Eighty-four years of editorial freedom Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan Saturday, January 18, 1975 News Phone: 764-0552 420 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104 Law hedges on file access THE ALLEGEDLY LIBERATING new federal law which theoretic- ally allows students access to their own personal and academic records looks like little more than a variation on the "give-em-a-few-inches-and- maybe-they'll-be-quiet" routine. As a result of the new amendment to the only months-old Educational Rights and Privacy Act, certain of the con- tents of student files may still be kept from them. Letters of recommendation written. while confidentiality was still the rule, medical and psychiatric records, and parents' financial statements are the bones of contention. One might well ask what else there is: only the academic transcript (easily available from 555 L,S &A for $1.00) is missing from the list of forbidden papers. Further, the law entitles parents and certain agencies to see their son's or daughter's files at the discretion of the university in question. Certain u n h a p p y implications emerge from this farrago of provi- sions. First, it is clear that the peo- ple who formed and phrased the amendment missed one essential point: the student wants access to his counseling file because it pertains to him and no one else; we want some knowledge of what is being compiled with regard to our personalities, our financial status, and our academic careers. Rather than giving students an undisputed right to their files, - which would, incidentally, help to de- ter such secret entries as the OAIS test results - the amendment hedges by limiting the student's access as well as by opening up the file to per- sons other than the student. SECONDLY, THE AMENDMENT goes too far in that it legislates aspects of the student's personal life as well as his integrity. Surely the parents' financial statement is be- tween the parents and the student. If the parents would rather their child did not see this form, can't they simply request he not look? Need fed- eral laws interfere in matters of this sort between parents and children? The same principle applies to let- ters of recommendation. If a profes- sor or employer prefers to know that his letter will not be read by the stu- dent to whom it pertains, he can simply tell the student so. If students want to be able to read all letters of recommendation, they will simply have to find letter-writers who are ambivalent. Again, this is a matter requiring no legal intervention in the form of a provisional amendment. This, I think, is the crux of the problem. A large chunk of society still regards the student as an indi- vidual whose intergity needs watch- ing over. Information which pertains directly to me by rights should be mine. My academic file concerns me; since I generated the information therein, I can no doubt handle it. It will in no way harm me to be re- minded that in March of 1973 I stop- ped in at the Health Service and was told I had a sore throat. Furthermore, if meaningful clues to my personality have been gleaned from a test and are included in my file, who can pos- sibly use that knowledge better than I? JN AN EDUCATIONAL system where the student has as much free rein to choose classes, a major, and extracurricular activities as we do here, isn't it clear that information academically and personally helpful to a student should be available to that student? And if the material in the counseling files is not aca- demically or personally illuminating, but merely tab-keeping, it should be removed. In any case, unless we have access to our files, limited only by ourselves and other contributors to the file, we alone are the losers. -DEBRA HURWITZ By BARRY KATZ E ARE THE first generation without a future. We are the first human beings to be confronted with not only the spectre of nuclear holocaust but also the possibility of environ- mental disaster or societal col- lapse. Significantly, the pro- phets of doom are not Je'ts freaks carrying their placards with the message "the world is coming to an end," but rath- er are respected scientists such as Paul Ehrlich, John Cicer- one,bGeorgejWald, and Robert Heilbroner, just to name a few. There are many reasons why the future outlook seems gloomy, but this essay does not want to deal with why t h e future is bleak, but rather the curious way in which an in:,ea singly large number of students are anroaching the problems mar- kind faces. What I reer to is the marathon studying that seems to have become common- place on this as well as other campuses throughout this coun- try. Walk through the under- graduate library on any right - weekends included - and you will find the library u' of neonle reluctantiv yet meti c- lously studying for the" var- ious courses. NO DOUBT, there are mans valid reasons for the retrn of the stident to serious acadenmc nursit (by return' I mean that the 'radical' student of the last decade seemed, at least to mnost observers. to stndv less than the student of today). The maior and overriding reason is t h e scientific and technological orientation of this society, an orientation which demands that a student choose his carear ear- her than ever before, an orien- tation which demands that a student know more fans and snecific knowledge in o:der to become an exoert in his or her chosen career. Because *o n e must 'know more', courses :n turn often become harder, re- nuiring more effort from t h e student. Secondly, there is the faltering economy, a- event which is making the t-ident much more aware of the hard, cold, cruel world with it' ten- sles awaiting noon graduation. Thirdly, there is the difficulty involved in getting into graduat schools, a diffiulty tis com- mnuity is nainfuhix aware of: all that ned be s id is that this is a problem which drves norm- ally rational indiv 1n1ls into hvsterics at the th "ght of re- "eiving a B instead of an A, he- lievine this may be the diffei- Pnce between accePntance c.r re- iection at the grad sh'ol 'f their choice. No dobt there are other pressures on the student That I have failed to mention, but what is imnorant here is that these have nelned t u r n briht individnrils into auto- matons who stuly day and p - r e pass night, fearing the 'us of one or two study hours will mean a lower grade, faiure t> get into law school, failure in later !ie, et cetera. However, it would be fallatious to believe emphasis on expertise, professors, a re- icession, or competition f o r graduate schools is entirely to blame for the creation of study- ing machines. Whle these are heavy burdens, students the- selves, must share the hame for they create extra pressure by overstudying, refusing to relax, and emphasizing competition, m the process neglecing personal growth in order to insure aca- demic success. This is not only a tragedy for the student, but for society as well. SIGNIFICANTLY, the prob- lem of students who s t u d y nearly all the time is no* one which goes unrecognize around the university. At last y e a r honors convocation no less an authority than University r)f Michigan President Rbhen Fleming stated that he felt that as a whole students were study- ing too much, in the prc.es fail- ing to take adva age of the many other ase.:ts Of uiver- sity life which comoins to cr ate a well-rounded individual. In addition, there are some pro- fessors around the campu who structure their corss so a to notturn their students into studying machines, preferring instead to emphasize thought and creativity. 3ut by and large, there has been little r- sponse to Fleming s lament. Most professors seam unaware or unsympathetic to their u- dent's plight, and thus unwill- ing to lessen the requirements of their courses. Others while aware and sympatheta feel that it is their duty to prepare us for our chose professions, and thus feel a responsibili v not to change their methods and ,or requirements. THE MOST dang'3"ous aspect of the creation of a one-dimen- sional studying automaton is that the answers to the prob- lems which threaten our future often can not be found ;n text- books. Rather, the answers or even the processes which lead to the answers often only turn up either in intimrta discussion with friends or more usually in reflective thoug: when one isI alone. At best, blks and their ideas can be a gaudance f o r thought, but never a substitute. And importantly, thnking -.s opposed to studying or memor- izing - is never easy. For it is; when he thinks that ma recog-I nizes just how vulerable he is:i in thought we bec >mc aware of; the failures of mankind, of the; limitations of our souls, and of the evil within us all. But as this is true, it also is the case that in reflective thought man is able to dream of the solutiosi ing s tudents by*. A "606FROM -"S4EUC. XIflEicR IMP 1M'A'ei cowcwevG80014 tk -r * - ~OO> ZEERY V1INe 3t-40 to past failures and recognize beliefs, values, and thought sensitive to the realitios of their the good and potential witlin come to grips with these ques- student's lives an:' try to en- him; it is here that he is able tions and by this process give courage rather than stifle crea- to resurrect his soul and create meaning to his life. tive thought. Finally, students a better future for himself. Only must try to relax more, recog- when one ponders, reflects adzd IT IS NEVER easy for one nize that one or two evening: tikcaheoshcofottfida anwratote heeadteeaa'fo hethe problems of our civilization, meaning of his or her existence: library will not have a negative this failure has plaguled aril- efect on their future, an l real- TIlS IS NOT to suggest th.,:t lions, and undoubtedly w i I 1 ize that the cultivatian of per- studying or education i,.self is trouble millions more. Today sonal relationships, new exper- not important to the develop- the problems and crises this iences, and thought is nn o r e ment of a person. Education - generation faces are tre mend- imnortant than anything o n e even with the limitations of the ouis - without a doubt th'e most will find at 12:00 a.mn. in the process at Michigan - is necas- dificullt adcmne n , library. sary for the psychic and spirit-, ual growth of an indi rdual which enables one to intelligent- ly deal with the woci. Wrat I am suggesting is that hours of memorizing physics eq'u- tions and the structure of local government is irrelevant and of- ten a hindrance to reflective thought. Simply, as Mark Twain once remarked, one shouli not let studying get in the way of one's education. W)!it one must recognize is that the eternal albatross around man's neck is that he does not know and can never scientifically know an- swers to questions such as 'why am I here, what is the purpose of my life, is there a Off, and what comes after death'. An- swers to these questions are not found in textbooks; rather each individual must through hi- own ciety has ever had to face What prompted me to wri'e ,his es- say is that it bothers me to see many of the best minds of the University totally commi'ted to hour after hour of memorizing, categorizing, copying, and re- writing facts and figures which by themselves are essentially irrelevant to the silitions of man's most presasing 'ethical, metaphysical, and existential problems. This is not a cali for students to burn their books, but rather a suggestion tha ad- ministrators, faculty, and stu- dents alike should constantly keep the classroom experience in perspective. President Flem- ing and other administrators must make a cometittment, and act to find ways t- lessen the external burdens vn students Professors must become more WE MUST ALL r aiize that thinking is the foundation of our future and that the confrontanikn of and solution to our genera- tion's problems can only be ac- complished throagh visions and dreams which can not be found in textbooks. Students here and elsewhere must realize that there is more to life than study- ing; whether we care to admit it or not we al have a com- mitment to our fellow man, a commitment whi:,h demands we attempt to make the world a more human and better place for all. Barry Katz is a senior in LSA, majoring in philosophy and political science- Is Super K on the skids? THE CREDIBILITY of Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger has slip- ped further in the eyes of interna-. tional leaders and the American peo- ple every day, and makes his chances of handling a successful Mid-East disengagement slimmer every day. His most recent slippage concerned his statement on the U.S.-Arab oil relations. When questioned by report- ers, he remarked that the possibility of U. S. military intervention in Arab oil controlled lands was not being ruled out if current oil prices and economic instability in the world's in- dustrialized nations continued its TODAY'S STAFF: News: Ken Fink, Cindy Hill, Lois Josi- movich, Sara Rimer, Judy Ruskin, Stuart Sherr, Suanne Tiberio Editorial Page: Peter Blaisdell, Alan Gitles, Debra Hurwitz, Marnie Heyn Arts Page: David Blomquist, David Weinberg Photo Technician: Stuart Hollander :t downswing towards depression. DR. KISSINGER HAS shortened the fuse on a political time bomb in the Mid-East that can only be alle- viated by his immediate removal. Arab military strength is expanding quickly in its war with Israel. Such antagonistic statements by Kissing- er, unchecked by President Ford, have raised the subsidies awarded to the other Arab nations by King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, the principle oil state leader. Israel itself is sitting upon the secret to nuclear power, and will not submit to the Arabs without mass destruction and loss of life, evi- nced by the direction it is headed now. Kissinger's removal is by no means the sole answer, but it sets the Mid-East and the Secretary of State's office on a new course of credibility, and offers a better chance for a real peace, rather than part- time disengagement. -ALAN GITLES ~ ~-- HENRY THE ONE AND ONLY I it ll Letters to The To The Daily: I WAS very pleased to note the expos6 of the term-paper producing company, Minute Re- search Company, in Chicago. I have for years watched t h e growth of these insidious com- panies and have always wonder- ed how they were ;allowed to continue. The use of such com- panies is of course partly a re- flection of students' attitudes towards the many inane re- search and paper.writing re- quirements on the part of pro- fess'rs who don't know their students from a chacr, and is partially a reflecti'n of stu- dents' increasing disdain o any original research and creative learning. It is interesting that the Uni- versity of Michigan as recent- ly abandoned its lab science requirement for freshman, an act that contributes to the gen- eral lack of respect f-r know- ledge and the learning process. While action must of course be taken against such companies, I suggest that it is the students themselves who shoui be more severely dealt with. Suspension from school for a term, or a failing grade, is the least a - tion one might expect to be taken against them. NO REAL ACTION can be taken, however, until the par- ents themselves get invcived. it takes little awareness to see that their children are defraud- ing their parents, wto are pay- ing for "an educati) " and are receiving nothing but counter- feit education for their child- ren. Hackles would rise much more quickly were these stu- dents found to be diving with forged licenses, married under false names and ages, using false nassoorts or using fa?{e Liz Taylor To The Daily: IN THE Thursday, January 9, 1975, Michigan Daily there was an article by Rob Meachum on the upcoming city elections. In- that article Meachum implied that Liz Taylor was running in the April election against ano- ther Democrat Bob Elton and against the HRP candidate Dav- id Goodman, and the GOP can- didate Karen Graf. That is riot true. On February 17 there will be a Primary in Ward 1 to decide who the candidate for the Demo- crats will be. In that election the voters will decide whether Bob Elton or Liz Taylor will face the HRP and GOP candidat.es. Ms. Taylor won't be running against anyone in April unless she beats Bob Elton in Febru- ary. -Kathryn Sedo Law '76 oil To The Daily: RECENTLY THE Shah of Iran, along with several other major oil producers in the Mid- dle East, has been critical of oil company profits in this coun- try. As a resulthe has roposed an increase in the royalties paid to him, with no accomnanying increase in the price of crude oil. The intent is to decrease oil company profits and yet keep the price at the pump at its pre- sent level. This approach is deceptive in its appeal to the American con- sumer, for it is clearly in the Shah's own interest to limit the amount that American oil com- panies can spend to find and develop new reserves in t 1i i s country. In this way Americans can be prevented from achiev- ing self-sufficiency in petroleum, -a wil rnnt n . oey n.r, tion, it's going to be a long time before we can stop relying on oil and gas. WHATEVER YOU may think of the oil companies, their pro- fits have not been excessive. Annual return on investment is now around 10 per cent, com- pared to 6 per cent or so in pre- vious years. American indus- tries average 10 per cent return on investment, thus cIarly the oil companies were depressed before and are only now recov- ering from a number, of lean years. It isn't popular in this com- munity to speak in support of the oil companies and their cur- rent level of profits. For nianv politicians it has been exped- ient to attack the major com- panies. But is is clear to me that blaming the companies and enacting punitive legislation would be wrong. For many vears all of us consumers have been getting oil and natural eas products at hargain nrices. Un- til the mast few years gasoline has cost 12 to 13 cents per gal- Ion, nIls federal and state tux- es. The onlvplace in the world where prices were so low was the Middle East. One cannot blame the Arabs for the current binh price if their crude oil either T n n nears ago in Kuwait a barrel of oil cost 90c, and simca oil is their onl resource they have to get a fair price. THE FUTTJE will continue to look bleak for us if we do not establish some kind ('f er- ergy olan, so T will sug pest that we do sevacr-l things. First, we must cut back our de n- nd se- verely. Theme are larg~e slin- plies of netroleum ava'b2 in this country and off our shor s, but these won't be suffi-'en. for our needs if we cotinue to was tit as U o no w.m!' d 'oDaily crisis was engineered ?y the oil companies so that t h e v could raise prices. What really happened was 'hat prices were depressed for so long that the return was insufficient to jus'ify continued exploration L o w prices incdeased demand 10 the point where it outstripped do- mestic supply. This isn't The time for reorim- inations; we reed action t h a t will allow us to have a :onsist- ent supply of energy - wnether it be from pe:t leum, the sun, the wind, o: fusion. Until then the oil companies are all we have - whether you like them or not. -Charles B. Kit'srnati November 11 doctor To The Daily: MY FIRST impulse is to fault your rep t)rer, Rob Meach- um, for unprofessional inaccur- acy in referring to the Demo- cratic mayoral candidate, Al- bert Wheeler, as a black phy- sician. But one shouldn t do this, for, in spite of the fact that Wheeler is not a physician, he aflows people to labor under that mis- representation, doing nothing to correct it. The fact s, Albert Wheeler is but a Ph.D. Is this intellec- tual honesty? -Arthur Swanson January ) -. PAGE ONE For The Free Press: When I was just a boy By WAYNE JOHNSON When I was a boy, I had a friend named Joey with a vet for a father. We would steal PCP from his office, And roll it in our joints. Then we would roll around laughing and rolling our tongues and eyes. One day Joey's father caught us smoking. He told us we were too young for pot. When I was a boy, fathers were not very bright, Se we gave Joey's a toke. We told him it was treated with THC, And sold him a lid for $50. Wayne Johnson is a staff writer for the Editorial Page. Contact your reps- Sen. Phillip hart (Dem), Rm 253, Old Senate Bldg., Capitol