poge Four THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, February 1, 1 976 ?age Four THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, February 1, 1976 BOO George Sand: The mystery still unsolved x tn. KS Watching TV again tonight? Look at CHANGIN' CHANNELS - SEE PAGE 3 IN SATURDAY'S PAPER - GEORGE SAND, A Biogra- phy by Curtis Cate. Houghteni Mufflin Co., 1975. 812 pp., $17.50i By CINDY HILL AT AUTHORESS G e o r g e E Sand's death in 1876, her daughter commented, "Bien malin celui qui debrouillera ma1 mere." (It will be a shrewd person who unravels my moth-1 er.) Curtis Cate is not the man1 who does it. His latest biogra- phy George Sand (he also au-+ thored Antoine de St. Exupery:l His Life and Times) is thorough and flawless in detail, but it falls short of providing the in- sight for his 30-page preface! promises. Sand is almost an unknown1 figure today, but her writing dominated the 19th century1 romantic movement - surpass- ing even Victor Hugo, Honore de Balzac and Alexander Du- mas in public acclaim. Her name has filtered down to us today for her less remark- able characteristics: she smok- ed cigars, occasionally wore men's clothes, and was the lov- er (some writers have said; nemesis) of Chopin, Musset, Sandeau and a host of others. CATE'S BIOGRAPHY of her+ extraordinary life hit the1 bookstores at an opportune1 time. The BBC series on Sand, + "Notorious Woman," had no sooner ended than the Christ- mas rush began. By News Year's, Ann Arbor's copies of the work had vanished. Although Sand acquired a vi-, cious images after her death, as a vamp who lured men to their destruction, the women's movement has recently lionized her as a social revolutionary. This, like the Sand of "Notori- ous Woman," is much too sim-, ple a portrait. Sand, in her day, was alter- nately labeled chaste and pro- miscuous, brazen and timid, mannish and feminine, cold- hearted and loving. While her novels suggested a need for a moral freedom for women, she publicly reaffirmed the sanc- tity of marriage. Her own mar- riage was an unqualified disas- ter, and she was incapable of+ sustaining a relationship with her lovers. While she preached a radical (for the time), communism, she I kept tenants on her Nohant es- tate as well as servants. While she preached the de-I mocracy of love, she was class-conscious in arranging the marriages of her children and friends. CATE MERELY presentsI these conflicts, he makes no attempt to resolve them. This flaw becomes critical when Cate refuses to analyze h e r oxymoronic repellent charm. Balzac, who knew Sand since and their sexuality would have her earliest days as a writer, withstood the scrutiny of thist said, "She isn't amiable, and century, or whether it was a consequently she will find it product of the Victorian era, is hard to be loved . . . All in all, a question Cate never really she's a man, all the more for explores. wanting to be one . . . A wo- (Cate's own biases become' man attracts, she repels." Cate'all apparents when he refers contrasts this with a fatuous, ;to Sand's son "sobbing like a Victorian a fanletter from the girl.") painter Charpentier on his first visit to Nohant. Does Cate be- N HIS PREFACE, Cate con- lieve the two quotes can be 1 fronts the legend that Sand weighed equally? destroyed the artists she lov- Sand's ed. He claims the situation was Gate often excuses Sadsthe revre h eieaey faults and only apologetically sth meverse:She deliberately explains them. For example, sought men she could "s§ave," waning friendships suffer crue, taking the role of a Mater Do- vivisection in her novels. lorosa. Cate scoffs at the idea, however, that Sand may have "The Vicomtesse de Chailly been masochistic. Unfortunate- had never had much wit, but ly, this idea is never developedI she was determined to have in the main work, either. some and make people believe To what extent Sand used her it," she wrote in Horace. The talen for social reform on one character was a thinly veiled Marie d'Agoult, Liszt's former lover. Chopin and Solange Du- devant, Sand'sdaughter, fared K eep ing no better in her works. K e p n "Is this a woman?" Chopin century Victorian. 1 inquired after their first meet- The comments Cate cites to t ing. "I think not." Yet Alfred buttress his argument are ques-|+ de Musset called her the tionable. Sand sought an ideal "most womanly woman I have love, and often intended to keep ever known." Elizabeth Bar- it "pure" through a tortuous,: rett Browning caught a bit of self - imposed chastity. Fre-; this when she called Sand "a quently she worried that the large - brained woman and a energy of love making would large-hearted man." overwhelm her lovers. Whether her attitudes towards woman ! . 4 hand and for ego-reinforcement on the other is another point Cate does not discuss. Her politics were naive, her writing about her politics; didac- tic and dull. She was shame- fully exploited by radical poli- ticians who collected the money her furious writing earned. Af- ter her communistic utopia was not realized in the Revolu- tion of 1848, she made an ig- nominous retreat from politics. While we cannot doubt the sin- cerity of her statements, we can doubt the depth of thought behind them - especially since most were feverishly completed one pen stroke ahead of her creditors. George Sand would have benefited by a little less re- search and a lot more insight. While scrupuolous in its minu- tae, Cate often strained out the proverbial giant and swallow- ed the camel. His thorough chronicling of Sand's life is in- teresting for the questions that arise from the material, not for the questions that are answered within it. Cindyf Hill is The Daily's former Execu/ive Editor. Drawing of George Sand by Alfred de Musset if clean: Stone on big business tx4tgMn Dailp iI Feb. 3: ROLLO MAY CATE, EXCEPT in his pref- ace, never mentions this vitriolic streak in her heroine. Instead he suggests that Sand was not consciously aware of. the objects of her parodies. Is it likely that a woman is keenly, intelligent as Sand would be so unaware of her real-life inspir- ations? Cate's opinions, when he does air them, are often best left unsaid: "There can be no doubt! that George Sand, were she alive today, would regard the militant crusaders of Women's Liberation as 'mentally de- praved,"' Cate states repeated-: ly. There can be plenty of doubt. George Sand's life was clearly influenced by the times. She was an intelligent woman, and were she alive today she would probably be more than a 20th Psychologist, Psychotherapist SPEAKING ON "CHANGING VALUES IN FUTURE SOCIETY" Admission $1.00 In HILL AUDITORIUM From 3-5 p.m. on Tues., Feb. 3 Sponsored by FUTURE WORLDS UAC Ars Comedia Presents The Time of Your Life An original adaptation of four one-act comedies Feb., 19 & 22-Mendelssohn Tickets on sale Feb. 5, Hill Aud. For more info: 763-1107 Join The Daily Staff By JACK HIBBARD WHERE THE LAW ENDS; Social Control of Corporate Behavior by Christopher D. Stone. Harper and Row, $12.95. CHRISTOPHER D. STONE is at least a pioneer in legal thinking. He has taken on the task of giving, full examination to the super-structures which we know as the corporate monolith and the legal system. In fact Stone's analysis in Where the Law Ends goestmuch farther as it sinks its teeth into business morality and ethics. What is more striking is that Stone's treatment of these subjects is penetrating, detailed, and fairly complete. The essence of the work is the postulate that the corpora- tion is "an actor" under the ex- isting legal system, and as such it has been the subject of vari- ous inadequate sanctions. His- torical trends are offered by Stone as evidence for the roles which the coporation fits. lDuring the development of trade guilds, such precorporate entities were used mainly as landholders and as such were treated as an individual by the law. This characterization of the collective business form as "an individual" began to cause ser- ious social difficulty with the advent of the industrial revolu- tion. The injuries caused by joint business forms were be- ginning to have serious impli- cations for workers, customers theres thni classifed to stem out of the same ten- dencies to allow a group to de- cide the best social interests. However, the tools for change are cobwebbed Victorian struc- tures, while space-age damage is being done to large groups of people all day long. There is no real redress against a cor- poration or a jury under our present legal system. The tech- nology h a s obliterated t h e checks and balances which our system supposedly treasures so dearly. THE LAW IS made and en- forced to protect people, and it vainly attempts to be fair . and to reduce harm. In the case of the corporation, how- ever, what is done is usually token punishment of socializa- tion of redress. The executives who, make the decisions to do 'x' or 'y' with different side effects and costs usually do not fear the law. The law has failed to be the conscience of the corn- uany; it has given us a set of vague laws which are extreme- ly difficult to enforce and there is no true appreciation of legal jeopardy by the big exec's who run the corporate show. With historical and contempo- rary perspectives out of the way, Stone attempts to remedy this troubled arena of behavior. His basic format includes inter- nalizing the conscience. If the law has not brought corporate ter Stone behavior into line, then there e Stshould be set up within the monolith a little man with a both systems. He begins by at- superego to tap the innocent tempting to find an analogy of violator on the shoulder. the corporate decision-making Stone suggests that perhaps process in the law. The jury the best place for the conscience process is used to illustrate the is on the board of directors in objectives, performance a n d order to impact corporate be- function of a corporation. He havior directly. This idea also spells out nine role characer- has the feature of not adding istics of a jury and attempts to any new faces to the already fit this shell over the business billowing bureaucracy. T h e operations of our present day exact nature of this beast is executives. There are votes, not clear but "general" direc- limited information and decision tors are usually financiers, and makers, qualifications for the when a public board is estab- I INTRODUCTION TO KUNDALINI YOGA as taught by Swami Rudrananda and Michael Shoemaker Beainners' Classes Every MWF at 5:30 p.m. RUDRANANDA ASHRAM 640 Oxford, 995-5483 11- S r Christoph i NEW MINI-COURSE THE STRUGGLE FOR ANGOLA. 1 CREDIT, PASS/FAIL BEGINS MONDAY 2 FEBRUARY Reqister: Political Science Department, 5601 Haven Hall and innocent third parties. The legal system adapted by shifting as little blame as it: could on the "corporation's shoulders." In other words, the law responded to a social ill by. holding the individual as work- er, etc. to be the one to repair the bulk of the damage. ('ERTAINLY there are work-, man's compensation laws, but they were fought for tooth and nail by the early laborI movement. But certainly Stone, is telling us nothing new whenI he says that the legal system listens predominantly to those with invested capital. Legal re- form for the "little guy" has been a gallant battle, as Ralpha Nader would testify. After laying out the historical construct in some detail with examples of dreadful mistreat- ment of the common man by "his" boss r ' his" legal sys- tem, Stone proceeds to examineI roles and participation, and in both there is an authoritative decisional framework. In addition, the corporation takes on the characteristics of being immortal and laced with inertia. Finally, Stone concludes that the decisions of a corpora- tion do not coincide with those of any one person nor an ag- gregate sum of decisions of the makers as a group. Basically, the need for jury and corporate reform is shown I ., , ,.- WE ARE PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE AN OPEN HOUSE FOR OUR FRIENDS AND PATRONS ON SUNDAY, FEB. 1ST from 12-5 p.m. -REFRESHMENTS SERVED- * Zef'' iwc 6 - *. 995-fc$1 nw rrrnr r. + ewni i i fianikas RESTAURANT OPEN 7 DAYS A WEEK We have daily specials ^ Mon.-Sat. 7-9 Sun. 10-8 307 S. Main St. DINERS CLUB and MASTER CHARGE f.<-)^ y(<-yt O-y< > Y<--> O O<--(? <- > U > (< <--:> lished it usually functions poor- ly (ala the Union Pacific disaster). THE INFILTRATING director should supposedly be govern- ment-appointed with the exper- tise which now exists in the regulatory bodies. These agen- cies are nothing more than con- glomerates themselves w i t h vested financial interests. Stone believes that financial disinter- est is also necessary to cleanse the behavior of a responsible board member. There are other checks which can be employed to supplementthe "do-gooder" on the board, the best of which is a probation officer paying visits to a violating industry with temporary injunctions as valuable tools. The line to be examined in Stone's analysis r e s t s some- where between Woodrow Wil- son's statement "You cannot punish corporations" and the suggestion of making the pun- ishment fit the crime by hand- ing out stiff jail sentences to "misguided" d ir e c t o r s. The mood in America is swinging toward jail, especially after the fiasco which resulted in Nixon's pardon. However, with proper state supervision, corporate behavior can be more closely monitored from within, and Stone's use of legal subversion, if implemented nrnnorl,, itn n rt.CnlyPtyc WE WANT YOU to sign up for a chance to be a Fall Orientation leader i SWINGING EDUCATION (by the tail) with Li I Studenis for Educational Innovation AT A MASS MEETING MD.BAl I III 1 11 I