emULHEM1ICHIAN DAILY 1uy ~I3I ~I~ I luuy, ryl 11 0, 1.71 1 ? SEA YOU COULDN'T DEAL FROM]Z Now Ponderosa has seafood dinners- Filet of Sole for an enticing $2.19, Plum prising combination of Steak and Sh It only takes one bite to get hooked on 29 J GET A BETTER r'HE OCEAN, -with prices to catch you. Tender np golden-fried Shrimp and a sur- rimp, each for an irresistible $3.19. n Ponderosa seafood. ENJOY OUR SALAD BAR1 .. @ sll.fu Carter asks for new research guidelines DNA research history (Continued from Page 1) the making of organisms thatI could gobble up oil spills. Califano told the Senate health and scientific research sub- committee that in more than three years of DNA experiments there had been no known case of creating a hazardous agent. HE DESCRIBED as most re- mote the possible creation of "a kind of Andromeda Strain," a runaway organism against which man had no defenses. But he added: "There is al- ways ahdanger of something like that. That's why we feel we have to have such strict guide- lines on research." Califano stressed that the re- search was probing the unknown and until more information on the kinds of risks became avail- able, -strict safety conditions were required. HE SAID the legislation pro- posed to regulate basic labora- tory research to an unusual de- gree but added, "There is no reasonable alternative to regu- lation under law." The bill, introduced in the Senate by subcommittee chair- manrEdward Kennedy, would require licensing of, facilities producing or possessing recom- binant DNA and inspection by government inspectors. It would also call for govern- ment standards tobe issued for the IYNA facilities, and fines and imprisonment for violations.r The Administration bill is one of a number of DNA-related billsr before Congress. It is described as basically sound by the Phar- maceutical Manufacturers As-; sociation. By LAURA LIEBLER At the center of the recombinant DNA controversy-often obscured by scientific, legal and emotional rhetoric-is a chemical compound and a technique for altering it. The compound is called deoxyribonucleic acid, DNA, and it controls the inherited traits of all organisms from amoeba to hu- mans. In 1973 researchers developed a way to splice segments of DNA, called genes, from the cell of one organism to another- for example, from a toad cell to a bacterium. With this gene-splicing technique, scientists are able to create new life forms and to alter the genes of existing organisms. DNA TECHNOLOGY could produce great benefits in the fields of biology, medicine and agriculture. Researchers could conceiv- ably develop methods for freeing humans from genetic diseases such as sickle-cell ane- mia; or for producing crop plants that could use nitrogen in the air instead of nitrogen in expensive fertilizers. Gene-splicing techniques have already been used to produce a bacterium to clean up oil spills. A researcher at General Electric com- bined genes from four different strains of Pseudomonas putida bacteria-each of which feeds on different components of oil-into one strain. Along with pollution-eating bacteria and tther potential benefits, however, come pos- sible hazards. Recombinant organisms might escape from a laboratory and infect humans with a new disease for which they have no immunity. Or a new plant might flourish at the expense of other plants, thereby upset- ting the ecological balance in an area. Worse yet, recombinant DNA techniques could be used deliberately to produce virulent organ- isms for use in biological warfare. Scientists themselves in 1973 called to pub- lic attention the hazards of recombinant DNA work. In early 1975 scientists from around the world gathered at the Asilomar Conference Center in California to examine the question of gene-splicing experiments. At about the same time, University Vice President for Research Charles Overberger appointed a committee to investigate the eth- ical and legal aspects of recombinant DNA research. In May 1975 the Regents adopted the committee's recommendation to continue the research under the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). At present two University groups are in- volved with seeing that the research com- plies with the guidelines. One committee is directing the installation of special equip- ment in three laboratories to provide greater security for moderate risk experiments. The other is developing procedures to review experiments, inspect laboratories and moni- tor research according to specifications in the national guidelines. e I IkL r,,- .- 1 4 s _ / ____ _ g - e, . ; ,:" t " V ti '' \ . Bargain For Hunters U' group monitors research THE DAILY CLASSIFIEDS make interesting j Taste what ~TMOHAWK adid to Peppermint Schnapps. Try the New CP PEPPER ;Ip ,. , n : t i i ' ' , --M1y __ s , t , rlt . . read ing (Continued from Page 1) 1 hearings specifically to discuss recombinant DNA research, and several bills now before Con- gress propose restrictions for the experiments that are more stringent than those already in Ieffect. The issues legislators are nowl discussing are variations of two general questions that first be- gan to plague University offi- cials two years ago: should scientists tamper with the basic programming mechanisms of life, and, if the research con-I tinues how can recombinant or- ganisms be prevented from in- fecting humans? . scribe in detail the kinds of lab-: oratory equipment, safety pro- cedures and research organisms that must be used to insure that recombinant organisms are con- tained in the laboratories. The containment requirements vary according to the risk level of the experiment, and the Regents prohibited the highest risk ex- periments from being carried I out at the University. To insure that researchers comply with NIH guidelines, the Regents established the nine- member Committete C to review research proposals, inspect lab- oratories and monitor on-going experiments. Committee C is required to: "certify to NIH that the facili- ties being used in an experiment. are the ones that should be used" to maintain the required level of containment, says Fran- cis Payne, chairman of the com- mittee and professor of epidem- iology. THE CERTIFICATION pro- cess begins with the researcher, who must determine what levels of physical and biological con- tainment are necessary for his or her experiment. The guidelines specify four levels of physical containment, which describe required labora- tory faciilties and safety pro- After lengthy debate involving zedures. The levels range from people from vastly different P1, which requires only the fields, the Regents in May 1976 safely measures standard in any voted to continue the research, open microbiology laboratory, to but under guidelines established P4, which requires elaborate by the National Institute of equipment such as air locks at Health (NIH). laboratory entrances and chem- T H E S E GUIDELINES de- ical showers for employes leav- ing the research area. The three levels of biological containment describe the ability of the research organisms to survive outside the laboratory environment. COMMITTEE C has spent most of its short life developing efficient methods for reviewing experiments. After the researcher deter- mines containment levels for his experiment, Committee C mem- bers must then inspect his lab- oratory. In almost every case, the research proposal then must be approved by NIH. WHILE THE Committee has no specified power to punish vi- olators of the guidelines, it has "considerable authority" to en- force the regulations indirectly, Payne says. "We affect the researcher's ability to get (grant) money," he says. "I would suspect that the investigator would be re- sponsive to the committee's rec- ommendations." "The major responsibility for any of this rests with the inves- tigator," Payne says. "We have to be careful that people don't relax after a time. We need to look for a mechanism to keep people on their toes." TOMORROW: LEGISLATION SCHNA Cool green colorn r U Taste Sens--ation Enjoy it straigh t or over ice 60 PROOF, BOTTLED BY MOHAWK LIQUEUR CORP The "Cool One" Is On Campus! Cool Peppermint Schnapps T-SHIRTS. .1.95 Tuna ban approved By LINDA BRENNERS University dorm, residents are guaranteed head lettuce, but they may not be able to use it to garnish their tuna fish sand- wiches. Of the 830 students (about 10 per cent of the dorm population) voting in the University Housing Council (UHC) elections, two- thirds voted to initiate a boy- cott on yellow fin tuna and more than half voted to end the boy- cott on non-United Farm Work- UNLIK ballot on this vote Eric Ar elections, weighed of studei boycott: between and the, head let the only vored the tuce boy "Thoug er lettuce and grapes. not press issue wa ' ZZVZV- zTI V '; e ;Vsaid. "Si is a wor Be the Easter Bunny lboe :bon Betufin tuna. with Homegrown staged t 40of porpos fin tuna. Albaco replace t AEASTEOR LILLIES $1300 per bloom A wide assortment of blooming and foliage plants, plus quality fresh flowers for in town or out of town -0 Udelivery. Rec EASTER HOURS iE S aCt.-8:30-6:00 0Exiton Sun.-9:00-1 :00 DOU ~ f)p .~ Term Ph IIIULJLIEN 4~' O 1021 MaID n er CE AN earlier advisary n the lettuce boycott, e is binding on UHC. nson, director of UHC said that two factors heavy in the decision nts to discontinue the the tentative agreement UFW and teamsters fact that dorms offer tuce. East Quad was dorm that clearly fa- e continuation of the let- cott. gh the lettuce issue was ed that much, the tuna s quite salient," Arnson tudents realize that it thwhile cause and we'll f the first universities )rt a boycott of yellow " The boycott will be o protest the slaughter ses in catching yellow re 'white meat tuna may he yellow fin. irseback Riding (NO GU IDES) Hayrides- c. Hall for rent hr. South on RT 23 To Sameria n M 151-East 5 min. GLAS MEADOWS RANCH 2755 M 151 perance, MI 48182 %. 313-856-3973 DNCE AGAIN, THE T-SHIRT AAf''1TIkH TT'y At '4' Ty 4' T'