i THE 4OOM6IDAY, BOXES Curriculum reform: Slow, I -- :-x A Z i + t r v P / , . ' s ./"' I I .-- 4 i . _ S _ r Eighty-Four Years of Editorial Freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104 News Phone: 764-0552 THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 1974 Editor's note: It is our intention to make this series the beginning of a serious dia- logue about the quality of education in LSA. We will provide special sections of the editorial page in future issues to be de- voted entirely to this series and we will make feature space available for other views at the conclusion of this series. By JOHN LANDE Jaci Knapman, Mary Goldstein, Pen- fly Pilzer and Joan Weiss all made im- portant contributions tosthis article. I accept full responsibility for its contents. * * * THE DEVELOPMENT of the curriculum and the curricular policy making pro- cess in the past ten years has been one of the few areas of positive change in the College. Ten years ago, students in the College had very few choices available to them in planing their educational programs. They were limited to one degree program even more narrowly defined than our cur- rent BA/BS, they were forced to limit their course selections to the departments and they had no decision-making power regard- ing curriculum. Today most students in the College are still studying in the rigidly defined BA/BS program, are still taking courses from the departments and still have no decis- ion-making power regarding curriculum, but we now have some options and there are cases where we can influence the curri- culum. The Report of the Commission on Grad- uation Requirements contains many val- uable proposals on curriculum reform. I would like the Report more if faculty and administrators didn't have their why-don't- students-appreciate-how-liberal-and-gener- . ous-we-are attitude. * * * THE FACULTY CODE assigns t h e power and responsibility of preparing the curriculums to the Governing Faculty. Be- cause the Governing Faculty does not act, most of this power is actually exercised by the College Executive Committee. T h e Faculty Code also provides a Committee on Curriculum which is supposed to formulate specific recommendations on curricular policies to the Governing Faculty through the Executive Committee. The Curriculum Committee is composed of six voting faculty, three voting students, the Associate Dean for Curriculum who acts as chairperson and votes in a tie, and several administrators and three other stu- dents who are ex officio members without vote. In 1971-72, the Curriculum Committee spent most of its energies discusisng gra- ing reform and drafting a proposal for the faculty. The faculty rejected the pro- posal on March 5, 1973. In the two years since the fall term, 1972, when the Commission on Graduation Re- qnirements began meeting, the Curriculum Committee has continued to process routine course approvals and has made minor pol- icy decisions and the faculty has not adopt- ed any curricular reform proposals. DEPARTMENTS ARE the bodies that actually prepare the curriculums which are almost always in the form of course pro- posals. Course proposals from departments are routinely processed by the Curriculum Committee and the Executive Committee and must be outrageously bad to be reject- ed. The College Curriculum Committee has a special subcommittee to study Course Mart course proposals and had, until recent- ly, had a special subcommittee to study Pilot course proposals. Most departments are at least fifty years old. Over the years, the economic-political structure has evolved where each depart- ment is an individual barony in the king- dom of LSA. The departments' power is derived from their control over their faculty members in terms of tenure and promotion decisions which have been used to reward and punish faculty who act with or against the depart- ments' interests. Since the decision-making power in the College is in the Governing Faculty and the departments have a strong incluence on the faculty, the departments rule the College. Over 90 per cent of the College budget is under the control of the departments. AS INDIVIDUAL departments excell- ed in their fields, their national reputations and ratings increased and they developed large and prestigious graduate programs and produced more and popular research, thus increasing revenues and producing still better ratings. This cycle of growth con- tinued through the late 60's. As long as this pattern continued, departments could grant tenure to as many faculty members as they chose and still be able to afford nn- tenured faculty. This pattern of financial growth of the departments has been reversed in the 70's. Departments, the College and the Univer- sity are depending on student fee revenue increasingly. Over the past five years, in yearly increases, student tuition fees have increased by 70 per cent. Small variations in enrollment in various teaching units are leaving some depart- ments crippled and other departments hor- ribly overstrained. Because two thirds of the faculty is tenured, it is difficult to make ladjustments between departments. This problem will be exacerbated by an upcom- ing decision to maintain the current manda- tory retirement age of 70. This means that departments must continue to pay their highest-payed faculty for several more years each, and the University is not refusing to disclose faculty salaries because it is under- paying the old guys either. THE RESULT of the depression on de- partments with decreasing enrollments can be disasterous. Note the Executive Com- mittee's action last week to grant tenure to only. three out of six possible applicants supported by the English department. Nor is this an isolated incident, for it will undoubtedly be repeated in the future as an average of half the non-tenured faculty, or approximately 65 faculty members, will be eligible for review every year. ,' * * In preparing this article we attempted to conduct a small survey of departments to find out how departments function. Because of time limitations, we could only investi- gate four departments whose representatives we cannot certify and I would think it unfair to report this information in survey form. I will instead list the kinds of questions we asked with my understanding of the range of responses typical of most depart- ments. Because of departments' history of power in LSA, I feel that this is a very important subject of inquiry and I urge you to find out about a department that interests you, or, even better, do an in- dependent research project, surveying de- partments, using our design as a starting point. General and Decision-Making Process MANY DEPARTMENTS are structured to the College. The chairperson has planning and executive powers and responsibilities, a faculty elected executive committee, with the chairperson responsible for formulating general policy-making and budgetary decis- ions, subject to faculty amendment or veto. Provision is generally made for stand- ing (particularly a curriculum committee) and ad hoc committees to perform com- mittees' advisory functions. Information Collection and Analvsis The Faculty Code requires that each de- partment submit an annual report to the dean. These reports often include a list of actions taken over the year, -eports of de- partmental committees, evaluations of de- partment related programs (they are par- ticularly concerned with their graduate pro- grams) and detailed evaluations of faculty concerns. Recently Dean Rhodes asked each department to perform an extensive self- evaluation and file it with his office. It is my understanding that these reports gen- erally are not available to the public. Student Course Evaluations I UNDERSTAND that this is an area of great variation between departments. Some departments have no policy and leave course evaluation to the faculty's discretion, some departments require instructors to collect student course evaluations but leave the analysis entirely to the individual instruc- tors, and some departments perform de- partment w i d e analyses on the data. This course and faculty evaluation information is difficult or impossible to get from de- partments. In any case, they are generally not publicized. Student course evaluations can be an invaluable tool in improving the quality of instruction if we students take them and use them seriously and make them reliable tools for discriminating between teachers and courses. If they are well used they can screen out bad teachers at'pramotion time, now that the competition for faculty posi- tions is very tight (all of a sudden, junior faculty will be able to empathize with pre- med students) and we will have some good information to make course selections on. I look forward to the day when depart- ments will take ads in the Daily: "Come in and check our course and teacher evalua- tion summaries. We are rated in the top 10 per cent in the College." THE COURSE evaluation issue is one of great importance to students and should be made a first priority issue. Another ex- cellent independent study project would be to collect and analyze course and instructor evaluation information and make it avail- able to the Student Counseling Office, the undergraduate departmental associations, the department and the Executive Commit- tee. National Rating and Teaching We tried to collect information that could describe a relationship between a depart- ment's national rating and the quality of its teaching. Since we were not able to get instructional cost information or student course and instructor evaluation informa- tion we can only make reasonable conjec- tures about this relationship. It is my guess that various measures of instructional quality would vary inversely with a department's national rating of the previous year, as departments that devote a lot of energy to research probably have less energy available for teaching and vice versa. This would also make for an tinteresting independent research project if good course and instructor evaluations could be obtained. Instructional Costs THE OFFICE of Institutional Research in the Administration building collects a n d analyzes instructional cost information which is analyzed by department, by un- dergraduate-graduate levels, by levels of undergraduates, by undergraduates of dif- ferent levels and by different types of class (e.g., lecture, lab., etc.). All this information and much, much more is regularly com- piled. The dean's approval is required for the release of this information. Dean Rhod- es declined to release this information on the grounds that it would not be "in the interests of the College," in his opinion. I disagree. Role in Departmental Student Decision-Making This also varies widely between depart- ments. Some departments have no student steady representation at all, some have "student input" (which means absolutely nothing. For years, this College has requested and then ignored student input and then legiti- mized their anti-student policies on the grounds that they "consulted students") and some have sincerely offered students a real and have sincerely offered students a real role in decision making. AN UNFORTUNATE incident: The His- tory Department, facing problems of de- clining undergraduate enrollments, sponsor- ed a student-faculty forum (and provided adequate publicity) to discuss ways of improving their curriculum. Three quar- ters of the faculty and ten students show- ed up. Incidents like this make it easy to understand why students are viewed as irresponsible. N!ln-Departmental Programs Over the past ten or so years, the Col- lege has developed an impressive variety of. non-departmental programs, such as a number of different living learning pro- grams (e.g., Pilot Program and the Resi- dential College), the Course Mart, Project Outreach, the BGS degree, mini-courses, area programs, constituency programs (e.g., Afro-American Studies, Women's Studies. Religious Studies), Journalist in Residence Program, Inteflex (six-year, joint BA-MD program) and the Medieval and Renais- sance Collegi'im. Many of these programs represent real improvements in the curriculum in offer- ing students a wider range of alternatives to choose from. The Commission's propos- als to establish a mechanism for creat- i-g interdisciplinary institutes of limited duration would represent an outstanding steo forward in the curriculum. This pro- nosal recognizes the values of departments in creating methodologies and makes the structural link of trying to apply those methodologies to relevant concerns. This nronosal a"lso recognizes that even the best innovations go stale after a period of time and should be terminated to make room for new innovations. MANY OF THE best innovative reforms rwime abowt only after lengthy and bitter fights, only to be displayed nroudly in the rollege's public relations literature and f'mded on a shoestring. This hypocrisy s'lo-ld stop. The Executive Committee and the Governing Faculty are going to learn sooner or later that times are changing in- creasingly faster and that if serious atten- tion is not payed to insuring that this Col- lege is relevant to those it is supposed to serve, it will shrivel and die. "I think it *ill be better for all concerned if their aware- ness comes sooner than later. Tomorrow: Student and Faculty evaluation Nixon's taxes: Duck Soup PRESIDENT NIXON OWES US at lea $350,000 in back income taxes. Th news, leaked from the House Joint Com mittee on Internal, Revenue Taxatlo: has been expected for several weeks. Those who have consistently believe the President to be a petty, venal ma will no doubt be pleased to see mo strong evidence for their position. On again, the President will probably blam his problems on "mistakes" by subord nates. But only bleeding-heart right wingers now buy the line that Mr. Nixo is an honest man who through incred ble bad luck managed to surround him self with the most corrupt assistants I the history of the republic. The Joint Committee on Interna Revenue Taxation was careful to no accuse Mr. Nixon of criminal liability TODAY'S STAFF: News- Prakash Aswani, Dan Biddle, Je Day, Cindy Hill, Rob Meachum, Sai Rimer, Judy Ruskin, Judy Sandler Editorial Page: Alan Kettler, Marnie Hey Arts Page: Mara Shapiro Photo Technician: Tom Gottlieb )taff Artist: Alan Kettler st Income tax chicanery may not even pro- is vide a legal ground for impeachment. .. Nevertheless, Mr. Nixon's utter contempt n, for the American people, reflected so thoroughly in his tax returns, leaves lit- tle doubt that his speedy removal from d office could be anything but good for the n country. re ce IMPEACHMENT MAY BE the least im- ze portant issue connected with Mr. t- Nixon's tax trouble. The advantages he originally claimed reflect fundamental m inequities in our present tax system. - The Vice-Presidential papers deduction In would have been totally legal if it had been made a year earlier. And the Presi- dent's new capital gains liabilities are al piddling compared with the benefit he ot gained from using his position to make y. home improvements in Key Biscayne and San Clemente at Federal expense. So long as the United States tax struc- ture is designed to reinforce inequalities ff of income by giving wealthy, powerful ra persons tax and other financial advan- tages not available to people with limited means, financial tricks like Nixon's will ,n not go away. Only a no-loophole redraft- ing of the tax laws, deliberately intend- ing to equalize this country's income dis- tribution, can guarantee that raids on the Treasury by people like the Presi- dent will cease. -CLARKE COGSDILL ."}y " ; yam r r.r... '} ,tm v . - 'C >r 2,rx' _ -' POLITICS IN LSA What makes a good curriculum tick? By JOHN LANDE NO CURRICULUM, no matter how well conceived, can suc- ceed in its objectives without the active concern and participation of students, faculty and adminis- trators. Clearly, with a given set of students, faculty and adminis- trators a good curriculum will fulfill its objectives better than a poor one. I am therefore not sug- gesting the following curriculum as perfect or timeless, (or par- ticularly original) but merely as one possible approach to a general education. I believe that good knowledge is nbt something that can be pre- planned and pre-digested or that tions of preparing students to sur- vive in the social systems they will soon be living in and to act to make that system responsive to their needs and interests. This im- plies a need for schools to be a place of mutual adjustment be- tween individuals and society, not just a place where students can learn how to fit their experience into the pigeonholes of life. I * * * I RECOMMEND that each stu- dent be encouraged to take part in an important planning process of designing both a personal and social curriculum and have an opportunity to personally test his or her plans, analyze those re- wide convention for a review of the curriculum and College. This is something too important to be left to small committees. If you think that the idea is ri- diculous, impossible or both, I can only respond that an obsolete cur- riculum is also ridiculous. The only reason why the proposal might be impossible is if you pr'e- vent it. * * * I WHOLEHEARTEDLY support the Commission on Graduation Re- quirements recommendations for an extensive freshperson program. Freshpeople come to this College and are expected to be able to op- rate as if they knew all about it. ly produced. * * * TAKING THE VIEW THAT knowledge should be an import- ant ingredient of intelligent action and that a purpose of this Col- lege should be to provide a me- dium where knowledge can be created to serve personal and -so- cial interests, I have proposed that the Governing Faculty adopt a four-course epistemology require- ment to take the place of the cur- rent foreign language requirement. In my proposal (which should be availIble from Ned Dougherty, 2522 LSA, 764-0321) I argue that buried deep within the current foreign language requirement was fined distribution requirement where students are encouraged to plan and take a broad range of study across all boundaries of knovledge. One of the important aspects of both of these proposals is that students be given the pow- er to plan their own curriculum. * * * THE CURRICULUM OF the College ought to provide the wid- est range of structures, approach- es and contents of knowledge pos- sible to open as many options as possible. The curriculum ought to provide an opportunity for seniors to take part in the freshperson program and to make their final term one et, t r. . 4 j . n: YY S =: '. ," vi:..4S "1.. 9 . yva' . n s+%r ' k 1.2 s53.".. f._+