I Ie ar4i;an an Eighty-two years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Of crime, punishment, and cop-killers 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mich. ' News Phone: 764-0552 Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of stoff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1973 New grading reform setback THE LSA faculty has slammed the door on academic innovation. In an amaz- ing show of conservative strength, the faculty defeated a grading reform pro- posal, 226 to 45. The grading proposal called for four specific changes in the present grading plan. They were:, " Failure of a class would never be re- corded on a student's transcript; # Grading for all 100 and 200 level cour- ses would be on a pass/no entry basis; 0 The instructor of an upper-level course may offer that course either grad- ed (A,B,C,D, no entry) or pass/no entry; and' * A student in a graded course could chose to take that course graded (A,B,C, D, no entry or A,B,C, no entry) or pass/ no entry. The purpose of the four suggestions was to give students and faculty a voice in the formation of the academic envi- ronment. Since no single program would satisfy all the students or faculty a va- riety of choices were offered. 4 The idea behind no entry of a failing grade on a transcript was to eliminate the use of grades as a means of punish- ment. The other three provisions proAde for lessening of competition among stu- dents. They advocate learning not for the sake of grades, but for the sake of knowledge. Those faculty members opposed to the proposals cited the disadvantages of pass/ no entry to those students planning on going on to graduate schools. The lack of grades, they said, would result in heavy use of external measurements such as standardized aptitude exams. But the important point to remember is that the proposals do not force a stu- dent to take advanced courses ' either pass/no entry or graded. The choice is left up to the student. Those planning on graduate studies are free to elect up- per-level undergraduate courses on a graded basis. For other students, striving for a good gradepoint average may be an unneces- sary burden. The options of pass/no en- try should be made available to them. The faculty was fearful that students in ungraded courses wouk remain un- motivated. They also were leary of in- structors becoming exceedingly lax in dealing with student work. It was be- lieved that once a pass was given to a paper, the instructor would cease to of- fer meaningful criticism. This is a very pessimistic attitude on the part of the faculty. They should have more faith in both'the student body and their fellow professors. The action of the LSA faculty is re- grettable. We can only hope that they will react more favorably toward future innovations. Grading reform will be pre- sented again in March. The faculty will be asked to vote on the various proposals separately. It is conceivable that they will take a second look at grading, and hopefully pass the suggested reforms. -JUDY RUSKIN By CHRISTOPHER PARKS Co-Editor N THE WORLD of those who slee' comfortably at night be- tween clean sheets there is almost no one with less status than a cop- killer. The policeman of this world hangs immortalized, on insurance company calendars in school rooms. He is helping children cross the streets - jolly, rotund, smil- ing. He is a Public Servant - big- ger than life. It comes as no surprise, then, that the cop-killer has become the object of a campaign to restore the death penalty in Michigan. X group of eleven Michigan po- lice and fireman's associations is pushing to get capital punishment placed on the ballot for a state- wide referendum. Although the group claims its appeal to be non-emotional, the re- marks of several of its members are revealing. DETROIT FIREMAN'S Associa- tion President Earl Berry puts it rather bluntly. "These people (cop killers) deserve what they get," he says, "and that should be death." Whether the state has a right to take away life is a -complex moral question. There can be no justifi- cation for it, however, when execu- tion is a mere act of revenge. Capital punishment is only effec- tive if it deters crime. Once a crime has been committed, the de terrent has failed and the execu- tion is reduced to a sordid act of barbarism. And there is little evidence to saigest that the threat of execution is a real deterrent to violent crime. A coldly rational person w h o weighs the benefits and risks of any action, might be deterred from murder by the threat of death. For the irrational and dsperate people who kill cops, however, this sort of cost-benefit analysis doesn't even enter into the picture. RATIONAL WEIGHING of the consequences of crime is a mid- dle-class luxury open only to those with a clear perception of w h a t they have to lose. The death penal- ty fails because it is only perceiv- ed as a deterrent by those in so- ciety least likely to commit the crimes for, which it punishes. Capital punishment as a deter- rent is only relevant in a white middle-class value system. It could be effective in deterring embez- zlement, price fixing and other so- called white collar crimes, b u t not crimes of poverty and despera- tion. No responsible person believes cops should be targets for a n y maniac who wants to take a shot at them. BUT IF WE really want to make police work safer, let's begin by passing strong legislation to g e t hand guns off the streets. It is not as emotionally satisfying as a primal scream for revenge, but it 'might actually save lives. A re- turn of the death penalty would only stand as another triumph for bigotry, emotionalism and ignor- ance in this state's politics. Get involved- write your. reps! Sen. Philip Hart (Dem), Rm. 253, Old Senate Bldg., Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. 20515. Sen. Robert Griffin (Rep), Rm. 353 Old Senate Bldg., Cap- itol Hill, Washington, D.C. 20515. Rep. Marvin Eseh (Rep), Rm. 112, Cannon Bldg. Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. 20515. Sen. Gilbert Bursley (Rep), Senate, State Capitol Bldg., Lansing, 48933. Rep. Perry Bullard (Dem.), House, State Capitol Bldg., Lan- sing, 48933 -Daily Photo Cop-killing is no excuse to b ring back the barbarisn of capital puiishm en t. Federal budget cuts hit home THE EFFECTS of President Nixon's hatchet work on federal funds for socially-oriented programs is slowly but surely coming to light on the local level. Ann Arbor itself felt the squeeze less than two weeks ago when federal funds were withdrawn from the local Model Cities program. Yesterday Mayor Gribbs of Detroit an- nounced that several of that city's peo- ple-oriented programs will also feel the impact of Nixon's -war of attrition on fed- erally funded domestic programs. According to Gribbs, an expected $155 million cut in federal support to the City of Detroit will mean the termination of the Community Action Program, the Neighborhood Youth Corps and the lay- ing off of 2,117 city employes hired un- der the Emergency Employment Act. Drastic cuts are also due for Detroit's Model Cities and water pollution pro- grams. In addition, funds for hospital con- struction will be frozen, putting the squeeze on the new Detroit general hos- pital. DETROIT'S PREDICAMENT as re-, vealed by Gribbs is sadly representa- tive of the fate of socially-oriented pro- grams in large cities and smaller com- munities across the country. Under the guise of stabilizing taxes and eliminating bureaucratic machinery Nixon has forced the termination of countless federal, state and local level agencies, which are actively involved in the betterment of American life. Other programs under the Nixon axe, although admittedly in need of some bureaucratic housecleaning, have great potential for such involvement. - What is most irksome is that while people-helping programs fall victim to this unprecedented assault, law en- forcement, ineffective drug-control pro- grams and the military remain compara- tively immune. Protection of one citizen from another at home and maintenance of large mili- tary capability abroad emerge as the Nixon administration's primary interest, with the individual left to his own de- vices to secure the necessities of a de- cent life. A LTHOUGH THESE priorities may, on a short-term basis, take the pressure off the American taxpayer, their long- term effect on the capability of com- munities to provide necessary human services could prove disastrous. -ROBERT BURAKOFF After I By YVONNE DUFFY AS I, ALONG with countless oth- ers across the nation at 7 o'clock on Jan. 27, gave silent thanks for even a fragile and in- coniplete cease-fire, I reflected with pride on the part played by the thousands of students and con- cerned citizens who had finally made their protests heard. To me, this moment demonstrated that in the dawn of defeat and despair of last November 8, was born n o t an overwhelming mandate f o r Richard Nixon's policies, as he so fervently proclaims, but a man- date for action by the people. For almost 200 years, there has not been such widespread ferment of concern or such long-term mobili- zation of action over a single pub- lic issue as that which culminated at the Washington Monument one week before the treaty signing. Despite his idealism and social vision, Senator McGovern could never have inspired this extensive public action that literally com- pelled an unwilling administration to negotiate, peace. With "our man" safely ensconced in the Oval Room,.we might have complacent- ly packed away our placards and megaphones with the hula hoops and other memorablia of misspent youth, and mumbling confidently, "Let George do it," slipped back to inertness. IT IS SAID, however, that we grow in adversity, and, to the ex- tent that this is true, we still have before us an unparalleled oppor- tunity for the attainment of ma- turity. The basic premises of our Constitution are being seriously threatened by both the current ad- ministration's attempt to curtail Freedom of he media and the usurp- ing of congressional power by the executive branch as well as cor- aorate interests. Our cities a r e >eing choked by an ever-tighten- ing noose of poverty and crime. Dur prison system is archaic. The physically disabled still have not >btained their civil rights. Nor, for that matiter, have the American [ndians. The 1974 federal budget roposal onlyupromises to further dehumanize our priorhies. Some of the techniques of pro- test have already been applied to these problems. Coming easily tk mind are the sit-in at the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the stopping >f rush-hour traffic at T i m e s Square by a coalition of disabled vreterans and Disabled in Action members (college activists) to Traw attention to President Nix- )n's veto of the Rehabilitation Act. WHILE NOT entirely ineffective, :hese efforts have not resulted in any desired changes in govern- ment thinking, largely because they have been undertaken by re- tietna m: atively small isolated groups. Yet, in the cease-fire and t h e preceding counter-inaugural ral- b, consisting not just of st dents but also congressmen, retirees, teachers, people from all walks of fife who, having searched their respective consciences, found it necessary to add their voices to the rising clamor for peace, we have actual proof that the people still do have some power to turn the tide, when enough sense the ur- gency. Such spirit must not be locked away in mothballs until the next crisis, for anyone knows that un- used talent is lost. It must be :appedaas inspirationrto remake the nation into a more accurate image of our Founding Fathers' big dream sQ that in '76, we will have earned a real celebration and not the empty farce of a loveless mar- rioge. IN ALL THE experience of talk- ing, walking, writing, and j u s t plain hard working for the cause of peace in the past few years, we have slowly and painfully accumu- lated a vast blueprint for m a n y kinds of social action. Students have traditionally been the van- guards of change, and as such, have a continuing obligation to lead in the march toward greater humanity for all. In the words of one contemporary sage, Ralph Nader, "Let it not be said by a future, forlorn generation that ours was a time when we lost our nerve and wasted our great potential." We shouldn't stop now No amnesty from Mr. Nixon -Daily ,Photo "Counter-inaugural: Proof that the people can still stem the tide." THE WORD "AMNESTY," like "peace with honor" or "communism," pro- duces an instant dichotomy in one's head. Long before American participation in the Vietnam War came to an end, the sides were drawn. And because of President Nixon's hard line stance on amnesty, the argu- ing will probably continue for a long time, while those men who refused to fight in Vietnam continue to suffer in- carceration and -exile. While most editorials and newspaper columns call for a cooling-off period to be followed by amnesty at a later date, Nixon made it abundantly clear in his press conference last week that he for one will never grant amnesty to "those few hundreds" who refused to fight for a cause in which they didn't believe. The President still harbors the illusion that the war, in which 50,000 Americans and countless more Vietnamese died was a just one. And that only a few cowards and social outcasts refused to follow the government's call to arms. HOWEVER, DESPITE what N I x o n would like us to'believe, we are not dealing with just a few common crimi- nals. We are dealing with the morality of -- tncarar - o Mn a , 11wMntP1mwit number of people who refused to fight in Vietnam is closer to 100,000, not a "few hundreds." The vast majority of these people didn't flee because they wanted some- one else to fight. They fled because they felt it immoral to fight a war on the other side of the world for a cause they did not believe in. And ultimately the majority of Americans were to agree with them. BUT RICHARD NIXON didn't stop there. After impugning their "high- er morality," he asserted, "We cannot provide forgiveness with a junket in the Peace Corps or something like that." Apparently the President feels it better for an American boy's psyche if he lets the army teach him how to kill instead of letting the peace corps teach him how to build. NEVERTHELESS, despite all those stor- ies relating how presidents from George Washington to Harry Truman granted amnesty to men who refused to fight in wars with a lot more moral va- lidity than the Vietnam "incursion," any moves toward amnesty appear a long way off. The scars and wounds of the past ten years are still too deep and painful to permit any kind of rational Letters to The Daily SGC not 'sexist To The Daily: A LETTER in Saturday's Daily labeled me as racist and sexist. This conservative viewpoint annoy- ed me greatly. One of sixteen candidates inter- viewed for a seat on SGC wrote 'the letter. She, too, was apparent- ly annoyed by the qualifications I felt the new SGC member should possess. Let me clarify these qual- ifications by describing the char- acteristics of the student b o d y, SGC's constituency. Enrollment data shows that wo- men make up 39.9 per cent of the student population. Blacks account for 8 per cent of the student en- rollment. To ideally represent student body five of the twelve SGC members- at-lage should be women. O n e member should be black. Before the new member, Elaine Leaphart, a black female, w a s seated, only two members-at-large perience in student affairs, racial and sexual characteristics can, in fact, enhance the nature of the Stu- dent Government Council. Historically, black race and fe- male sex hampered an individual applying for almost any position. If one feels turning this pattern around is not appropriate in view of the constituency SGC must re- present (and I feel it is highly ap- propriate on these grounds), then perhaps it is appropriate (and mil- itant, to the squeamish) to turn this pattern around for justice and reparation. The nature of the last SGC elec- tion made it practically impossible to distinguish which candidates would most adequately represent the individual voter. The next SGC election, coming in March, w 11l hopefully, clarify the issues a n d individualize the candidates. Until then the interviewing board saw fit to upgrade SGC by nominating candidates who would round out the Council. This. to us. is affirmative action, are held. Parties form slates com- posed of friends or of those stu- dents willing to make various poli- tical deals with them. Perhaps this is one reason why only 8 per cent of our student body took the time to vote in our last election. As president of the Coalition of Lib- erals and Moderates Party (CLAMP), I would therefore like to unprecedentedly offer all stu- dents an opportunity to run as candidates and to participate di- rectly in student government. For this reason, CLAMP will hold an open meeting on Friday, Febuary 9 from 7:30 to 8:30 p.m. at 9415 South Quad Kelsey (basement floor). Discussion of the coming election and selection of CLAMP candidates for Student Government Council (SGC), LS&A Executive Council, and other openings will take place at this time. Those in- terested may contact me by call- ;- A7t 7 CO benefits To The Daily: I WOULD like to point out that conscientious objectors who have completed alternative service may be able to get Veterans Administra- tion educational benefits. A court case in Boston gave CO's the right to benefits there. I wrote to NISBO (National Interreligious Service Board for Conscientious Objectors) asking about this, and they told me that a similar case in Califor- nia went the other way, and is now on the docket for the Supreme Court. I do not yet know if the court has agreed to hear the case. If you are a CO who has fin- ished alternative service, you should go ahead and apply for benefits (although it may be some time before the court acts). The Veterans Affairs Agency on Wash- tenaw Ave. is taking applications; you can also apply at the LSA building, and they can handle a Student certification at the same