.4 Page Eight. THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday, April 8, 1973 The Deadline for. Submitting New Work TO THE U UNION GALLERY JURY WILL BE SUNDAY, APRIL 15 by 5 P.M. GALLERY HOURS: Wed.-Sun., 12-5 p m. Friday Eve., 7-10 p.m. SThe Union Gallery. PRESENTS The April B.F.A. Show APRIL 6-15U A display and sale of work done by gradu- ating seniors from the School of Architec- ture & Design. OPENING RECEPTION: Friday evening, April 6, 7-10 pnm. GALLERY HOURS: Wednesday through Sunday 12-5 p.m. Friday evening 7-10 p.m. 1st FLOOR MICHIGAN UNION . cI Editor's note: Since Margaret Bell Pool was built over 20 years ago, no new covered IM facilities have been built" at the University. This article examines recent attempts to create new facilities needed by students, women's teams and sports clubs, Mr. Kirk is a former Daily Associate Sports Editor, and is currently an education student and Janitor. By LEE KIRK The infamous legacy of the Ad- visory Committee on Recreation, Intramurals and Club Sports soon may end if the Regents ap- prove the Executive Officers' plan for improvement and ex- pansion of intramural facilities. The plan calls for the con- struction of two new IM build- ings - a large facility on Cen- tral Campus adjacent to Mar- garet Bell Pool and a smaller facility on North Campus, pro- bably on Murfin Field. They will be financed by a seven to ten dollar tuition increase. This goes beyond the Regents- earlier proposal, which called only for a building on North Campus. The Regents also have approved in principle an Athletic Department proposal to renovate the Coliseum for intramural use, move the ice rink from the Coli- seum to Yost Fieldhouse, and construct a track-tennis facility to replace the Yost track. ACRICS has been huffing and puffing with various ideas for funding and building intramural facilities for over four years, yet none of their proposals has come close to Regental approval. The Executive Officers' deci- sion to bypass ACRICS and submit a proposal directly to the Regents is indicative of ACRICS' inability to attain any sense of unity or purpose. ACRICS' original proposal - North and Central Campus buildings to be funded by a tui- tion hike of $10-15 per term - was made public in the winter of 1969. ACRICS naively sup- posed that students would gladly pay for the buildings, and the committee was totally unprepar- ed for the overwhelming opposi- tion that arose from student groups on campus. Students rejected not so much the proposal as the fact that there was no provision made for a binding student referendum. ACRICS chairperson and Ath- letic Director Don Canham, while never actually opposing the idea of a referendum, strong- ly urged the committee not to deal with the issue of funding in the formulation of a proposal for presentationl to the Regents. u ture cloud filled Sports of The. Daily Canham's stance was a sharp reversal from earlier ACRICS' statements regarding funding. When the proposal was first made public, ACRICS had stat- ed that student fees were the only way of financing the build- ing. University vice-President Allan Smith flatly told the com- mittee that without a funding recommendation, they would re- ceive a "thank you" from the Regents and "nothing would be built." When released, the commit- tee's final proposal turned out to be no proposal at all. In what one disgruntled committee mem- ber called "passing the buck to the Regents," ACRICS said in effect that new IM facilities were needed but made no men- tion of funding. The Regents rejected the pro- posal, claiming that without clear methods of funding they could take no action. This Catch- 22, not totally unanticipated by dissident ACRICS members, al- lowedthe original proposal a swift and painless death. The sometimes bumbling in- eptitude of ACRICS in its han- dling of the original IM pro- posal can be in part attributed to the committee's unrepresen- tative membership. Only two of the 13 members with votes were elected by students, while four of the committee's members worked in the Athletic, Intra- mural or Phys Ed Departments. The fact remains, however, that there will be no construc- tion of IM facilities in the near future without student fees. The problem will be further com- pounded when the dilapidated Waterman and Barbour gym- nasia are razed. ACRICS has had all this in- formation for four years, and its failure to come up with a proposal that includes provi- sions for funding doubtless in- fluenced the Executive Offic- ers to take the initiative. Regrettably, their intervention is no improvement. The propos- ed seven to ten dollar tuition hike is too high to be justified until all possibilities are consid- ered by ACRICS. Athletic Department propa- ganda stresses the concept of "Athletics for All." The most obvious method of financing stu- dent recreation needs is with Athletic Department monies. Regents Bylaw 12.210 states that "any surplus funds from in- tercollegiate operations should be devoted . . . to permanent university improvements, partic- ularly to the upbuilding of fa- cilities for participation in all forms of physical exercise." The Special Faculty Com- mittee on the Sports Service Building addressed itself to the question of expanding IM facili- ties. The committee's May, 1971 report notes that ". . . there must be a substantial injection of funds generated by the in- tercollegiate athletic program, particularly football." Such contributions from the Athletic Department would be a radical and welcome change. The Sports Service Building Committee found that ". . . the Board's (Board in Control of In- tercollegiate Athletics) net con- tribution to the support of intra- mural and physical education programs in the Fiscal Year 1970 was on the order of $30,- 000." less than a dollar per stu- dent. This contrasts sharply with the amount snent for varsity ath- letics. 1970-71 university audits reveal that varsity sports (ex- centinq football) lost over $360,- 000. When the cost of grants-in- aid (scholarships) is added in, sports other than football cost at lest $700,000 per year. Athletic Department revenues come nrimarily from ticket sales, gifts ($254,127 in 1971-72), and General Fund monies (over $525,000 per year). The benefits derived by stu- dents from General Fund con- tributions are few. Students pay five dollars towards the debt incurred in the construction of Crisler Arena. An additional $150,000 is earmarked for "Stu- dent Intramural Facilities" but is listed in the Intercollegiate Athletic Budget as "University Maintenance Funds." $75,000 of this sum is allocated by the Ath- letic Department to help cover maintenance costs at Crisler Student members of ACRICS will propose the committee en- dorse all the facilities, including a new intramural building on the North Campus site originally endorsed by the Regents. They will further propose that this facility be financed by a modest student fee not to ex- ceed four dollars per term per student, that the facility enclose at least 65,000 square feet, and that ACRICS determine its con- tents. To meet future recreation needs, the student members of ACRICS will also propose that the university allocate $170,000 per year, that faculty and staff pay a 30 dollar per year user charge, apd that a 25-cent tax be imposed on each paid admis- sion to intercollegiate athletic events. Part of the money thus generated can be expected to be used in a fund for a new build- ing on Central Campus. This plan is highly commend- able in that it minimizes the burden placed on students and spreads the funding out. More- over, it may be the only alter- native to Regental approval of a proposal such as the one drafted by the Executive Officers. 4 A Daily Photo by KAREN KASMAUSKI Dilapidated Waterman .DOUBLE SHOT LSA COFFEE HOUR TUESDAY 3:00-4:30 April 10 Counseling Offices Students Lounge (Outside Counseling Offices Angell Hall) EVERYONE WELCOME Ruggers ravish Detroit By CHUCK DRUKIS played with the finesse not seen ling, poor passing, and numerous It wais a long time coming, but at Michigan since last year's Terry mental errors. the Michigan Rugby Football Club Larrimer squad. The performances The Blue gained the advantage finally played the type of rugby of Mike Markman and Rob Hui- when scrum half Child fielded a they are capable of as they destroy- zenga within the context of a team long throw-in during a Michigan ed the Detroit Cobras 15-9 and 22- effort were most pleasing. Mark- lineout and dodged through the sur- 0 on Palmer Field yesterday after- man, playing his first "A" side *ined Co ta b rorahyThe noon. game, scored two trys while Hui- prise backs for a try. The Blue had played without in- zenga finally blossomed into arug- conversionotaoled e spiration in close losses to Pitts- ger.Detroit, not to be denied, recap- burgh and Chicago during the be- Commented co-captain C 1 e- tured the advantage when Michigan ginning of the season, and contin- land Child," Huizenga played the failed to cover the field on a pen- ued through the first half of the best game I've ever seen him alty and penetrated the Blue goal Motor City match, but the second play. He passed well, tackled via an unmarked man. The success- half was a sight to behold. The hard, and held the ball 10 n g ful conversion resulted in a two forwards began to assert themselv- enough after a tackle to allow point deficit for the Blue. es in the scrums and the rucks, the forwards to get to the ruck." Working their way back d o w n and the backs handled the ball like The uneventful first half consist- field on a series of kicks for touch, they knew what they were doing. ed of a penalty try by each team Michigan regained the lead. The The entire Michigan backfield sandwiched in with sloppy tack- fine passing of Child, Hank Luka- - --ski, Walt Holloway to Markman re- sulted in a try just inside the out- of-bounds marker. "4 A'.:. ~Peter Hooper set up the fi na l Blue score as he placed a kick in the corner of the Cobra goal :>:,...Play ball ! The Michigan baseball team will. entertain Eastern Michigan Univer- sity today in a doubleheader' at Fisher Stadium beginning at 1 p.m. 'Thewolverines will likely throw Craig Forhan and Tom Joyce at the Hurons, whose season record is 9-3. Michigan is currently 3-7. s SPECIAL! HOT CHOCOLATE Everyone LOTS OF PEOPLE Welcome! GRAD COFFEE HOUR WEDNESDAY 8-10 p.m. West Conference Room, 4th Floor RACKHAM LOTS OF FOOD '_ - - , '73 MICHIE PICK UP YOL TODAY-4. 10 am--4 p 6:30 pm--8:30 . 44.. _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . n _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _4_. _ _ _ . _ . and Markman outraced the full- back to the ball. The Gold, looking more im- pressive than the Blue, mortar- ed the Motor City "B" squad with three trys, two conversions, and two penalty goals while de- fensing the opposition inside their own side most of the game. Dave Cyrus, playing his first game for Michigan after two years of action with a United States naval squadron stationed in London, Eng- land, opened the scoring with a try during a back movement. Bill Os- born converted. Osborn added two penalty goals to thrust the Blue to a 12-0 halftime lead. Tom Giordano and Osborn added second half trys with one 'con- version to complete the Michigan shutout. 1AN ENIA Doily Photo by KAREN KASMAUSKI RUGGERS MIKE MARKMAN and Rob Huizenga make the tackle on Detroit's outside center Bob Jor- dan in rugby action on Palmer Field yesterday afternoon. Michigan went on to win the match 15-9 in preparation for the Big Ten Tourniment in East Lansing next week. IERE JR YEARBOOK 20 Maynard )m Monday night 1. CODE OF ACADEMIC CONDUCT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND +HE ARTS i .' The College, like all communities, functions best when its members treat one another with honesty, fairness, respect and trust. There- fore, an individual should realize that deception for the purpose of individual gain is an offense against the members of the com- munity. Such dishonesty includes: PLAGIARISM Submitting a; piece of work (for example an essay, research paper, assignment, laboratory report) which in part or in whole is not entirely the student's work without attributing those same portions to their cor- rect source. CHEATING Using unauthorized notes, or study aids, or informa- tion from another student or student's paper on an examination; altering a graded work after it has been returned, then submitting the work for re-grading; and allowing another person to do one's work and to submit the work under one's own name. AIDING AND ABETTING DISHONESTY Providing material or information to another person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used improperly. FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS AND OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS Altering documents affecting academic records; forg- ing signature of authorization or falsifying information on an official academic document, election form, grade report, letter of permission, petition, or any document designed to meet or exempt a student from an estab- lished College or University academic regulation. Whena complainant believes that academic dishonesty may have taken place, he or she may present the evidence to the Academic Judiciary, The Judiciary must determine: (1) Whether the evidence is admissable; in the event it is not the case shall be dismissed; if the evidence is admissable, the Judiciary must determine: flN SAIF i !'