Eighty-Seven Years of Editorial Freedom 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Tuesday, December 7, 1976 News Phone: 764-0552 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Colem---an + shirked his duty in auto air bag decision ALMOST EVERY top government of- ficial is called upon to make basic decisions of life and death as a part of his or her, job. The President, Congress, the Supreme Court, Cabi- net officials, and even the heads of minor regulatory agencies must grap- ple with controversial. issues involv- ing the health and welfare of theen- tire nation, questions which rarely have answers in a consensus of' the American people. Secretary of Transportation Wil- liam Coleman found himself under the pressure of one such problem yesterday - whether to require the installation of air bags on new auto- mobiles beginning with the 1980 mod- el year. The government's own study concluded that such a mandate would save 9,000 lives and prevent 500,000 serious injuries annually. Other evi- dence was overwhelmingly favorable to air bags. Coleman, who warned the public of his weakness by unnecessarily de- laying his decision until after the presidential election, demonstrated indifference toward bloody, need- less highway carnage, and coward- ice in tfie face of the powerful auto- mobile manufacturers' interests by deciding to leave the air bag question, for the most part, up to the profit- hungry auto companies themselves. Shirking his public duty, he decided only to "urge" the automakers to of- fer the safety devices as options. It was almost certainly the 'most fool- ish and unsupportable ruling of his entire term as a Cabinet member. Air bags would offer unmatched protection for passengers of the death machines manufactured in Detroit. They have so far deployed 103 times Edit qria? Stax Rob Meachum -. Bill Turque Co-Editors-in-Chief Jeff Risine .................Managing Editor Tar Scik........... .....Executive Editor Stephen Hers ......... Magazine Editor Rob Meachum .... Editorial Director Lots Josimovich .......... Arts Editor STAFF WRrrERS, Susan Ades, Bill Barbour, Gwen Barr, Susan Barry, Michael Beckman, Philip Bokovoy, Michael Broidy, Mara Brazer, Laurie Caruthers, Ken Chotiner, Eileen Daey, Ron DeKett, Chris Dyhdalo, Nancy Englund, Scott Eyery, Elaine Fletcher, Larry Friske, Debra Gale, Owen Gleiberman, Tom Godell, Nancy Graser, Liz Greenfield, Eric Gressman. Kurt Harju, Robb Holmes, Michael Jones, Lani Jordan, Lois Josimovich, Liz Kaplan, Joanne Kaufman, David Keeps, Janet Klein, Steve Kursman, Jay Levin, Ann Marie Lipsinki, George Lobsenz, Dobias Matulonis, Stu McCon- nell, Deb Meadows, Jennifer Miller, Patty Mon- temurri, Angie Nicita, Maureen Nolan, Michael Norton, Jon Pansius, Ken Parsigian, Karen Paul, Stephen Pickover, Christopher Potter, Martha Retallick, Bob Rosenbaum, Lucy Saun- ders, Annemarie Schiavi, Billie 'Scott, Jeffrey Selbst, Jim Shahin, Tom Stevens, Jim Stimson, David Strauss, Mike Taylor, Jim Tobin, Pauline Toole, Keith Tosolt, Susan vintilla, Loran walker, Linda willcox, Shelley wolson, Mar- garet Yao, Bill Yaroch, Laurie Young, Andrew Zerman, Barbara Zahs. Big St are fea By JON PANSIUS ELBERT HENRY GARY, the founder of U.S. Steel who tried to form a cartel of steel firms in the early part of this century, may well have been proud of recent action taken by the steel industry to raise its prices. Despite fall- ing demand for their product, the major manufacturers of steel instituted the price increase all in concert; while they probably did not meet or communicate with each other to agree about it like in the infamous Gary dinners thrown by the founder of Indiana's Dirty City, they might just as well have. These things have happened before; in fact, that steel prices go up (up, al- ways up) together is pretty much taken for granted. In most industries, when this happens it usually starts when the largest or second largest firm in the market raises its price first and the rest then follow. Sometimes they do not fol- low, and a price war results. Usually, however, they are 'only too glad to go along if they are assured that every- body else will, too. Jon Pansius is a member of the Mich- igan Daily Editorial Page staff. eel LrfuI companies, I IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY, how- ever, this price leadership process is reversed. The leading firm, U.S. Steel, is regarded by the government and oth- ers as a Giant Corporation; if it initiates the price increase, it gets bad publicity and political repurcussions. Being such a political target, it just sits back and lets the smaller companies do the dirty work of announcing the new rises. If the small fry change prices at - a bad time, the Big Mama sits pat and takes all the business away, eventually forc- ing them to return to the status quo. Thus, we never, could be sure that the increases announced by fou; of the small firms in the beginning would stick until U.S. Steel and Bethlehem said that they were going along. This sort of group action is the re- sult of tacit collusion made possible by the steel industry's high concentration of firms (that is, most of the market is shared by a few firms) and the ease of exchanging information between each other through trade organizations. Ex- tensive tariff protection and an econom- ic recession makes raising prices even easier by removing the threat of entry of competing firms. SUPPLIED WITH sufficient motives, of price c then, the steel industry can raise prices relatively easily if all the firms can agree. The motives here are more politi- cal than economic. True, costs have been increasing for these firms, but the price increase outstrips this substantially. As mentioned before, demand is falling off. And President-elect Carter has repeated- ly said that he will not impose wage and price controls. Hold it right there. Let us suppose that Carter did announce that he would institute controls after he took office. If that happened, all companies would stampede to raise their prices to beat the freeze, so it would have little ef- fect. We really can't be sure what Car- ter will do in this except to note that he seemed inclined towards them dur- ing the campaign. Of course, campaign pledges or hints are hardly gospel fact, so we still have little to go on. THE STEEL COMPANIES are hard- ly clairvoyant, either, but they feel safer with the hike, just in case. They are not alone, for these are already rumors of more price hikes by other industries, aluminum for example. Firms that use these materials will also charge more, creating more inflation that will en- courage or force workers to seek wage increases, which will of course encourage others ontrois or force industries that employ that la- bor to raise their prices, and so forth. All'this stems from fears about possi- ble price controls, and ironically, might well lead to them. Carter has promised more than jobs (something he has found need for caution about); he also pledged to restrain inflation. Faced with a new surge of it, he may have to impose or suggest some kind of scheme, perhaps voluntary controls. However, he is not in office yet, and conditions can be al- most anything by January 20. President Ford will most likely do little if anything, having already stagnated into typical lame-duck atrophy. BUT THEN, HE COULD be courage- ous and active about this anticipatory action by the steel industry, and do so without infringing upon the future Car- ter administration. Several months ago, he ordered special import restrictions and tariffs on specialty and other types of steel. By rescinding this protection of the steel industry (supposedly for, help- ing employment there), he could put competitive pressure upon its firms and make them think twice about sticking with their new charges. This would help mitigate the beat-the-freeze stampede and give the next administration a bet- ter chance against inflation. William Coleman in real-life traffic accidents, and only four of the 129 front-seat riders in- volved in those crashes died. In two of those instances, investigators de- termined the crashes were so severe that no safety device could have saved the passengers. In a third, an infant slid off the seat before the automobile impacted and the air bag deployed. Improvements in the de- sign of air bags have reduced the number of accidental deployments to negligible levels. No one can view the films compar- ing the results of an air bag frontal crash, wherein the passenger is cush- ioned by a soft, balloon-like device, with the maiming effects of an acci- dent without them, or even with seat belts alone without realizing their superior ability to save lives. WHY REQUIRE AIR BAGS? Be- cause the automobile companies will never in a thousand years attempt to persuade motorists to buy them. Air bags remind drivers that cars are dangerous - and that spoils their sexy image. Because the public, too ignorant even to fasten their seat belts, won't buy them even if they are offered as options. Because 125 peo- ple dies every day from auto acci- dents, ending lives worth much more than the $100 to $300 it would cost to install -air bags in every car., Coleman's gutless decision on pas- sive restraints needn't be permanent. President Carter's transportation sec- retary, whoever he or she may be, can overrule the decision in January. Let's hope the next administration values life a little more than Cole- man does. TODAY'S STAFF, News: Lani Jordan, Ken Parsigion, Jeff Ristine, Bill T u r q u e, Linda Wilicox Edit Page: Michael Beckman, R o b Meachum, Tom Stevens, Barb Zahs, Jeff Ristine Arts Page: L o i s Josimovich, J i m Shahin Photo Technician: Brad Benjamin CO~ '4 A M OF t AL- J .VU MU(,(C REHINM? HC1 OF 6(R16. Izl - ,mm / M C1OPJT gci~xc HCo r G caw To axLX K TrtUS COT. r6ATt 1 ' am raw &VOW OPM1! 4"A""r, 0"6 i ,A 4r " affirmative action To The Daily: THE U. S. DEPARTMENT of Labor has proposed revisions to its Affirmative Action guidelines which enforce non-discrimina- tory employment practices poli- cy of federal contractors. A group of Michigan citizens, the People's Coalition for Affirma- tive Action, has organized a campaign against implementa- tion of the revisions. Petitions and letters requesting a public hearing in Detroit on this issue have been denied by Depart. ment of Labor officials. We have been directed by them to go to Chicago on December 13 to deliver testimony instead. A Michigan delegation of ten will go to Chicago that day to speak out against the revisions. We object to the revisions because they will reduce the number of contractors bound to provide written affirmative action pro- grams and to go through a re- view of their plan before re- newal of their federal con- tracts. The revisionswill also allow the Office of Federal Con- tract Compliance Programs (0 FCCP), which is the affirmative action enforcing agency, to shift some of its caseload over to the Equal Employment Op- portunity Commission which is currently disfunctioning with a 120,000 case backlogue. In addi- tion, greater arbitrary power has been given the director of the OFCCP for determining what constitutes a good faith ef- fort towards compliance with- out providing any criteria to guide him in making that judge- ment. Further, a violator can bid for new contracts while un- dergoing enforcement proceed- ings foralleged violationsand the contractor need not show cause for deficiencies which continue to exist though orders for correction have been issued. THE THREAT THESE revi- sions pose is an enormous one; not just to women and minority races but to all those who have ever been discriminated against and even to those who have not. With the government's emphasis Letters We must make this a visible issue. The People's Coalition urges the public to send letters to the Editor of this paper, to the Department of Labor, to i members of Congress, to the Carter Transition Team, to ra- dio stations, televisions sta- tions, etc. to make it clear that we will have our civil rights protected, that the revisions must be withdrawn and that af- firmative action policy must be strengthened. Chris Miller People's Coalition for Affirmative Action and State Chair, N.O.W. Task Force on Affirma- tive Action Dec. 4 thank you To The Daily: I WOULD LIKE to thank The Daily for your excellent cover- age of my campaign for the Michigan Student Assembly. I must give your editorial of No- vember 30 a great deal of credit not only for making me one of the elevencpeople to be elected bnt, for causing me to gather the second highest number of votes of all thirty four candi- dates. Had you not informed the student body that in the Daily's estimation I am imma- ture, paranoid and an intellec- tual lightweight; I may not have received the surprising amount of support which I did. Once again, Thank-you. Irving Freeman MSA Member December 4, 1976 refraction To The Daily: We, the Voluntary Funding Party, in resnonse to the claim that we made erroneous state- ments concerning The Commit- tee Against Mandatory Funding, reinvestigated the matter and found that we had indeed made a mistake. This was due to our lack of political experience and or subsequent reliance on po- litical sources for our initial information. to e biofeedback To The Daily:' BARB ZAHS' article on. bio- feedback has a number of in-+ accuracies in it. First the in' formation concerning the stu- dent who troe up his exam and screamed during a recent Phys- ics 240 hourly, was poorly re- searched. Secondly the unfor- tunate emphasis of the article stressed that it was the stu- dents problem to cope with aca- demic tension and does not con- sider that the real problem is FreeI Daly our academic system, or more specifically with the unfairness of that particular exam. According to the people at the physics 240 exam, who saw the incident, the student's be- havior looked and sounded au- thentic. It is cruel indeed to dis- miss the anxietyr a student ex- perienced as a prank and mini- mize the incident for use as a lead in to a story about a bio- feedback class. ZAHS DOES NOT cite her sources: An editorial in The " ?ress, in despair, always raids An Arbor, Daily later told us that her source was merely an anony- mous telephone call. But the caller who admitted that the scream was a prank, may in fact not have been the in- volved student. The Daily is perpetuating poor journalism and empty sensationalism in the University community, instead of highlighting through exam- ple, real systemic problems. Tina Rosenthal, Mark Melman December 6 By Marnie. Heyn J UP TO HERE. I've had it. Whenever the Feature and Magazine people at the Detroit Free Press are stuck for copy, they raid Ann Arbor. They ruined the Art Fair, which used to be a nice local custom. Now fifty thous- and tourists a day stomp through, nicking fend- ers, throwing up on lawns, and ripping the turf on the Diag to little brown hunks. Then it was the Old China, which used to be a nice place to go for great not-expensive food and quiet conversation. You could wander in on Saturday evening for a tranquil plate of chow mein. Now you need a machete to get in any time on the weekend, and you need to be rude to keep your place in line the rest of the time. Forget reservations; some people will claim to be anybody to get a table for four. You can hope that the jukebox is broken. I FEEL SORT of guilty for feeling hostile to the Freep for the Old China's new-found popularity. It is the best Chinese restaurant in North Ameri- ca - the best that I know of, anyhow. It's a family-run. small business, and it deserves to suc- ceed. But with the mob' traffic, service has de- teriorated to the vanishing point, and the food tends to be raw or overcooked. The burden of fame, perhaps. LAST SUNDAY'S COLUMN on Ann Arbor bar- hopping (seriously) took the same tack. The Del Rio was alleged to have "strange music tapes and grad students." Grrrr. I was grateful' to know that Dooley's had an "Aspenlike" decor (hadn't been able to identify it), but I am not grateful that bored Detroiters now know how to find Mr. Flood's and the Del. There's never enough room as it is. Snotty references to "yogurt-eating, back- pack-toting students" don't make the cultural im- perialism any easier to take. There are several neat bars in Detroit that the Freep never men- tions. Coleman Young may be deliriously happy with an upsurge of tourist and convention trade in De- troit, but I don't feel the same way about pan- dering this town. In the first place, the area wasn't designed for crowds (except for Chrysler and the football stadium, which are surrounded by congestion before and after each' athletic event). But more important is the maintenance of Ann Arbor's proper function as cultural pre- serve. IF THE FREEP were writing up local pheno- mena to provide models for people in other areas to learn from and elaborate on, I wouldn't object. Other towns could be the richer for arts festivals, coop garages and markets, crafts guilds, small classy pubs, decentralized downtown shopping, KIV -~,"kW ItC Cff jy //ILd n ~ T.~. I