nine- teen behave like a raggedly or- ganized group of laborers, grous- ing now and then through a spokesman, but generally under control. The supervisors relax in the comfort of their supervision, enjoying small comforts reserv- ed for the well-to-do, engaging in snippety complaints a n d highbrow chitchat, and basking in their smug power.f THE DEAD FATHER provides the entertainment. He is a# moody and many-faced travel- ling companion and will be al- ternately god-like, presidential, cagey, babyish, and lecherous. He is deferential on only one subject - the completion of the journey. He is aware that his conditioned has weakened. In a previous story, "T h e Indian Uprising", which appear- ed in the collection Unspeakable Practices, Unnatural Acts, Bar- thelme's narrator finds himself being chased by a Comanche In- dian down a stairway, and even- tually tossed "over the balus- trade through a window and into another situation". One of Bar- thelme's favorite concerns, seems to be these alternate sit- uations - simultaneous goings- on with the facades which sep- arate them. In The Dead Father, the en- tire cast often finds itself, with the abrupt turn of a page, leap- ing into a different situation. There is a bartender mixing drinks in the middle of a field, an adolescent couple nuzzling each other by the side of the road, and a dance attended by a small community of apes. All seem to be waiting in limbo for the travelling party to come upon them. This adds a film-like quality to the narrative, as if there are prepared sets and characters awaiting their turns before the camera. QEGMENTS of the narration also enhance the perception 1876 By Gore Vidal, Random House, N.Y. $10.00. By JEFFREY SELBST GORE VIDAL has proven him- self time and again a man of dual nature. He can be mod- ern yet terribly antique, funny' and amazingly dull, childish T I : and awesomely mature. All of these he displays in his latest! work, a novel by name of 1876. It may be that this book owes< no debt whatsoever to Doctor- ow's Ragtime-esque style of pit- of the novel as film. Visual ting fictional against real histor- phrases, like instructions from ical characters. It may be, too, a shooting script are common. that the Grand Canyon is some- "Evening. The campfire. Cats where in New York State. And crying in the distance. Julie the buck does not stop here - washing her shirt," is one such the commercial appeals this example. book makes are many. makes it enjoyable is its bright- ly written style. Once the read- er has been brought into the novel (a formidable task in it- self, after the massive number of historical events and charac- ters that must be assimilated), it becomes a fast-paced gallop through the history that bored us in school. HISIS NO SMALL feat. Vi- dal, we may remember,j gave us the childish Myra Breckinridge and its sequel My- ron, shocked the critics of 1948 with The City and the Pillar, and wrote The Best Man, gen- erally considered to be one of the finest political satires of the last 20 years. This is by way of demonstrating to what de- gree his quality fluctuates. { The Dead Father is an arch-t ly unromantic and vaguely de-I pressing novel; unromantic be-' cause it finds all of society in. cahoots, and only vaguely de-1 pressing because though there isi a sense of something originally human going down with the 1 Dead Father. The novel seems to look at itself with a kind of: chagrined laughter - it sees a; banana peel in its path a n d knows it will slip and fall, so it says "Ooops" before stepping on the banana. It follows on the heels of Vi-1 day's earlier historical successE Rvi"u asru, e toi) it a Lf bifUUI t But it is nonetheless irritating his nose. Yet the story itself is en- gaging. There is perhaps no better way to make history come alive than to present it in this framework. The plot is slight - Charles Schuyler, an aging diplomat-cum-reporter, is back in the United States after 38 years abroad, with his daugh- ter Emma. She is looking for a husband, and not anyone will do, for she is the widow of a French prince. jT IS ALMOST a cliche to pre- sent history through the eyes of journalists or writers, because who else, we ask our- selves, must keep their senses alert as a part of their profes- sion? So we have the prolifera- tion of those who tell their stories of the age. Perhaps no one represented an age as well as Edmund Wilson did in the twenties, yet if Vidal is attempt- ing to emulate the snide good humor and incisive analvsis of Wilson, he is making a joke of the matter.f Which is not to say that the1 observations of Charles Schuy- ler aren't wickedly funny, be-1 cause they are. But they must|l be recognized as the aristocrat- ic and effete mumblings of a man who has seen better days.- The novel is a good one; itj is engrossing, and funny. The main points against are its ob-' vious imitatory nature, and the way it is being hawked. But if there is indeed nothing new un- der the sun, this obiection can be overlooked. For if it is mere reworking it is exceedingly clev- er. And if the manner in which Burr, even to the extent of or. -~- - rowing one of the major charac- that Vidal the writer chooses to r ters, Burr's son and protege show off his vast historicali Charles Schemerhorn Schuyler. knowledge in the novel. Referen- The story is set in 1876, capital- ces are made every third line izing neatly on Bicentennial fer- to some ongoing historical event; vor. It deals in large measure that will remind the reader that with governmental corruption, not only are the events he's1 focusing primarily on the Ulys- reading about taking place a ses Grant and Boss Tweed scan- century ago, but that Gore Vi-I dals, though also touching on day, his genial host, has done! the robber barons and the pur- quite a job of researching those chase of seats to the United events.1 States Senate. And it is an his-' And Vidal doesn't miss a lick. torical novel, with all the lovely In the first few pages he re- connotations that entails - the minds us that Nordhoff report- vicarious thrill for the reader ed from Washington for the: of reliving an era. Herald, that Stanley searchedl Vidal is either a lucky mounte- for Livingstone for 10 years, bank, or a fine writer who has that Tilden was planning to run produced some real garbage. I for President, that Fifty-seventh think it more likely that he can Street was considered a farm-a write; it's just that he chooses land, on and on, ad nauseam. to pander every now and again. Vidal is just so pleased with The aspect of 1876 which: himself that you want to pull, Vidal it is sold offends, why, it can be purchased through the mail by the agency of any one of the many book-clubs that have se- lected or plan to select this plump volume as the monthly offering. There are few books that can- not be criticized meaningfully, and fewer still that have no flaws. But 1876 is not meant to read with an eye for per- fection, it is meant, to use the vulgar, to be "one hell of a read." And it is. Jeffrey Selbst is a for on the Arts Page. night edi- Sherwin details drama behind the A-bomb conclusion is not without its ambiguities. The Dead Fath- er perishes in a ditch. It is not a difficult death. He puts up no grim fuss. He was, he adimts, resigned, and there is merely a brief whimper just before the end. The journey was infinitely more trying. He cannot die in his native state. The question, then, is the Dead Father more tragic in being killed, or in just being carried out of sight? Are our old myths more frightening because they never die? Or be- I A WORLD DESTROYED by ,throughout the world became matic counter against the post- Martin J. Sherwin. Alfred A. alert to the possibility of har- war ambitions of other nations- Knopf, N.Y. 315 pp. $10.00. nessing atomic power into a especially those of the Soviet military weapon of awesome de- Union. Roosevelt elected the By THOMAS FIELD ; structability. course of action espoused by T HE DROPPING of atomic Cognizant of the danger of Churchill and, to the very end bombs over Hiroshima and sucha weapon should it fall of the war, atomic weaponry Nagasaki in August,1945-an ac-ainto the hands of the Nazis, a was never discussed with Stalin. tion which leveled both cities small group of emigrant physi- Sherwin's account challenges to the ground and killed tens of cists from fascist Europe. in- traditionally held opinions that thousands within seconds - has g d Alera te in un Roosevelt was a firm believer come to be regarded as per-ed a desperate campaign upon in collective security as a guar- haps the seminal event of the the American and British ga antee of national safety and twentieth century. It brought ernments to begin work on an that he made every possible World War II to a devastating- atomic bomb. When the Man- effort to assure friendly post- conclusion while planting the hattan Project, as the effort to war relations with the Soviet seeds of the Cold War. It also develop the bomb was called, Union. ushered in the nuclear age and finally got off the ground in its threat of total annihilation of late 1941, the primary driving When he ascended to the mankind. force behind it was fear that presidency following Roosevelt's What went on behind the Germany might make a bomb death in April, 1945, Harry Tru- scenes regarding the bomb's de- first. man was a complete stranger to velopment has long been some- foreign affairs and foreign di- thing of a black box for his- ,TEILS BOHR, the eminent plomacy and, in fact, knew noth- torians, a fact which has result- Danish physicist and an ing of the atomic bomb, which ed in a host of mysteries. un- emigrant to the U.S., emerged was.now almost ready for use certain speculations and myths. as the leading advocate of in- (Secretary of War Henry Stim- Martin Sherwin, drawing on a ternational control and warned son waited a few weeks before wealth of original material in- the President that if no initia- letting the new president in on cluding s e v e r a I recently re- tive were made toward sharing the secret). leased documents, has produced the atomic secret with Russia in A World Destroyed a tight, before America deployed a INSECURE IN his new position, well-written account of Ameri- bomb, the result would be dan- and lacking policies of his can atomic diplomacy during gerous competition with the So- own, Truman had little alterna- the war that goes a long way viets once they developed their tive but to follow the recom- toward establishing the truth of own bomb. mendations of his predecessor's what went on in policymaking British Prime Minister Win- advisors - especially those of circles. ston Churchill, who took a dif- Stimson-who urged him to take ferent view of the situation a more forceful diplomatic ap- FOLLOWING the discovery of than Bohr, urged Roosevelt to proach against the Russians nuclear fission in Germany maintain the Anglo - American than Roosevelt had. A conviction in December, 1938, scientists atomic monopoly as a diplo- that the atomic bomb was a diplomaticrmasterscard that would "force Russia to play ball" was b e h i n d Truman's GIN ETTA SAGAN rather blunt negotiations with Stalin at the Yalta Conference. West Coast Coordinator of Sherwin's study reveals that the purported effectiveness of AMN ESTY INT ERN AT IONA L such diplomacy was merely an illusion and that it may have WILL SPEAK ON had adverse consequences for the United States. The Soviets "Political Prisoners in q ui c klI y achieved their own Brazil Uraguay Chile Iranbomb after the war and, in the Brazl, U agua, Chle, raninterim, practiced a "reverse and South Korea" atomic diplomacy" underplay- MONDAY, MARCH 1 Three 14hcenru 12 noon: International Center (brown bag) THE CREAT IoMAN'S DISOBEDIENCE 4 p.m.: International Center THE I Sponsored by: Group on Latin American Issues presented by students from the U of M school of drama, __ i directed by Royal Word. j ~'MUSIC BY: : !. r f r r t r '> 1 4 t F t 1 'x I . ing the bomb's importance. Sherwin thoroughly explores the motives and intentions of the policymakers who decided upon the surprise attack deploy- ment of two A-bombs over Ja- pan instead of less drastic measures. He finds that from the very beginning of its de- velopment, the government as- sumed the bomb would be used if available during the war and that no alternatives were really ever seriously entertained. THE BOMB had come to be regarded as something of a panacea for establishing America's power in the post-war world, especially vis a vis Rus- sia, and it was felt that only a dramatic demonstration of the weapon, meaning the use of it in a military situation, could establish it as an effective dip- lomatic tool. Also, in the minds of many, there would have been nothing to show for all the time and money spent on the bomb's development if it were not de- ployed. In light of information that a Japanese surrender may have been imminent b e f o r e Hiro- shima, 'and was definitely con- sidered before Nagasaki, Sher- win concludes that "neither bomb may have been neces- sary; and certainly the second one was not." A World Destroyed. provides a 'fascinating glimpse into recent history and offers new insights into American foreign policy during the war. Sherwin's book is thought-provoking and a bit disturbing, for it leaves one to ponder how things may have turned out if America's policy- makers had chosen alternative courses of action in regard to their awesome new weapon. Thomas Field is a senior maj- oring in English. I ry mystery plays: ION OF MAN AND THE FALL OF MAN DELUGE ASSERTION TRAINING I1 Audrey Schumann, organist Sue Kieren and Nelva te Brake; recorder, viola do omba. TONIGHT, 6:00 P.M. CAMPUS CHAPEL a place for people 1236 WASHTENAW CT. orie block north of South University and Forest includes unlimited trips to our famous salad bar, choice of potato L Ever say "no" and feel guilty? ] Difficulties epressing your feelings? [ Want to meet new people? TWO EXPERIENCED L E A D E R S WILL BE LEADING ASSERTION TRAINING GROUPS in connection with an ongoing research project. For further information, fill out the form below or call 764-0434 (Dr. James Papsdorf) or Ken j Newbury, 764-9188. Reply soon-groups will be forming in a few weeks!!! Ii I =J1 E _ _ . _ _ _ _ U _ _ _ _ _ . : i Michigan Undergradui is sp ate Economic Association onsoring 1 BROWN BAG LUNCH with PROF. GARDNER ACKLEY and WILLIAM SHEPHERD 1 1 1 C .r . -m S I