----, atie £idgan DaUb Eighty-two years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Controversial tactics blur the issues 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. News Phone: 764-0552 SATURDAY, APRIL 14, 1973 By RICHARD PARKS IN RECENT weeks, serious citi- zens of Ann Arbor have witness- ed three separate stunts " which have demonstrated the quintessen- tial truth of this statement as it applies to social change in general. In each case, the nature of the in- cident forced people to direct their attention and thought to the stunt, rather than to the serious and im- porant issue at hand. These inci- dents were: -a campaign promise by mayor- al candidate Franz Mogdis that he would fire police chief Walter Kras- ny; -an invitation from Ann Arbor state representative Perry Bullard to his colleagues asking them to join Bullard for a day's outing and experience in the illegal use of drugs at the Second Annual Ann Arbor Hash Festival, and the sub- sequent photographs of Bullard "lighting up" which s p r e a d throughout the state like Wallace posters; -a book burn-in, sponsored .by AMI (Advocates of Meaningless In- anity?) In Editorial Director Kathleen Ricke's thoughtful and well-reason- ed discussion of the book burning issue in Wednesday's Daily, she has cut to the heart of the issue (possibly unintentionally) when she states in the twelfth paragraph that "the results may prove counter- productive if the issue becomes the book burning, and not the book.." Indeed, the effect of the latest in this bizarre series of events has been the virtual elimination of any discussion concerning meaningful reform of the hideous ways in which aspiring doctors are taught to deal with women patients. BOOK BURNING, regardless of how "symbolic," is a disgusting, morally reprehensible and general- ly indefensible act which displays a complete lack of class, taste and reverence for history on the part of the "firewomen." The issue of medical care for women must ne- Rchard Parks is a guest writer for The Daily. cessarily take a back seat for a response to this brand of "protest". The most sorrowful loss brought about by radical freak-ins of this type is not the waning of the sup- port of the sympathetic, but the nearly audible closing of ears and minds on the part of the neutral and the uninformed who simply will not listen to issues presented under these circumstances. Such tactics cause those who are sym- pathetic to reform to hedge on their support and those in the middle who are yet to be convinced to become apathetic or antagonistic. Many hundreds who would sup- port reform under normal circum- stances or who, at the very least, would be willing to listen dispas- sionately to a tight, well-reasoned, well - documented a r g u m e n t for change, are forced by the dic- tates of taste and dignity to ally themselves against groups such as AMI. It is simply not true that, for a given issue, all people are either for or against social change: there is a great mass in the mid- dle, waiting to see what kind of people support each side, what kind of evidence they present and how. they present their argument. * ~* IT WOULD BE nice, in times of stress, to be able to say "who needs the support of those who are so reluctant to listen and so easily turned-off"? As Ms. Ricke writes later in the article, "The public shows no vio- lent reaction to women dying from improper care at childbirth, illegal abortions, being raped by doctors, or being sent to psychiatrists for medical problems." Well, don't hold your breath. Be- cause they never will. It is important to dispel the myth that the demand for social change and reform comes from the peo- ple. The masses in this country do not demand social change and they won't even support it unless the case for change is presented to them in a succinct, educational manner, and until the arguments against change are met effectively and honestly. THE FACTS OF LIFE in a plur- alistic, conservative society de- mand that those who seek change seek the attention, support, and, most importantly, the tax dollars of the as yet unconvinced. Well it is that the situation dictates this, for the necessity of getting the ap- proval of the people, real people, is one of the hallmarks of the sys- tem. These are the same people who have worked their lives away in back-and-mind-breaking jobs to pay the lion's share of the cost of the education and experiences of those who now challenge the system the middle-mass built. Having already financed the attacks upon their sys- tem, they are now being asked to pay the staggering bills which will come as the price of social pro- gress. It is correct and just that they should bear this burden, for this is the means by which society has institutionalized the process of change, reform and progress. -, The evidence of history clearly shows that they will gladly pay these new bills and more if those who seek change are careful and tasteful in the exercise of noblesse oblige in bringing education and the light of truth and reason to the middle-mass. Groups such as AMI should look at the overwhelming evidence of history and learn that social and educational reform is brought a b o u t by kleen-kut coat-and-tie types who swim upstream In the established channels-people who reach the relevant committees, groups and individuals and present those in a position to make changes with a strong, well-documented case. Such channels undoubtedly exist with respect to the review and reform of medical college ma- terials. Y * THE BIG LOSERS in all the fur- or, as usual, are women, who must stand by helplessly as AMI sends the 'issues of their physical and psy- chological health and well-being up in smoke. With discouraging and increasing frequency it is often the case that those who would speak for an oppressed group begin by prejudicing the issue in the public mind and conclude by replacing it with a secondary, irrelevant issue. 1. ' ' ,. . adT'bune Sc ndca, """""" rr!/ t' ". .. and so, in support of our great President's commend- able battle against inflationary, high government spending -please find enclosed not one red ..." Defining presidential power Daily Photo by JOHN UPTON BOOK BURNING: "Such tactics cause those who are sympathetic to reform to hedge on their support and those in the middle who are yet to be convinced to become apathetic or antagonistic." j '[ Black Muslim groups split over ideology LAST WEDNESDAY's court decision calling President Nixon's dismantle- ment of the Office of Economic Oppor- tunity (QEO) illegal will hopefully not only save the OEO and some of its pro- grams from a premature demise, but will clear up some important constitutional questions as well. In his ruling, U. S. District Court Judge William Jones made the basic as- sertion that according to historical pre- cedents, logic, and the Constitution the President does not have the power to shut down programs that have been en- acted by Congress. In recent months we have watched with growing apprehension the increased assumption of powers by the President. Considering the elected congressional representatives unresponsive to the "will of the American people," Nixon has ve- toed bills regularly. When Congress ov- errode the veto of a bill to provide funds for water pollution control, Nixon im- pounded the funds with questionable Constitutional power backing him. President Nixon has also refused to allow his aides to be questioned to clear up some of the mystery clouding the Watergate investigation, extending ex- ecutive privilege far beyond previous bounds. WHILE CONTINUING the American air war .in Cambodia, the Nixon ad- ministration has been unable to explain what authority it has to continue drop- Today'-- --- ff: News: Angela Balk, Robert Barkin, Laura Berman, Bill Heenan, Cindy Hill Editorial Page: Martin Stern Arts Page: Diane Levick Photo technicians: Thomas Gottlieb, Steve Kagan ping the bombs. The only explanation it has offered is that the President has a mandate from the electorate after his easy victory in November. We are not aware of any section of the Constitu- tion that says that a President may do whatever he wants because he was re- elected in a landslide. However, the presidential assertion of power that has gained the most publicity is the dismantlement of the OEO. The agency is funded until the end of the this fiscal year, but is not funded in the President's 1974 budget proposal. Just to make sure that OEO was killed before Congress could make up its mind whether to fund it for another year, Nixon hired Howard Phillips, a former member of the Young Americans for Freedom, to dismantle OEO as fast as possible, especially the controversial Community Action Agencies.-. PHILLIPS DID AN efficient job, often ordering people out of the agency with as little as thirty minutes notice. Such tactics tend to upset bureaucracies, and so the OEO employes unions, along with other groups, filed suit against Phil- lips calling the actions illegal. The judge agreed, saying that allowing Phillips to continue to wield his axe without congressional approval would clothe "the President with a power en- tirely to control the legislation of Con- gress and paralyze the administration of justice." We also agree. Unfortunately it may take more such court actions to convince Mr. Nixon that there is indeed something called separation of powers under our present Constitution, and that "Presi- dent" is not just another word for "dic- tator." r :, By DENISE GRAY "WE BELIEVE that we who de- clared ourselves to be right- eous Muslims, should not partici- pate in wars which takes the lives of humans." These words, taken from the doc- trine of Black Muslim beliefs, ap- pear every week on the back page of Muhammad Speaks, the official organ of the Black Muslim faith. They are perhaps more effective on paper than they are in prac- tice, however. For despite these beliefs, the Black Muslims are allegedly par- ticipating in a "holy war" with a rival group of Moslems, the Han- afi sect. The killings of seven Hanafi Moslems in Washington, D.C. last January have been link- ed to the Black Muslims. F i v e children and two men were method- ically killed by eight armed men in the Hanafi headquarters in Georgetown. Hamaas Abdul Khaalis, the Han- afi leader, believes the murders were in retaliation to his p r o- nounced disagreements with Mus- lim leader Elijah Muhammad. Mr. lKhaalis believes that Mr. Mu- hammad is a false prophet w h o preaches racial hared, which is contrary to true Islam. The Han- afi believe that Islam is color blind. IN JANUARY OF this year Mr. Khaalis sent letters to the minist- ers of all 50 Black Muslim mosques in which he denounced Elijah Mu- hammad's teaching and urged the ministers to leave the Black Mus- lim faith. The major difference between the two groups is the Muslim belief that whites cannot be a part of their faith and that all whites are devils. The Hanafi feel this is contrary to the orthodox Moslem ideology as taught in the Koran. HISTORY SHOWS that eventually all such leaders come to question their roles and become insecure about their positions. So perhaps Elijah Muhammad has reason to fear opposition from below. Once having reached the top there is ap- parently a burning desire to stay there.rBut Elijah is aging and will be forced to retire soon. Perhaps he is afraid that many supporters will be attracted to rival sects when he retires. The problem may 'stem from Elijah's search for a replace- ment who will faithfully carry on his teachings and can keep the members within the sect. Any organization that depends solely upon the leadership of one man faces the risk of falling apart when new leadership takes t h e helm. But in this case, the Black Muslims do not seem to have any reason to be overly concerned. Eli- jah Muhammad still has thousands of supporters across the United States, and the contributions the Muslims have made toward black nationalism can never be forgot- ten. Muslims have alwavs sent their children to Islamic schools where they were taught black pride by black teachers. They have, furth- ered economic growth in the black communities by establishing and supporting their own restaurants, schools and clothiers. And in Chicago, the Muslim head- quarters, tremendous progress has been made. Besides the smallr business ventures, the Muslims are presently constructing a S a I e s and Office Building on the south side of the city. The building will provide underground parking and available space for sales and med- ical offices. This is part of Elijah Muhammad's call for the blackman to 'build up and beautify phis com- munity." SO DESPITE whatever paranoia may exist within the Muslim lead- ership, their political contributions, if not their religious ones, cannot be questioned. The ideological dif- ferences between sects will always exist for the jihad, or holy war against the infidel, is an old and bloody Islamic tradition. But politically speaking the con- tinuation of this "holy war" would be a mistake. In the long run this trend toward violence will only be detrimental to the Muslim image in the black community. To non-Mus- lims, it appears that Elijah Mu- hammad is merely running scared. The Black Muslims doctrine also advocates justice and equality for all black brothers and sisters. Must a qualifier be added that reads, "that is, justice for all blacks who agree with us?" Denise Gray it an Editorial Page Night Editor. I' Elijah Muhammad: Controversial leader It is very difficult for an out- sider to discern exactly what is happening between the two rival groups, since the Muslims never discuss their internal affairs with non-Muslims. But it is apparent, however, that there is some oppo- sition to Elijah Muhammad's lead- ership. Malcolm X alluded m a n y times to the power struggle within the faith, and it is believed that he was murdered because he broke with the Muslims and spoke out against Elijah Muhammad. And Elijah has often been crit- icized for his monolithic leadership and quasi-dictatorial rule. Elijah Muhammad (born Elijah Poole) holds the top leadership position within the faith. The faithful sup- porters believe he is the messeng- er of Allah. (God). Letters to TheDaly/ pt-J MY' i56 r ; ' '1l .,. t TO ITTF CA!$F' CRAVE SZL US(o&). Cba& . P ir/A r ' Election To The Daily: I HAVE RECENTLY been ac- cused by Ken Newbury, the elec- tions director for Student Govern- ment Council, of negligence for my role in the past election. I feel that I should make it clear that I had no role in the past election. As an employee of SGC until Jan- uary of this year, I was instructed by Bill Jacobs and Dave Schapr to open and close the sticker regis- tration table during class regis- tration at Waterman Gym. I was not consulted on the operation of the system, nor was I given any discretion in carrying out m, or- ders. I opened the registration at 8:00 a.m. as ordered, and closed it at 5:00 p.m. During the registration p.er'od I warned both Jacobs and Schaper that the Kellev Girls and Manpow- er Men hired by Council were not only expensive (costing at least $1,000 in wages), but inefficient as well. The employees often failed to show causing large crowds to gather in front of our area waiting for someone to put stickers on their I.D. cards. The pressure of t h e situation undoubtedly caused many errors and imposed extreme limi- tations on security. My advice went unheeded, how- ever, because of my poor relations with the current "politicos" of S.G.C. who seem intent upon wast- ing as much of the students' money as quickly as they can. The past two elections have seen $25,000 spent on an over-sophisticated and unwieldly election system. As I was given no responsibility Offensive al To The Daly: I FIND IT exceedingly difficult to imagine how the editors of the Daily can remain so oblivious to the sexist attitudes so often evi- denced therein. I am specifically offended by the Schlitz M a I.t Li- quor advertisement in the April 6 issue. One could hardly avoid' noticing this slick, poster-sized, full color, presumably nude appeal to the Playboy crowd. Equally no- ticeable, I hope, is the contra- diction implied by the appearance of such an ad in a newspaper which at least does lip-service to the cause of feminism. A lengthy dissertation on the principles of feminism, however kell deserved, would, I think, 'e inappropriate here. Both feminists and gay people have repeatedly cihastized the Daily for not assum- ing a positive attitude toward our common goal - the total elimin- ation of sex roles. Besides contin- uing to ignore my letters and oth- ers in the same spirit, the Daily can: 1) Appoint someone within t h e Daily (or without) to oversee the reduction of sexist articles (e.g., "Taking a Straight Look' at Homo- sexuality" (Daily, Mar. 25) and advertising: 2) Provide regularly scheduled editorial snace for the exposition ,)f radical feminist and radical gay ideas regarding sex roles: 3) Formulite and publish an editorial oninion explaining t h e Daily's position on sexism and the reasons for not complying with 1) or 2). 15, 3:00 p.m. at St. Andrews Ch-rch, 306 N. Division. In the past few weeks, several task forces have been formed and are working in these areas: medi- cal practices, public relations and information, fundraising, and or- ganization. Much progress is being made and we hope for even more inpuit on Sunday. Representatives xill be chosen from these task forces and others at large to serve on the coordinating committee. It will be their responsibility to arrange publicity for meetings as well as communicating about activities be- twen the Sunday meetings. It's time we started moving for- ward faster, but we need your help to do it. All women who want high quality, sympathetic health care at a reasonable cost, and don't think we can get that without a con- sumer-controlled clinic, are urged to come. -Beth Brunton April 12 Book burning To The Daily: The AMI's protest of Dr. .1. R, Willson's Obstetrics and Gynecol- ogy (1971) by burning is more than just a moral affront. It is inef- fectual idiocy. Even if Willsron's "description of women's minds" is somewhat atavistic does the AMI really believe that all medical stu- dents believe everything they read? Perhaps the AMI would concede that ontside of ten pages, te text- book has some redeeming s o'c i c 1 value. No matter . . . for medical stiidetns from this university (and others) will still be required to be I t -«1=' X NAVECTHE 9$XACT NMf LWJ[A'S VF "06 ;I A r . 4 1! M; W- - OTHUQ 6&PI fI 4 rA Vb' , A C 40 0. p ? OR I 4 I