r so ~oV6i4. T. CONE A 0170 F t)MPYI TO ILI~ 630 rrTI-UOU6. J.COME 10 F6 L-( C AUOTHER I7X. --- (//wrs -- F J'VN2 d I FEU1- 5TRO 3,. Q) 'T-23 A1JcTHCR I ~FUSE KN 6H L - I CO THtRO(JGFSWT HA- AE K-ING1 ME 17TC OfoAP3- F66 ,.HYST62I- r GI T 1u. CO- , ~0~ Surveillance and burglaries: Tradition, not an aberration? LPXR.z Fo W~ CRAZYt. ej f. By ZACHARY SCHILLER THERE ARE those who say that law and order are just code words for repression a n d bigotry," said President Nixon last March.. "That is dangerous non- sense. Law and order are c o d e words for goodness and decency in America." Since the President made t h a t statement - the same one in which he called for the reestablishment of the death penalty - the Water- gate dam has broken, and a deluge of information linking Nixon and his underlings to one unsavory crime or another.flooded us. Payoffs, laundering of m o n e y, illegal contributioins, " the break- in at the office of Daniel Ells- berg's psychiatrist, tricks against Democratic Presidential candidat- es, the coverup of the Watergate affair itself - one is left feeling almost like a rat in a maze, un- able to comprehend either the scope or' the particulars of t h e crimes themselves. CONTAINED WITHIN this mass of information and almost totally obscured by the more lurid details of President Nixon's home main- tenance costs was the 1970 intelli- gence plan of Presidential adviser Charles Huston. Among other things, the plan - approved by the President and pur- portedly abandoned because of the objections of J. Edgar Hoover - called for burglaries and the open- ing of mail to obtain information. After the initial hubbub over the, plan's disclosure,, it has been men- tioned infrequently, and will most likely find a quiet grave where it will be totally forgotten. However, some developments since the plans disclosure should stir serious thought over whether it should be forgotten so easily. JUST LAST month, it was reveal- ed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation used burglary as a common tactic for 30 years to obtain information. e Burglary, it seems, was a tech- nique which according to one source 1 An .era ends with Say-hey kid Eighty-three years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104 News Phone: 764-0552 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1973 Grandjury should come first By CHARLES STEIN To NO ONE'S surprise, Willie Mays -decided to hang up his spikes last week after 22 years of baseball. Though his muscuar frame looks remarkably similar to the one he brought to the New York Giants as a 19 year 'old rookie in 1951, at 42, it no longer allows him to perform the feats that nwade him one of the game's superstars. Students of the sport will re- member Mays as a man who could do it all. A power hitter w h o could run bases with the best of them - a centerfielder in a class by himself. And if not for the two missed sea- sons during the Korean War and the baffling winds of San Fran- cisco's Candlestick Park, it night be Mays rather than Henry Aaron getting all this .year's headlines for the pursuit of Babe Ruth's home run mark. Yet quite apart from his skills, Mays came to occupy a special niche in the world of baseball that at times overshadowed the legend he earned for himself on the field. IT WAS THE PLACE reserved for the Say-hey Kid. The little boy, who according to the writers, played baseball for the sheer love of the game. The crass financial motivation that af- fected other professional athletes was simply alien to this exuberant young "an from Mobile, Alabama. This was the Willie Mays who delighted the fans in the P o 1 o Grounds with the kind of antics one simply didn't expect from your average major leaguer. The Willie Mays who would drop his cap chasing. a fly ball, run back and put it on and still manage to snare the ball before it hit the ground. He gave the game the color it so desperately needed and the writers were quick to. seize on it. While the Sey-hey image b'ecame slightly embarassing to an aging superstar earning $165,000 a year, it stuck just the same. AND MAYBE it was the little boy in Mays that made him so attractive to those of us who were also little boys in Wilie's p e a k years of the late 50s and early 60s. To us, Mays was an essential part of growing up and memories of his influence come easily to mind. In New York, there were the heated arguments on the bus ride home from school about the rela- tive merits of Mays and the town's other superstar - Mickey Man- tle. And there was of course the ecstasy that greeted the lucky kid who found Willie's card tuck- ed neatly under his piece of Topps bubble gum. The local little league field or sandlot was another natural place for little boys to relate to Mays. What small-time centerfielder did, not once let his mind drift int a fantasy that featured him in the role of Willie Mays. "At the crack of the bat you were off, racing full s p e e d toward right-center in pursuit of, a screaming line drive. Your legs churning, your heart pound- ing, you lunge in desperation and watch as the ball lands squarely in your outstretched glove. The play, however, is far from over. The runner on third has tagged up and confidently takes off for the plate. He does not realize that he is testing his speed against the legendary right arm of Willie Mays. You pivot a full 180 degrees and' in one sweeping motion you launch a missile toward the in- field. The stunned cut-off man looks on in disbelief as the ball sailshover his head, straight for the catcher's glove. The runner is out by a step. You trot into the infield humbly accepting the praise of your teammates and tippinghyour cap to acknowledge the thunderous applause from the still-startled gallety. Say hey. The thought that Willie Mays is no longer .a ball player is frank- ly depressing. It's like turning over a brand new 'baseball card only to discover tfie ballplayer was born in the sme year as you were. Now everyone kpows that major league ballplayers just aren't born in 1952. They were born in years like 1933 or 1941. Maybe an occas- ional rookie will have a 46 or 47 birthdate, but not 52, it just can't be. So with the announced retire- ment of Willie Mays, an era has truly come to an end. Not just for the world of baseball, but .for a whole generation of American lit- tle boys, who like Willie, have been forced by the passage of time, to reluctantly hang up their spikes. has not been "limited to national security affairs." He said: "It's been done on criminal cases, too. You can catch a fugitive m u c h' quicker (that way) than by looking for him for a year and a half." The disclosure of FBI burglaries spanning a 30-year period - dis- continued, the President would have us believe, in 1966 - c a m e first in relation to the surrepti- tious entry into foreign embassies during that time. ALL FBI agents before 1966 "had the capability" to perform such burglaries, but the agents u s e d were more select group. "Just like a man has a special talent for playing the violin," one source ex- plained. William Turner, an FBI agent from 1951 to 1961, said last month he engaged in about a dozen eg- al "black bag jobs" during his career, adding that "burglary was a common investigative techni- que." More recently, the Nixon Ad- ministration ordered a high-rank- ing FBI official to follow Joseph Kraft, the syndicated columnist, to Paris and arrange with the French government to keep him under electronic and physical surveil- lance while he was there. Kraft's phone was tapped and he himself was followed around the clock. MEANWHILE, Presidential ad- viser Henry Kissinger was naming 17 persons, 13 of whom were gov- enmentrofficials, ontwhom wire- taps were placed by the FBI. The President himself was taping eve conversation he held, as well ° those of his brother, who he ap- parently feared - might scandalize his Admiistration. The Army has kept dossiers on 100,000 Americans, stored in more than 350 record centeres around the country. While burglaries and wiretaps have been and probably are in wide use, we have seen the growth also of less covert mechanisms for gathering and quickly retrieving data on criminal and political ac- tivity. Computer systems, such as t h e Customs Authority Data Processing Intelligence Network, have b e e n set up to speed information on criminal suspects, from one end of the country to the other. IT IS HARD to imagine that in- telligence networks in operation do not dwarf those .mentioned in this space; records stolen from' t h e Media, Pa., FBI office referred to a list of several hundred thous- and citizens who should be rounded up in case of national emergency, for instance. In light of both the recent dis- closures concerning FBI activities and the long history of surveillance the bureau and other government agencies are known to have par- taken in, the Huston plan should not be lightly tossed aside as a momentary aberration. At this very moment, 50 differ- ent federal agencies with in o r e than 20,000 investigators are oper- ating inside the U.S. Just what they are doing is a question which should concern us all. Letters to The Daily should be mailed to the Editorial Di- rector or delivered to Mary Rafferty in the Student, Pub- lications business office in the Michigan Daily building. Letters should be typed, double-spaced and normally should not exceed 250 words. The Editorial Direc- tors reserve the right to edit -ill letters submitted. I ANOTHER constitutional showdown ap- pears to be in the making .over the criminal investigation of the financial affairs of Vice President Spiro Agnew. Agnew's lawyers will soon go to court to prevent federal prosecutors from present- ing evidence against the Vice President, and thus raise the constitutional ques- tions of whether the Vice President (or the President) can be indicted or pro- secuted while in office. There seems to be no precedent in American legal history indicating if the Vice President is subject to criminal in- vestigation, prosecution or indictment before resignation or impeachment and conviction by Congress. The question is simply: Are the Presi- dent and Vice President above the law of the land? rVHE POSSIBILITY that the President or the Vice President cannot be in- dicted while in office, or that evidence regarding them cannot even be presented to a grand jury investigating possible criminal action is certainly ominous. If the courts ruled that such was the case under the Constitution, then the Congress would have to impeach and con- vict a Vice President who had allegedly TODAY'S STAFF: News: Penny Blank, Josephine Marcotty, Chris Parks, Marilyn Riley, Sue Steph- enson Editorial Page: Ted Hartzell, Zachary Schiller, Eric Schoch, David Yalowitz Arts Page: Diane Levick Photo Technician: David Margolick committed criminal acts before the evi- dence could be presented to a grand jury. The evidence would first go to the House of Representatives, of course, who would then determine if impeachment was necessary. If the Vice President were impeached, then the Senate would hear the evidence and deliver a verdict. However, due to the political nature of Congressional processes, 'political consid- erations might play just as an important role as any legal evidence. CONGRESS might find it politically ex- pedient to avoid the drastic step of impeachment or conviction of a President or Vice President, perhaps due to party affiliation or fear of whom the succes- sor might be. But more importantly, in such a situa- tion the President and the Vice President would be beyond the reach of normal criminal proceedings. Thus any investi- gation of possible wrongdoing by one of the two executives would become an ag- onizing national issue impeding all other Congressional activity. As a result the difficulty of beginning any such investigation and carrying- it through with any sort of efficiency and f a i r n e s s would be tremendously increased. Such difficulties would effectively leave the President and the Vice Presi- dent above the law far beyond what could have been intended by the archi- tects of the Constitution. Clearly the courts must rule that the Vice President does not have the power to halt investigations of alleged past criminal activities merely because he is the Vice President. Letters. To The Editor: YOUR EDITORIAL, "Long Aut- umn for Woodcock" reflects the kind of wishful fantasizing that seems all too common among would-be radicals - a fantasizing built on the hope that workers will reject the negotiated contract or that somehow the established lead- ership of the United Auto Workers will be destroyed. To legitimate this position, we are told that the "workers would seem justified if they feel that the union leadership sold them down the river on" the issues of voluntary overtime. The logic explicitly suggested is t h a t compromise equals sell-out. This simplistic equation seems to iie so much at the heart of student radical conventional wisdom. Yet, the hard questions of un- der what circumstances and from what perspectives this equation holds or doesn't hold are seldom asked. Certainly, the equation re-. presents a total misreading of UAW UAW compromise not sell-out It was won through the same sort of incremental strategy over suz- cessive contracts that has chara:- terized so many other UAW achievements. If that is what com- promise is about, I see no reason to be apologetic. There is every reason to be confident that we will see an expansion of the voluntary' overtime protection in future con- tracts. One can point to such areas as health and safety in the shop where the UAW apears to have dragged its feet - though my own work experience suggests that in the past when push came to shove, workers ofter preferred wage in- creases to health and safety ex- penditures. On balance, in any case, it strikes me that the UAW has been a good deal more responsive to its consti- tuency than most other American institutions. This.ought not to make them immune from criticism but it ing perhaps, hardly resolves t h e problem. -Robert E. Cole Dept. of Sociology Sept. 24 criminal To The Daily: AS I DROVE up to the stoplight at Madison and Main and saw the police car drive by, I could 'hear' them talking: "What do you think, Elbert? Should we get him?" "Sure, C.B. Why not?" As I crossed Main and saw the car turn onto a sidestreet I 'knew' that my time was limited. Need- less to say, I was right. As I peddled furiously up Madison, sud-. denly, flashing red lights appeared at my heels. I pulled over. They had done it again - two of Ann Arbor's finest had appre- hended another daring nignttime First, did he (the arresting of- ficer) need any help and second, what did I think was so funny? I only laughed harder and the se- cond car drove off. Finally the cop handed me the ticket. I didn't say thank you; I would rather have spit in old Elbert's face. Free at last, I was able to escape the glare of the lights and the curious stares of passersby and continue on my merry way, secure in the knowledge that with public servants like that around, t h e community was safe. In a pig's eye. -Jeff Daniels, grad Sept. 21 salaries To The Daily: JUST IN CASE my colleagues and students did not s3e the re- traction buried in the Snday (Sept. 23) Ann Arbor News, I want ano- operating salary disclosure pattern in another state. The correction stated I "took no stand on the issue." This is true. The first line of my memo stated so. I did not take a side becaase I don't think salary disclosure is the answer to the real problem .f salary insquity. Rather than focusing on salary disclosure, we should be devoting as much attention and publicity to finding an equitable way to estab- lish salaries in all units. We need a system which operates fron, an easily understood standari b a s e with known merit ;ncreases (per- haps a point system) for rank, past experience, teaching quantity and quality, research commitment, publication record, University a n d community service, and, yes, even for such variables as "wooing away from another university.' If each faculty member under- stood how base salary and increas- \" I